Not to be a climate change denier, but I just don't see the climate changes you speak of.
The way that US citizens vote is now a major factor in their belief in global warming - with a wide majority of Republicans
not seeing climate change as «here and now», compared to a tiny minority of Democrats who deny that global warming as already upon us.
Not exact matches
That irony points to what I
see as an inescapable conclusion: The world probably can't solve
climate change without nuclear power.
He didn't speak on the environment, but the project he worked on showed something missing from
climate change work, at least that I don't
see.
On Monday, as Irma weakened over Georgia, Bossert used a White House briefing to offer more hints of an emerging
climate resilience policy, while notably avoiding accepting
climate change science: «What President Trump is committed to is making sure that federal dollars aren't used to rebuild things that will be in harm's way later or that won't be hardened against the future predictable floods that we
see.
But the president has also pledged to «respond to the threat of
climate change» in his second term and would rather
not be
seen as eating his words by approving Keystone.
«You've
seen other examples around the world where transitions weren't necessarily related to the move to tackle
climate change, but workers and communities weren't put first.
What's still
not known: Did
climate change alter the odds of
seeing three incredibly strong storms — Harvey, Irma, Maria — in a row this season?
«I also can't
see her getting behind the Keystone pipeline in a serious way given the emphasis on
climate change within her party, particularly the more progressive left,» Hagle said.
But here the thing: We don't yet currently know, conclusively, that the storms we
saw were made larger and nastier by
climate change.
I really don't
see what he gains from being indifferent and idiotic about the issue, but for the mere fact he can't make up his mind whether humans are a cause behind global
climate changes makes me think this guy isn't fit to run the country.
Although it will be incredibly difficult to ever match his contributions on the pitch, it's vitally important for a former club legend, like Henry, to publicly address his concerns regarding the direction of this club... regardless of those who still feel that Henry has some sort of agenda due to the backlash he received following earlier comments he made on air regarding Arsenal, he has an intimate understanding of the game, he knows the fans are being hosed and he feels some sense of obligation, both professionally and personally, to tell it like he
sees it... much like I've continually expressed over the last couple months, this team isn't evolving under this current ownership / management team... instead we are currently experiencing a «stagnant» phase in our club's storied history... a fact that can't be hidden by simply
changing the formation or bringing in one or two individuals... this team needs fundamental
change in the way it conducts business both on and off the pitch or it will continue to slowly devolve into a second tier club... regardless of the euphoria surrounding our escape act on Friday evening, as it stands, this club is more likely to be fighting for a Europa League spot for the foreseeable future than a top 4 finish... we can't hope for the failures of others to secure our place in the top 4, we need to be the manufacturers of our own success by doing whatever is necessary to evolve as an organization... if Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke can't take the necessary steps following the debacle they manufactured last season, their removal is imperative for our future success... unfortunately, I strongly believe that either they don't know how to proceed in the present economic
climate or they are unwilling to do whatever it takes to turn this ship around... just look at the current state of our squad, none of our world class players are under contract beyond this season, we have a ridiculous wage bill considering the results, we can't sell our deadwood because we've mismanaged our personnel decisions and contractual obligations, we haven't properly cultivated our younger talent and we might have become one of the worst clubs ever when it comes to way we handle our transfer business, which under Dein was one of our greatest assets... it's time to get things right!!!
The idea that the sunny weather they enjoy may be a harbinger of runaway
climate change, that their beloved happy meal hamburgers are responsible for the release of dangerous methane gases and the unjust monopolization of vital water sources, and that the plastic refuse from their picnics might end up endangering the dolphins they idolize from afar — well, it's a lot to lay on a child who's still
not old enough to
see the latest Star Wars.
The idea that the sunny weather they enjoy may be a harbinger of runaway
climate change, that their beloved happy meal hamburgers are responsible for the release of dangerous methane gases and the unjust monopolization of vital water sources, and that the plastic refuse from their picnics might end up endangering the dolphins they idolize from afar — well, it's a lot to lay on a child who's still
not old enough to
see the latest
But «let's
not try to make it so» is (unfortunately) premature...
climate change appears to remain deeply contested within the Conservative Party (
see the campaigns of elected representatives like Douglas Carswell MP, Roger Helmer MEP; the most prominent opinion formers, such as The Spectator and forums such as ConservativeHome; and the weak priority which most party activists give the issue (according to ConHome surveys).
(I take your point that failure to achieve this might legitimate peaceful civil disobedience; I wouldn't
see that it could legitimate prioritising
climate change over democratic means, which has been argued eg by Mayer Hillman).
People like Latimer if you want modern day sewers, you believe in
climate change, you
see all the empty office space in Westchester, and realize that Astorino has
not brought one single company to Westchester.
All three of the main political parties are stuck in a dangerous Cold War time warp, unable to
see that the world has
changed and that modern security threats such as
climate change and fundamentalism can't be tackled with nuclear weapons.
No such target was included in the November 2012 energy bill but the report
sees «little reason
not to include one» unless the targets in the
Climate Change Act 2008 are to be revised at a later date.
