But Nelson doesn't see the creation of CGI versions of actors becoming widespread in Hollywood.
Let
's NOT see the creation of these so many ministries as creating «jobs for the boys».
But Nelson doesn't see the creation of CGI versions of actors becoming widespread in Hollywood.
Not exact matches
When asked how he decided what ad content his agency would
not use, an advertising executive famously said he would
not allow the
creation of anything that he wouldn't want his wife and children to
see.
«If you look at more current information, you will
see that these data points are
not demonstrative of our current network, community impact, and both the direct and indirect job
creation near fulfillment centers,» a company representative said previously, adding that «Amazon's investments led to the
creation of 200,000 additional non-Amazon jobs, ranging from construction jobs to healthcare industry positions.»
It is strange, however, to
see corporate tax cuts being touted as a job
creation strategy, as the benefits of higher productivity are mostly higher wages and profits,
not increased employment.
«If companies are maintaining traditional hurdle rates, they are unlikely to invest any time soon, and we will
not see the kind of growth, productivity and job
creation we are looking for,» Poloz said.
See Finance 101 and Economic Versus Accounting Profits for more detail on why accounting profits are
not reliable indicators of corporate profitability or value
creation.
No doubt there will be plenty of other absolutely crazy
creations made in the game in the weeks and months to come, and we can't wait to
see what fans cook up next.
But if companies are maintaining traditional hurdle rates, they are unlikely to invest any time soon, and we will
not see the kind of growth, productivity and job
creation we are looking for.
In his April letter for the fund - raiser the next month, he told employees, «America needs business and job
creation,
not the ruthless destruction that we are
seeing from Barack Obama and his Democrats supporters, whom are Hollywood characters, liberal elitists, radical environmentalists, unionists, and Americans who do
not want to work.»
One may or may
not accept Thomas's metaphysical analysis, but at least one can
see that the doctrine of
creation, in its philosophical foundations, is
not challenged by any discovery in the natural sciences.
Someday, it may well
see that the beginning of
creation, as described in the bible, had a valid premise, and we can
not rule anything out.
As it seeks to apply this voluntarism to marriage and family, which are
not mere social constructs but are firmly anchored in God's
creation, we may
see liberalism at last reaching a breaking point.
Since Uran.us and Ga.ia both are real too, when I look around I
see Gaia, Zeus's grandmother, I don't know about this god you speak of, I mean I get to TOUCH god whenever I feel the ground, you just touch his «
creation», you poor soul,
not knowing what god actually feels like.
For me I
see evolution the same as you
see God
not enough proof to say I believe it and
see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has
not been proven where God I can
see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the
creation of the universe in some other way I would
not deny that truth.
East Eastern Christians
see a dichotomy of God and
creation Eastern theologians are largely unaffected by modernism Eastern theologians do
not agonize over the existence of God Eastern theologians systematize the transcendent, the miraculous, and the mystical into their theology, without a concept of «supernatural» Eastern theologians have coherent and helpful answers for most practical spiritual problems (such as during bereavement) Eastern clergy, monastics, and lay experts have resources for spiritual direction, moral direction, and Eastern clergy, monastics, and lay experts have resources for spiritual direction, moral direction, and bereavement counseling; thus they do
not outsource religious problems to secular experts.
IF you were to look at
creation it - self and how complex and in order things are surely after a few days of thinking about it you would have to say there must have be a creator in all of this stuff going on??? there is to much out there to say it all happened by chance or accicedent... you do
nt have to go past the moon or the nearest planet to
see what im talking aobut i will pray that God will reveal him self to you and you too can
see what im talking aobut... you can emial me if you like randytherealtor7 at yahoo com
The
creation of the world are clearly
seen — the mind brightly beholding what the eye can
not discern.
I can
not look at the
creations of this world and
see anything other than the work of God's hand.
If you
see the universe as a
creation (though only a moron would now argue that it was created 6,000 years ago), it is possible to argue that God is
not hiding at all.
The greatest distance most people can
see is
not sufficient to view the God of all
creation.
Marriage is so important in a man's life that the only thing that God
saw as «
not good» in
creation was that man was alone, and it was
not good for him to be alone..
My decision
not to intervene in the already completed election by his fellow parishioners of Florian Stangl to their parish council — the results of which do
not need approval of the Archbishop in order to be final — was inspired by my genuine desire to help a young man find his way towards a life in union with God's plan for
creation (
see my attached sermon of April 2nd which explains this in further detail).
Can say that I believe in every thing that you disbelief of when it comes to the Creator and the
Creation of universe, life and guidance, God has given me hearing,
seeing, thinking and heart feelings to
see and experience signs and small miracles to have faith in him and continue with good deeds I was told of in his Holy Book although am
not perfect at that but nothing to lose but contrary to that there are more to gain in life and life after... For those disbelievers they lose their senses by being locked and blocked from such experiences... It is all about souls as verses speak for them selves;
20 For the invisible things of him since the
creation of the world are clearly
seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity; that they may be without excuse: 21 because that, knowing God, they glorified him
not as God, neither gave thanks; but became vain in their reasonings, and their senseless heart was darkened.22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God for the likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of birds, and four - footed beasts, and creeping things.24 Wherefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts unto uncleanness, that their bodies should be dishonored among themselves: 25 for that they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever.
