Sentences with phrase «n't running a surplus»

And that's a long time if ever, frankly, because the average state government isn't running a surplus and making a profit off of taxes.»

Not exact matches

So we know what the outcome of a successful negotiation would be: Greece would be obliged to run a positive but small «primary surplus,» that is, an excess of revenue over spending not including interest.
Because capital exports are just the obverse of a current account surplus, this meant that after spending much of the 1990s in deficit, Germany's excess production, caused not by a surge in production but rather a decline in consumption, was resolved by the country's running a current account surplus.
Yet the whole world can not run a trade surplus.
Many economists reject this debt anchor and instead believe that with a strong economy now is the time not only to eliminate the deficit, but also to run surpluses and reduce debt.
So if I run into a surplus sometime, I don't think of something to buy with it, I think, «OK, I better get rid of this money and put it to work again.»
In short, the federal government takes revenue from provinces that run surpluses and remits it to those that don't.
This is not true, however, of Australia where, after four successive budget surpluses in the late 1980s, the Government has been able, responsibly, to run deficits to help the economy out of the recession.
With just one week to get something over the line, I would suggest we may have run out of targets, I believe AW is now waiting for one of the big boys (Real, Barca or Bayern) to go splash the cash on a new star so Wenger can pick up their surplus, It worked well with Ozil and Sanchez, but we aren't the only side looking to buy more players, we are not the only side who need an injection of quality.
It's also anticipated that with the baby boomers retiring, running a surplus is not expected in the next several years at...
Although he didn't draw attention to it, Osborne's plans to run a surplus this year rely on his decision to sell off our assets.
Osborne doesn't care that he almost certainly won't be running a surplus by 2020.
Citizens Party office holders may not vote themselves payraises or new perks unless the budget is balanced or running a surplus.
In either case, if you don't know exactly how many calories you're utilizing for fuel, upkeep, reconstruction, etc., you're better off running a surplus of fat calories than of sugar calories: As you mentioned, calorie surplus will go into the fatty tissue.
So, in the vast majority of cases, any calorie surplus you run will be autonomically regulated by eating less later on when the initial surplus is a fat surplus, but not when it is a sugar surplus.
Even though eating a surplus of calories has been shown to increase testosterone levels short - term in few studies, it's not a good long - term plan, because you would simply get fat, which would negatively affect T levels in the long run.
The reason I put this last, is that if you have done your job right, and properly sized the first five factors above, there will be enough surplus and liquidity that does not easily run away in a crisis.
Not everyone can run a current account surplus.
I'm not sure, but those that are running a current account surplus should do better.
FDR ran deficits, Truman ran deficits (but also surpluses with a GOP Congress & rapid defense cuts), Ike had surpluses with GOP Congresses but not with Democrat, JFK ran deficits, LBJ ran deficits, Nixon had just one surplus, thanks to Democrat Congresses, Ford ran deficits under Democrat Congresses, Carter ran deficits, Reagan ran deficits, thanks to his budgets» being declared «DoA» by Tip, Clinton ran deficits until the GOP took control of Congress & Bush ran deficits, under mixed Congressional control.
It would not be run for profit - if there is a surplus, I will simply reduce the subscription / charge in the next year, or put it towards a Christmas meal for the members, or donate it to charity.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z