Sentences with phrase «n't pushing a political agenda»

They aren't pushing a political agenda.»

Not exact matches

And we shouldn't be treating innocence as a political asset used to push the agenda of more sophisticated players.»
Cuomo in this morning's interview insisted he wasn't concerned with political insider debate over the ballot line and instead wanted to successfully push the women's agenda next year.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo in a news conference this morning did not mention the women's agenda as potential measures he'd like to push in the spring, but did note the Dream Act, public financing of political campaigns and changes to the teacher evaluation law were items he wished were in the budget.
Ofsted was not set up to push through education reforms against resistance from unions, nor was it established to push any particular party political agenda.
Surprisingly, however, political candidates from the program aren't just pushing its national education agenda, they're advancing local issues as well, according to a new study.
In an interview with Indiewire, the filmmaker was direct about the political implications: «You can get on your soapbox, you can push your political agenda or your religious agenda, against gay marriage, against racial equality, but you can't argue about these people in their home... Equality as a concept isn't something I think we ever achieve, it's something we make progress toward, and hope that we don't slip back and lose any of it.
When investigating these other ranking systems what comes to the forefront is not whether Utah school children are performing well, but rather a political agenda to push some specific program.
The DeVos interventions are not about improving public education; they are about pushing a political agenda that is rooted in ideological obsessions rather than an understanding of how to improve schools.
Their need to push their agenda, political and social, have stripped away good story telling and now the Emperor is naked and, well, he doesn't look nearly as good as he thinks he does.
And how much longer will it be before the public finally rejects the bureaucrat - science quacks and political / institutional / celebrity elites who continue to push the failed CO2 - based anthropogenic global warming (AGW) hypothesis, whose real political agenda is not science related whatsoever.
Some people (not all) in the Intelligence Community are pushing a political agenda, just as happened in the disastrous WMD fiasco (yes, I, and any knowledgeable person, knew the WMD stuff was fake before we went into Iraq).
Now I'm a practical person, and I know the vast majority of climate researchers aren't political ideologues who are trying to push an agenda.
Peddlers of this myth push the assumption that climate science can not take place independently of the influence of policy debates, accusing the climate science community and institutions like the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change of having a political agenda, conspiring to fabricate data, and hyping up the science for personal gain.
Everyone seems to have missed one of my main points: the scientists themselves aren't personally pushing a green agenda; rather they are caught in a green political machine (UNEP / UNFCCC) and the whole system has made it advantageous for the scientists to support it.
What I take from Paul Nurse's comments is that, apparently, the climate scientists thought they could do «science» AND be heavily involved in radical political agendas that directly benefited their enterprise, and while doing so, NOT expect to get some push back by the tax paying public (who, after all, are paying their salaries while also being the targets of the CAGW activists).
The bad news is that the Obama administration, the establishment media, and the political powers that be that have been pushing the global - warming frenzy for the past couple decades are not backing off from their destructive agenda.
If this isnt a political agenda, and saving the very earth itself is the goal, then why do nt we see more of a push on those who are already «enlightened» to live up to and be a shining example for the rest of us??? SO yeah, agenda seems much more likely then complete idiocy.
Now, it's not like Fox is some lone bad actor nefariously seeking to push an anti-climate change agenda — there are numerous interests that benefit from climate confusion, the richest and most powerful of whom also support climate - denying conservative political candidates and sponsor the think tanks that Fox draws much of its ideological substance from.
Well, Malthusianism is a specifically biological kind of reductionism, one that buttresses right - wing pessimism and policy conclusions, and one that not at all incidentally pushes social justice off the political agenda.
Anyone who quotes the IPCC as a credible source is just pushing a political agenda — it is certainly not science.
The global economic crisis has pushed the search for a legally binding treaty to limit planet - warming emissions down the political agenda and countries do not want to lose their competitive edge by going it alone on strict climate targets, he said.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z