Sentences with phrase «n't prove his point»

The fact some projects are not using blockchain solutions to manage their organisations doesn't prove any point besides that the space is new and maturing.

If I can't prove my point using scripture from the Bible i so love and cherish, how can I prove my point?

You won't prove your point worthily with through yet another ad hominem stake in the ground.

You won't prove your point worthily with a cautious but firm ad hominem stake in the ground.

The verse you use did NOT prove your point - rather, it showed that you quote scripture without understanding what it is you are quoting...

Also, atheism does use faith, you have faith that there is no god (s), you can't prove your point more than religious people can prove theirs, so there is no facts, no proof either way.

There is no way you could even prove or not prove this point and that's not being unloving.

Since the idiots like Monarda and its alter egos can't prove their points, the conclusion is that they're without proof; therefore the other side wins.

Such articles don't prove any point.

So to me that doesn't prove the point.

If anything, given that the efforts overhaul curriculum have begun just a decade ago, Ferguson and his colleagues can't prove their point in any empirical manner.

I'd advise you to not be fooled, but seems it might be a bit too late... Edit: Unfortunately for you both, it doesn't prove his point at all.

It just goes to show you that when the Green Movement can't prove their point they will stoop to an dishonest approach to get what they want the Green to finance their campaign of untruths and lies behind what will probably turn out to be the biggest lie ever perpetrated on the World.

You don't prove your point by finding more data that agrees with you, you prove your point by looking hard for data that does * not * agree with you, and not finding it.

Picking a single poll, data set of perspective out of context and without relevance does not prove a point, but merely raises it.

The purpose of treatment is to help the patient, not prove a point.

I might add that even if you relent on your commission percent and are yet so sure of your ability that you will sell and close the property quickly, then why not prove your point?

Not exact matches

Another victory for @realDonaldTrump for not attending and proving his point once again.

He's not doing it because he needs a job, but because he wants to prove a point,» Ackman says.

The Wall Street Journal won't take your calls, but trade publications, local papers, radio stations, and moderately influential bloggers may, especially when you have something different to say and a story that proves your point.

But if the nation reaches a point where Mike Pence is whispering about unborn babies in Donald Trump's ear — or about how Mulan proves that women shouldn't serve in the military — it won't be such a laughing matter.

In front of a crowd of eager ears, the entrepreneur recounted this time in the company's history to prove a point: You don't know jack about your customers — until you meet them face - to - face.

Of course, with debt in 2016 rising by roughly 40 — 45 percentage points of GDP while nominal GDP grew by less than 8 percent, it isn't easy to explain how the real value of assets in China grew by roughly 40 — 45 percentage points of GDP, nor why it is proving so difficult to rein in credit growth without a sharp slowdown in GDP growth.

Pollster Frank Graves of Ekos Research points out that Jean Chrétien's 1993 win wasn't followed by any «post-election swoon,» while Paul Martin after 2004 and Stephen Harper after 2011 suffered declines which, far from being short - term slumps, proved irreversible.

Although these points may seem easy to prove if you're in dire straights, Leslie H. Tayne Esq. of Tayne Law Group, P.C. explains why that's not the case:

I based my growth expectations on what I think were conservative estimates of consumption growth and the growth in productive investment (with which the reported data is currently consistent, although do not prove my assumptions one way or the other), but I always pointed out that as long as credit growth accelerated, the growth in non-productive investment would remain high, in which case reported GDP would also remain high for much longer.

If you want my opinion (which we don't trade on and neither should you), my opinion is that this singularity will prove to be more than an inflection point.

My point being I don't think there's much to prove except I'm not senile, maybe.»

In these instances, I try to use the US dollar's performance against gold to prove the argument that the US dollar will not have to crash in the future to prove my point because it has already crashed!

'» Maier points out that we shouldn't have to prove women are needed on boards and looks forward to when women don't have to use research to prove their worth in the boardroom.

Second is that the conservative partisans can not hide their contempt for dislike for Trudeau — they still believe Harper's line «he is not ready» or he is a lightweight, so they attack things like this to try prove their point.

Moreover, since the rise of the Wildrose Party, PC throne speeches tended to propose policies driven by talking points — not the other way around as you might imagine — drafted mainly to cancel positions and strategies that had proved effective for the Wildrose Opposition.

Regardless, Hemel and Rozema seem to be proving Maynard's implicit point that traditionally «equitable» policies do not necessarily promote equality of income or wealth.

This proves an interesting point when correlated to the fact that many American venture capitalists (VCs) are serial entrepreneurs, while their Canadian counterparts generally come from financial, not entrepreneurial backgrounds.

And if you don't believe that, consider that the Fed's moneyless («Portfoli - O - Matic») transmission mechanism has already had one «stress test» — the one administered between late 2008 and 2014 — which it failed miserably, by proving incapable of transforming $ 3.5 trillion in fresh reserves into more than a few percentage points of NGDP growth, or far fewer than were required to restore that growth to its pre-crisis path.

With massive and increasing structural deficits; exploding debt in all sectors; hostile demographics; social and political fracturing and disintegration; grotesque wealth inequality; extraordinary global trade competition; a complete collapse of respect for vital government organizations such as the Justice Department and FBI, which the people now realize have gone rogue; an extremely complex and corrosive global geopolitical environment; the real prospect of war, potentially nuclear and worldwide; not to mention numerous additional factors, we can only point to few other times in history more dangerous to the people's financial welfare, and therefore more overall bullish for gold, one of the only financial sanctuaries proven to work in times of dislocation.

There is no point posting on here that evolutionary theory is unproven because every theory can not be completely proven.

NAZI's didn't pick on people who were gay (once again if you think you can prove this point, please point us in the direction of said evidence), they set out to rid the world of JEWS.

Please don't get one of my favorite comedians killed to prove some sort of point.

You can not use mythology to prove a point, you can only use facts and logical deductions therefrom.

You pointed to a dispute of how neandertahal DNA didn't get included in human DNA, But that article doesn't change the FACT that neanderthals existed, which proves the bible wrong.

It's just a shame that we haven't come to the point in society where it should be required that those who make decisions must meet certain, more highly regulated, fool proof, corruption resistant criteria proving their intellect and open mindedness as well as weeding out individuals with preconceived notions, racist, sexist or religiously or other discriminative views (even if they themselves don't believe they are discriminative in their beliefs... this happens more than many people realize) and overall ignorant minds.

If you don't think he killed people you are proving my point about Christians not reading the Bible.

I also don't think I need to point out to you that using only part of a definition fundamentally changes the word and definition itself, so to take only parts out to prove what atheism does do as «religious» is flawed and destroys your argument.

But his reason for doing so is to prove this very point, «MAN CAN NOT GOVERN THEMSELVES.

And whatever dirt you people spill on Israel doesn't matter a bit — it just proves my point.

If he would fulfill my need, and prove he exists, I would pay more attention to what other people claim he wants and does not want, but at this point, he seems as invisible and irrelevant as Santa Claus.

My point is I do nt think anyone really knows 100 % God is real or isnt real and you can't really «prove» anything.

Historical studies may point us towards the source of modernity's collapse, but they do not prove it.

your immature, irrational and absolute blind remarks toward atheism have been proved that there is no rational argument beyond this point, I suggest you read my post to the fullest and absorb it's meaning, and continue to act like a civilized being, your behavior is not acceptable in any rational debate, you are not making yourself look good.