Sentences with phrase «n't hetero»

Cue the gym instructor — the most divine Dutch woman who, if I decided to turn and she wasn't the hetero mother of two small children, I would definitely go for — flicking through her iPhone and showing me some marshmallow skewers she made for her son's birthday party with paper toppers.

At this point, it becomes obvious that Michael may not have always had the best intentions while he was a gay activist; he just wants others in the LGBT community to do as he does, to Be Like Mike, which now means that everyone who isn't hetero must deny their sexuality and see the light.

Are there not hetero as well as single parents who fail horribly?

First, it seems that coming to consciousness (awareness that reality is not hetero - reality) provides to women - identified women not only a place to stand from which to make judgments but also from which to engage in a new cosmogonic endeavor.

There are people who are not hetero — get over it.

To bring up the «child» factor is simply out of line because not all hetero couples have children and if that is (as it would appear to be) part of your argument, why allow them to get married?

Not hetero but still want a partner with whom you can talk bench during dinner?

Not exact matches

So, to be plain in my answer: if both hetero and gay couple are Christians and they die living out that life - style, I believe they will NOT go to heaven.

When a foreign born gay or lesbian has to leave the country despite being in a committed relationship because they can't marry and get the same benefit of residency that the spouses of hetero Americans use all the time, that's a civil rights issue.

If the couple wants to talk about their sexual topics, be it hetero or homo, they will do that, and they must be treated with real, humble love and compassion, and not with brimstones and fire, and not making scapegoats out of them in front of the congregation.

then they will be upset because hetero's are making babies to replace the army, and won't enlist.

Let's say there is a hetero and same sex couple, both equal in every way, both born - again Christians, they do all the same things are are the type of congregants pastors dream about; are they all going to heaven or is one going to hell or are they both going to hell, why or why not?

For example there is no reasonable argument to be made from a secular viewpoint to oppose gay marriage that can not be said to oppose hetero marriage as well.

Even if one accepts the absurd notion that one's $ ex drive is a «choice» why would he create 15 million people only to tempt them with urges that we hetero $ exuals do not have?

First of all, I do not think that morality has anything to do with this at all, on so much as there is just as much hetero — and more — sexually immoral behavior that has ravished this country.

And, it can be pointed out that technically, in the modern vernacular, the word sodomy can mean any se.xual act that is not directly penile penetration of the va.gina... many of these acts are regularly used by hetero folks, including anal penetration, the use of toys for penetration, etc..

As I said I am bisexual, I have been in hetero relationships as well, some not so healthy ones, and the one I am in now which is the healthiest and happiest I have ever known.

The discussion concerning whether all women who reject hetero - reality are Lesbians does not seem to me to take us very far.

But again, the scripture you quote doesn't specifically mention ho / mose / xuality — sensual sin can be committed by heteros too.

I don't know what God thinks, but to me if gay marriage is about family life and the possibility of raising children (in other words a desire on the part of gays to be accepted into married life as it exists) then I think it is a good thing for the same reasons that I think hetero families are good and necessary.

You did not decide to be hetero.

I used that as an illustration to your assertion that there is no way to prove being born gay is a choice, because it is not, any more than there is any way to prove that being born hetero is a choice.

He talked about the s3xual sin of ADULTERY by heteros, but he did not consider commandments against gays to be worthy of inclusion.

if we are not born gay or hetero..

When the Law of Love becomes the measure of whether or not an act sinful, the issue is no longer about sexual orientation, hetero or homosexuality; but whether the act is one of expressing love or exercising power / control over another.

I should think that two gay people getting married would not affect one's life any more than two hetero people getting married would.

It's not a lifestyle any more that being hetero is a lifestyle.

So in the first place I thought that if you were hetero then you liked women how is it that they were hetero and gay??? How do you explain the fact that they would not take lots daughters to mean that they were passing by women in favor of men that sure sounds gay to me.

I should add, all these words which describe «sexual orientation»: homo, trans, ped, hetero, etc, are not actual science.

but to clarify: i don't believe «heteros» define marriage.

There simply isn't enough people who are gay to overtake all of the heteros in America.

Hetero - reality assumes that women do not / ought not have relationships with each other.

Women who have been caretakers of hetero - relations have not participated in worldmaking.

Not only is segregation a silencing of women by hetero - reality, but it is an elimination or negation of women's influence in the world.

The assumption that women are not really related to other women, the absence of understanding men in relationship to women, the refusal to acknowledge the homo - relational basis of heteroreality, the ignorance of connectedness with nature all attest to the relational naivete of hetero - reality in comparison with a worldview based upon internal relations.

Male heteros run the country and make the most money and believe it or not — we don't hate you.

my motto: «god isn't going to judge you any less harshly just because you go hetero and not homo».

A hetero Atheist can't even be honest here.

Hey fellow atheists (hetero / glbt), remember to not stick it into crazy or let crazy stick it into you.

And I would really like for you to demonstrate how the «natural sciences» leads to the conclusion that children become objects and lose their own rights, or how gay sex implies dominance / submission and hetero sex does not.

I don't care whether the partners in a hetero marriage live according to stereotyped gender roles, either.

I do assure you that the gay couples who may find hetero activities «yucky» don't care what YOU do while you're «enjoying intelligent sex.

I don't think that the point of the story is that this is a particular sin that heteros do nt need to worry about.

If marriage is only for procreation then there are a whole slew of other considerations to make like what about hetero - couples choosing not to have kids or physically unable.

Did your god make g - ay people just so that they would be miserable and not have the physical intimacy allowed to heteros?

You also don't understand biology; gayness and hetero - ness developed together within the powerful s.e.x - ual drives evolved to amply guarantee reproduction.

Gays are not trying to ban hetero marriage.

I can't wait till your kind die off and we wonder why we ever thought gays were less human that heteros.

Doesn't mean I have to be involved in a romantic hetero $ exual relationship.

However, if the argument is that gays shouldn't have to live up to a hetero definition of marriage which implies marriage as a foundation for family, and that gays marriage is a redefinition of marriage to be any thing we want it to mean, then the question becomes; why does the government involve itself in the ritual of marriage?