Sentences with phrase «n't proper understanding»

Before AITSL, there wasn't a proper understanding of what an expert teacher looks like.

He also said that there isn't proper understanding for the state that the C of E is in now.

So although this theory is compelling and seems to fit the context of Matthew 12:31 - 32, the fact that it is impossible to live out in real life indicates that it is not the proper understanding.

Not exact matches

The Mayor was involved in some financial irregularities that may (I honestly don't know) just be a matter of either poor judgment or poor understanding of proper procedures.

But good traders need to take a proper approach to investing and have a solid understanding of the game, not to mention a healthy respect for markets, as much as they need an ap that offers clues on what the pulse of market sentiment will be in the short - term future.

Or they don't have the proper understanding of what has happened, or how it affects them.

I've always shied away from proper keyword research in the past as I didn't understand it.

The importance of these insights for a proper understanding of central banks» devices for monetary control becomes instantly apparent once one realizes that, by regulating the actual quantity of its outstanding notes and deposit balances, together with the terms upon which it is willing to make more of the last available on credit to private sector financial firms, a central bank is able to influence, not just the quantity of circulating paper money, but the quantity of money substitutes created by the private sector.

There's nothing worse than getting involved in something without proper examination or understanding and not being successful as a result.

Regardless of this, Bruce Fenton proceeded to point out that these organizations are not only inefficient when dealing with bitcoin, but that they also do not have a proper understanding of it, due to the ignorance towards the technology that they have reportedly showcased.

This does not mean we should run from desire, rather we must teach a proper understanding of it.

(Jefferson did not understand proper hermeneutics as evidenced by his re-written Bible, sans the miraculous)

So if these sorts of texts guide our understanding of the tenth plague, we must not look to the death and destruction of the firstborn sons of Egypt as a proper indication of God's activity in this event, but rather, we must look to the blood of the lamb.

Here, I think, John Paul II's joining of abortion with the death penalty in Evangelium Vitae is exactly right: A culture that can not bring itself to rescind its license of murder in the womb is unlikely to understand the proper ways in which justice should be done.

I just don't think that we have the proper perspective to understand the full consequences of our actions; that is why we must trust God on so many issues of morality even when we don't understand.

The Lordship controvery, the lack of understanding of the true Gospel and myriad other theological issues, along with a sin busting vs. a grace enhancing view of sanctification (not toleration of sin but a proper motivation for serving Christ).

The above outlined distinctions are not intended merely as a technical exercise but as an attempt better to understand and foster the proper use of the marriage act.

Believe it or not, while most people view death as a curse and a punishment from God, a proper understanding of death allows us to see it as a blessing and an act of kindness from God.

Therefore it was also natural that the kerygma as we find it in the New Testament should not only be couched in biblical terms but also that these terms require for their proper understanding an awareness of the whole Old Testament witness and record.

Though revelation stands at the center and the proper study for the Jew is not simply man, but man confronted by God, we encounter the image of God when we encounter the Arnoldian best that has been thought and said, and we understand ourselves and others better when we confront the voice of the other.

A proper understanding of the context reveals that pastors can not use this verse to encourage greater generosity in tithing, but instead, the pastor should give sacrificially from his own income to help the poor and needy in the church, as well as those who partner with him in the ministry.

And when Jesus advised his hearers, in Luke 17:31, on their proper behavior when the end should break in («On that day, let him who is on the housetop, with his goods in the house, not come down to take them away; and likewise let him who is in the field not turn back»), both he and they appeared to understand that the advice was for them.

If this avoidance of personal pronouns is found to be clumsy or fails to give a proper sense of God as a being who is related to us in a personal way, then certainly one is free to speak of God both as male and as female so long as these usages are understood to be metaphorical and not to be claiming gender for God, and so long as the male and female references are relatively balanced.

Calvinists believe that their understanding of the biblical text is the only proper understanding, and if people disagree, it is because they don't want to submit to God's revelation of Himself in Scripture.

The question that Wyschogrod presses time and again is whether on this particular point the proper Jewish understanding is not the proper Christian understanding as well.

To sum up, Leclerc argues against Whitehead, as he understands him, that a complex physical organism exercises an agency proper to itself which is not simply reducible to the agency of its constituent actual entities.

