Not exact matches
In a realm of swirling, incomprehensible big biological data — which is, perhaps, another way of thinking about the
human body — the opportunity to use computer
learning to better anticipate which drugs will work well (and
not so well) in any one person is one we shouldn't pass up.
Not only do you have to understand
human search behaviors and how people search for content within the confines of an internet search engine, but you also have to get familiar with Google's machine
learning components - i.e. RankBrain.
Young people don't appear to be as saddled by this issue, though — a 2011 study found that
humans are best at
learning new names in our early 20s.
It shouldn't surprise you to
learn that
human error is a leading cause of most hacks and cybersecurity threats, rather than the sophistication of the threat itself.
It's
not until advances in machine
learning help bots develop a deeper understanding of natural
human language will the real progress begin.
When you do that, you know people are putting what they've
learned into practice — and that's valuable because we all know that
human nature is such that, if you don't practice what you
learn, within 90 days you'll revert back to what you used to do.
David Gould, creative services director at online marketing firm Vertical Measures, puts it well: «For users, this reinforces the idea that the result is reputable: this link isn't just the result of robotic SEO manipulation, but rather it's from a
human being who we can
learn more about.»
But if you fundamentally believe that
human beings are hard - wired for growth and adaptation and
learning, then the fact that your business failed does
not mean your next one will.
Today's AI systems largely are blind to those critical pieces of
human interaction, and thus can't
learn from them.
If a Martian landed from outer space and spoke a language that violated universal grammar, we simply would
not be able to
learn that language the way that we
learn a
human language like English or Swahili... We're designed by nature for English, Chinese, and every other possible
human language.
This isn't the first time AI researchers have programmed an algorithm to
learn without
human data.
The main difference between the old AlphaGo AIs and the new one is that one
learns how to play Go from
human data and one doesn't.
Students also need to
learn the critical thinking and creative skills that give
human beings the ability to consider the «why» and
not just the «how.»
AI can replace a
human in pure computing power or in data analysis, but it can't replace the magic that happens when you and your team
learn to work together and really trust each other.
As
human beings we can't know it all, and only through a constant thirst for information and
learning can we achieve something valuable in this arena.
But parents and childhood experts have been wondering what effects smart speakers may have on young kids, who may
not quite understand whether Alexa is
human and maybe
learn from barking orders at her that barking orders is OK.
I have
learnt in the short to medium term, markets tend to move on
human emotion,
not fundamentals, this is what presents the opportunities.
The democratic vision offers, Robert A. Dahl writes, the hope «that by engaging in governing themselves, all people, and
not merely a few, may
learn to act as morally responsible
human beings.»
One more thing CA... I contribute every day to your country... Whenever I shop at Subway or WalMart or Target... some of that money goes directly back to your country... so suck it up and
learn to stay on topic... this isn't about who lives where, this about some religitard dictating basic
human rights!!!
If
humans are the result of so - called «intelligent design» then why do we have too little room on our jawbones to accommodate wisdom teeth (unless this alleged «god» intended our teeth to rot out since we're
not supposed to have
learned science, and therefore that the presence of bacteria plus acids are a bad environment for tooth enamel), and that so many of us are near - sighted, and that women can have FACIAL HAIR (is that a cruel joke?)
Religions incorporated and codified these basic social values and skills, and quickly
learned to take credit for them — as if, without the religion, we would be doomed to
not have them — although we see them in every
human society, including hunter - gather tribes with no sense of gods as we understand them After many centuries of religious domination, enforced through pain of death, ostracization or other social sanctions, allowing religion to take credit, as well as failing to question other religious claims — has become a cultural habit.
------ This is a shame for those
human beings in this world who will never
learn about Jesus, because God placed them into an area of the world where christianity doesn't exist.
Still, at the end of the day, when the atrocities in Bosnia and elsewhere make one despair of
human perfectibility, of moderation, of a universal moral law based on reason, reading so fine,
learned, and humane a book is, if
not a consolation, at least a relief.
People who don't believe in your God are still capable of deep committed love, it's through our intimate relationships with other
human beings we
learn the true meaning of love.
As
humans embraced science you see, they
learned things, such as the fact that lightning is
not caused by a lightning god, thunder
not by the thunder god, the sun is
not a god, on and on.
The theological issues are far from resolved; but, judging from what has happened in Bloomington, even conservative Christians (though traditionally among those most opposed to gay civil rights) are
learning that theological concerns need
not blind any of us to the needs and rights of homosexuals as
human beings.
