Sentences with phrase «n't lack depth»

While it may be a lacking a little soul, it doesn't lack depth with plenty of racing / crashing to do and generally attractive visuals.

A: Running back is a position group in which the Wolverines are not lacking depth.

On the face of it, Villa signing Whelan would be an odd move considering it is a position they are not lacking depth in — an already busy midfield was supplemented in January by Henri Lansbury, Birkir Bjarnason and Whelan's Irish compatriot Conor Hourihane — but manager Steve Bruce still appears to be interested in a transfer if a deal can be struck with Stoke.

Not exact matches

Sure, you put in your take on things, but you can't say things that are blatantly wrong or lacking in depth — because others will see through it in a second.

I can't help but laugh at his lack of intellectual rigor in constructing his position, in which he demonstrates the very lack of depth in understanding he is attributing to the «spiritual but not religious».

Summorum Pontificum, still not fully implemented in the Church in Great Britain, is another step towards the revitalisation, or renewal, of the Catholic Church, as it encourages a depth of prayer, reflection, true worship and reverence that the many outdoor Masses of Blessed John Paul II lacked almost to a fault.

To me, it doesn't matter if a particular country uses a particular ingredient; what matters is if in vegan cooking, that ingredient provides a depth of flavor that might otherwise be lacking.

While there is a lack of depth behind him with Ainsley Maitland - Niles played out of position in his absence, it arguably shouldn't be seen as a priority for the Gunners with Mkhitaryan the more important addition to help fill the void left behind by Sanchez in the final third.

- long term, cause several players to be not available, creating a lack of depth in squad.

I'm not talking about Gabriel and Chambers specifically, look at the bench there's no CB if let's say one of Chambers or Gabriel get injured during the game it means Debuchy will play that's a lack of depth!

The only misfortunes he had was with injuries, which can not be blamed solely on him because he never had enough time to recover, Wenger always rushed him back to the squad due to lack of depth.

That requires a strong bench with quality on it, players in their best positions, not having horrific injury pools season after season (showing up lack of quality depth) and a manager and other club employees who see they needs the best players and can find them (not talking king ransom buys either).

They could use one or two more to bolster depth but they certainly don't lack talent.

Rutgers, UConn, USF, and Cincinnati had strong seasons, but depth didn't hold, and the conference lacked a true elite.

If we're lacking we should ask Coquelin to hold the fort down, if not well then it's another example of our much improved squad depth.

Feazell should boost the production of a frontcourt that lacked depth in 2016 - 17, but it still won't be close to what the league's contenders can roll out.

We don't have a «star player» for contention (yet, hopefully), nor a contending coach, maybe a 2nd option or two, an extreme lack of depth, and a borderline toxic free agent desirability.

Even with the lack of depth because injuries, it's time other players were given a chance, because we can't get much worse!

But this is good because it shows we have depth in attack which we lacked for years Competition is good, don't worry

Nervous start — usual criticism at the beginning of the season, with the lack of spending Ramsey's first blood — Arsenal shocked the league, we played brilliant football, scoring beautiful goals, all seemed like a decent season for us Coq red card — injury crisis struck, the lack of bench depth put pressure on the team, the downfall of performance caused crucial points Alexis» goal when down to ten men - it all seemed like arsenal would lose out in the title race again but arsenal somehow surprised the league again, saying aye we got the quality but we just ai nt gonna show in week in week out Draw in NLD with 10 men — can't really complain about it but you ain't happy.

To go after him or not may or may not be a wise idea, I don't know, all I know is that between Walcott and Giroud, there's 40 goals and with Welbeck's 10 plus the rest from midfield, there's enough goals in the squad, however Wenger needs to take his head out of the sand and look at the right wing and or the CDM, for those positions are lacking depth; sorry but Arteta I don't ththink is ample cover, we've loaned Hayden and Wilshire is injured so there's a void there.

... the fact is some gunner fans have forgotten that we almost won the league 2 years ago without sanchez nor cech and with the same olivier giroud as our ONLY strike force, and as we know if not for lack of depth and injuries we would av won the league that year... now we av sanchez and cech plus welbeck, we now av the depth, all we need is a fit team and we will win the league next season... I believe in this team and frankly, its high time we put all the doubts away and stand with the team and manager with or without a new striker signing... COYGs!!!

Most of the problems with Arsenal teams is a lack of depth, since the team doesn't have the money to spend.

So you're right, but rb shouldn't have been an issue... but I concur we lacked the depth needed for cover.

Not so long ago we were complaining about the lack of depth in our squad and how our bench was not intimidatiNot so long ago we were complaining about the lack of depth in our squad and how our bench was not intimidatinot intimidating.

mmmh injuries (not news and infact we already are in it), lack of a proper dm until the new yr (le coq emergence who desperately needed a back up), lack of a lethal striker (giroud's injury noted though obviously not good enough and the sole reason even wenger himself needed a new striker) and finally lack of depth in key positions (CBs, DM and yes a CF).

