Sentences with phrase «n't label them as such»

Luckily, failure — even if you do not label it as such — can be a beloved aspect of the road to success, something our world's brightest individuals have grown to respect and appreciate.

Many of the recipes on my blog are «naturally gluten - free», I just don't label them as such.

I knew that health food stores sold really expensive dairy - free chocolate chips, but I wondered if there were dairy - free chocolate chips out there that just weren't labeled as such.

I certainly didn't label it as such.

The guys you mentioned were and still are all around offensive weapons yet were not labelled as such when heading into the draft (as far as I can remember and I can find through quick Google searches so take it with a grain of salt).

In the Netherlands, he said, «We wouldn't label it as such, but a big issue in our country is how to teach science, or how to teach in general, [those] children with very different backgrounds, very different needs, very different talents.»

Though Al - Khalili and McFadden did not label it as such at the time, their paper was one of the first in the now burgeoning field of quantum biology.

These labels were included with the recipe submissions, so some of these may fit into the other categories, even if they are not labeled as such.

While some believe it lessens the symptoms of viral kennel cough, the vaccine is not labeled as such.

One thing you won't find when scanning dog foods is a large breed senior formula, but that's only because they aren't labeled as such.

Some dog foods are clearly labeled as hypoallergenic, while others aren't label as such but still offer similar health benefits.

We wanted a durable fabric because this is a family space so we definitely steered clear of any fabric that was not labeled as such!

Not exact matches

The FTC also said that when it comes to labelling, advertisers shouldn't use terms such as «Promoted» or «Promoted Stories,» because they are «at best ambiguous and potentially could mislead consumers that advertising content is endorsed by a publisher site.»

The founders decided to play up the blog and their PR because they didn't want visitors to think they sold existing apparel labels such as Polo or Levi's.

Also, remember that every event is considered a networking event, whether is it labeled as such or not!

When it comes to labelling, the FTC said, advertisers shouldn't use terms such as «promoted» because «they are at best ambiguous and potentially could mislead consumers that advertising content is endorsed by a publisher.»

Concepts such as creativity, prototyping, and turning ideas into action pertain to many facets of growing a company, not just the visual or functional thinking commonly placed under the «design» label.

So here's a quick look at the ethical issues — not necessarily labelled as such — in the September 26, 2011 issue of Canadian Business.

The legislation would also strip power from the Financial Stability Oversight Council, an interagency agency group now led by Mnuchin, to label financial firms that are not banks, such as Metlife, «too big to fail» and subject them to tougher regulatory oversight.

The site is enlisting users to help them identify ads that should be labeled as such, but aren't.

Aldi's business model is based on low prices, which it achieves by practices such as stocking fewer items, eschewing national brands for cheaper generic labels and not accepting credit cards.

I am so sorry that you have been told / taught such awful things about Jesus, but whether or not you believe He is fully man and also fully God, there is more than enough proof historically and in present scripture to show that labeling Him as a mysogonist and an advocate for murder is a drastically false account of who He is and what He stood for.

I am not defined by such labels as atheist or believer, they are just possible words to describe some very miniscule part of what I happen to think about a very basic level of the topic.

Since when once is seeking an honest answer one does not limit the discussion by setting boundaries such as: «Without arbitrarily labeling as mass mental illness,» especially when that could very well be the case.

CW's comments and how he labeled David a God «hater, I can see how it can be seen as bad because david's post on average does not have the visaral rage that post such as yours do.

Yet, many do not follow Christ and are labeled as such.

This approach did not escape unscathed; other Jewish missionary enterprises labeled Our Hope's «Messianic Judaism» as outright «Judaizing,» declaring that such theology was «unscriptural, mischievous and dangerous.»

AND please don't splutter into your latte about the NT being «hearsay» — The Apochryphal gospels were written 150 - 400 years after Jesus and they are labelled as such.

Whenever someone like the Fort Hood shooter commits an act of terror we are lectured on not jumping to conclusions, and not profiling, blah, blah, blah... But when someone who does such an act so much as passes within a thousand miles of a Christian, then the media labels him as a murderer and condemns Christianity as a whole.

When the constitution of 1917 was drafted, therefore, «Catholic» representation was nonexistent, and the resulting document not only repeated earlier material restrictions on the Church (such as government ownership of all church property, civil registry of priests, and making marriage a civil matter) but also got in a symbolic lick or two (for example, religious garb was not to be worn in public; worship was to be only an indoor affair; alien priests were forbidden; and no religious labels were allowed for political parties).

(II Samuel xv - xviii) Again, if we isolate those parts which in our proposed classification would have to be labelled «Religion», some of them do not appear to have any particular relevance to the religious life as it is understood by civilized men in our contemporary world; such as the detailed regulations for the ritual slaughter of animals in the Book of Leviticus.

Even though we label this abuse «sexual,» it is not merely sexual, since it includes other types of abuse such as emotional, psychological, and spiritual abuse as well.

Most truly spiritual people would thank him for sharing, and not give him labels such as «obnoxious» — because you are doing the things you claim to hate — labeling to manipulate opinion and silence opposing viewpoints that are different from your own.

