Sentences with phrase «n't help defend»

Maybe all you fanboys should actually analyze why walcott doesn't get starts: low workrate, very limited, doesn't help defend, still working bac from a long term injury.

It may not help you defend yourself against the kind of beasts Mungo is chasing after, but it might just save your life if you're ever stranded in the wild.

Not exact matches

Commonwealth Bank of Australia chief executive Ian Narev has admitted the bank «made mistakes» in failing to report money laundering but defended his leadership, saying he is «motivated» to help restore trust and that problems identified by Australia's financial transactions regulator don't reflect cultural shortcomings under his watch.

«In some cases, the information gathered may be used not just to defend the nation but to help infiltrate computers of its adversaries.»

He didn't just want to help companies defend against data breaches.

Still, Case defended Grindr's decision to share the data, arguing that Apptimize and Localytics are simply tools to help apps like Grindr function better, and that the information was not shared to make money or for other nefarious purposes.

So by helping Afghanistan defend itself against the Russians, or helping the Saudis do what they felt Osama couldn't its are fault?

Perhaps, but I can't help but believe that when people in a position to defend a belief system for this they have no evidence after a while there must be some shred of doubt that sneaks in.

For the sake of liberals who are (understandably) queasy about defending abortion on its merits, Democratic politicians like to pretend that Planned Parenthood offers mammograms (it doesn't), that it is a common source of pre-natal care (it's not), and that abortion represents only 3 percent of its services (the real number is unclear, but far higher — though again, it doesn't help our cause to inflate it to 94 percent).

You can be very useful in «defending» your nation from beihnd a desk or in a hospital or clinic helping heal the wounded, while still choosing not to «take up arms» yourself.

That means WE DO N'T WANT / NEED YOUR REDNECK lDIOTS HELP DEFENDING US FROM «TURR «R» / FORCING YOUR PATHETIC CHRlST DOWN OUR THROATS.

There is no «rock and a hard place» set of choices here for Christians, nor is there any in Nigeria and Uganda on the front of basic human rights that Christians themselves helped define and defend: We are called to speak the truth in love, to oppose what is wrong, and to do so whether or not it is culturally comfortable or politically secure.

Selfishness, greed, judgementalism, hate, etc. are not the sort of qualities I would suggest you can defend on that day by explaining that those poor, needy people were deemed unworthy by you & yours for breaking the man - made idea that crossing an imaginary line on his Earth to seek a better life makes one of God's children unworthy of compassion and help vis - a-vis the lesson of the Gospels.

Why is it he can't manage to defend his posts without your (inept, ineffectual) help?

I am not on here to defend Jesus as He is a lot stronger then me and doesn't need my help.

I deviate from the standard opinion, and in my dissertation I defend not only the possibility but also the desirability of Whitehead's implicit conception that a (not completely) specific initial aim can be envisaged and can be provided by God's primordial nature without the help of God's consequent nature (RWT).

And his longtime management team — the folks so often left in the unenviable position of trying to defend the indefensible — couldn't help.

but i think we are using giroud as a scapegoat for our shortcomings, its not like we defend too well either.we might get a wc striker but how many points will he be worth if we let in cheap goals?i know we got a good gk to help with that, but he alone cant do much..

Chelsea will not attack us, they'll play only to defend and try and dig out a result, so Coquelin won't need too much help dealing with their limited attack.

Our Def might not be great but we can defend higher up a bit better now we have 3 CM who enjoys a tough tackle, we win a game by scoring more goals and last season we had difficulty in scoring... I would be more willing to trust our CM to help defend compared to scoring goals.

Mane, so damn cooperative, he knew Salah wasn't the defensive guy, so he help up, he often switched to the right side and track back to help the defend.

Unfortunately, we don't have a quality defensive midfielder to help protect the defenders and both Ozil and Mkhitaryan (cup tied) hate defending.

They cave - in through Alexi Iwobi's novice defending who shouldn't in the first place be where he was when he helped the ball past Ospina.

A lazy midfield not interested in helping defend leaving defenders with no chance.

When we then also have Caozorla, who is lacking a bit in physique to be defending well, we basically play with 5 player, who aren't enough help for Coquelin and the defence.

What is more frustrating is how we didn't play to the whistle, how Mustafi didn't get goal side, how Xhaka and Rambo was walking back to help defend instead of busting a gut in a final.

