Sentences with phrase «n't make it to the court»

After counsel on both sides entered their appearances, Metuh's counsel, Onyechi Ikpeazu, SAN, informed the court that his client could not make it to court because he was indisposed.

Barnes & Noble didn't make it to court with that claim, an ITC judge has seemingly thrown those claims out before an evidentiary trial even started.

Whether you want to fill in the time between games during the NBA season or you just can't make it to the court, developers have created plenty of basketball - themed games for your Android device.

This solves three problems at once — less demand for the cars, greenies can feel like they are saving the planet, and the greenies can't make it to their court hearings because they're stuck on a bus somewhere!

A Toronto lawyer built an app for finding a lawyer to handle simple appearances when you can't make it to court.

Not exact matches

He said the most effective way to blunt trolling is to make it less costly to see patent litigation through to court so companies will not feel pressed to settle claims quickly.

If a leader can not listen to contrary opinions and make informed decisions based on a full range of views, then he / she courts disaster — as Rumsfeld did in Iraq.

«For the record, we wish to make it clear that as we start this trial David Baazov and his counsel have not been given by the AMF or this court the time necessary to review the millions of documents disclosed and judged potentially relevant,» she said.

Now local legislatures can make such changes without explanation, and it's up to voters to try to challenge them in lawsuits, and to do so often on an tight timetable, since courts won't want to change voting rules close to an election.

The «fib» to which Journal was clearly referring was the government's claim, made repeatedly in those same court filings, that it was only interested in cracking the San Bernardino case, not in setting a precedent.

Finally, in most jurisdictions, if the criminal court doesn't compel the perpetrator to make full restitution, the law generally provides that the restitution order may be automatically converted into a civil judgment.

What's important is that, when Donald Trump was asked what he thought the Supreme Court should do with its power, the first thing he decided was important to address was that the justices on the court should be nice to him — and that he had made one of them apologize to him when she waCourt should do with its power, the first thing he decided was important to address was that the justices on the court should be nice to him — and that he had made one of them apologize to him when she wacourt should be nice to him — and that he had made one of them apologize to him when she wasn't.

In the notice of his decision, New York Supreme Court Justice Manuel Mendez supported the arguments made by Schneiderman at the November 25 hearing and did not appear to be sympathetic to or convinced by those of DraftKings or FanDuel attorneys.

While courts and regulators couldn't see that technology would eventually make their interference unnecessary, today it's already very obvious, which is another reason to allow vertical integration to go ahead unhindered.

The FBI made clear to the court that Steele was not let go as a source because the information he provided was inaccurate but because he made «unauthorized disclosures» to the media in September 2016, according to the Democratic memo.

Raisman, who has become a vocal critic of both organizations after initially revealing the abuse in her autobiography released last fall, did not plan to go to court but says she felt compelled to press forward because she believes USA Gymnastics and the USOC are not making a sincere effort to «properly address the problem.»

The court found that the father made «many of the threatening phone calls,» according to Bob, and that the mother is not a suspect.

Mars Canada, based in Bolton, Ont., took its complaint to Federal Court, but the two sides settled when Bemco agreed it would not import or sell the U.S. - made products in Canada.

In a letter to John Doerr in 2012, Ellen Pao alleged she had recieved a «demotion» when she wasn't made a general partner at Kleiner Perkins that year, court documents reveal.

Workplace whoopee has remained a hot topic since the 1998 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Burlington Industries Inc. v. Ellerth, which makes it easier for employees to file sexual - harassment lawsuits even if they can't show significant job - related consequences.

The FBI also made clear to the court that Steele was not let go as a source because the information he provided was inaccurate, but because he made «unauthorized disclosures» to the media in September 2016.

Still, all of this means the U.S. burger chain might not even really have to win in court against Down N» Out to succeed at its larger goal: demonstrating from a legal perspective that they're aggressive in protecting their name and other trademarks, which makes the marks themselves stronger.

They want the court to demand Facebook remove similar — not only identical — postings, and to make it identify holders of fake accounts.

The league would have to prove this in court with evidence, not just state it as a fact — and it's not clear at all that watching a couple of tweeted highlight GIFs is going to make substantial numbers of people refuse to pay money to watch an NFL game.

The share price for the company did go up about 25 % between 13 and 22 May, according to the court — trading volume increased over 17 times — but then the price dropped back 15 % on 23 May when the Porter - hyped announcement was not made on 22 May.

They permitted forum selection bylaws while not making Delaware the exclusive forum; seemed to be limiting appraisal rights exercises by awarding lower amounts; and in conferences and outside the court, indicated a deliberative approach to the fee - shifting issue.

