Sentences with phrase «n't mean your response»

Now, that doesn't mean your response would help.

Not exact matches

in response to someone landing a difficult trick doesn't, of course, mean that the flip or spin made you gasp at the grandeur and majesty of the universe, but it does make you want to tap the person next to you and say, «Check that out!»

If responding quickly means not taking your time to fully understand the situation, however, your response may reflect the unpreparedness.

That means employees not only can watch the share price rise and fall but can alter their own performance in response.

In response to allegations that the company did not sufficiently vet incomes for mortgage borrowers, SoFi wrote, «This is an incredibly vague claim, and we have no idea what this means.»

But as large companies shore up their security systems in response to high - profile data breaches, that means «the bad guys are moving down the food chain, where folks are not as prepared,» says Brian Casazza, CIO at Vistage, a training organization for small - and mid-sized businesses.

Though our responses are innate, it doesn't mean we're doomed to a constant tug - of - war over credit and blame.

The response, he said, was that Padilla didn't want to do that — «which in my mind meant Google was not willing to do that.»

Notably, the survey was conducted between August and September of 2016, meaning that responses don't reflect the results of the U.S. Presidential election.

That should be an unacceptable response, she said, because it simply means that person hasn't looked at a diverse talent pool.

So Creative Direct Response offered a buyout proposal that was not only financially attractive, but also a means to reward loyal employees.

This doesn't mean mistakes won't happen, but the quality of output from your team and their response to setbacks is consistently amazing.

Wired has called gamification an enemy of great support, and while dissenting opinions often point to cases like Microsoft and the increased productivity they saw when implementing gamification, the numbers don't tell the full story — a lower response time does not mean your team is doing a better job of taking care of customers.

That means higher response rates, and ensures that your e-message won't be considered spam.

Yet each of these stocks has climbed in response to improving conditions in their industries, and although the pace of their growth will necessarily slow, that doesn't mean it will stop entirely.

There is an exception in which you are not a «beneficial owner» of shares over which you have voting power «if such voting power arises solely from a revocable proxy or consent given to such Person in response to a public proxy or consent solicitation made pursuant to, and in accordance with, Section 14 (a) of the Exchange Act by means of a solicitation statement filed on Schedule 14A.»

As long as PS Fund (along with any of its Related Persons) does not otherwise engage in (or has not otherwise engaged in) conduct that would otherwise result in its becoming an Acquiring Person by becoming the Beneficial Owner of 10 % or more of the shares of Common Stock then outstanding, PS Fund's solicitation and receipt of one or more revocable proxies from the Company's stockholders to be counted toward the number of shares of the outstanding Common Stock needed to cause a special meeting of stockholders to be called pursuant to and in accordance with the Bylaws, which proxies are given to PS Fund in response to a public solicitation of proxies made pursuant to, and in accordance with, Section 14 (a) of the Exchnage Act by means of a solicitation statement filed with the Commission on Schedule 15A, should not, of itself, cause PS Fund to become an Acquiring Person.

We did find that PIP365 does not offer the flexibility of automatic trades in response to signals, meaning that traders must be present to respond manually to any received signals.

This is not meant to be, hence last week's monetary policy response of lowering interest rates.

My response was not well - received: «If mistakes don't matter, doesn't that mean successes don't matter either?»

And by all means please do make another response to me where you still pretend to not be responding to me because you can not live by your own word that you were done responding to me.

I'm sorry, I don't mean to invalidate your experience, but more and more evidence is pointing to NDEs being the brain's response to dying, a physiological process but not a spiritual one.

That post was supposed to be meant as a response to herbert juarez on the previous page, but apparently CNN decided it didn't want to work that way.

I have felt the undercurrent since just barely stating that «I didn't think I ascribed to Calvinism» and since have been told «the problem with you is,» «you misunderstand the meanings of words,» and one friend said «Poor Sue» in the subject line of an email she sent me in response to an email on my understanding of the means of salvation!

The term did not become popular currency again until the beginning of the modern era — as a means of self - identification, in response to the Turkish threat — and was asserted more generally in the eighteenth century.

Does Piper's response not «reinterpret apparently plain meanings of biblical texts» and rely on a bit of «technical ingenuity»?

Mockery, satire and sarcasm aren't simply mean - spirited responses, they're rhetorical weapons in the hands of those on the bottom.

Also, the examples were in direct response to Chad's question regarding why «we» (I assume he means non-believers) «don't prowl around bigfoot exists forums».

