Not exact matches
Oh, so in the vast known Universe, which reaches out for 15 BILLION light years in all directions, with over 100 BILLION galaxies, containing an average of 100 BILLION
stars each, with most of those
stars now thought to have multiple
planets orbiting
around them, you can't imagine that there would be at least ONE little
planet SOMEWHERE with the right conditions for life without divine intervention?
In the sixteenth century, Nicolaus Copernicus initiated the novel idea in astronomy that the
planets and the sun and the
stars do
not revolve
around the Earth but that the
planets, including our own, revolve
around the sun.
In a few thousand years of recorded history, we went from dwelling in caves and mud huts and tee - pees,
not understanding the natural world
around us, or the broader universe, to being able to travel through space, using reason to ferret out the hidden secrets of how the world works, from physics to chemistry to biology, we worked out the tools and rules underpinning it all, mathematics, and now we can see objects that are almost impossibly small, the very tiniest building blocks of matter, (or at least we can examine them, even if you can't «see» them because you're using something other than your eyes and photons to view them) to the very farthest objects, the
planets circling other, distant
stars, that are in their own way, too small to see from here, like the atoms and parts of atoms themselves, detected indirectly, but indisputably THERE.
Rovelli points out that humans have always observed that the
stars, the moon, the
planets, etc, continually revolve
around us, so it should follow that «below us» is nothing; in other words, the sky is
not just over our head, it's also under our feet.
Captured by Kepler's digital sensors, transformed into bytes of data, and downloaded to computers at NASA's Ames Research Center near San Francisco, the processed starlight slowly revealed a remarkable story: A
planet not much bigger than Earth was whipping
around its native
star at a blistering pace, completing an orbit — its version of a «year» — in just over 20 hours.
The lead author of the new study, Guillem Anglada [1], from the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC), Granada, Spain, explains the significance of this find: «The dust
around Proxima is important because, following the discovery of the terrestrial
planet Proxima b, it's the first indication of the presence of an elaborate planetary system, and
not just a single
planet,
around the
star closest to our Sun.»
The answers will
not only help explain how Earth became an ideal place for incubating life; they will also tell a lot about the odds of finding similar habitable
planets around other
stars.
But that doesn't stop him fantasising about easier ways: «Wish I had a friend on a
planet around a runaway
star in the halo, sending me back a photo.»
«Ours isn't the only group looking for
planets around young
stars, and my hope is that astronomers can find enough of them to shed light on some of the nagging questions about
planet formation,» Johns - Krull said.
«There are plenty of reasons to be optimistic that we will find hints of extraterrestrial life within the next few decades, just maybe
not on an Earth - like
planet around a Sun - like
star.»
Looking ahead, NASA has no plans for a next - generation mission to study Earth - like
planets around other
stars, the most exciting astronomical discovery of the past decade if
not the past half - century.
ne = the number of habitable
planets around each
star In days gone by, scientists would speak solemnly about our solar system's «habitable zone» — a theoretical region extending from Venus to Mars, but perhaps
not encompassing either, where a
planet would be the right temperature to have liquid water on its surface.
If confirmed by other researchers, the
planet would
not just be an astronomical novelty; Its detection, reported on the e-print server at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (see astro - ph / 9908038), would also be a triumph for a new and potentially powerful technique for finding
planets around other
stars.
Not necessarily, says Harvard astrophysicist Matt Holman, who has used a computer to simulate how a
planet around a binary
star would behave over millions of orbits.
Early on, I always had to say to the class, «It's probably true that
planets around other
stars are out there, but we really don't know.»
[6] This detection rate of 3
planets in a sample of 88
stars in Messier 67 is close to the average frequency of
planets around stars that are
not members of clusters.
«These new results show that
planets in open
star clusters are about as common as they are
around isolated
stars — but they are
not easy to detect,» adds Luca Pasquini (ESO, Garching, Germany), co-author of the new paper [6].
Maybe F [hot, yellow - white]
stars — there are probably some
planets around them, too, but I'm
not sure if you want to live there.
Unfortunately, Kepler can
not provide that kind of detail on the more than 2,300 likely
planets it has discovered
around other
stars.
But it wasn't until the early 1990s that we actually saw good evidence of
planets around other
stars.
The first
planets outside the solar system were discovered 25 years ago —
not around a normal
star like our Sun, but instead orbiting a tiny, super-dense «neutron
star».
One controversial theory posits that giant
planets might
not need rocky cores if they form directly from unstable whorls of gas in the nebula
around a young
star.
«If [the moon is] real, maybe it shouldn't be terribly surprising that we saw it, since it's large enough to be detected as a
planet in its own right, at least
around some
stars.
The same approach was used by the team to study the SDSS 1557 system as any
planets within it can
not yet be detected directly but the debris is spread in a large belt
around the double
stars, which is a much larger target for analysis.
«TPF will look at each of the nearest few hundred
stars for a few hours, and we'll know for sure whether or
not there's an Earth - like
planet around it,» says jpl scientist and senior project overseer Charles Beichman.
The one thing they turn out to have in common — and this is still
not completely appreciated — is that in solar systems with multiple
planets, these multiple
planets fill all the gravitationally stable niches
around the
star.
In fact, last week, astronomers found a rocky
planet not much bigger than Earth whose orbit
around its relatively young
star is only 3 % of the distance from Earth to the sun (ScienceNOW, 21 April).
«The fact that you can form
planets around a
star that has so little of this material is a very surprising and unusual thing,» says Christopher Johns - Krull, an astronomer at Rice University in Houston, Texas, who was
not involved in the new work.
«This solidifies our view that rocky
planets are everywhere, ubiquitous,
around all kinds of
stars,» says astrophysicist Nikku Madhusudhan of the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom, who was
not involved in the project.
Ehrenreich and his team think that such a huge cloud of gas can exist
around this
planet because the cloud is
not rapidly heated and swept away by the radiation pressure from the relatively cool red dwarf
star.
Although it probably won't happen here, the same process might make Earth - like
planets around other
stars uninhabitable.
Planets are found
around nearly every
star, but astronomers still do
not fully understand how — and under what conditions — they form.
For instance, the IAU states that it is
not allowed to propose the same name for a host
star and a
planet around it, yet one entry for the planetary system of Tau Boötis suggests calling both the
star and its
planet «Alfraganus.»
He pointed out that there are many close - orbiting
planets around middle - aged
stars that are in stable orbits, but his team doesn't know how quickly this young
planet is going to lose its mass and «whether it will lose too much to survive.»
You said, it was
not assumed that
planets are being formed
around such a young
star as HL Tau.
Planet «b»
around star Upsilon Andromedae A has a mysterious hot spot that is
not located near the point closest to the host
star, as was expected (more).
Found via radial velocity variations, the
planet's true mass could
not be known with knowing whether its orbit
around Star B is being viewed edge - on, face - on, or somewhere in between.
«While the current state of the technique can
not detect Earths
around stars like the Sun, with Keck Observatory it should soon be possible to study the atmospheres of the so - called «super-Earth»
planets being discovered
around nearby low mass
stars, many of which do
not transit,» Blake said.
Primarily, the K2 Mission is searching for different
planets around different
stars, determining whether or
not these exoplanets could be habitable.
However, it wasn't expected that so many large
planets are growing
around such a young
star at the age of 1 million years in a «standard model» that was long accepted by astronomers.
Scientists believe that by looking at Mercury, they will learn
not only about
planets in our solar system, but also about the increasing number of rocky
planets being found
around other
stars.
On March 25, 2015, a team of astronomers using the Hubble Space Telescope revealed observations which indicate via the transit method that Alpha Centauri B may have a second
planet «c» in a hot inner orbit, just outside
planet candidate «b.» After observing Alpha Centauri B in 2013 and 2014 for a total of 40 hours, the team failed to detect any transits involving
planet b (previously detected using the radial velocity variations method and recently determined
not to be observed edge - on in a transit orbit
around Star B).
Although techniques exist to find
planets around the closest
stars, they have
not been a focus of a systematic search.
«If there is water in Kuiper belt - like objects
around other
stars, as there now appears to be, then when rocky
planets form they need
not contain life's ingredients,» said Siyi Xu, the study's lead author, a postdoctoral scholar at the European Southern Observatory in Germany who earned her doctorate at UCLA.
Based on 86 radial velocity observations obtained with the HARPS -
N spectrograph on the Telescopio Nazionale Galileo and 32 archival Keck / HIRES observations, we present a prec... ▽ More Kepler - 93b is a 1.478 + / - 0.019 Earth radius
planet with a 4.7 day period
around a bright (V = 10.2), astroseismically - characterized host
star with a mass of 0.911 + / -0.033 solar masses and a radius of 0.919 + / -0.011 solar radii.
But the resemblances stop there: A
star - circling «year» on either
planet wouldn't be much longer than one of our days, and the surface temperatures probably hover
around 2,000 ° C.
We can rule out gas giants at Barnard's
Star thanks to continuing Doppler monitoring, but we can't yet rule out small rocky
planets of the kind we are now turning up
around other M - dwarfs in data from the Kepler mission.
According to a study published Wednesday in the journal Nature, a team of scientists has, for the first time ever,
not only directly observed a
planet being formed, but also captured a photograph of the process taking place
around a
star 450 light - years from Earth.
This discovery was a surprise to the astronomical community, which had expected
planets around «normal»
stars and
not around ultra-dense stellar remnants.
Assuming that the spectroscopic companion B does
not preclude a stable inner planetary orbit, the distance from
Star A where an Earth - type
planet would be «comfortable» with liquid water is centered
around only 0.457 AU — between the orbital distances of Mercury and Venus in the Solar System.