Sentences with phrase «n't read her thoughts on»

If you haven't read my thoughts on the term «preferred», the point is that what a cell will consume first isn't necessarily the fuel that is the healthiest, though it certainly can be.

If you haven't read her thoughts on indie publishing, I recommend it.

Not exact matches

The letter, which is widely read for clues on where the world's most famous investor thinks the economy and markets are headed, is not an explicit rebuke of President Trump.

When I read this, I couldn't help but think of my colleague Chris Matyszczyk, who's kept tabs on all the nickel - and - diming policies airlines have instituted lately — from reducing the amount of food they serve to charging you to sit with your children.

«Just as you would expect, you often do your best thinking [when] you're off hiking on some mountain or something and you get a different perspective... or you're reading something that's not connected to work.»

Users can't post comments on Altman's blog, but many people who read his thoughts on political correctness were eager to respond.

Of course, this list isn't for everybody, but the larger point is simply to get you thinking about the potential of using the winter holidays soon to come as a great opportunity to cozy up and catch up on your reading.

I think I will read the other two articles on the Roth, but I am not sure if you touched upon the fact that one can also take up to $ 10K in gains for a first - time home (no tax penalty) and there is also no tax penalty for withdrawals so long as the account is 5 years old.

I read all the related articles months ago deciding whether it was something that could work for me, and wasn't convinced — possibly because it seemed more US focused particularly on healthcare benefits (which is not covered by employers here in Oz), but also just couldn't envisage any scenario where my firm would want to let me go (perhaps I think I'm more valuable than I really am??)

He was reading a professional photography magazine and thought about how there wasn't something like this for the people he was meeting on Instagram.

I thought the things I read explained mean reversion quite clearly, but I wasn't entirely clear on how to implement momentum investing

If I were to elaborate it would be to say read, read, read and don't forget to talk to people, really talk, listening with attention and having conversations, on whatever topic, that are an exchange of thoughts.

I got some good reading in yesterday and came across this excellent article by Toby Carlisle at Greenbackd about the state of the overall market and thought I'd share thoughts... Focus on Stocks, not Markets I don't usually pay a significant amount of attention to where -LSB-...]

During an interview broadcast on Tuesday's «PBS NewsHour,» former FBI Director James Comey stated that he doesn't think people can read his book and concluded that he's «in a partisan way, trying to attack the president, or that I've somehow

It should not be read with other people telling you what to think, and what parts to skip over, and so on.

It's not that I don't feel like I can, I can... but is that in the vocabulary of the one who I worship, if it's not then why would I as His Son want to take on what is not His, my Father's nature... The versions of the Bible I've read seem to think that words are powerful and speaking them is an action and can even change physics if used properly... Again, the scriptures speak for themselves and circumventing the topical study with christiany cliche come - backs doesn't answer or annul anything that the Word has to say on the matter.

Probably you've moved on from this post, and I will too — but I don't think by «been there, done that» you meant «read about and understood many things about evolutionary biology and paleontology».

After reading several of the posts on the «interpretation of mythical texts into a book called the bible» one is left to wonder how a being who is supposed to have created the universe would permit what is often referred to as «his inerrant words»... to get so screwed up... you would think he / she / it would have been keeping a close eye on a book that he / she / it wanted to have in print for... mass distribution... it is not not a womder the bible is messed up the way it is... it is a «human» construct... only humans could mess a book up that badly... gods do nor make mistakes... except for Rick Santorum

One would think, reading complaints like yours, that CNN is the one and only venue for news and that there isn't a single other source on the web.

So, what is my point?To read Paul's polemic, his rhetoric and generally his theology as an end in itself, rather than his attempt to bring others to an experience of the living God is to me, missing the point.It seems that much of the divisiveness between believers on this blog and a few others I visit is just that: I often read... Paul says this... hey, but Jesus says that... no, he wasn't saying that, he was saying this and so on and so on.Am I the only one bored with this «your Mother and my Mother were hanging out clothes» approach.I think we need a little more adverb, as in maybe....

