Sentences with phrase «n't omnipresent»

The engineering gymnastics required to do this could help Instagram grow in developing nations where data is either too expensive for everyone to afford, or there aren't omnipresent or stable data connections.

Another interesting element about Atriox is that he's the first enemy in quite some time in the Halo universe that isn't some omnipresent force trying to destroy everything.

The media simply aren't omnipresent.

Police aren't omnipresent, and you can't just instantly summon them upon demand.

Jesus wasn't omnipresent during the incarnation, He wasn't omniscient during the incarnation, and He didn't engage in «genocide» during the incarnation.

As the Spirit's spontaneous gift, they are not the omnipresent metaphors of a comic world.

He is not omnipresent but have you forgot about demons and his satanic human agents.

And yes Satan is not omnipresent but he does have rather a large army behind him doing his bidding and he has been around a while so I'm pretty sure most people one way or another are tempted by him or his bidders.

I also appreciate that mobs in The Division are not omnipresent.

Not exact matches

Jones said the attacks «may give an impression that groups like the Taliban are omnipresent,» even though they are not.

Physics is usually not introduced as a business topic: while gravity, acceleration, and friction may take turns metaphorically coloring our executive summaries and quarterly reports, we don't discuss literal omnipresent rules of the physical universe in any given boardroom.

The North Pole (Alaska, not Santa's «hood) is losing its location of the once omnipresent video and DVD rental chain.

And because our «phones» (actually I'd call them digital trackers that happen to make phone calls) are transmitting our thoughts, actions, locations and activities — actively and passively, knowingly and not — all day long, the communication and surveillance loop is persistent, omnipresent, and unending.

Buting has not been quite as omnipresent in the media as Strang since the docu - series debuted, but he has been active on social media.

I pray to whichever holy name (God, Allah, Jehovah, Krishna, Jesus, etc.) suits the ONE Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnipotent being that ignorance is wiped away from our species and we become a closer, more loving, peaceful creature and that we realize how much time we waste and how much further we push our fellow neighbor and brother under God, regardless of creed, away debating over who's God is better and discover the error of our ways before we destroy each other... before it's too late, because The End is Nigh!!!!! LOL!!!!! Really though, isn't the world full of enough tragedy, and aren't their so many more important things that need our energy and attention like the innocent children in Pakistan dying from diseases from the flood or the homeless children in our own country, or the lack of education, which is exactly what leads to this kind of debate?

Remember that christianity not only claims that there is a god, but that he is omnipresent, omniscient, all loving and perfect.

Omniscient and Omnipresent, meaning this has already ended for him and it hasn't begun yet.

In order to assert that in fact God does not exist one would have be everywhere at once in the universe and God was not there (omnipresent,).

Also when i pray i know God hears me because he is omnipresent but it seems as though He has cut his end so that its not an open line.

Human learning is not so much an activity in culture as an inevitable and omnipresent effect of culture.

Radiant Word, blazing Power, you who mould the manifold so as to breathe your life into it; I pray you, lay on us those your hands — powerful, considerate, omnipresent, those hands which do not (like our human hands) touch now here, now there, but which plunge into the depths and the totality, present and past, of things so as to reach us simultaneously through all that is most immense and most inward within us and around us.

God, the omnipresent and omnipotent, is not confined to any one creed, for, he says, «Wheresoever ye turn, there is the face of Allah.»

Don't you think that there's a uniqueness about the incarnation as opposed to God's normal omnipresent / omniscient state?

After all, heaven must be a great place to look forward to as there certainly can not be any leukemia in children, natural disasters that kill the innocent nor other calamities that afflict the masses as occurs on earth, the place in which god is omnipresent, looking after his followers.

At the very least, we know that Jesus was not immortal, omnipresent, or omniscient (Luke 2:52; Matthew 24:36) as a man, even though Jesus is all these things as God.