The proper role for the study of the diachronic dimensions of the text lies not in fragmenting or in replacing the synchronic level, but in using a recovery of a depth dimension for increasing an understanding of the theological substance that constitutes the biblical narrative itself.

So a proper understanding of punc eq and allopatric specation shows that «gaps» supposedly flow right out of their biological model of evolution — not merely geology.

For the remainder, such as most of the new independent evangelical churches, their distaste for liberation theology and their understanding of the church's proper role in the public arena derive not from «an ideology of the national security state» but from sincerely held beliefs about theology, politics, and economics.

In Love» s Knowledge and elsewhere Nussbaum uses the fiction of Proust, Henry James, Dickens, and others to buttress her claim that the emotions are not necessarily opposed to reason» that, in fact, a truly rational person will experience certain emotions as the consequence of proper understanding.

I'm not sure what exactly you're saying regarding the waffle, but, yes, all of scripture is in fact «cultural» — it is placed first and foremost within the cultural context of the readers (the original, intended recipients) and any proper understanding of it and interpretation of it in our culture today must first understand how it would have been received and interpreted by those it was written to.

It is that interreligious polemics, properly understood, can not use a community - specific self - guaranteeing authority - source as a proper tool of debate.

As to your claim about the keys being used to determine moral right and wrong, I don't see that anywhere in Matthew 16 or Isaiah 22, and although the Jewish people may have understood this as referring to such judgments, they understood then (and even today) that moral judgments are made by God alone and through a proper understanding of what God has said in Scripture.

To get a proper and adequate understanding of human freedom, one has to see man in the total context of evolution, for freedom did not start with man; it had its evolutionary roots at the infrahuman level.

Jeremy — I do believe that you are correct in observing that most Christian churches do not have the proper understanding of God's character.

It is not to be denied that there are many contentions about proper methods of instruction, about the possibility of understanding the Bible without the use of Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek; and about its ultimate meanings.

The rich man did not understand the proper order of things — seek ye first the kingdom of heaven and all other things you need will be given to you.

If the text wrestles with serious questions and if the reader does also, then the reader's own questions are not extraneous intrusions upon a «pure understanding» of the text but vitally involved in a proper understanding of the text.

Jesus understood the proper roles of government (force) and charity (altruism), that's why he wasn't a political revolutionary.

The absurd is not one of the factors which can be discriminated within the proper compass of the understanding: it is not identical with the improbable, the unexpected, the unforeseen.

Rom 1:28 And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, Rom 1:29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, Rom 1:30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, Rom 1:31 without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; Rom 1:32 and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them.

28 And just as they did not see fit [u] to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, 30 slanderers, [v] haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; 32 and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them.

Rom 1:28 And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, Rom 1:29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, Rom 1:30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, Rom 1:31 without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; Rom 1:32 and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty

The system of checks and balances they built in the Constitution was formed not only by the recognition that good citizens may differ over the proper course of action, but also, at least in part, by the Biblical understanding of humans as fallible and prone to wrong - doing, and therefore frequently in need of some healthy opposition from their fellows.

Immediate sensation and immediate cognition can not deceive, This is important for the understanding of doubt, and for the assignment to belief of its proper place through a comparison with doubt.

But I believe that his hermeneutical reflections are not adequate to his own understanding of a proper biblical theology.

The main entry in our Cutting Edge column shows how this relationship, contrary to the apparent monism not to say fideism of Professor Ayala the 2010Templeton Prize winner, is related to a proper understanding of the relationship between science and the spiritual.

That conflict is a proof that faith has not yet discovered the proper terms in which to express itself, it has not realized that it can not be logically proven, it has not clearly understood that its basis and its object are identical, it has not clearly apprehended the transcendental and hidden character of the divine activity, and by its failure to perceive its own «Nevertheless» it has tried to project God and his acts into the sphere of objective reality.

I must refrain from saying more about it until we arrive again at a proper understanding of what the Mass is and what it is for... I am not speaking of the old foundations which were established for the children of the nobility... I am speaking of the new foundations...» There were too many, and as things were at these smaller places their incumbents all got reduced to «anthem singers, organ wheezers and reciters of decadent, indifferent Masses».

Rom 1:28 And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, Rom 1:29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, Rom 1:30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, Rom 1:31 without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; Rom 1:32 and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death.