Sentences with phrase «n't meet the spending requirement»

You don't meet the spending requirements for the Chase Sapphire Preferred ® Card, or you want to have multiple authorized users on your account

If you're in a search for an everyday card to use and may not meet the spending requirements to make the Club Carlson or other fee based cards worthwhile, you should probably begin here.

But, if you don't meet the spending requirements for the bonuses, you're be better off with the Platinum Delta SkyMiles ® Business Credit Card.

If you don't meet the spending requirement, you do not get the bonus points!

Couldn't you meet your spending requirement on these cards by purchasing $ 2,000 each through the Rapid Rewards shopping site at merchants that give at least 2 points per dollar?

You don't meet the spending requirements for the Chase Sapphire Preferred ® Card, or you want to have multiple authorized users on your account

If you're in a search for an everyday card to use and may not meet the spending requirements to make the Club Carlson or other fee based cards worthwhile, you should probably begin here.

Not exact matches

If you are employed by a not - for - profit organization, any time you spend on religious instruction, worship services, or any form of proselytizing may not be counted toward meeting the full - time employment requirement.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The governor has long maintained that Ms. Teachout does not meet the five - year residency requirement to run for office in New York, due to time spent and an address used in her native Vermont, even though a Brooklyn Supreme Court judge dismissed such claims earlier this month.

The court said lawmakers could not rely on the local spending to meet state requirements for school budgets, the strategy lawmakers used last year.

Here in CA my mother is a public school teacher, I don't think it's exactly the same as the NCLB requirements, but she has to spend hours filling out BTSA standards paperwork and going to meetings about the standard.

From the language in the website it looks as if someone could spend all that money only to be told the book doesn't meet BAM's requirements.

There are a few people out there who would buy a policy to show proof and then immediately cancel it because they don't want to spend ten or fifteen dollars a month meeting the requirements of their lease.

Typically, there's a minimum spending requirement you'll have to meet to qualify for the bonus, but if you're planning a big trip, snagging those extra rewards shouldn't be a problem.

You might not be able to redeem the points earned from the sign - up bonus for free plane tickets for this holiday, but your travel purchases can help you meet a sign - up bonus spending requirement and earn purchase reward points to be used for future travel as well.

While this card does not have an introductory spending bonus, it does let users earn loyalty bonuses when they meet the spending requirements.

While many cards offer bonuses for eligible new Cardmembers who meet specific spend requirements within a set period of time after account opening, the Citi ® Double Cash Card — 18 month BT offer does not.

This is a great way to help meet the minimum spending requirement on ANY credit card, or even for earning miles and points for transactions which don't usually earn miles and points as long as you buy Vanilla Reload cards with your credit card at Office Depot and load them on your Bluebird card.

If you want point flexibility, a lower annual fee, or you aren't able to meet the spending requirements for the bonuses, there are other options that could be more beneficial for your business.

Assuming you aren't meeting any of the minimum spend requirements on the Platinum Delta SkyMiles ® Business Credit Card, the net rewards in the first two years of membership would yield you $ 295 for the Gold Delta SkyMiles ® Business Credit Card and merely $ 65 for the Platinum Delta SkyMiles ® Business Credit Card.

One advantage of the REI Credit Card bonus is the fact that it doesn't require you to meet any minimum spending requirements.

If you ever want to make a large purchase on a credit card or you want to meet a spending requirement for a credit card bonus, but you don't want to be hurt by the high credit utilization, use this simple trick.

Because if you get the personal or small business version of the AMEX Platinum Delta card and spend $ 50,000 + in a calendar year, not only will you get 70,000 Delta miles and 10,000 Medallion qualification miles for meeting the minimum spending requirements.

Given that an average person spends about S$ 600 on food and S$ 400 on transportation, we don't think it'll be too difficult to meet this requirement for an average spender.

That said, I would personally operate under the assumption that as long as you meet the spend requirement and keep the card open for 6 + months, you'll not be at risk for losing any of the points or the $ 300 travel credit.

