Sentences with phrase «n't name of course»

Not exact matches

Of course, that is not the name of the filOf course, that is not the name of the filof the film.

Of course, it includes a lot of assets that an average investor can't easily buy — including big stakes in privately held companies and infrastructure facilities like toll roads and airports, to name just a couplOf course, it includes a lot of assets that an average investor can't easily buy — including big stakes in privately held companies and infrastructure facilities like toll roads and airports, to name just a couplof assets that an average investor can't easily buy — including big stakes in privately held companies and infrastructure facilities like toll roads and airports, to name just a couple.

You know Occam's Razor, of course, even if you don't know it by that name.

Of course, the fact that the company didn't name them «men's» and «women's» doesn't mean Apple didn't intend to target two different sets of customerOf course, the fact that the company didn't name them «men's» and «women's» doesn't mean Apple didn't intend to target two different sets of customerof customers.

With the third - party apps, it gets worse, of course, since it wasn't just profile pictures and names that these developers were able to harvest off Facebook.

http://www.progressive-economics.ca/2009/11/10/public-sector-workers-the-recessions-next-victims/ This battle will, of course, be fought by right wing (and perhaps not so right wing) governments in the name of «fiscal responsibility», and justified with reference to the imperative need for «exit strategies» from Great Recession deficits and debt accumulation.

Of course, new names that I'm not formally considering may pop up on my radar suddenly because of a near term price swoon which I more often than not take advantage oOf course, new names that I'm not formally considering may pop up on my radar suddenly because of a near term price swoon which I more often than not take advantage oof a near term price swoon which I more often than not take advantage ofof.

Of course, other solid names that I'm not considering still look weak like GWW and VFC but I'd rather add to my consumer staples at this time.

Of course, this is not an endorsement of blindingly building a portfolio solely from stocks on this list, rather, it's a solid starting point for further research to pick and choose from some of the most solid and reliable names in their respective industrieOf course, this is not an endorsement of blindingly building a portfolio solely from stocks on this list, rather, it's a solid starting point for further research to pick and choose from some of the most solid and reliable names in their respective industrieof blindingly building a portfolio solely from stocks on this list, rather, it's a solid starting point for further research to pick and choose from some of the most solid and reliable names in their respective industrieof the most solid and reliable names in their respective industries.

Today's case study is for «Captain Ron» and, of course, Ron isn't his real name, though he is indeed a Captain.

Of course, I own names that are not included on the list but I still think it's a good place to start.

All of this occurs, of course, in the name of academic freedom, the guarantee that professors will not be sanctioned for the substance of what they write and teach.

An argument against my position, of course, is having African - American soldiers serving at forts named for very or even fantically pro-slavery men (not Lee [although he was okay with slavery], but check out some of the others).

Some have had their Xmas parties and parades and other events saying merry Xmas to everyone and still have two or more weeks to go before Xmas even arrives, it is just stupid and silly, and of course not one word about God or Jesus, they are embarrassed to even mention his name.

You do know, of course, that a good chunk of the people can't even name our current VP?

Of course not all of these are authoritative teaching documents, but they are issued in the name of the bishopOf course not all of these are authoritative teaching documents, but they are issued in the name of the bishopof these are authoritative teaching documents, but they are issued in the name of the bishopof the bishops.

Not to point out the obvious, (which, of course, I'm clearly going to do), but for someone who named himself after a Swedish carved wooden horse, calling anyone else out on their name is... silly.

However I find it invaluable as a place to take my pagan unchurched friends and have them taught the word by people more knowledgeable and grace - filled than I. Also as a place to be encouraged to hold the course and not revert to the old me which prefers kicking a ** and taking names over compassion, concern and giving my time / resources to the benefit of other.

Of course, didn't David Letterman name his new son Harry?