He is: • Supernatural in nature (as He exists outside of His creation) • Incredibly powerful (to have created all that is known) • Eternal (self - existent, as He exists outside of time and space) • Omnipresent (He created space and is not limited by it) • Timeless and changeless (He created time) • Immaterial (because He transcends space) • Personal (the impersonal can't create personality) • Necessary (as everything else depends on Him) • Infinite and singular (as you can not have two infinites) • Diverse yet has unity (as nature exhibits diversity) • Intelligent (supremely, to create everything) • Purposeful (as He deliberately created everything) • Moral (no moral law can exist without a lawgiver) • Caring (or no moral laws would have been given)

• Eternal (self - existent, as He exists outside of time and space) • Omnipresent (He created space and is not limited by it)

One comment re Satan not being omnipresent: I believe your» e slight off track here.

I really like this article, you're so right and I'm glad to see someone that's written about it, especially in what you said about Satan not being omnipresent and how we're not likely to actually come across him

I can not imagine anything more useless to an eternal, omnipotent, omnipresent divinity than a earthly body that has been tortured, hung, stabbed, and desiccated!

• He must be omnipresent (He created space and is not limited by it).

God is: • Supernatural in nature (as He exists outside of His creation) • Incredibly powerful (to have created all that is known) • Eternal (self - existent, as He exists outside of time and space) • Omnipresent (He created space and is not limited by it) • Timeless and changeless (He created time) • Immaterial (because He transcends space) • Personal (the impersonal can't create personality) • Necessary (as everything else depends on Him) • Infinite and singular (as you can not have two infinites) • Diverse yet has unity (as nature exhibits diversity) • Intelligent (supremely, to create everything) • Purposeful (as He deliberately created everything) • Moral (no moral law can exist without a lawgiver) • Caring (or no moral laws would have been given)

This means, of course, that he was not omniscient any more than he was omnipresent.

The fact that mind has emerged only once in the whole known course of evolution does not, in my opinion, bear out the view that rudiments of mind, or some kind of protominds, are omnipresent or even widespread in the living world.

So why can't an omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent god manage that?

With response to the comment about why an all powerful, omnipresent God can't explain certain things to a finite mind... There is a flaw in your philosophical trap of reasoning.

I think that what really messes with people's ability to not call it all bullshki is the way that an all power and omnipresent being (and all knowing, don't forget that) couldn't see the flaws inherant in the system.

We can not possibly become like the omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent creator.

Here is my version of my atheism: I have yet to see any evidence that convinces me any gods exist at all and quite a bit that convinces me the anthropomorphic all - loving, all - knowing, omnipresent god of the Abrahamic religions does not.

Here, you see, Principal Caird makes the transition which Kant did not make: he converts the omnipresence of consciousness in general as a condition of «truth» being anywhere possible, into an omnipresent universal consciousness, which he identifies with God in his concreteness.

If we do not see an omnipresent God in the effect (the current world), how can we hope to see him in the cause?

Where else could we be, if not with the omnipresent God?

If I accept the idea that God is Omniscient, Omnipotent and Omnipresent, shouldn't I then accept the idea He could create the world and the universe and all that is in it with athought?

But, on the other hand, if angels do not take up space, then the question is this: «Are angels then also omnipresent?»

I am not just thinking of the images of divine beings that are omnipresent, but the philosophic acceptance of spiritual knowledge.

It should not surprise us, since God is, according to our doctrines, omnipresent, that some men throughout history might gain some understanding about him.

In Creative Synthesis and Philosophical Method Charles Hartshorne writes: God «Can not absolutely conceal himself from any creature, for the omnipresent can never be more than relatively inaccessible» (CSPM 156, italics added.

Believing there is no God means the suffering I've seen in my family, and indeed all the suffering in the world, isn't caused by an omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent force that isn't bothered to help or is just testing us, but rather something we all may be able to help others with in the future.

The only way I square ALL of these things is believing that God (omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent) knows that all these event will happen, but not that He caused them.

Before his judgment seat they expect to be required to give account not for their treatment of the limited number of friends and neighbors of the finite Jesus, but of all the sick, imprisoned, hungry, thirsty men of the world — the neighbors, brothers and companions of an omnipresent being.