In a speech later Mr Huhne told his party's conference that evidence of
climate change was becoming «more alarming,
not less» and said he wanted to
see a huge expansion in the number of offshore wind farms but that this would go hand in hand with nuclear power.
As you can
see, the answer to the question about whether or
not climate change is man - made has a direct impact on which policies should be enacted to solve this problem.
From Provisional list of participants (PDF): 196 signatories of UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change) are listed here; 2 Observer States are The Holy
See and Palestine (proof); I could
not find the full list of Observer Organizations and Media; Further information: Detailed list of participants — three PDF documents dated 11 Dec...
I can't myself
see how any MP who votes against the target will thereafter be able credibly to claim that they support an effective response to
climate change.»
«I don't
see anything that Elise has done in her two years that leads me to believe she takes
climate change seriously at all,» said Funiciello, in a meeting Wednesday with The Post-Star editorial board.
We
see that in a lot of ways: Families deciding
not to have their kids vaccinated; federally - funded R&D was half of what is was 50 years ago; people are denying
climate change when the evidence is right in front of them; and so on.
In 2004, Jones said of two published papers he regards as flawed: «I can't
see either... being in the next Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change report.
This will come about as a result of a cultural
change whereby the university is
not only
seen as «a marginal phenomenon», a place to practice skills, but instead as an academic meeting place which offers a stimulating and pleasant working
climate for everybody who works there.
«As such, we begin to
see that the geology, and
not just the
climate, control the availability of water — the landscape was a catalyst for
change in Africa.»
Norgaard was surprised Morano had noticed her, because although her university had written a press release, she hadn't
seen much coverage of her research, which focuses on why it is so difficult for societies to take action to respond to
climate change.
The case of having a long lead time before
seeing benefits is
not unique to
climate change policy, however.
The study, published this week in the journal Nature
Climate Change, suggests that some tough decisions could be ahead: Some areas might
see tougher zoning restrictions, while others could be faced with relocating species that can't move on their own.
In their conclusion, the authors state that it is important for conservationists to
see climate change not as one of numerous independent variables acting on species survival in mountain landscapes, but as an exacerbating force over the many direct human alterations to these areas.
«The fact that we don't
see the presently understood meteorological signature of global warming in
changing outbreak statistics leaves two possibilities: either the recent increases are
not due to a warming
climate, or a warming
climate has implications for tornado activity that we don't understand.
Skutsch adds that «while it is clear that the communities themselves need to be part of the overall plan» for battling
climate change, she «can
not quite
see the rationale for direct payments» to indigenous groups for forest conservation.
While they
saw changes in meteorological quantities that are consistent with these upward trends, the meteorological trends were
not the ones expected under
climate change.
And for us that was a much more powerful example of
climate change impacting wildlife than anything which we have
seen previously and gave us an image of
climate change that the receding glaciers didn't.
And if animals do undergo size
changes with future
climate change, as Secord points out, we are
not going to be
seeing smaller race horses — unless we breed them that way.
He's
not convinced
climate change has made its way into real estate pricing, though, and he doesn't
see sea - level rise influencing shorter - term investors or speculators.
Typically, one
sees the framing as: We reduce emissions (mitigate) to allow us to avoid all the
climate change we feasibly can, and then we adapt to what we can
not avoid.
Dry places are expected to get drier with
climate change, while wet places are expected to get wetter, but Crouch said that the particular precipitation pattern seen in June isn't what is expected in a warming world, according to the National Climate Assessment that was released
climate change, while wet places are expected to get wetter, but Crouch said that the particular precipitation pattern
seen in June isn't what is expected in a warming world, according to the National
Climate Assessment that was released
Climate Assessment that was released in May.
«When you read descriptions from the 1940s and compare them with the
climate of today, you don't need to be a scientist to
see there's been a
change,» Parzinger says.
While some may
see evidence of rapid glacier thinning in the past and again today as evidence that the West Antarctic Ice Sheet is nearing a collapse driven by human - caused
climate change, Steig said at this point, scientists just don't know whether that is the case.
A quick look at the proposed Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change carbon budget to keep global warming below 2 °C, alongside the fossil fuel reserves held by the industry, is enough to
see that the two aren't compatible.
Scientists had long suspected that some local animals might
not be able to outrun
climate change, but researchers haven't yet been able to prove the hypothesis, says Loarie, who was
not involved in this study: «It's just wonderful to
see empirical evidence that backs this up.»
I
see the greatest risk of failure to solve
climate change as simply
not trying hard enough.
WriterWeegs Matt, it's actually arrogant
not to
see climate change for what it is... and yes, potentially apocalyptic.
Plant breeders have generally been supportive of this technology,
not seeing the genetic modification as a threat to crossbreeding for combating
climate change.»
«We live in an era during which it has become clear that we can
not burn all of the fossil fuels without causing dangerous
climate change,» the letter,
seen by Reuters, said.
The patterns of the
changes in magnetic field strength over 48 hours
seen in these two events were so similar to those recorded in a ground sensor during the Carrington event that the first event must
not have been global in its reach either, the team reports in the Journal of Space Weather and Space
Climate.
Then again, given the
climate change impacts already
seen at present greenhouse gas concentrations, the world may
not have much choice.