I'd have focused more on Torres (which I did), the lack of CB depth (I'd prefer to have two quality CBs to back up a 3 back rather than just one with one of the starters being a converted CDM), the lack of players who fit the outside mid role well in this formation (which, hey, maybe that's part of what you were referring to), and the fact that when you play more attackers higher up the pitch, it often requires a team to be able to implement a high pressuring defensive line (Dempsey and Bruin are not suited for that).

Debuchy we definitely need chambers centrally with our lack of depth he shouldn't even touch right back let bellerin fill in a few for Debuchy when he needs a rest.

Plus this team lacks depth and can't afford to keep filling the holes with FAs.

The first 14 players may have been great, but we lacked depth and it's why in the following years after we lost a few key players we could not ever get going again.

for me i am jst so shocked that arsenal have a set style to dominate and when they are dominated by munich or barca (games you expect to be chasing shadows) there is just no plan B — they do nt hold there shape they do nt do anythign urgent if anything solidified my want for wenger to go was Wednesdays performance — another year gone and no progress made also the lack of depth — ozil needs to be dropped but who replaces him??? — we cant replace him so we just keep playing him and hope he comes good again

But the depth lack top quality as some of them if not all of the reserve players and all the academic players but Bielik are worthless.

Are you serious??? That's not even mentioning the clear lack of defensive depth and no quality holding midfielder.

You obviously look at week to week results, klopp has a meddioca team and lacks depth compared with Arsenal and Arsenal players, yes they have one or two great players but we have a better team on paper, I was tring to make a point that we need a manager who multi tasks with ambition agretion and caring, it's clear now that AW lacks ambition yes he would like to win trophies but not this way

So we should concentrate more on our team and when we come to our defence, we lack depth and quality at the back thanks to wenger.we should use Bellerin and Hayden more for league games, we should not risk kos, mert and gibbs.

I can't believe the line we lack any kind of depth in is already looking shaky now.

If Arsenal had not let these player go, but instead paid wages that kept them Gunners, Arsenal would have either gone bankrupt or lacked the depth to compete in Europe, further eroding the club's finances.

And for those still bemoaning Wenger not signing a winger this window and crying about our lack of depth, please note we have seven players that are either injured (Theo, Ox, Ramsey, Wellbeck, Rosicky, Wilshire) or unavailable (Reine - Adelaide) that can play on the right.

Suso and Hakan Calhanoglu have rarely been rested this season due to a lack of quality depth behind them, and while they're both technically gifted and dangerous in their own right, the Rossoneri haven't got any pace in their attacking line - up to change the tempo and offer a different dynamic in the final third.

Having bemoaned the lack of depth in his squad already this summer, it doesn't seem to make too much sense to sell more squad players, but there still seem to be question marks hanging over Batshuayi as he looks set to play second fiddle again this season.

I don't think providing you with a full, seven - round mock draft is necessary to demonstrate why I think the idea of drafting a safety with our top draft pick is stupid, which I laid out in my initial post (the quality and depth at safety vs. the lack thereof in the interior O - line), along with some of my preferred alternatives at the top of our draft.

This is the first season in a long time that we have depth in most areas Last season losing Cazorla and Coquelin killed us We were also lacking in central defense Xhaka, Mustafi, Holding and Perez have made us a whole team Gibbs is also good back up to Monreal Not sure about backup to Bellerin though.

I also think that the problems with the D were (in order): Injuries, Lack of depth from an over the hill GM, Capers inability to adapt, Perry not being an OLB1, CM3's injuries, HHCD's terrible year, Randall's inconsistency.

It's not the problem of depth, it's a mixture of injuries and lack of quality in some players cases, so really you can not argue that when wenger says if all our players remained fit we wouldn't need any.

Very true we can't keep blaming injuries because all teams suffer from them, we lack depth in the striker position, we need a striker with pace who'll be a starter against the likes of Terry, Shawcross, Williams etc then we use Giroud as a plan B when a physical presence is needed

Given their lack of depth in defence, it would seem like a sensible decision for Barcelona to address that area of the squad, but Lionel Messi reportedly isn't keen on David Alaba being the solution.

He began to stockpile draft choices — not give them away, as the Kings had done over the years; he traded for veteran defensemen — Dave Lewis and Jerry Korab in particular — to stop the traffic jam in front of the Kings» goal; he signed scoring champion Marcel Dionne to the biggest contract in NHL history — a six - year, $ 3.6 - million deal; he remedied the Kings» lack of depth by acquiring the services of veteran Center Garry Unger; he gave Berry a bevy of rinkside assistants; he organized a farm club in Houston; and he redesigned L.A.'s uniforms.

Yes the Frenchman is ultimately to blame for picking the side which didn't win, and I can't help but think that our squad depth is a problem with our injuries stacking up, but I'm not 100 % sure that the club wasn't to blame for our lack of transfer activity in the summer, especially when the likes of Ivan Gazidis are insistent that our summer window was a success!

I think it would be best for him to go out on loan... Problem is, we can't afford to send anyone on loan with our lack of depth!

They won't just give away depth to get that space, not when most of the league is in need of an arm, but his lack of team control combined with the luxury tax benefits point to him as the guy to go.