Of course Satin had nothing to do with the murders and brutality of the Crusades, nor the burning deaths of «witches» in Salem, torture and burning «heretics» at the stake in the Middle Ages, and most certainly not the millions of Jews killed by a good Catholic by the name of HitleOf course Satin had nothing to do with the murders and brutality of the Crusades, nor the burning deaths of «witches» in Salem, torture and burning «heretics» at the stake in the Middle Ages, and most certainly not the millions of Jews killed by a good Catholic by the name of Hitleof the Crusades, nor the burning deaths of «witches» in Salem, torture and burning «heretics» at the stake in the Middle Ages, and most certainly not the millions of Jews killed by a good Catholic by the name of Hitleof «witches» in Salem, torture and burning «heretics» at the stake in the Middle Ages, and most certainly not the millions of Jews killed by a good Catholic by the name of Hitleof Jews killed by a good Catholic by the name of Hitleof Hitler.

And of course, I agree with the concept that when God said not to take His Name in vain this is exactly what was the primary meaning.

However, as James Sanders wrote in Torah and Canon: «The true prophet does not engage in political diatribe to provide a rallying point for a particular course of action... he questions all the powers that be in the name of the one power beyond them.»

Saying god exists does not make that so... of course the opposite is true as well... all the pundits here (and Hawking) who like to call things by descriptive names like «fairy tales» do so because they are desperate to be right in this matter... because no one can be proven right or wrong in this I choose to respect the faith that some have in Science as well as thos who have faith in God's existence.

The reason they are mnot saved is because of lawlessness rather than being obedience to Gods word they believed in Jesus Christ but because of there hearts did not walk according to the word and because it speaks of signs and wonders it seems more about them and the works that they did.Of course none of us are saved by works.How do you understand that passage as some are saved and some are not it seems clear that to be saved we must believe and also walk in obedience to Gods word.brentnz A Tree and its Fruit mat 7: 2Many will say to Me on that day, «Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?»

Some of those above you don't really function as blogs, but as conduits for getting «their» message across... no names of course!

What Pete Seeger never left, of course, was the left: not the pragmatic liberal world of Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy, Hubert Humphrey, and Scoop Jackson, but the hard left that created Stalin's Popular Front in the «30s and later spelled the country's name «Amerika» in the «60s.

And we may suspect that Rousseau's claim that the experiment could not be «tried innocently» unless it were known in advance that orangutans were themselves human may be less sincere than his playful willingness to contemplate — in the name, of course, of research — acts of bestiality that would deny any distinct place in the creation to humanity.

Of course not, but I'd wager they're invoking the name of JesuOf course not, but I'd wager they're invoking the name of Jesuof Jesus.

Casting off the confines of the silliness of belief is what will finally free up humankind to some measure of greatness, provided of course believers don't succeed in squashing education in favor of myth, or blowing up the planet in the name of some angry invisible hominid who apparently lives in the sky.

I do not know its name, and I give it the designation of the Tao (the Way or Course).

I have described it as a recruiting campaign; not of course that Jesus was persuading people to «join,» or entering names in a list of members.

Nelson wasn't his real name either, of course.

So after a confusing succession of events in which Abraham had sex with his wife's maid (with his wife's permission, of course) and had a kid through her and this produced a ton of family strife and Abraham was nervous God's promise would not be fulfilled, Abraham and Sarah (though both nearing one hundred years old) had a kid name Isaac because God promised that this would happen.

This time, of course, the professional Greek «bashers are not attacking Hellenic civilization in the name of the Hebrew Bible.

I've known Jesus for as long as I've known my name, and still I use other people like capital to advance my own interest, still I gossip to make myself feel important, still I curse my brothers and sisters in one breath and sing praise songs in the next, still I sit in church with arms folded and cynicism coursing through my bloodstream, still I talk a big game about caring for the poor without doing much to change my own habits, still I indulge in food I'm not hungry for and jewelry I don't need, still I obsess over what people say about me on the internet, still I forget my own privilege, still I talk more than I listen and complain more than I thank, still I commit acts of evil, still I make a great commenter on Christianity and a lousy practitioner of it.