If religious belief is attained when reason makes a «total response of the total being to what is apprehended as the ultimate reality,» such that in this act reason is reborn, then it follows that those who totally accept a given world - view as ultimate, whether it be theistic or non-theistic, naturalistic or supernaturalistic, immanentist or transcendentalist, as normative for their entire lives and as the supreme value in their hierarchy of values, and hence not taken as a means but as an end, belong to the religious dimension.

Obviously, God intervenes radically only in response to a radical attitude on the part of the believer — radical not in regard to political means but in regard to faith; and the believer who is radical in his faith has rejected all means other than those of faith.

After a pretty lame attempt to explain to him how doubt has actually enriched my faith over the years, how walking with a limp has made me more dependent on the steady shoulder of my heavenly Father, and how I don't really want to be fixed if being fixed means accepting without question or concern the notion that God creates the majority of the human population for hell with no hope for salvation, I decided just to turn the response over to you guys instead.

Anger, resentment, frustration, self - pity, questioning God are all perfectly normal responses to the situation, and it doesn't mean that they do not love their mothers.

As we have already pointed out (and as the arrows in the diagram indicate), there is a movement of meaning from each side; but the arrows moving in the opposite direction indicate that meanings often do not meet and return without receiving response.

A perusal of the Church of the Brethren Web pages provides clear evidence that a commitment to pacifism is not limited to denominational headquarters: the 48 churches of the Northern Indiana District Conference have joined to urge «the use of nonviolent approaches and interventions» in response to the terror; the Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania, Church of the Brethren has adopted a statement in which they «remain committed to walk in the Jesus way of nonviolent love, in which evil can only be overcome with redemptive acts of love»; a group of Brethren Volunteer Service Workers have issued a statement in which they «advocate the use of nonviolent means to settle disputes» and «stand opposed to the increased drive toward militarization»; on October 7 members of local Brethren churches (along with Mennonites and others) organized a peace rally at the state capitol in Harrisburg, «Sowing Seeds of Peace: Prayers and Petitions for Nonviolent Action,» which attracted over 300 people.

You tell only parts of the story you know will get an emotional response from the believing (meaning they will respond the way you want them to) but you don't tell the entire story.

This is very true «This means that while we may not be able to hear the voice of God, we can see His response to us through how life unfolds as we pray and communicate with Him.»

This means that while we may not be able to hear the voice of God, we can see His response to us through how life unfolds as we pray and communicate with Him.

Come on CNN, whether it's true or not, is there someone that sits around and tries to come up with blog t itles that are meant just to attract angry responses?

Just as ridiculous is the post modern response of «they cant change» - which if true would mean that any addiction or sin would be unchangeable despite the facts humans change all the time and I am NOT speaking of through Christ.

The fact is that Abelard was trying to say, with his own passionate awareness of what love can mean in human experience, that in Jesus, God gave us not so much an example of what we should be like but — and this is the big point in his teaching — a vivid and compelling demonstration in a concrete event in history that God does love humanity and will go to any lengths to win from them their glad and committed response.

This does not mean, of course, that the author ever forgets or betrays his science; what it does mean is: that the reader's approach, and response, to these pages must of necessity be quite different from those demanded by the scientific works.

It is certainly not the only way, and should not by any means be our first response to all situations; however I can not agree with Wink's conclusion, as summarized by Jeremy, that «history has proven time and time again that violence will never put an end to violence,» or that violence itself is always an evil action (Wink concludes the latter much more firmly than Jeremy.

But his habitual response to any concept whose meaning he has not taken the time to learn is to dismiss it as meaningless, with the sort of truculent affectation of contempt that suggests he really knows, at some level, that he is out of his depth.

Altizer's response to this whole discussion was that the meaning of the word God in the spiritual history of the world can not be determined by a few theologians acting in the privacy of an academic discipline.

I think what Dave meant was that the previous behavior would have indicated a somewhat violent response from Muslims and that the maker should have expected that, not that the violent response was justified.

Washington (CNN)-- Speaking at the 60th annual National Prayer Breakfast inWashington on Thursday, the president said, «We know that part of living in a pluralistic society means that our personal religious beliefs alone can't dictate our response to every challenge we face.

When he commented - in response to the usual question about why he was so unreasonably opposed to condoms as a means of fighting Aids - that in fact condomdistribution isn't helping, and may be worsening, the spread of HIV / AIDS in Africa, he provoked an avalanche of hostile comment, much of it almost hysterical in tone.

But glorifying, meaning adoration and awe, is a response to worship not its essential core.

@right4life: your response basically means «YUK YUK I CA N'T FIGURE IT OUT, SO, IT»S TOTALLY OUT OF OUR ABILITY TO UNDERSTAND.»

These passionate responses are from people who say they are «spiritual but not religious» — which to me largely means people who are in denial over (and afraid to embrace) atheism, likely due to one of: