About 75 percent of Ghanaians say their Members of Parliament do
not listen to their views on critical national matters.
«They were asking how our voices were heard,» Mr. Quintana said, «and across the board we told them that the city didn't listen to our views.»
Though they may deprecate religion, they are as bad as the worst of the religious in
not listening to the views of the other side — after all, they have the knowledge that few do.
Not exact matches
If a leader can
not listen to contrary opinions and make informed decisions based on a full range of
views, then he / she courts disaster — as Rumsfeld did in Iraq.
If you want people
to respect you, you need
to respect them back, and that includes
listening to points of
view that aren't in accord with your own.
If I start suggesting that I will only purchase goods and services from a Democrat or a Republican, or only
listen to your pitch if you agree with my political
view, I have draw a line in the sand that doesn't really make sense.
Still, I don't think Facebook is really the place that people chose
to listen to opposing
views, so I usually ignore posts of that nature.
Obama's veto didn't come as a surprise
to anyone who has
listened to the president discuss his
views on climate change.
The best bosses understand their own strengths and weaknesses, but Trump's inflated
view of himself means he won't
listen to others.
Not everyone believes what you believe, and we are sick and tired of you people forcing your
views on everyone else then screaming about being persecuted when people say «no, we don't want
to listen and we're tired of you putting your rules and the name of your deity all over everything».
Catholics themselves don't care what their point of
view is about, but they mouth words and ask us
to listen.
Let us remember that and be more respectful — let us reach out
to each other with AT THE LEAST tolerance that each person will have different
views and INSTEAD of trying
to degrade someone just because they refuse
to adhere
to your beliefs —
LISTEN to them and allow that you may feel differently but they have a RIGHT
to believe or
not believe as they will.
You don't have any interest in
listening to opposing
views, you've just distilled it into this typical nonsensical «explain how something evolved from nothing».
so glad YOU know what god means... why don't you enlighten the rest of us becuase the bible is full of contradictions... I am going
to come here everyday now
to see if you can fill me in... but unless you can clear it up for me post haste, I am going
to continue
to view belief in god as silly and childish which it is and that is how I teach it... I don't say «all of you
listen: god doesn't exist.»
Vatican II, in his
view, inaugurated a two - way dialogue in which Catholicism
not only
listened to the world's hopes and anxieties but also proposed
to the world a Christian humanism: the «passionate love of God for all humanity, made visible in... Jesus Christ, crucified and risen,» that same Christ who fully and uniquely reveals
to humanity its incomparable dignity and high calling.
Like what I
listen to or watch doesn't affect what I think and how I speak and how I move through my life, how I
view humanity and violence, sex and God.
Since the belief system of a parish includes
not only its formal creeds but also the meanings it assigns
to itself and its members as finite bodies,
to learn about a church's world
view — what it believes is really going on in life — one must
listen to the church's stories about its own body and those of the members who constitute it.
Try
to ask a serious question with an open mind, acutally
listen & try
to imagine where that person is coming from...
not just your narrow pious world / church
view.
The conceit hinges on the fact that one can
not listen clearly
to anyone else's
view.
Now, I'm sure some might play with semantics here, and I don't know ancient Greek, but I find it hard
to see how this
view is «
listening to the Prophets.»
And while the possibility of being wrong about God does
not mean you can
not have your
views and defend them, it does mean that you need
to listen to the thoughtful arguments of those who disagree with you.»
period) DO
listen to religious voices on social, political and economic issues (don't shout down Christians especially) allow people
to justify their
views (justify..
I know that John Paul II takes a dimmer
view of American society than would totally gladden my heart; and I must confess that I have felt a certain cold wind at my back as I
listened to him caution people in Latin America who do
not even yet own shoes against falling into the trap of materialism.
Steve — I don't expect you
to change or
to see any other's point of
view — but maybe it would be good
to listen to others, have empathy with them rather then just perscribing your almost robotic response.
I've
listened to both points of
view with an open mind, whereas you have
not.
(2) The final editor of Q took sayings of Jesus that were still circulating, including these small clusters, and edited them in two regards: On the one hand, he superimposed on the Q material the Deuteronomistic
view of history found in the Old Testament, according
to which God lets Jerusalem be destroyed
not because God is unfaithful but because Israel is, having rejected God's prophets, indeed having killed them, rather than
listening to them.