The court could make its decision very specific to South Dakota, which would require these other states to carefully examine their laws to ensure they won't face additional court challenges.

This Fried Frank memo reviews recent Delaware appraisal decisions and identifies situations in which Delaware courts are likely to make awards that are lower than the deal price — as well as those in which it isn't.

«But once people started to understand what he was going to do — he made jobs [for residents] and isn't over-developing, but is fixing the [community] gymnasium and put in basketball courts — well, now he has a large group that supports him.»

Canada's Federal Court could be given greater powers to combat unacceptable behaviour by domestic and foreign «patent trolls» — companies that do not make or sell a product but sue other companies for patent infringement based on existing patent rights the troll has secured.

In a meeting at the White House, Mr. Sessions informed Mr. Trump that he would not defend what he considered an unconstitutional order in court, according to people familiar with the conversation, and officials at the White House and the Department of Homeland Security have made the case to the president that his administration would look foolish if it argued in favor of preserving it.

«Larry made it very clear that he was very upset with us and not happy that we were doing autonomy,» Kalanick said during court testimony on Feb. 7, referring to Larry Page, chief executive of Google parent Alphabet.

It probably won't make Wynne any more popular in Harper's eyes, and will be one more reason for him to avoid meeting with her, but it could also be the first shot in a Supreme Court challenge of the legislation, which could conceivably be much faster - tracked than it would be if we had to wait for a Charter challenge the traditional way, which could conceivably help save lives, going back to the thrust of the Bedford decision in the first place.

Manafort, 68, and Gates, 45, remain under home confinement on pledges to pay $ 10 million and $ 5 million, respectively, if they fail to return to court after pleading not guilty Oct. 30 to charges of conspiracy, money laundering and making false lobbyist registration statements in connection with their work advising a Russia - friendly political party in Ukraine.

Even if regulators do not act, when a presale results in nothing more than profits for its promoter, a disgruntled investor will inevitably make a private securities fraud claim to try and claw back some of their capital; assuming a court will determine a presale of digital tokens to be a private placement of securities, any such federal claim would fall under Rule 10b - 5.

There are many pundits trying to place probabilities on the court's decision but I am not briefed enough in the BASIC LAW of Germany to even try to make that bold a prediction.

What I am sick of is those who continue to deny that priests should have due process, accuse and broad brush all priests, and make claims that are not proven anywhere in a court of law.

The standard intelligent design belief has been proven in court to be completely based on changing a few words in a creationist text to try to make it legally «not religious.»

The government, the Supreme Court actually, you know, the one made up of christians and jews but no atheists, said one religion could not be taught to the exclusion of others, and they said ID is not science, just religious creationism in disguise, so can not be taught as science.

Justice Byron White wrote in dissent that the Court elevated the value of individual autonomy over the value of the «continued existence of... life or potential life,» while simultaneously pretending not to make such a choice and failing to demonstrate a constitutional warrant for preferring one value over the other.

Thank goodness that the supreme court has not been influenced to the same extent or we would be living in a country that would make you toe a religious line rather than a secular one, scary.

This may come as a shock to you — BUT - evolution could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in court — if it is a «Law» of science and not a theory explain to me why Scientist in the same field have differing opinions theory has undergone massive changes since the 1850's when Darwin first came up with the THEORY — there are a lot of interesting similarities to true science which makes it sound so plausible, but it should sound good — After all the top scientist / humanists in the world promote it and they are all pretty smart

«References to Jesus, of course, didn't make into the recent U.S. Supreme Court's hearings... Yet there is a moral dimension to this epic legal debate:»??

The Court has sent the message that it is unconstitutional for government to offend the religious sensibilities of any American, thereby creating a right not to be offended that makes being thin - skinned a civic and constitutional virtue and thus undermines the virtues necessary to social and religious harmony.

George Bush found this out to his cost when he nominated Harriet Miers for the Supreme Court, and McCain must make clear to voters that he wasn't compromising the pro-life position when he joined the Gang of 14.

Wouldn't doubt it if it's a ploy on their part to make Gays and Lesbians look bad during a time when the Supreme Court is taking up the Gay marriage issue!

Sometimes these sources point in different directions — as when a right not recognized in the past becomes widely understood as fundamental — and a court has to make a judgment between the two lines of argument.

Christians may also he attracted to an approach advanced by former Harvard professor John Hart Ely who argues that courts should not themselves choose substantive constitutional values, but should issue rulings that keep the processes of political debate and decision - making open to all.

A group that claims a sincere religious belief in staying high all the time will probably lose its ease, not because it is necessarily insincere but because any drug defendant could make that claim and courts have no good way to know who is telling the truth.

To hold that same - sex marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fatherinTo hold that same - sex marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fatherinto marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.