Sentences with phrase «n't much science»

Even though there currently isn't much science backing them up, many people and animals have seen improvements in their pain and mobility after taking glucosamine for a while.

And, contrary to my initial thoughts on it — I was under the impression that there wasn't much science to support it — there actually have been a number of studies published in the last 5 years showing that it does actually work, and quite powerfully at that.

And, contrary to my initial thoughts on it — I was under the impression that there wasn't much science to support it — there actually have been a number -LSB-...]

Activated Charcoal — Although there isn't much science out there explaining why activated charcoal has long been used to relieve digestive gasses.

Although there's not much science to support it, some moms of twins report feeling movement earlier and more frequently in pregnancy, sometimes as early as the first trimester.

For now, there's not much science can do with this information, but dream of continuing to study the unique benefits of breast milk.

A research professor says that there is not much science to back up the claims of most dating sites.

That means that U.S. students read a lot of stories in their elementary classrooms, but not much science or history.

Peter Davies «Not much science in this topic Judith?

I sold residential real estate for years (not much science there, but lot's of legal issues).

Not exact matches

The same things you generally do to avoid catching any flu — wash your hands and steer clear of the guy hacking and sniffing on the subway or airplane (and hey, if you're want to try stocking up on Vitamin C, you'd be in good company, even if science suggests you're probably not accomplishing much).

You probably already know too much screen time can make you fat and unhappy, but science says that's not actually the worst effect all of our gadgets might be having on our health.

The H1B highly skilled immigrant visa is limited to 65,000, with an additional 20,000 for holders of advanced degrees — not much when you consider that U.S. universities pump out 1 science graduate for every five China does.

It's just an electronic ether that doesn't really exist, much like heaven (as far as science can prove).

According to a recent article by Stanford's Emma Seppälä for the Greater Good Science Center, «one of the most extensive studies on charisma found that charisma is not so much a gift as a learnable skill.»

The government's Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology has released its report on e-commerce in Canada, titled «Pursuing the Promise,» and it paints the same picture we've known for some time now — that despite Canadians being among the most prodigious users of the Internet, they really aren't doing much online business-wise.

When the headhunter contacted him months before, he wouldn't tell Eckert much except that the company had been founded by famed scientist Rodney Brooks, who, until a few years earlier, had led MIT's computer - science and artificial - intelligence lab.

Tanking is obviously an inexact science, and has much more to do with lineup construction and the allocation of playing time than anything else — players are professional athletes, and convincing them to lose on purpose to bring younger, cheaper new talent to their franchise isn't exactly a great sell.

You don't even need to know much about the science behind hydroponics to bring the magic of growing delicious plants into your own home.

But according to happiness expert and author Christine Carter there's a more fundamental problem with adjusting your behavior to please others — not only does it harm you, but science shows that other people don't actually like it much either.

But some outsiders are concerned that may not be as relevant in an era when millennials are enthralled more by value than by top - of - the - line science, by sustainability as much as performance.

Not only is your worst employee probably costing the company twice as much as a star employee is earning it, according to science, but that jerk is almost certainly making everyone else miserable along the way (according to just about everyone who has ever had to endure one).

Are you aware that there is science behind how much to sleep and when to wake up, but you don't want to dive deep into this stuff?

This is the first, in what will become a regular feature here on TheCloseShave.com, of low cost razor that I will be reviewing — not so much for the sake of science, but curiosity.

«We now know that young people who are going into the office for the first time are making decisions about who they work for not based on how much they're getting paid, but on the space design,» ASID president Randy Fiser told members of the design community at the recent Science of Design Conference at Liberty Science Center in New Jersey.

However much time they have — and in my opinion they are unlikely to have much more than 2 - 3 years in which to get credit growth under control, but there is no science to this so I can not know for sure — as Beijing moves forward in its struggle to rebalance the Chinese economy, we should keep three things in mind:

You see, there's an entire subfield of computer science that can roughly be described as «pulling information out of things that look exactly like the Bitcoin transaction graph», and while these researchers haven't done much to Bitcoin yet — that's only because they're still fighting over the grant money.

«They can predict the future as much as I can predict the future, and they can't be right 100 percent of the time,» said Peter Pham, co-founder of the Los Angeles - based start - up studio Science.

We don't know much about the author other than he appears to have no professional financial background or qualifications, is well - qualified in computer science and claims experience in data science and simulation.

If you reject any science that doesn't take place in a petri dish you don't have much left.

I think it's a clever trick to make people (young people generally) who don't know much about science to think you have to be on one «side» or the other (God's side or Satan's side?)

I don't think the human GREED within the financial industry has much to do with understanding science and technology.

Hopefully science can figure that out but I am not going to hold my breath... it is hard to know who to believe with so much conflicting bias research.

This doesn't go into the realm of atheism vs. theism as much as it does go into the realm of science vs. nonsense.

«Creation» seems to magically conform to whatever seems closest to it, not so much in mainstream science, but anything some reputable scientist might have said that might serve to give the idea a bit of cover.

Types of Moral Argumentation Regarding Homosexuality by Pim Pronk Eerdmans, 350 pages, $ 24.99 paper An interesting book not so much for the position it advances (approval of homosexual relations) as for the claim that any position on homosexuality (or anything else) must be reached on the basis of moral reflection independent of nature, science, or theology.

«Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.»

If you're alluding to atomic weapons science may have developed them, but pretty much everyone who had a say in deciding to actually use them were Christians, weren't they?

It really does nt matter what my beliefs system was, let's just say it was based on chaos theory and science as applied to occult arts, I have since moved on to more pragmatic beliefs but I clearly recall how oppressive they were and surprised at how much propaganda they spread that was based on their ignorance.

Of course, much of reality may elude our senses, but much of it has been revealed to us using math and science using advanced technology, which is not so limited.

As a scientist in my profession, people who understand science know that not much is really «proven.»

In my opinion, being agnostic on many things, I believe we have much more to learn in Dawkins» area of expertise before we can really get to an educated answer to the issue, but that is just a gut feeling, but with serious consideration to what we don't actually know on the issue from these fields of science.

@BillyD:»... if a reliable witness tells me he has experienced something which modern science, in all it's glory can not explain, much less degrade, then the simplest rationale is to accept that he has indeed had an encounter with the supernatural.»

My argument is that if a reasonable, sane and reliable witness tells me he has experienced something which modern science, in all it's glory can not explain, much less degrade, then the simplest rationale is to accept that he has indeed had an encounter with the supernatural.

What simpler means in science is much discussed among philosophers — it is not at all a simple question.

Whether it's politics, science, history of literature... the young mind absorbs so much info but has not background to know what is real or not.

You don't know much about science then do you?

Not so much for the supernatural but for everyday guidance for a thousand ethical questions people are going have driven by science and money — as well as recognizing divine moments.

Atheism doesn't require much science, but does require logic.

This didn't matter too much until the rise of science exposed an insufficiency.