Please don't
listen to these people on here they have so many different
views and ideas of their own but don't
listen to them they have closed their heart
to God and are doing Satans work of misleading people away from the Almighty they look for men who like
to have their ears tickled so don't take mine our anyone else's word for it look it up for your self history attests
to the bible as true and The writings of Moses is far older than anything they have ever found thats right Moses wrote the first parts in the bible 3,500 years ago The scriptures weren't inspired by Pagan stories Pagan stories was inspired by actual events just like those in the bible because if you notice that a lot of the stories found in the bible have a lot
to do about people worshipping false Gods.
If these whiners don't shut up about having
to look at a cross, then I'm going
to sue them for forcing me
to listen to their stupid
views.
a knee - level
view from your bit of pavement; a battered, upturned cooking pot and countable ribs, coughing from your steel - banded lungs, alone, with your face
to the wall; shrunken breasts and a three year old who can
not stand; the ringed fingers, the eyes averted and a five - paise piece in your palm; smoking the babus» cigarette butts
to quieten the fiend in your belly; a husband without a job, without a square meal a day, without energy, without hope; being at the mercy of everyone further up the ladder because you are a threat
to their self - respect; a hut of tins and rags and plastic bags, in a warren of huts you can
not stand up in, where your neighbors live at one arm's length across the lane; a man who cries out in silence; nobody
listening, for everyone's talking; the prayer withheld, the heart withheld, the hand withheld; yours and mine Lord teach us
to hate our poverty of spirit.
In the past, I have
not extended
to her the basic courtesy of
listening attentively
to her point of
view.
I might
not be convinced of your
views but I will continue
to listen.
No matter how ridiculous their
view is, they will
not listen to even the most articulate, logical, and gracious arguments.
After last nights CNN interview, it is very clear that EVEN IF the muslim center was built near Ground Zero, it is
NOT going to enhance anything meaningful discourse because the muslim world has an ulterior motive of thrusting their views down our throats and not at all interested in listening to our tolerant vie
NOT going
to enhance anything meaningful discourse because the muslim world has an ulterior motive of thrusting their
views down our throats and
not at all interested in listening to our tolerant vie
not at all interested in
listening to our tolerant
views.
You said, «We get nowhere if you're
not open
to listen because you're so stuck and set in your own
views about Christianity and the 38,000 + «cults» within it.»
This article appears
to be written by someone who
views Billy Graham as a celebrity,
not someone
to listen to and take the message seriously.
However, if you would like
to set aside your biases, actually discuss this matter and leave the whole «You're delusional» «You've been indoctrinated» crap
to the side, then we can continue... We get nowhere if you're
not open
to listen because you're so stuck and set in your own
views about Christianity and the 38,000 + «cults» within it.
Sharing our opinion on an issue isn't necessarily a bad thing, but sometimes, when we are trying
to be a voice for those who are suffering, we end up speaking over them, shouting our own
view without first really stopping
to listen to their experiences.
You scare me because you will
not openly
listen to or even consider Opposing points of
view from intelligent people.
He writes that «When someone is so rooted in God and the Church he is
not afraid
to listen to different opinions; he can let himself be enriched by new points of
view without losing his grounding in what is essential» (pp.96 - 7).
Listening to other
views and perspectives is
not some heresy
to be rooted out, but it does require some stability and confidence.
For instance, making or
listening to music, executing or
viewing a landscape painting, or preparing or eating exotic foods would be considered appropriate occasions for esthetic evaluation, while ordinary pursuits like operating a lathe, feeding a baby, or painting a house would
not.
We as the church shouldn't be above humbling ourselves
to listen to others with different
views, because as we
listen the Spirit may well speak
to us about the person and where they're at.
For pastors and churches, this means encouraging loving, open - minded dialogue
not only within your congregation, but with other congregations as well... For all of us, productive dialog means reaching out
to people whose
views and experiences are different from our own and having the patience
to really
listen to them with a goal of better understanding them and their worldviews.»
Could have had me fooled...
listen, I may
not agree with your point of
view, but there's no need
to compare me
to Hitler, ok??
And we all know the flack that Mr Wenger gets for that approach — for
not thumping the table and shouting, and instead
listening to the players comments first before setting out his
view.
Not saying agree with them,
listen to them, show them the courtesy that you would like when trying
to explain your point of
view.
Whatever floats your boat mate, I'm
not going
to argue with someone that fails
to listen to another
view, my point stands, whether you agree with wenger or
not doesn't make you more or less of a supporter it just means you have a differing
view, no need for insults.
Wenger is
not listening listening and fan
view is
not important
to him and the Board as I know.
Merse being passionate about the problems at Arsenal is one thing as soon as Lee Dixon says something like that it's time
to listen, he isn't known for his anti Wenger
views and has always praised him as a person.
He is
not ready
to sell any of them, just
listen to what he says instead of making up things
to suit your
views.