I think 2 different people could each read the bible, koran or torah or any other religious based guidebook and depending on what they have experienced in life come to 2 absolutely different opinions on whether God exists or not.

Me personally would like to believe so and I do.If there is not god life is pretty pathetic if your think deeply about it.Theres always going to be someone who says no this is how something is or this happened exactly like this I know for sure (ha ok)... On another note instead of acting like you really do know everything maybe broaden your horizon and try church or read the bible and give God a chance.

If you were to sit around reading the bible at a company like JPL, that is based on type of thinking that is in direct contrast to religious «faith», then I would think it reasonable to seriously question whether or not you were a good fit for that company.

... i know your book says don't believe anything else before or after to protect its place in history, but just as you would read greek mythology and have incredulous thoughts about multigods ruling the earth water and the undergrounds, those who are not stuck on your wavelength, read your mythology and think how anyone in their right minds could ever fall for those idolatric stories... your belief in your creationist god is as unfathomable as an adult looking up the chimney and feeling the power of Santa Clause in them... does the power of Santa Clause compel you?

i did read page 2 and i know what im talking about you obiosly do nt because you all think hitler was a christian and he wasnt because im a christian and i know for a fact christians do nt act like that you can claim it all youd like but you should of read more up on history and if you think hitler was a christian your wrong because even if he said he was a christian then he wasnt a real one

I think I'm too simple in my thinking that; if you don't like it, DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i seeN'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i seeN'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see...

I actually got stuck reading this book — as I think I must be a bit of a literary snob and couldn't get past how awkward it read, but I am slowly being inspired to persevere and read on.

ian... not sure which part you wanted me to reply on, but I will take issue with yr point about homosexuality being a threat to human existence.I'm no expert on the subject, but I think we cd safely assume that the phenomena has been with us since our ancestors came out of the trees... we're now over six billion and growing at an alarming rate.Not sure where you might find the data on this supposed threat to going forth and multiplying.BTW, I have read that homosexual behaviour is observable in the animal kingdom, but I wd need to do some work to reference a credible study.

I even have a problem with «Literature as Literature»: Reading King Lear, I don't think about Shakespeare; reading Paradise Lost, my eye is not on Milton, but the crReading King Lear, I don't think about Shakespeare; reading Paradise Lost, my eye is not on Milton, but the crreading Paradise Lost, my eye is not on Milton, but the creation.

Sarah, I think maybe you have not read many posts on my blog, and have jumped to conclusions about how I view church and church - going Christians.

Some agents read it and think it's well done, but he still can't get anyone to take a chance on him (to say I could relate to this movie would be an understatement).

Ken, I know you're not extreme which is why I posted: I don't think so based on the post I have read from you.

I have not read the book — my church is already living through enough spiritual abuse on the part of its leaders that I really don't think I can stomach any more!

Personally I stumbled on the thought of what you have labeled universal forgiveness (I didn't have a name for it) when I was reading the book of John and John said» Behold the lamb of God who takes away the sins of the World» This inspired my thought and made realise that THIS WAS THE GOODNEWS.

Holiness for me was found in the mess and labour of giving birth, in birthday parties and community pools, in the battling sweetness of breastfeeding, in the repetition of cleaning, in the step of faith it took to go back to church again, in the hours of chatting that have to precede the real heart - to - heart talks, in the yelling at my kids sometimes, in the crying in restaurants with broken hearted friends, in the uncomfortable silences at our bible study when we're all weighing whether or not to say what we really think, in the arguments inherent to staying in love with each other, in the unwelcome number on the scale, in the sounding out of vowels during bedtime book reading, in the dust and stink and heat of a tent city in Port au Prince, in the beauty of a soccer game in the Haitian dust, in the listening to someone else's story, in the telling of my own brokenness, in the repentance, in the secret telling and the secret keeping, in the suffering and the mourning, in the late nights tending sick babies, in confronting fears, in the all of a life.

