Sentences with phrase «n't pay that kind of money»

Content is key, yes, but you don't pay that kind of money and get into bed with a hated nemesis for just any content.

He'll cost around # 50 million, maybe more, and you don't pay that kind of money, and then rarely start the player.

Fans don't pay that kind of money to watch their team lose, and Henning knows it.

Arsenal are notorious for not paying that kind of money in the transfer window, especially not for players who haven't even managed to establish themselves as a regular at the highest stages of European football.

We aren't paying him that kind of money.

We just can not pay that kind of money, and, stay financially solvent.

The vast majority of breeders do not pay this kind of money.

I'm not paying that kind of money.

Not exact matches

It's the same kind of resentment that builds up when you've borrowed money from someone and you know that you can't pay it back.

If you and I make the exact same amount of money, we live in the exact same value of house, we have the same kind of car, our kids go to the same kind of schools, shouldn't we pay the same federal income tax?

What kind of incentive do you give someone who drinks, smokes, eats excessive fatty foods, doesn't exercise and says they can live the way they want and they want government funded (taxpayer money) to pay for their healthcare.

Jack's mother and his wife no doubt found solace in the kind words and in the money collected from the Iowa State community — «to express in a material way the sympathy of the college» — $ 2,259, that covered funeral expenses, paid off Anna's mortgage and provided both Anna and Cora Mae with a little nest egg.

Wallace has yet to earn that kind of pay day, and he might not ever earn that kind of money unless Dan Synder has a chance to sign him in free agency.

Not too big a worry of course we aren't gonna pay the kind of money asked for him anyway.

I just don't see the point on paying Keenum that kind of money and still draft Mayfield.....

You don't get it do you?I'm not even talking about the money.But I agree with you that for the kind of money that will be spent on Mbappe it's a higher gamble.Henry was bought to be a starter and as the main man for Arsenal.He was so young by then and the pressure on him was massive.Looking at the impact he's had in our club if Henry had failed who would imagine what Arsene would have done.To me he's our best player ever.Arsene put a lot of trust in him to be honest but the gamble paid off.However, I think he had a point to prove to world and to Juve hence he succeeded.The same as is with Mbappe with even a higher transfer fee and more expectation.If he's ever signed for that amount he's coming here to be the main man whowill send us into glory.Forget Ozchez for all eyes will be on him.

# 60M for Aubameyang seems a bit high... this could have easily been paid for if the board had sanctioned the Sanchez to city summer transfer so now I don't know where we will get that kind of money from.

So i believe a # 30/35 million would certainly give Dortmund something to think about (Plus I don't think any arsenal fan would mind paying that kind of money for a player of that quality).

As a 4th place team to secure good players who are above our standarts, we need to pay them the money they demant, otherswise they do nt have any reasons to remain in a club who do not show any kind of ambition or signs that they can could actually win somethng.

Kondogbia seems to be a nice player, though I'm not sure if he has the technical quality to beat out Coquelin immediately — and if you're paying that kind of money, you need him to start immediately.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

And I can't see how the Celtics pay a 6th man the kind of money Rozier is going to be offered.

Asked which clubs around the world could pay the kind of money United have invested in Sanchez, Conte added: «I don't know, but, for sure, United.

Now I don't know about you, but I can not see AW paying an attacking midfielder that kind of money, when we already have a gaggle of players in his position, none of whom are earning anything remotely like that.

As long as you smile back and hand him any kind of toy that you haven't paid money for at the kids store (I'm talking about small boxes, lip gloss, tissues but never his rattles and teddy bears), he is satisfied!

6 months after we were in the relationship he got a job in a supermarket as security guard, but here in my country that does nt really makes a lot, its like almost $ 300 dollars per month, i make 600 up to 800 per month, by taking calls in a call center, he never went to college he only graduated highschool, im in law school right now... from the very beginning since i knew he did nt have a job or was making money he could spend, if i had money i would invite him out to dinner, or to the movies or whatever and it was me paying for it which i did nt mind, he is not the kind of men who buys flower, or invite u to the movies, or out, he rather visit me at home and watch a movie in netflix and thats it, we have made plans to go out, but none of them works out, something always happen, and the day it may happen, i say no, just because i think i will have to pay for the date..

use disposable plastic pastry bags instead of the paper kind, if you do nt mind paying the money for them.

But you don't want the kind of garage sale where you sit in your front yard for two days and come away with only enough money to pay the pizza delivery man.

I actually have never spent «real» money on cloth diapers — so far I've only spent money that I made from writing, which isn't part of our budget, and since I usually get paid in Paypal and then buy stuff online with it, it kind of feels like play money to me.

All it (NNPC) does is allow a group of people, who themselves don't have any kind of operating background to pay $ 50m for access to the crude oil in blocs valued at over $ 2bn and they just take the crude oil, ship it out and don't return the money and there is no trace of where the money has gone.

The problem isn't «corruption with a capital C or corruption in inverted commas», says Bacon, whose main contribution while in Tanzania was to help prepare a report on precisely this problem, «but, for example, sometimes officials expect to be paid to come to a meeting... If you're not careful, before you know it a good deal of the money earmarked for front - end agriculture goes into administrative costs of one kind or another.»

«You don't turn round 15 years down the line to pay this kind of money to these people,» the lawmaker told Accra - based Citi FM's Richard Dela Sky.

Pre-Campaign Community Service / Activism: Worked extensively with Family of Woodstock, Rip Van Winkle Council of Boy Scouts of America, establishing Ulster County Habitat for Humanity, Ralph Darmstadt Homeless Shelter, Ulster County Board of Health and Ulster County Human Rights Commission, Caring Hands Soup Kitchen Board Member, Midtown Rising Board Member, Teacher at Woodbourne Prison, part of Rising Hope Program Platform At a Glance Economy: Supports farming subsidies, job creation through infrastructure investments in rural broadband and sustainable technology, in favor of strong unions Healthcare: Medicare for All Women's Rights: Pro-choice, supports fully funding Planned Parenthood, birth control to be paid for employer, supports equal pay for equal work Racial Justice: Will work to prevent discrimination of all kind Immigration: Supports comprehensive immigration reform that includes path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants Foreign Policy: Supports increased pressure on North Korea but not military intervention Environment: Supports measures to stall climate change and create green jobs LGBTQ: Supports anti-discrimination of all people Gun Control: Will not take NRA money, supports common sense gun control and against Faso's vote to allow the mentally disabled to obtain firearms

You can pay loads of money for miracle products, but if you're eating poorly, not getting enough sleep, and letting your stress level go unchecked, your dark circles are going nowhere, no matter what kind of seaweed or snail extract you put on your face.

I want to read about real fashion, the kind everyone can and does wear, not the runway model stuff that no one in their right mind would pay that kind of money on.

Unless you have an exceptionally well paying job you probably are not able to spend the money on this kind of a watch.

Not happy with the expensive product producing this kind of reaction and not happy with the money I now have to pay to fix my skNot happy with the expensive product producing this kind of reaction and not happy with the money I now have to pay to fix my sknot happy with the money I now have to pay to fix my skin.

To the maximum extent permitted by law, Venntro Media Group excludes liability for any loss or damage of any kind howsoever arising, including without limitation any direct, indirect, punitive or consequential loss whether or not such arises out of any problem you notify to Venntro Media Group and Venntro Media Group shall have no liability to pay any money by way of compensation, including without limitation all liability in relation to:

Paul's divorced mother, Abigail Harris Getty (Michelle Williams), is frantic when she receives the call from her son's kidnappers but doesn't have that kind of money, so she hopes that her wealthy father - in - law, painting - collecting oil baron J. Paul Getty (Christopher Plummer), would without question pay the kidnappers to have his grandson set free.

If you like Japanese hot hatches but aren't willing to pay that kind of money for a limited - edition Yaris GRMN, the 2018 Suzuki Swift Sport may be a more attractive proposition.

I did find one that was so horrible I thought it would be fun to read, but I refuse to pay that kind of money for it because I'm not going to reward bad writing.

«Paid Reviews — We do not permit reviews or votes on the helpfulness of reviews that are posted in exchange for compensation of any kind, including payment (whether in the form of money or gift certificates), bonus content, entry to a contest or sweepstakes, discounts on future purchases, extra product, or other gifts.

Seems kind of misleading, especially when people will sign up and then pay money for borrow credits in order to borrow a book that can't be borrowed in the first place.

«This product is not worth the money I paid for it» is perfectly cromulent, and in reviews of every other kind of consumer product, it is understood to be so.

I certainly didn't have that kind of money after paying for editing and cover design either.

And I don't see anybody else rushing to write a different iPhone app that can handle this kind of DRM, even though I know a lot of people who would pay money for it.

It's possible, given the kind of property they pay real money for) I wouldn't go cold calling.

These allow you to put money into various kinds of investments (savings account, bonds, stocks, ETFs, mutual funds) and you don't pay any tax on the capital gains, dividends or interest.

Not sure what kind of lawyer to get and we do nt have money to pay for one.

When you have investments that you can otherwise use to pay off your debt, it's kind of like borrowing to invest, even if you didn't borrow the money to make the investments specifically.