Sentences with phrase «n't label things»

PLEASE don't label things nut free that absolutely are NOT, it can cause some well - meaning person somewhere to put someone else in great danger.

Why don't they label these things what they are — not news, but Opinion Editorials.

Not exact matches

Is labelling foods as «organic» a positive thing or not?

But that doesn't mean jobs will come back because [things are] made in America, because the labels may as well say made «by robots» in America.

«You're paying for privilege and brand and label that makes you feel good and better about yourself,» he adds, «but doesn't actually affect the two things that matter most which is your health and the environment.»

This is not a directly observable thing: there is no time series labelled «potential supply».

I am so sorry that you have been told / taught such awful things about Jesus, but whether or not you believe He is fully man and also fully God, there is more than enough proof historically and in present scripture to show that labeling Him as a mysogonist and an advocate for murder is a drastically false account of who He is and what He stood for.

In more recent years, I've repeatedly seen the encouragement and value women have found in discovering the same things: the relief that following Christ doesn't mean forcing themselves into a box labelled «womanhood», which narrowly defines the life they should lead and sometimes restricts their gifts and calling.

We're are saying that He didn't see things through the lens of political or economic labels.

You're obviously not an ultra-orthodox Jew so why should anyone care what you think needs to be labeled kosher or not seeing as you don't know the first thing about kashruth.

I know that I see elements of divine around me in things and in ways that others don't, including other religious people... And as long as different religions and even sects constantly argue about what god truly is, and as long as they come up with different asnwers, then I have to say that the spiritual elements of our universe simply manifest differently for different folks, including not at all for some... as with those who label themselves as athiest...

When I claim that label, I'm connecting not only with a number of active feminists who are working today to help women, but with an ongoing history of feminists who got women the vote, who made birth control happen, who got women into positions of power in the government, who worked to rectify racial inequality and fight against things like mandatory sterilization of welfare recipients.

What I meant with the labels is that they do nt explain things, you have to look deeper than that?

The most important thing behind what ever label we give to those who lead among us is that it's helpful to those who are joining our communities, who don't yet have a depth of relationship to defer to leadership.

The label is not the thing.

Even the SBNR label doesn't completely capture things.

If a lion kills a zebra we don't call it «murder,» and if a great white forcibly copulates with a female, we don't call it «rap.e» If everything is objective to people, moral code being up for grabs, it seems quite feasible to live in a world where these things labeled as crimes are all just as ok as in the animal world!

If you can do both those things, maybe you won't be labeled ignorant bigots, just silly ignorant people who believe in fairy tales before hard scientific facts.

Its not bigotry becasue people disagree with your lifestyle — get over yourself and quit labeling things incorrectly to try and bolster your position and push your beliefs on others.

In her view, the labels we use do not express, but rather distort, the most important things we can know and say about our own sexuality and human sexuality in general.

In my view, the labels we use do not express, but rather distort, the most important things we can know and say about our own sexuality and human sexuality in general.

What I meant was that people who label everything good and bad, tend to avoid «bad» things like anger and sadness and fear so that instead of dealing with those emotions, they just pretend they aren't there — even though they still are.

Most truly spiritual people would thank him for sharing, and not give him labels such as «obnoxious» — because you are doing the things you claim to hate — labeling to manipulate opinion and silence opposing viewpoints that are different from your own.

While I'm no fan of labels --(and «emerging» or «emergent» can mean a lot of different things to a lot of different people)-- it would be dishonest for me to say that I have not been influenced by many of the writers and speakers that are associated with this movement.

PTSD is not a thing, like a virus or a tumour, but rather a label given to specific groupings of psychological symptoms; and while it is true to say that not every woman who has had an abortion suffers from PTSD, a majority do display relevant symptoms.

Yes Ducatihero... «christian»... although I don't use that label... others do for me... I also get atheist (i might get that more so after today's post)... we wouldn't be on the same page I'm sure... but that doesn't bother me... i still believe in the unity of all things... that at the deepest and most fundamental level we are connected, one, and that ideas only seem to divide or separate us.

I do nt think anyone is saying that people were celebrating Christmas 1500 years ago like they do now, but the whole idea of taking a holiday / seasonal celebration and putting a christian label on it is the same thing as taking something that isnt yours and saying you own it.

As time goes buy the kind defenders of free will over their rejection to «dead» here and colossians 2:13 tend to resort to a familiar defense, that of labeling it a Calvinist viewpoint and that its almost a cultist view point to hold.Very sad yet very much the defense of many christians.Dead may i suggest is dead, the inability to respond, does not mean that prior to being saved one could not read scripture but because of this spiritual deadness its not profitabel / meaningful - we just can not continue to revise the meaning of dead to fit a view point - because natural man has not been born again this deadness (spiritually) shows itself as «none seek after God», in this condition they are» slaves to sin» and the spiritual things of God (the bible) is «folly / foolishness» even the gospel is judged by natural man as «folly / foolishness «(1 cor.1: 18) Please stop with this weak / common defense called Calvinism - many believers are truly turned off by such a defense.We must not forget the man's «free will» is what took the whole human race down in the garden; i would hope we can rise above our love affair with the human will.

If there is one thing you SHOULD (in my subjective opinion) have learned about me it is that my beliefs are NOT governed by any labels you or anyone else seek to place upon me.

It's sad that Christianity has been labeled all these things just because Christians don't believe that homosexuality is wonderful.

If, as I stated to Christine above, I wanted to label any vague form of those as «god's voice» or «god's mind» or some such thing, I could see how I could do it — but after not doing it so for so long I would so quickly know that is what I am doing that I now think it would be impossible for me to «know god» as I use to.

If your argument requires that something be real and not imaginary, surely it is a reasonable thing to insist on making sure that what is imaginary be labeled correctly?

Whether formulated by Durkheim (a system of beliefs and practices related to sacred things), by Weber (that which finally makes events meaningful), or by Tillich (whatever is of ultimate concern) religion in its «classical» sense refers not so much to labels on a church building as to the imagery (myth, theology, and so forth) by which people make sense of their lives — their «moral architecture,» if you will.6 That human beings differ in their sensitivity to and success in this matter of «establishing meaning» there can be no doubt.

Labels The important thing is not to know who «I» is or what «I» is.

But it you aren't in that position, letting go of a label may be just the thing that makes you too vulnerable to withstand the storm.

I hate labels and have always refused to say I Am one thing or another, but as someone with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (an autoimmune disease) I know I'm not supposed to eat gluten and the only way I'll totally stop eating it is by using the I Am.

I don't think that you have to exist within a given label to be healthy and an occasional burger with friends isn't such a bad thing.

I to can only eat things that is organic so I redo alot of the recipes so I can eat alot of stuff I «am allgic to pesticides, hornmores, n antibotics, dairy, eggs, whey, so I watch n read everything, I do not have a galdbladder n was told I could eat everything after that well I could not n get sick after that it will come out of 1 of the ends is all i need to say, but if I eat this stuff I «am ok, for everybody that may have the same problem as me just try drinking the organic milks w / o hornmores, pesticdes, n antibotics in it n see if that works for you same with the eggs thats what I do open the lid n see what it says, if it don't say that well its not for you (eggland) is one of the names I use horizan, silk, r 2 of the milk blands I use, they also have sorbet icecream but watch them some do have milk in them n if it doesn't say organic milk your not getting that your getting real milk, then go on internet n read, read, read all your labels n read whats best for you cause everybody is not the same, I hope that helps n feel free to send me a message n let me know if anybody wants: - P

Also, you might see some that are labeled «extra-virgin,» which is not really a thing as it is with olive oils.

There's not a lot of other ingredients and everyone is trying to go clean label, so being able to work with flavor is probably the biggest thing.»

Helen — It's not about lack of empathy for people who can not eat things they wish they could; my goal when making things that fall under these labels is that they should be so good that you'd eat them regardless of dietary limitations.

«We're both vegans and we come at this from a vegan perspective [many vegans have found dairy the hardest thing to give up] and we wanted more nutritious, cleaner label vegan products that are not held together with a bunch of starches and gums and stablizers, and from all the vegans that we talked with, this totally meets their expectations.

While defining «natural» for the purposes of food labeling has not appeared to be high on the FDA's priority list since it announced its 2015 probe, things could be about to change, predict Perkins Coie attorneys Charles Sipos and Lauren Staniar.

Now I know fairtrade is not all about chocolate, but chocolate was one of the very first things to be given the fairtrade label and it is this wonderful substance I associate most with Fairtrade.

I use the expeller pressed for cooking because it doesn't have taste and the Gold Label for oil pulling and things like that.

One thing is certain, clean label is not going away, and the clean - label impact has changed, for the better, the way foods and dietary supplements are formulated, marketed, and labeled.

If you've read my about page you'd know that although I am a big fan of healthy eating, sometimes I like to splurge on things I wouldn't necessarily label as «nutritious» and since the name of my blog is Nutritious Eats I have to preface things by saying this pie is not one of those «nutritious...

And not terribly difficult as I use a scale to measure when I bake anyways, but the recipe is very poorly written with things forgotten and things that should be labeled much more clearly such as * omit if using....

Sugar - free is about to be printed on every other label, but we all know sweet things aren't going away.

The honey thing bothered me since they are labeled as vegan, but since I am not vegan...