These aren't rhetorical questions... I need answers.
This is
not a rhetorical question.
That is
not a rhetorical question.
That is
not a rhetorical question, I would like an honest answer.
This is
not a rhetorical question and I'd love some honest knowledgeable feedback.
No, that isn't a rhetorical question.
For Robert Colescott, Kerry James Marshall, and Mickalene Thomas, that is
not a rhetorical question.
This is
not a rhetorical question, by the way.
Not a rhetorical question.
These are
not rhetorical questions, but a sincere attempt to understand your explanation for observed phenomena.
These are
not rhetorical questions.
In fact, if I read correctly what he says afterwards in this very interesting thread, I fail to see how this is
not a rhetorical question.
As it turned out, it wasn't a rhetorical question; I was just asking the wrong people.
It's
not a rhetorical question — you likely have different needs or intentions as they relate to real estate and will, therefore, be influenced by different criteria than your neighbors.
Not exact matches
Don't get me wrong, I don't mean that to be
rhetorical or even a provocative
question.
And the answer to that
rhetorical question, of course, is that nonbank companies generally don't get bailed out when the whole thing blows up.
Don't bother to answer, that's a
rhetorical question.
After listing Charlemagne's previous conquests as evidence of his power, he introduces the main theme with a
rhetorical question: «Under these conditions, was it
not to be expected» that the king should add a more general title commensurate with his authority?
No
question about it, the listening is demanding,
not only because of the writer's
rhetorical style but also because of the assumption that the reader knows the Old Testament and the wilderness life of Israel, a life centered in the tabernacle and the daily ministrations of the priest.
I don't think the various Gospel authors had Jesus asking
question to show he did
not know, nor to say «my peace is in the
questions» but instead as a mere
rhetorical tool to make a point and tell what he thought the answers were.
This time, the
question is
not rhetorical.
The answer to this
question can
not be found, as is so often claimed, in the inadequacies of the preacher so far as his
rhetorical skill, his use of apt illustrations, his logical development of theme, and so forth are in view.
These aren't necessarily
rhetorical questions, but they are ones anyone putting together a protest sign for any event should be able to answer.
It's here, in the sermon's second half, that we find what Dominican chronicler Miguel Ángel Medina called Montesino's «arch-iconic» declaration of universal human equality, those
rhetorical questions heaped upon the colonists (and all future oppressors): «Are they
not men?
So of course your
question about children's toys is
rhetorical and therefore doesn't need answering.
This heady stuff turns on Montesino's charged
rhetorical question: «[These Indians], are they
not men?»
Same - sex advocates are inclined to treat the latter
questions as
rhetorical absurdities, but the evidence for posing them is
not hard to find» and, Not surprisingly, it generally conforms to the argumentum ad consummationem patte
not hard to find» and,
Not surprisingly, it generally conforms to the argumentum ad consummationem patte
Not surprisingly, it generally conforms to the argumentum ad consummationem pattern.
I'm
not sure that's correct considering what the apostle writes in the first seven verses, especially the
rhetorical question, «Is the law sin?»
I've asked this
rhetorical question already, but I think it bears repeating: When you tell children that god / Jesus loves them, do you also tell them that after they grow up they will go to hell if they do
not worship this christian god?
(They were meant as geniune
questions,
not rhetorical arguments, and I'm glad you took them that way.)
I'm
not trying to be hateful, nor am I asking a simple
rhetorical question, but how do those who do
not believe in God explain existence?
Safranski summarizes Schleiermacher's «capacious» position with a
rhetorical question («Was
not Romantic poetry with its sense of the uncanny and the wondrous already directly religious?»).
We can
not avoid raising this
question, but the moment it is asked it is seen to be
rhetorical.
2:10 asks the
question which introduces the new dimension; and it is interesting to note that the
question is itself preceded by two
rhetorical questions which at once are addressed to and define the covenant community: «Have we
not all one father?
Pilate, who was
not a Jew and was something of a cynic, as evidenced by his
rhetorical question, What is Truth?
Hey man,
not sure if that
question's
rhetorical, but sometimes seems this whole human experiment is a failure... that the only way anyone is like God in character is by being delivered and saved.
If Bell's book is
not an argument for universalism, and that Bell's
rhetorical questions are
not meant to ridicule the traditional beliefs of eternal conscious suffering, penal substitutionary atonement, and salvation by faith alone in Christ alone, then the marketing mechanism is a paradigm example of what Harry Frankfurt has defined as «bull ****.»
The
rhetorical question does
not apply to process theists because we accept neither of the hypotheses in
question.
I think that's a
rhetorical question, but I will answer you......... Arsenal can't and will
not win the league with that squad.
I count nine
rhetorical questions so far, and I'm
not stopping anytime soon.
You don't need a Harvard degree to know that is a
rhetorical question.
Why won't Arsene substitute Ramsey?????????????? That's no f *** king
rhetorical question.
It's
not quite a
rhetorical question.
These are all
rhetorical questions, and I'm
not smart enough to answer them.
The obviouis
question, though a
rhetorical one, is to ask WHO buys, keeps and trusts and plays those players who Gilberto (and countless other Gooners too) considers
not good enough.
I will answer my own
rhetorical question by saying it is because all respected journos everywhere know full well there is
not a cat in hell's chance of Wenger EVER doing what he should have done a decade ago and ever since, by bringing in a DCM who is any good.
I apologise for the bombardment of
rhetorical questions but what is the point of having these talented players if we don't have a manager who will use them in the their correct positions for any length of time?
Rhetorical question or
not: the problem with homebirth is that the information is hidden, glossed over, made out to be false or biased, or otherwise ignored.
The
rhetorical question that Efremov addresses to the United States is that, if you are a superior nation, why did you
not take him to the Hague International Tribunal?
This
question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or
rhetorical and can
not be reasonably answered in its current form.