Making education contextual means recognizing that 1) theology involves responding to the living God in diverse
human situations; 2) theology involves specific practices as much as it does religious concepts and experiences; and 3) theological education requires attention to personal formation and
not simply the
learning of specialized lore and skills.
I wouldn't be surprised to
learn that many of those who do in fact leave the Church over issues related to sexuality do so because they've been told over and over again that their value as a Christian, and as a
human being, is wrapped up in their virginity, so they no longer feel welcomed or worthy.
And Jesus answers, a. blessed are you, you read that in a good book b. blessed are you, you really listened in church c. blessed are you, you
learned this from God
not human teaching.
I
learned from whites, at a very early age, that blacks were violent, stupid, unacceptable
human beings who were less important than themselves and most of all, «
not safe.»
For it is
not in rational explanations about God — explanations that fit our systems of knowledge and our
human categories of experience — that we
learn who God is and how to love God; it is in the response, «I am the Lord's servant.»
With all due respect if these are the things you
learned by observing Osteen you aren't a very astute observer of
human nature.
Human learning is
not so much an activity in culture as an inevitable and omnipresent effect of culture.
Show us, Lord, how to contemplate the Sphinx: without being beguiled into error; how to grasp the mystery hidden here on earth in the womb of death,
not by refinements of
human learning but in the simple concrete act of your redemptive immersion in matter.
everything is made up of atoms (don't believe me do some research) its the different variables of heat and light and things like that that cause different reactions to make different things and these things when they interact can create something completely different and you and slowly the process of mitosis or miosis starts to work and form stuff hell i
learnt that in high school and it was a catholic one at that a millions of years ago i bet the universe was completely different and had things in it that our minds cant even imagine that have since changed over time from action and reaction to what we have today and in another million years who knows with all the different gases we pump into the air and the weather getting more intense on both ends of the scale life as we know it will be different the
human race will have to evolve to survive and will probibly form into a slightly different species hell maybe well evolve into 2 different species like in the movie time machine
Its spiritual root is an alienated will that has
not learned how properly to order
human loves.
This doesn't mean there still won't be differing callings, but we should commit to
learning about and sympathizing with other fights for
human dignity.
The movement of imaginative generalization, which I have described above as the discovery of a general metaphysical principle and its repeated application and rediscovery within the diverse branches of
human learning, is
not intended to fulfill a condition of «complete enumeration of particulars» which would ground the affirmation that the principle is indeed of universal scope.
The key to this view of
human being lies in what Bingham calls the «second Darwinian revolution,» through which we have
learned that evolution shapes
not only our bodies but also our minds.
While theists can
learn by listening to atheists more, atheists themselves can foster greater understanding by
not just emphasizing the «no» of atheism — our disagreement over the existence of any gods — but also the «yes» of atheism and secular humanism, which recognizes the amazing potential within
human beings.
Finally, the fact that religion - at least in the West -
learned something about
human rights from democratic experience does
not mean that «
human rights is
not a religious idea,» as Schlesinger dogmatically asserts.
So, too, fallen
human beings can
not read the book of nature and
learn about God without the assistance of the spectacles of scripture.
Life is about
learning and growing — whether or
not I agree with someone, I certainly respect that faith (or the conclusion, after genuine reflection, that there's nothing to believe in) is among the most personal elements of the
human experience.
In these groupings of sensitive people we
learn that we can
not progress unless we all turn to a new vision of the
human being.
No matter how well we
learn to manipulate genetic matter or replicate
human life, we do
not create life the way God does.
A
human that God created can't follow God's will, if they are
not aware of how to
learn of it.
Learning that it was a
human who said, «these are the four,» (in reference to the Gospels), and shutting out many of the other Gospels, most of which did
not have as strong of a focus on the death and resurrection of Christ, was the turning point for me.
i do
not feel in any way smug to offer another
human being valuable insight that i gained through personal
learning.
The Nazi doctors had
learned the ethic of their profession: that a physician may
not relieve one
human being's affliction at the cost of another fellow
human's suffering.
the belief on the existence of the devil was concieved by theologians of the past thousands of years, there was no other way of explaining the bad experiences of people in the past because we were
not educated yet to the kind of what we have now, Why this happened because that was part of the
learning process that God wants us to know, in pathrotheism, we are part of God, and He himself is evolving because He is the universe, We are now the conscious part of Him, our destiny in accordance to his will also be His destiny because it is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality of the universe ahead of us, The experiences for us
humans including the supernatural is just part of nirmal process for
learning because its natural process, today we reach a point of
not believing the practices of the past, but it does
not mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them, because we knew children enjoys it as part of their
learning process.