Sentences with phrase «n't respect their individual»

Unfortunately, this is another effort to bypass the legislative process by people who don't respect the individuals who are creating jobs,» said Legislator Edward Rath III.

I try not to compare how two actors play a role as that's just unfair and doesn't respect their individual talents.

Not exact matches

When I first built my company, I wanted to make sure that a culture of respect and equality permeated everything we do — and not just respect for individual differences but also for larger cultural differences.

Luckily, failure — even if you do not label it as such — can be a beloved aspect of the road to success, something our world's brightest individuals have grown to respect and appreciate.

Not only are half the employees I work with in full - time education like me... but the other half were all upstanding, good individuals (in their own ways) who I respected as much as they respected me.»

The takeaway from this exchange was that you need to be honest and direct for the team to function well, but this must be built on a foundation of respect for the individual so that you're not undermining their position.

(l) Except as otherwise set forth in Schedule 2.7 (l) of the Disclosure Schedule, (i) the Company is not and will not be obligated to pay separation, severance, termination or similar benefits as a result of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, nor will any such transactions accelerate the time of payment or vesting, or increase the amount, of any benefit or other compensation due to any individual; and (ii) the transactions contemplated by this Agreement will not cause the Company to record additional compensation expense on its income statements with respect to any outstanding Stock Option or other equity - based award.

Fortunately, early in my career I worked closely with someone who was highly respected not only because of his job knowledge, but even more so because of his uncanny ability to interact with individuals of all types.

If they can't conform to standards of equality and non-discrimination, or respecting the liberties of an individual, then I don't want them... we don't need NCOs or Officers or leaders in our armed forces to continue to disgrace the uniform.

This would assume an «imaginative,» not a historical, disposition: a divine intent in history, God - gifted immutable laws of morality, to which man has a duty to conform; order as a first requirement of good governance, achieved best by a restraint and respect for custom and tradition; variety as more desirable than systematic uniformity and liberty more desirable than equality; the honor and duty of a good life in a good community as taking precedence over individual desire; an embrace of a skepticism toward reason and abstract principle.

There IS reason not to respect the church because they directly and callously protected such individuals.

While I respect your opinion, sir, I think that not all Christians or religious individuals are bad people.

No, I am only speaking of individuals with full blown diagnosis from a well respected clinical psychologist, MMPI, hours of one on one clinical sessions, and another test I can't remember....

In some respects he is absolutely unexcelled, even by himself in another conceivable state; in all other respects he is (to state the view reached in this book) the only individual whose states or predicates are not to be excelled unless he excel them with other states or predicates of his own.

In this completely social philosophy (conflict, which is not denied, being also a social relation) God is that in the cosmos whereby it is a cosmos; he is the individual case on the cosmic scale of all the ultimate categories (including those of social feeling, «subjective aim,» etc.) thanks to which these categories describe a community of things, and not merely things each enclosed in unutterable privacy, irrelevant to and unordered with respect to anything else.

However, such an approach does not adequately take into account human wisdom: although one may argue that an individual of superior wisdom may engender respect and thus attain reproductive success, says Deane - Drummond, the fact that many of those who were thought to have wisdom were celibate makes this explanation unlikely.

... viewing morality not simply as individual perfection but as part of a social context... tile concept of universal human values which are valid through history and across national, cultural lines respecting different political and cultural possibilities, but at the same time acknowledge some common goals.

At least, the way is open to argue that each individual has some perfect duties with respect to the treatment of all others, specific moral obligations that can not be canceled by a duty to maximize the good.

We can then all just respect, not tolerate, each others beliefs, for being what makes each of us the unique individuals we are.

The coercions of political correctness sway him not at all, and the sentimentality that urges us to respect the will and creativity of individuals, especially children, is altogether ousted.

Unchecked by respect for individual persons and individual initiative, these can be principles of strangulation and death, not of vitality, life, invention, and creativity.

Therefore was Christ crucified, because he, even though he addressed himself to all, would not have to do with the crowd, because he would not in any way let a crowd help him, because he in this respect absolutely pushed away, would not found a party, or allow balloting, but would be what he was, the truth, which relates itself to the single individual.

Why not respect them as individuals?

Christianity teaches that this particular individual, and so every individual, whatever in other respects this individual may be, man, woman, serving - maid, minister of state, merchant, barber, student, etc. — this individual exists before God — this individual who perhaps would be vain for having once in his life talked with the King, this man who is not a little proud of living on intimate terms with that person or the other, this man exists before God, can talk with God any moment he will, sure to be heard by Him; in short, this man is invited to live on the most intimate terms with God!

But even with respect to the latter, wide segments of the intellectual community know that the individual man can not finally be grasped in the impersonal categories that constitute the science.

If my analysis is fundamentally accurate, liberalism's endgame is unsustainable in every respect: It can not perpetually enforce order upon a collection of autonomous individuals increasingly shorn of constitutive social norms, nor can it continually provide endless material growth in a world of limits.

I know we need to respect the rights and opinions of the individual but sometimes individuals are whiny, selfish people that want it there way and don't care if 99.99999 % think differently.

In a free society we are obligated to respect other individuals, not organizations.

An individual who can not accept minor boundaries should not be trusted to respect larger boundaries.

Indeed, considered with respect to individual essences, they are incommensurable and could not both be ingressed (qua being) in one and the same actual occasion.

At any rate it is now plain that the new rapprochement between diverse religions makes it important that the church find a way to understand and even co-operate with other religious groups and individuals that will not be ambiguous and will preserve due respect for the distinctive things in Christianity.

-- As private individuals, we are responsible for seeking our interest in harmony with, and not at the expense of, the interest and well - being of others; responsible for condemning and averting all forms of killing and violence; and responsible for respecting the right to life and development of all people and all living things on Earth, next door to us the same as on distant continents.

That is what individuals DO N'T want, they don't want a rigid set of doctrine or beliefs; they want to feel connected to others and themselves and the world through respect and compassion, not flog an ideology that tells them what to believe and how to act and on what basis to judge and often condemn otheN'T want, they don't want a rigid set of doctrine or beliefs; they want to feel connected to others and themselves and the world through respect and compassion, not flog an ideology that tells them what to believe and how to act and on what basis to judge and often condemn others.

I certainly do not mean that only Christians respect this intangible dignity of the unique individual.

The refusal to use this terminology is, therefore, not at this point in itself a prior decision in favour of a Platonic conception of spirit, nor is it a prior decision whether within the world, that is to say within the domain of possible individual objects of cognition, there are any which absolutely and in every respect can be exempt from those «material» laws which we discover in the reality which we empirically experience, or whether this is inconceivable.

«This responsibility for God's earth means that human beings, endowed with intelligence, must respect the laws of nature and the delicate equilibria existing between the creatures of this world... The laws found in the Bible dwell on relationships, not only among individuals but also with other living beings... by their mere existence they bless him and give him glory»... «the Lord rejoices in all his works» (Ps 104:31).

Through monotheism and the worship of God, God has protected the individual's right, for believers in God should not be aggressive toward others, but should respect others» rights.

Considering his condition is likely what allowed him to spend most of his time thinking and doing physics, thus making him one of the world's most well respected physicists and living far longer with ALS than any other individual before him, and is still able to communicate, I would imagine Maire is correct and he is an atheist not because he is all that bitter, but because the further people tend to go in science, the less they tend to believe in religion.

As Bok argues: «The premises supporting confidentiality are strong, but they can not support practices of secrecy — whether by individual clients, institutions, or professionals — that undermine and contradict the very respect for persons and for human bonds that confidentiality was meant to protect» (p. 30).

Because of the importance of these accounting records to ensure probity, individuals should not bank money in their own account nor should they pay cheques from their own account to the charity in respect of funds raised.

It may not agree with the ways an individual may seek to resolve those tensions, but the gay rights movement must respect individuals» decisions to pursue their own paths.

There is only reason why many humanbeings born & living on earth want to diminish anyone else's beliefs, «FEAR» & lack of their own personal self esteem & respect as a humanbeing??? They truly do not appreciate whom they were born to be, thus making them or forcing them to want to create turmoil in lives of others???... There are so many «lost souls» living in our world whom have not & may never know whom they were born to be as an individual being?

And so, too, with respect to interaction with others: whereas any individual other than God interacts with some others only, God interacts with all, not only acting on them but also being acted on by them.

The ones not showing respect are those that complain that this individual didn't do what they wanted.

Religious individuals and groups should respect and honor the valuable principle of pluralism, the essence of which is not that all values are equal, but that our society is one in which any number can play, and that a multiplicity of views contributes not to chaos, but to a rich and diverse republic.

Although the declaration of individual rights does not guarantee that they will be respected, it has certainly made an important difference in a positive direction.

The respect in which I conceive of an individual object as distinct from my reaction with it is then that I conceive of the former but not the latter as retaining an identity through time.

Such people do not feel that their work allows them to express enough that is unique in themselves to win others» respect as individuals.

Experimental procedures can be licit if they «respect the life and integrity of the embryo and do not involve disproportionate risks for it, but rather are directed to its healing, the improvement of its condition of health, or its individual survival»; but the mere «use of human embryos or fetuses as an object of experimentation» is «a crime against their dignity as human beings.»

I certainly don't feel that any particular religion is rot, and many are downright silly, but I respect the right of individual Americans to believe and practice as they want as long as they don't proselytize or bother others.