Of course Torah... there are plenty of verses in Koran talks about Torah and Injeel... both Torah and Injeel were having the name of the prophet and the koran to come if you see in 3:70 and they knew it both the Jews and Christians... but after the revelation of Koran some of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.Of course Torah... there are plenty of verses in Koran talks about Torah and Injeel... both Torah and Injeel were having the name of the prophet and the koran to come if you see in 3:70 and they knew it both the Jews and Christians... but after the revelation of Koran some of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.of verses in Koran talks about Torah and Injeel... both Torah and Injeel were having the name of the prophet and the koran to come if you see in 3:70 and they knew it both the Jews and Christians... but after the revelation of Koran some of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.of the prophet and the koran to come if you see in 3:70 and they knew it both the Jews and Christians... but after the revelation of Koran some of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.of Koran some of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth...

[specific names not needed, of course — just setting] And is this phrase «do not touch God's anointed» a Biblical one?

And of course they could be the result of the union of material from two people who were not married and who did not even know each other's names.

If then this issue has been settled by these Doctors of Law or experts in this way, and we certainly are in those situations in which one may resist the governing authority... we are unable to oppose... if in this instance it is necessary to fight back, even if the Emperor himself attacks, or whoever else may do so in his name... That until now we have taught absolutely not to resist the governing authority was due to the fact that we did not know that the governing authority's law itself grants the right to do so; we have of course always diligently taught that this law must be obeyed.

(Re 3:14) If he failed, he would reproach his Father's name as none other could.In selecting his only - begotten Son, Jehovah, of course, was not «laying his hands hastily upon him,» with the risk of being «a sharer in possible sins,» for Jesus was no novice likely to get «puffed up with pride and fall into the judgment passed upon the Devil.»

Try to name one group of persons or nations which in running the course from victim to victor has not shed some of its virtue along the way: business, labor, blacks, white ethnics, Catholics, Jews, white Anglo - Saxon Protestants.

People set up rules, not some deity that has changed names from «AN» to YAHWEH over the course of human history.

Of course not — they are evangelicals — Christian in name only.

«pervert alert» degenerates to: «Taskmaster» degenerates to: «Ronald Regonzo» degenerates to: «truth be told» degenerates to: «Atheism is not healthy...» degenerates to: «tina» degenerates to: «captain america» degenerates to: «just sayin» degenerates to: «nope» degenerates to: and many other names, but of course this extreme homophobe is the disgruntled ex Evangelical Fortune Cookie Co. troll.

I know the followers can be judgmental, and of course many atrocities were caused by people in the name of Christianity, but I can't imagine what the U.S. or the world would be like without it.

Adopting «in Jesus» name» as the necessary minimal condition for a counting as a «Christian congregation» for the purpose of a theological school's study does not, of course, require any particular answer to the quite different question whether God is truly known and worshiped by groups who do not worship in Jesus» name or whether God is redemptively present to them.

Go, with Gustavo Gutierrez, who would bid us be mindful of that great company of anonymous Christians who, unable for compelling reasons to name the name of Yahweh / Christ, are nevertheless among the thousands who have not and will not bow down to Baal; and who reminds us that, in Christ, God has «irreversibly committed himself to the present moment of mankind (he means, of course, every present moment) to carry it to its fulfillment.»

Departmental names won't matter much if the shift has already taken place from a scientific theology, based on the prior Catholic faith commitment of every student in the classroom (which obviously would require everyone enrolled in the course to be a committed Catholic), to a phenomenological, historical study of what others believe.

You know, Jesus Christ translates to «Anointed One» so the name is actually more of a ti.tle, of course jesus wasn't his real name, the folks who believe it is need to read their bibles more often.

She is renewing the conviction that to be a Christian requires one to be a socialist as well, Of course this does not mean an unqualified approval of all that is done in the name of socialisOf course this does not mean an unqualified approval of all that is done in the name of socialisof all that is done in the name of socialisof socialism.