It was made worse by Ramsey not getting back and helping to defend as well and Xhaka being too slow in close quarters, that lack of snappy pace hinders his tough tackling.

I do think with Kos getting injured more and more often and with a set of odd ball DMs that we could have done more to help our defending either by adding to central defends (Wenger clearly doesn't think Holding or Chambers are ready for full - time duty) particularly after the sale of Gabriel, or by adding a better DM.

I really don't care if he doesn't help with the defending, as long as he is doing his hob and assisting.

«Coach told us they would be defending one - on - one in the post and there wouldn't be a lot of help.

Part of the issue is, now that Sanchez is playing centrally, Monreal doesn't get much help defending from either the Ox or Iwobi, neither of whom tracks back well.

Their 1st goal was frustrating to see ox walking into the box while the guy he should have been tighter on got in for a free header, yes Theo could have done better on the other side to block the cross but at least Theo ran to try while the Ox just lazily walked into the box and not done anything to help defend the cross in.

If you don't have a god keeper and defence, your midtfield nede to help defend, making it harder for the attackers as they are somehow left alone.

Would the Gala team done better, with ozil not offering much on the wings i felt Ox would have gotten more free kicks and put terry and the LB under pressure without the need to chase the game and also help in defending against hazard.

I don't think you can be a valuable team member any longer in modern football if you can't help out defending and pressing.

He doesn't really help in defending, lacks of workrate, very rarely create forward through passes and doesn't have enough ball control skill to hold the ball for more than two touches.

I can comprehend why some would want him sold, he does underperform a LOT but i can't help but think the team selection hinders him, having Ramsey who forgets to defend and bomb forward into his space doesn't help him, he was dropping deeper against pool and lost the ball a few times when he shouldn't have been that deep.

He should have started with TW not OG simple and our captain should have been on the park to help the defending.

He is not spectacular in his defending but he wants to do the job, he wants to help the team.

Valverde will need to help the Colombian defender find a balance in that regard, as while he's evidently comfortable on the ball and technically good at passing as well as defending, he will need to adapt to Spanish football and know when to express himself and when not to, ultimately for the betterment of the team.

Even Van Dijk can not help if Arsenal still defend like that as a team.

Recently, we have been defending leads in games which means he isn't needed to come on and help the attack but we haven't been leading games by enough to warrant giving him playing time just because he needs it.

We do nt need any new players if we play simple football... stop making basic errors when defending though does nt help when players not sure if we are back 3 or back 4

My reasoning behind swapping those players around is because Cazorla I feel would be better at defending, he doesn't have 30 min quiet periods like Podolski and he has quick feet which would help him skip past a couple players to release Podolski... and Podolski is the best finnisher at the club according to it so we would want him around the box more often than not, he can score with his left peg if given space and the chance.

There is ZERO width in that system, and even if Kolasinac, and Mustafi (who's a CB, not a RB, or RWB), are providing the width, that then leaves just ONE player at the back to defend, and not even a DM to help him out!

The reason it didn't help was that Cincinnati must first win the Missouri Valley Conference race before getting a chance to defend its national title in the NCAA tournament.

Yes wenger will defend him... so would all of us if we had paid 42.5 for him — Wenger has to save his bacon and hope to hell Ozil will do a little running to help his mates - He clearly wants to be a spectator, so don't use him on the pitch — let him watch the game on TV.

Wenger put ozil on the wing for his development one thing i do nt get is how the fans do nt see that Wenger done the same process with Wilshere, I remember when Monreal was caught out at the back post from a set piece and ozil did nt cover he just jogged abit n let monreal get beat, that would be video evidence for Ozil to learn and work on his duty to defend instead of giving him Candy like a baby n letting him be lazy in the middle not tracking back for the team its a learning process im 100 % Wenger knows ozils best position is in the centre he followed him since Shalke its obvious but Wenger develops players into world class after seeing Ozil in the world cup and coming back after the world cup i coud see he defended alot more helping out monreal on the flanks and putting in alot more effort only then once hes showed his duty in defending will he be given his free role in the middle.

The Trojans» problems came in defending the pass; a volatile young secondary suffered too many breakdowns to be trustworthy, and a good pass rush didn't help out quite enough.

When did we reach this point as a club that players are being sweet talked, they are not good at defending or should not help out the team when we are under attack?