I believe in reason, evidence, and a Deity, and in no myths, magic, or «fanciful beings», and I am not childish in my beliefs, in spite of being labeled as such.

Naturally, they believed that they were denying notions that were unworthy of deity when they said that God is not passive, contingent, dependent, and effect; but Hartshorne labels such belief as pure prejudice.

He tells us that Raheb «rattled off standard points from the pro-Palestinian side,» such as «labeling Israel an apartheid state,» but does not give the reader any reason to judge this characterization inaccurate.

(I coin this label because Latin American Music indigenous to regions wherever there are few blacks, such as Peru, Mexico, etc., does not allow for useful comparison, and has had less international appeal.)

Whether or not these feelings are labeled as such and organized into overt behaviors and lifelong identities is a result of a wide combination of social and cultural dynamics.

As time goes buy the kind defenders of free will over their rejection to «dead» here and colossians 2:13 tend to resort to a familiar defense, that of labeling it a Calvinist viewpoint and that its almost a cultist view point to hold.Very sad yet very much the defense of many christians.Dead may i suggest is dead, the inability to respond, does not mean that prior to being saved one could not read scripture but because of this spiritual deadness its not profitabel / meaningful - we just can not continue to revise the meaning of dead to fit a view point - because natural man has not been born again this deadness (spiritually) shows itself as «none seek after God», in this condition they are» slaves to sin» and the spiritual things of God (the bible) is «folly / foolishness» even the gospel is judged by natural man as «folly / foolishness «(1 cor.1: 18) Please stop with this weak / common defense called Calvinism - many believers are truly turned off by such a defense.We must not forget the man's «free will» is what took the whole human race down in the garden; i would hope we can rise above our love affair with the human wilAs time goes buy the kind defenders of free will over their rejection to «dead» here and colossians 2:13 tend to resort to a familiar defense, that of labeling it a Calvinist viewpoint and that its almost a cultist view point to hold.Very sad yet very much the defense of many christians.Dead may i suggest is dead, the inability to respond, does not mean that prior to being saved one could not read scripture but because of this spiritual deadness its not profitabel / meaningful - we just can not continue to revise the meaning of dead to fit a view point - because natural man has not been born again this deadness (spiritually) shows itself as «none seek after God», in this condition they are» slaves to sin» and the spiritual things of God (the bible) is «folly / foolishness» even the gospel is judged by natural man as «folly / foolishness «(1 cor.1: 18) Please stop with this weak / common defense called Calvinism - many believers are truly turned off by such a defense.We must not forget the man's «free will» is what took the whole human race down in the garden; i would hope we can rise above our love affair with the human wilas «none seek after God», in this condition they are» slaves to sin» and the spiritual things of God (the bible) is «folly / foolishness» even the gospel is judged by natural man as «folly / foolishness «(1 cor.1: 18) Please stop with this weak / common defense called Calvinism - many believers are truly turned off by such a defense.We must not forget the man's «free will» is what took the whole human race down in the garden; i would hope we can rise above our love affair with the human wilas «folly / foolishness «(1 cor.1: 18) Please stop with this weak / common defense called Calvinism - many believers are truly turned off by such a defense.We must not forget the man's «free will» is what took the whole human race down in the garden; i would hope we can rise above our love affair with the human will.

If, as I stated to Christine above, I wanted to label any vague form of those as «god's voice» or «god's mind» or some such thing, I could see how I could do it — but after not doing it so for so long I would so quickly know that is what I am doing that I now think it would be impossible for me to «know god» as I use to.

But its author can not see that it is wrong to speculate, so long as speculations are labeled as such.

Lycidas, what I meant was that you speak of respect, but this is an arbitrary value dependent upon your point of reference and so does not come under the label of freedom as such.

A miracle is often labelled as such when we can not explain for ourselves how the event occurred.

Here in Australia you can not buy «gluten free oats» — irrespective of whether they have been either grown or processed away from wheat, rye, barley, etc. — because FSANZ (food standards Australia) prohibit their being labelled as such, for all oats contain gluten!

We're adding new tools and updating our labels to tell you about our products, such as those that contain no artificial flavors and colors, are gluten - free and are made with dairy ingredients from cows not treated with rBST.

Unsprayed means that it hasn't been sprayed with chemicals — such as labeled organic or «unsprayed.»

As you remove certain problem food groups from your diet, you want to replace them with nutrient - dense real food, not the processed products from the shelves of the grocery store that are labeled in such a way to draw you in and entice you.

(b) Any livestock that are treated with a prohibited substance applied as the result of a Federal or State emergency pest or disease treatment program or product derived from such treated livestock can not be sold, labeled, or represented as organically produced: Except, That:

Note that Canada and the U.S. have slightly different approaches to organic labeling, such as: Canada does not permit a «100 % Organic» claim; the U.S. «Made with» claim for products containing 70 - 95 % organic ingredients is treated as a percentage claim in Canada (products must state «XX % organic ingredients»).

The state was the first in 2014 to require labeling of genetically engineered food sold in retail outlets, such as supermarkets but not including restaurants.