Sentences with phrase «n't heard his side»

He's furious at a system that he feels won't hear his side, but he's also desperate to meet the baby son he's just learned he has.

He doesn't hear their side of the story.

Not exact matches

I've heard from several young people lately that they're excited by the possibilities of the technology sector and want to start their own businesses, but aren't sure how to go about learning the technical skills to help them succeed — or whether they need to know the technical side in the first place.

You might not have heard of an online publication called Digiday — unless you spend all of your time reading about the media industry, and specifically the marketing side of the digital media industry, in which case you probably read it all the time.

But when you say something isn't what I want to hear, you shift the issue over to my side of the table.

But Bono says, «When you're looking for neon on your side and you can't afford it and when the politicians are telling you, «I'm not hearing about your issue out at the pig roast,» a company like Starbucks helps you get attention.»

«On the left side of the page, I write real - time notes around what I'm hearing — interesting, relevant points that I need to make sure I don't forget,» he says.

But when you say that something isn't what I want to hear, you shift the issue over to my side of the table.

If we don't hear about ETFs and hedge funds blowing up after what happened yesterday, it means the PPT (NY Fed + the Treasury's Working Group on Financial Markets — the «PPT» — which both have offices in the same building in lower Manhattan) has monetized and covered up those financial road - side bombs.

And, of course, on the other side, you should also be practicing good listening as you fairly consider all of the input offered by your mentor, even when it may not be what you want to hear.

That's the takeaway from everything we've ever heard from the governor and which was reinforced in Poloz's most recent analogy on the matter — comparing the rate cut to life - saving surgery, and saying that you don't worry about possible side effects at a time like that

Forget the specifics, for a paragraph, because this is a notable development: while these hearings usually devolve into partisan cliches with the same talking points — Democrats want regulations, and Republicans don't — yesterday Senators from both sides of the aisle expressed unease with Facebook's handling of private data; obviously Democrats tried to tie the issue to the last election, but that made the Republicans» shared concern all - the - more striking.

If you say no and you just protected yourself, you're actually a little more open to hearing what the other side has to say, because you're not worried about what you've committed yourself to.

4) Keep hearing the term «the gig economy» these days and this book now gives me a window into a world of side - hustle and micro businesses that I was not previously aware of or super interested in.

Let's hope that when the Supreme Court hears oral arguments on the case on October 2, the Justices will side with regular working people like Hobson, not with the big bosses and corporations who want to use the fine print to rig the rules against the rest of us.

Only when I began to think for myself and to question what I had been told, did I see that the «other side» had some valid points — I simply didn't want to hear them, much less attempt to understand them.

we unfortunately, do not take into consideration the detail of each side ad rather present our opinion which is pragmatically just our consensus based on hear - say, exaggeration and the media.

Kim — It isn't that we don't hear the ID side of the debate.

Yes listen to them, but if you want to hear the other side of the story don't go to the Toyota, or KIA guy, go to the source, the Ford dealer.

If you allow only one side to be heard... you will get one side... and that's it... That hasn't exactly worked out for non believers in the past few centuries.

I'm honestly asking — when I do not know these people or their story, but I do know the murkiness and agony of divorce — is it wrong of me to not want to rush to grab a pitchfork after hearing just one side in a series of anecdotes derived from a divorce?

Living this side of Easter, we know what Mary and Martha could not know: that hearing and doing are finally in the realm not of law, but of gospel — because the host of the banquet has himself become the main course.

But I haven't heard the other side of the story, really, until it started to be posted here.

GW can be a christian yes but there are some people who are catholics and christians and jehovas and atheist and so on that don't understand their wrong doing, saying God is on my side to go ahead and kill millions of innocent woman and children based on lies while the truth is for oil, that's not a real christian in my book, There's plenty of serial killers out there that says they've heard God telling them to kill.

But the flip side of this is that a lot of the so - called blasphemy we might hear on a daily basis isn't, really, blasphemy.

For instance, most atheists don't come on here to call believers idiots (well not most and not at first anyways), it's to get into some healthy debate and expand our knowledge as well as hear a differing side.

I don't know many people who are interested in hearing Scientology's side of the story because they're full of it, why would I want to hear any lies from the racist cult of mormonism?

Whatever you think you know about it — the theology, history, politics, human rights aspects — there's another side you haven't heard.

And just like with partisan American politics, if we take one misstep — or even use a wrong term — people on both sides won't hear anything we're trying to say.

These fears are not so different from the fear I see in the eyes of protestors carrying signs that depict President Obama as Hitler, the fear I see in the red faces of angry preachers urging their parishioners to «take America back for God,» the fear I detect in some of the books against emerging church, the fear I detect in some of the books in support of the emerging church, the fear I hear in the voices of both gays and the conservative evangelical activists who lobby against them when both sides consider for just a second the possibility that maybe they have it wrong.

I didn't want «Mechanist Atheists» put on the «extremes of thought» side, which is kind of what I heard.

I hear ya» about @justpro's plagiarism, but otoh, since those sites don't allow discussion or rebuttal this gives us an opportunity to refute them up one side and down the other...

if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.

I am not disrespecting their views but think about it, have you heard anything... I mean anything new from the pro-life side lately?

Jesus reveals a free God, who is uncoopted and uncontained by those identified with religion This God is free to hear the cry of the outcasts against the guardians of religious society This God is not under the power of Brahman but is free to hear ones against Brahmans and other upper castes and side with the Dalits, who are ousted from the Temples and who are denied the right to study the Scriptures.28

So I'm sending out an alert: even though this seems difficult for some people to understand, when space is given for a person to share their experiences and be heard and even believed, this does not necessarily mean I am taking sides.

In other words, in 15 to 20 years that I have more identified with the pro-life side and debated, discussed and exchanged views with the other side, I have not heard really anything new.

we're not hearing anything from the side of his congregation, so it's unfair to completely take his side.

The revivalists retorted that the Old Side would not allow the people to hear converted pastors.

You hear about disillusionment on the Dem side, but not people defecting to the Repubs.

Who defines equality under the law, does the right to display openly a persons faith and a persons right to not have to hear it, either side have ultimate standing?

Speaking from the other side of the fence as a (former) seminary instructor, what you're saying is the exact same thing we hear from * every * student that didn't master one or both languages.

And the people keep coming every sunday for that little spiritual hit, that pat on the back and the message they want to hear «You are special, any bad deeds weren't your fault as you can blame them on Satan, and you get to live for eternity at the universal creators side, all for just a fiver...»

I heard of a study about all the negative mental, emotional, and physical side - effects of not forgiving someone.

I think often we read ourselves as Jesus and others as the Pharisees too — I don't think I've heard many sermons taking what Jesus says to the Pharisees as a direct challenge to us, as opposed to assuming that we're on Jesus» side and confronting those who disagree with us.

On the other side of the question, we hear, even today, that most gay men are not really interested in marriage.

I'm not saying we're perfect down here, I'm simply saying that the more I hear from American Christians, the more I start realising that there are some very strange problems that side of the world that I struggle to understand.

At least some Republicans of conscience tried to urge their political brethren to choose a plausible, competent alternative to a narcissistic vulgarian; I haven't heard anything analogous on the other side of the aisle, and the seemingly tongue - tied Catholic Democrats in the blogosphere are no exception to that default.

What is more, our now learning who the white Chicago girlfriend was that Obama says this play - incident involved is probably inevitable, and so we'll likely hear a different side of the story from her, i.e., whether she thinks Obama's descriptions of her reaction to the play and her distress over not being black were accurate, and if they were, how she feels about his sharing them.

I'm not going to interject into the lengthy argument here, but I want to comment on David» comment:» it is becoming more and more evident that there are those who are victims and support the right of victims to be heard and believed, and then there's the side of those who victimize and their supporters.There seems to be no grey area in between.»