That was a very interesting read many comments caught my attention I've recently been diagnosed with Bipolar I have hallucinations and hear voices in my ear's when I hallucinate it's likes they are trying to get me thousands of them I can only describe them as dark shadows and they are trying to get me just as they are about to get me a brilliant white light surrounds me and there's three entities humanly shaped but like this brilliant white light they are also glowing this brilliant whiteness I can't understand what they are saying the only way I can explain it is emotions comfort joy love is what I feel emanating from these entities the voices I hear aren't evil telling me to do bad things to people when I get put into a mode of fear I live in a rough area of Scotland and everytime I've got into a fight something possesses me I know this for a fact as I can't control myself I'm an observer watching my family / Friends say I change they say my eyes change and I look evil I personally do think possibly through my own personal experience I» am possessed as I act out of character I've lost interest in many things I've recently I decided it's time for change I've lost my faith I've been trying to connect with God and feel his love which I used to feel the presence of the holy spirit everytime I try connect I get a feeling of abandonment I just think if I am possessed could these entities stop me connecting with «God» I can say from my heart of hearts «JESUS CHRIST HAS COME IN THE FLESH» I think it's more to do with the persons own personal fears which I have noticed my fears have changed if I had to be truthfully with myself I fear God which I know I'm not supposed to just I can't explain it I guess if you ever need a test subject I'm up for the challenge like I said I'm on journey to find myself and my travels have brought me hear I'm going to hang around for a wee while there's lots of good information to be plundered loll

Read those studies again and take off your bias blinders... and look at words like «may» «perhaps» and think that sciuence does not make conclusive decisions based on those words.

I know some Christians that think the decision about who goes where is actually up to God and that God is not limited or constrained by what some people 2000 years ago happened to write down on paper or what more recent people read into those words.

I read the Bible several times as I was on this journey from 16 - 60 years thinking I could pick and choose what I wanted to believe and what I couldn't.

Tiggy... actually, Andrew is my husband, and he has shocked me by actually responding to a post on David's blog which I did not think he read.

I think that every Bible should have a big «STOP» sign on the first page along with that passage of scripture letting the reader (or potential reader) know that this book is not for everybody, but only for those that have been enabled by God to read and understand it.

And even when I am not studying, researching, reading, and writing on the topic, I am thinking about it.

However, after reading Dr. Al Mohler's excellent reflections on Mrs. Osteen's faux pas («The Osteen Predicament — Mere Happiness Can not Bear the Weight of the Gospel,» Sept. 3), I gave the matter more thought.

And they were able to read it in language written so that anyone, even, as Tyndale wrote, «the boy who driveth the plow,» could understand it.1 The Word became, as Ong says, silent.2 That silence has had profound influence on the way we think about religious language, but it is well to remember that when those translations into the vernacular were made, they were not written down in the language of print.

I haven't really seen where Neal thinks the nation should run off his own views but there are some reading challenged commentors on here that don't seem to get that.

OK, I checked out the comic, and then read the headline, and obviously missed the play on words, but then I got it, and kept reading, then I went back to the comic and looked at it again, and thought that the point was ok, but it wasn't really funny... then I looked a little south and laughed out loud.

Robert D. Mansfield, «TGM - If you just read it for what it says, and not try to put all kinds of slants on it, I think you will find it perfectly clear.»

TGM - If you just read it for what it says, and not try to put all kinds of slants on it, I think you will find it perfectly clear.

then you are not reading my posts or thinking much either... I base it on what I MYSELF experience as well!!!

If you're not a big on way to technical, in depth Bible talks, this is probably about the time to stop reading this post, as I'm about to nerd out and I know I can get dry; but I think the following explanation helps to understand how to follow Paul's thought process with all his «else», «since», «but then» and «therefore's that don't always seem to follow what he just said: