Sentences with phrase «n't physical things»

Share prices aren't physical things, they're monetary concepts.

It is not a physical thing it is that which is not visible and comes through faith.

Hence, He is not a physical thing that can be poked and prodded via the scientific method like some kind of lab rat.

From Abraham to Jesus we see awareness of the hope in a promise (not a physical thing) that was echoed in the earliest forms of worship.

Logan: Time isn't something that is real, in the sense that its not a physical thing.

Competiton either exists or it doesn't; it's a concept, not a physical thing, like the various kinds of snow as described via the Inuit language denoting various uses of same.

Not exact matches

«This book talks a lot about paradox of our world of hyper digital convenience that doesn't necessarily translate to a seemingly logical replacement of physical things.

The most important thing to remember about the 70-20-10 principle is that it is a rule of thumb, not a physical law.

Fun activities like this not only improve our physical health, but they also keep things exciting and light during a particularly busy time.

While VR headsets may not be realistic for everyone, creating consistent scorecards to judge candidates can also prevent interviewers from putting too much weight on things like physical appearance or shared interests.

This Cyber Monday, one thing that will be heavily discounted isn't a physical product.

«Important thing is, customers do not have to visit physical branches, then we can smoothly reduce branches,» said an MUFG official on condition of anonymity.

Second, it leads you to question excuses you give yourself for not doing things, physical or otherwise.

«It is not by muscle, speed, or physical dexterity that great things are achieved, but by reflection, force of character, and judgment.»

More often than not, the solution most inside sales reps are selling — whether a physical product, tool, or service — has a primary purpose of helping customers to do one (or more) of two things:

Often, we lose sleep over things we can't control, get the sweaty palms before giving a speech, experience dry mouth when waiting for an answer to close the deal, or any other physical symptoms that indicate anxiety may be present.

But Apple and other Big Tech corporations like Google and Amazon — along with much of Big Pharma and even Starbucks — have avoided paying hundreds of billions of dollars in taxes on their worldwide earnings because they don't mainly sell physical things like cars or refrigerators or television sets that they make here and ship abroad.

If premium content and courses aren't your thing, maybe you could sell physical products.

«You're using fundamental physics to measure things and you're doing it in a way that is so sensitive that you don't need to actually have physical contact,» Lazaridis said.

I see atheists doing exactly the same thing, saying «we just don't know» as a justification for things that contradict physical laws and reason.

No, atheists can look at those things, and not say they came about randomly, but instead following a series of physical laws that allowed them to occur naturally.

God says, «You can not reduce me to physical things that can be experienced with your senses.

Physical proof isn't always necessary to prove things.

Awareness is not tethered to the physical but relationship with the physical There is no such thing as non existence physically or conceptually Agency of time and space must be outside our subset of existence and predate singularity Our known world is configured to be appear concentric Probability of intelligent life in only 14 billion years is one out of ten to the power of 127 assuming one universe.

You simply can't or won't face the fact that all evidence points to the facts that your conscious self is solely the product of your physical existence, that you are limited and temporary, and that there are no such things as gods, souls, heavens, hells, etc..

Everyone is aware that without computers, silicon, copper, plastic, fossil fuel for energy production, and many other humbly tangible physical things, the net could not be constituted nor even exist.

After all, aren't there more important things than death, physical harm, or loss of property?

It turns out that things are not more coarse or crude or unformed as one goes down into the foundations of the physical world but more subtle, sophisticated, and intricate the deeper one goes.

Not only do the physical things in the universe «obey» the laws of nature, the universe itself obeys them!

It is possible to believe in Jesus for eternal life (and of course, receive eternal life as a result), but still not be «saved» from many of the temporal and physical consequences of sin, or from sickness, or from enemies, or from many of the other negative things that can happen in life.

The physical laws themselves as grasped by us, e.g. Newton's Laws of Motion, are not material things, but intelligent and useful descriptions of what we have observed of the physical world.

Not only do the physical things in the universe «obey» the laws of science, the universe itself obeys them!

«Male and female he created them» is not merely a statement from Scripture but a reflection on the physical and spiritual reality of things, and in the modern era we are coming to understand just how very interesting it is that we are male and female, how different and complementary we are, howsignificant this might be, and how much we need to study and reflect on it.

I do not think that the answer is in the negative and that the thing to do is to give up the search for transcendence as a myth and surrender oneself to some present and quite physical experiences.

It is not by making themselves more material, relying solely on physical contacts, but by making themselves more spiritual in the embrace of God that things draw closer to each other and, following their invincible natural bent, end by becoming, all of them together, one.

What ties together Shenk's different arguments is what I call the divine inversion — the many ways in which God acts contrary not merely to physical nature, but to what humans take to be the natural order of things in the social and political world.

Things which are spiritual CAN NOT be discerned by things which are phyThings which are spiritual CAN NOT be discerned by things which are phythings which are physical.

It would not take them long to understand at least the elementary principles of those things which they affect to despise, and even to have some clue to the rudiments might give them an inkling into the enormous skill, patience and ingenuity which lie behind the practical application of physical science.

Evidence for spiritual things must come from spiritual sources, experiences, and methods, not from physical ones.

In ST1.75.6 Thomas explains that the intellect is not subject to contraries, as are physical things: a stone, for instance, becomes cold if warmth is driven away, warm if cold is driven away.

I am pretty sure you do not «see» the physical blood of Jesus or have seen the blood do magical things... therefor I am forced to challenge your declaration that you «see».

Which is another reason why we can share how we feel and why; but can't be impute motives or be dogmatic except for the most obvious predatory acts like murder, rape, physical assault — those things that have been criminalized by enforceable laws, laws that have the support of an overwhelming public consensus.

Someone posted that you become dust; well that physical, we're talking about spiritual things here and you can not mix the two.

Not to mention the reports of some having seen things that could only be seen by a «soul floating up out of the body»... such as near - death victims identifying items on hospital rooftops where their physical bodies had never been...

That is, the form is received in matter as it is in any physical change, but also the form is received without matter, that is, it is possessed in disassociation from the sentient's material constitution.3 In virtue of this second mode of reception, the sensible thing is something more than an agent; it becomes an object for an experiencing subject — though this is not, of course, how Aristotle expressed it.

This world doesn't seem to allow for thinking or believing or even experiencing things outside of the physical or metaphysical box.

Read the words «created in God's image» — now we can ascertain this is likely not a literal physical image thing (God is a Spirit)-- then what image is it?

Here are three typical answers: «He is as much a necessity to my spiritual existence as the elements of pure air are to my physical system»; «If I were convinced that there is no God, I fear a sense of loneliness would become intolerable»; «As for any repose, or ability to face life and death with composure, any incentive to be perfect in things hidden from outsiders, any exhilaration in living and trying to do my best — I can not conceive it without the idea of God.»

What I have particularly in mind is that while there is much talk about taking Jesus as a key to the interpretation of human nature, as it is often phrased, or to the meaning of human life, or to the point of man's existential situation, there is a lamentable tendency to stop there and not to go on to talk about «the world» — by which Miss Emmet meant, I assume, the totality of things including physical nature; in other words the cosmos in its basic structure and its chief dynamic energy.

You don't lift weights with your mind, or take a shower with your mind only, you use your body to do physical things.