If you are employed by a not - for - profit organization, any time you spend on religious instruction, worship services, or any form of proselytizing may not be counted toward meeting the full - time employment requirement.

Whether it's worth it for you depends on how highly you value the points or miles you're manufacturing, and whether you are using this technique to meet minimum spending requirements you can't meet with your everyday purchases.

The ease of manufactured spend comes and goes and can be very location dependent so it's always good to have a variety of ways to meet spending requirement that don't violate the T&C s of signup bonus offers.

I haven't really used the BA card since I met the spending requirements, I plan to keep the Sapphire card longer term.

This is a high spend requirement that cardholders may not be able to reach, but it's a valuable perk if you can meet the threshold.

American Airlines, for example, offers a status challenge that is available to anyone — whether or not you already have status in a comparable program — that lets you fast - track your way to earning either AAdvantage gold or platinum status by meeting both a flying requirement of 7,000 or 12,500 miles and spending at least $ 1,000 or $ 2,000 respectively within a period of 90 days.

I don't think we'll know for certain until someone meets the min spend requirement and confirms.

A true Milenomics follower wouldn't use either card unless their latest spending requirements had been met.

Typically, there's a minimum spending requirement you'll have to meet to qualify for the bonus, but if you're planning a big trip, snagging those extra rewards shouldn't be a problem.

However, I don't advise applying for more than one card at a time, and you should be sure to meet any minimum spending requirements needed to earn the sign - up bonus before obtaining your next card.

Don't spend more money than you normally would to meet minimum spend requirements, because again you'll just end up spending money, which is the opposite of what we want to do.

While there aren't as many of those rare 100,000 mile or point bonuses as we saw in recent years, you can still score 50,000 to 60,000 miles if you play your cards right and meet those initial spending requirements.

So it makes no sense to register for 3 cards all at once with a minimum spend requirement of $ 10,000 within 3 - 4 months, if I know I can not meet that spending obligation.

If on the other hand, meeting minimum spend requirements is not ever an issue for you, then I say go with this offer.

And why not — just meeting the minimum spend requirements on these cards will net me a combined 350K points.

(It's actually not that hard to meet the $ 5,000 spend requirement on each card given the 6 - month window.)

While this is not as lucrative as the current offer, this is still a useful offer to meet any spend requirements and get bonus points.

Not all of the foregoing transactions are available on every product that may be used to meet the Spending Requirement.

Purchases to meet the spend requirement do NOT include fees or interest charges, balance transfers (balance transfers are not available on Delta SkyMiles ® Business Credit Cards), cash advances, purchases of travelers checks, purchases or reloading of prepaid cards, purchases of gift cards; person - to - person payments, or purchases of other cash equivalenNOT include fees or interest charges, balance transfers (balance transfers are not available on Delta SkyMiles ® Business Credit Cards), cash advances, purchases of travelers checks, purchases or reloading of prepaid cards, purchases of gift cards; person - to - person payments, or purchases of other cash equivalennot available on Delta SkyMiles ® Business Credit Cards), cash advances, purchases of travelers checks, purchases or reloading of prepaid cards, purchases of gift cards; person - to - person payments, or purchases of other cash equivalents.

Purchases to meet the spend requirement do NOT include fees or interest charges, balance transfers, cash advances, purchases of traveler's checks, purchases or reloading of prepaid cards, purchases of gift cards, person - to - person payments, or purchases of any cash equivalents.

If I don't have any planned travel right now on Amtrak, any idea if I can buy 200 of Amtrak gift cards and meet the spending requirement?

Over half of you (57 %) said that you'll be able to maintain status (easily or just barely) while 43 % said that you would not be able to meet the new spending requirements.

There is a minimum spending requirement but it shouldn't be too difficult to meet for regular spenders.

If you have an immediate need to plan a trip to India, you may not have enough time to apply for a credit card and meet the minimum spend requirements to get the bonus miles and book an ward ticket as this process can take at least 2 months from the day you applied to miles deposited to your frequent flyer account.