You do
nt believe in gods as many do
see there being many Gods from GOD who did build from «the ground up» the GOD who is
creation and
not the created!
Can you
not see that simple fact??? The Bible explains that God's
creation makes all men to be without excuse when it comes to the determination of whether or
not there is a God.
By what we
see around us in the
creation, for our Creator, made us to
see in color,
not just black and white, to have a series of senses that allow us to thoroughly enjoy life, such as the capacity to feel very minute things with our fingertips.
But there is evidence — beginning with Genesis 1, where we are told that God looked at the whole
creation and
saw that it was good — that biblical thinking is
not nearly so anthropocentric as many interpreters of the Bible have supposed.
To
not see God's involvement in violent actions is to deny ourselves of
seeing the Master in His
Creation.
He was active early in the second century CE and is well known for having posited
not one but two Gods, one represented in the Old Testament and
seen as responsible for the world's
creation, the other encountered only in the New Testament in the teaching of Jesus and specifically in the theology of Paul.
This DOES
NOT surprise me, seeing that 48 % of the United States does not believe in evolution, and do believe the creation my
NOT surprise me,
seeing that 48 % of the United States does
not believe in evolution, and do believe the creation my
not believe in evolution, and do believe the
creation myth.
If the work of
creation is
seen as an evolutionary process, then existence of matter is the necessary precondition for the appearance, on earth, of spirit: elsewhere Pere Teilhard de Chardin speaks of matter in more exact language as the «matrix of spirit»: that in which life emerges and is supported,
not the active principle from which it takes its rise.
It's always nice to
see that humans are capable of
creation and
not just destruction.
We
see this in sports, where Roger Bannister's comment about his world - record race (he was the first to run the mile in under four minutes) has often been repeated by other runners: «The world seemed to stand still, or did
not exist... «17 And certainly this can be true of the play world of art, which, according to Gerardus Van der Leeuw, is a new «
creation, a second world, with its own power.
Whether or
not God tinkered with
creation in the manner envisioned by creationism or some versions of intelligent design, such tinkering is neither necessary to the doctrine of
creation nor is it the source of the beauty
seen by the believer.
But if He held back in
creation... maybe I would
not be able to
see how awesome He really is.
We can draw an analogy from our own experience and
see that as we are in our activity but are yet more than any particular action, with reserves of energy upon which we may draw, so God is in the divine operation in
creation — indeed that operation is itself divine — but God is
not lost in it.
And while it is true that history is
seen as the context and vehicle of divine activity, it does
not follow that the
creation accounts are to be interpreted as history, or even prehistory.
It is to
see God's gift of the
creation as
not only a word about the earth «in the beginning,» but also the affirmation that God is present now through the spirit, overcoming brokenness among people and their habitation.
For the
creation was subjected to futility,
not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it, in hope (Romasn 8:20) I bet the universe groans very loudly «Nature, with its melancholy charm, resembles a bride who, at the very moment when she was fully attired for marriage,
saw the bridegroom die.
That child's dance is nothing less than the eternal dance of divine Wisdom before God's throne, the dance of David and the angels and saints before his glory; it is the true face of
creation, which God came to restore and which he will
not suffer to
see corruption..
And we shall
see that the transformation of the earth, its new
creation, is
not solely a reorganization of its social and technical aspects nor just the institution of new political and economic relationships among people; it is also a profound spiritual metamorphosis of mankind, a revolution.
For the
creation was subjected to futility,
not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it, in hope (Romasn 8:20) I bet very loudly «Nature, with its melancholy charm, resembles a bride who, at the very moment when she was fully attired for marriage,
saw the bridegroom die.
Surely feel that you are
not aware of the proper way of how to preform ablutions or keep your A$ $ as clean...!?! So please speak of no superior or inferior we are all of Adam & Eve and are as equal only those who fear God most are more superior but as I
see you are
not God fearful since you look upon his
creations and Worshipers as if inferior to you although they might be remembering, worshiping and praying to God more than you do... or will do in your life...
However, they
see the finitude of God's
creation not as his creative will but as the way
creation appears within the habitual limits of human perception.
The fourth step goes a bit further, to
see «the trajectory eventuating in the
creation of human historical existence»
not «as a metaphysical surd but rather as grounded in the ultimate nature of things, in the ultimate mystery.»
We never have
seen anything pop into existence ever, everything we
see or build starts with some type of
creation from some creator whether it be from humans or whatever,
not one single example of anything would prove otherwise, so going about everyday life feeling confident that everything just magically popped into existence without a magician really takes a lot more faith than what I have.
It's only after we're older once we've had notions pounded into our heads that we can't or shouldn't learn from this or that, that we lose our ability to appreciate all of God's
creations and
see God's hand (poetic term
not literal) in all things (or worse, some have been so blinded as to
see it in nothing, as they hide behind their cold scientific idols, losing the same wonder that got the scientists there to start with)