Sentences with phrase «n't see the other side»

Someone once told me that usually when people are arguing, and they can't see the other side, people argue about the what and the why.

I do a lot of yelling at Jesus right now, and I still can not see the other side of this.

Between the trees I can see out over Sausalito to the bay where there are clouds so thick I can not see the other side where I live with my family in...

It's strange to play a game and have such an utterly different reaction that you can't see the other side.

All I could think of was 1) I can not see the other side of the room so it is hard to say what is by the staircase across from the sofa and 2) perhaps the furniture was pulled out for the photo for some reason or 3) it reminds me of my house when my kids leave furniture all crooked and pulled out and it drives me crazy!

Not exact matches

Of course, fear isn't rational — you don't see people giving toaster ovens the side - eye, and many other things that people are afraid of, including public speaking and spiders, are unlikely to harm you either.

«It's perfect for sharing quick moments with friends who aren't right by your side or making your conversations richer by seeing each other face - to - face when you are messaging,» Facebook said in a blog post on Thursday.

«On the other side, we've seen such vitriolic display of bigotry and hate and divisiveness, and that is not the leadership we need for the future of the country.»

It disappeared faster than a bad Fall sitcom, leaving me to wonder why the only place I ever saw a pair were on my doctor as he conducted my appointments, complete with a note - taker on the other side of the connection (so many... jokes... can't pick... just one).

«The reason you won't see a compromise anytime soon is because Congress actually acting in the wake of Orlando would be a tacit admission on the other side that guns had something to do with what happened in Orlando as opposed to ISIS,» he said, using an acronym for Islamic State.

A wise people, seeing the situation for what it truly is, would grapple with these harsh truths, determine a way to stop fighting literally on the other side of the world, and seek a settlement, not as victors, but as an honorable people.

[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the other side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5 things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design for what you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us together?

Don't take my word for it, let's see what other people (on the buy side) are saying about the state of sales development today.

On the other side of the border, where even Hillary Clinton wasn't planning a national price on carbon, we expect to see one from Donald Trump precisely never.

Only when I began to think for myself and to question what I had been told, did I see that the «other side» had some valid points — I simply didn't want to hear them, much less attempt to understand them.

It's easy for someone in the majority to make these claims of calmness and peace but that is not what us atheists see coming from the other side either.

If you think there are some «compelling reasons» to change your views, then why wouldn't you share them here, and others can see them and either change as well or possibly present «compelling» reasons from the other side?

We can see others not as foes and enemies, but as people who are on the other side of the galaxy from where we are at.

And this is why the issue will never go away — because people like George want to equate abortion with ra.pe — some people will obviously never see the argument from the other side and thus will not compromise.

Just because evil is always relative does not mean we as humans can not see ourselves in others and share that with them, letting them know we can relate, that we feel the relative evil as well and attempt to support those in harms way by saying «I am you too, i'm on your side.»

Do you suppose that I've gone through all I have, and come out on the other side and starred a life of my own which every day I'm thankful for, just to take charge of you and see that you don't go to the dogs because you're so weak and full of self - pity?

Secondly I argue that the New Testament's seeing Jesus as example is a necessary correlate of what later theology calls his divine sonship (the other side of the «incarnation»), in such a way that those who downgrade the weight of Jesus» example, on the grounds that his particular social location or example can not be a norm, renew a counterpart of the old «Ebionitic» heresy.

Imagine that we are in a boat, rowing across a vast, slow - moving river so large that we can not even see the other side.

This «seeing the other» is not, as we have seen, a matter of «identification» or «empathy,» but of a concrete imagining of the other side which does not at the same time lose sight of one's own.

ok i've decided — after soul searching and observing my and other's reactions to these religious blog news on CNN learning more about religion from this alone and about the mideast than from anywhere else in my USA educated life i need to be more tolerant of others having religious based governments THAT is what is confusing me — that religion are governments are not seperated that is hard for much of USA population to understand perhaps it is for me i think you would have to actually live in a society like the mideast to truly understand it i mean — actually be part of the society the religious part is truly offputting — since most in USA seperate church and state like — church is for faith and imagination and celebration and family and community involvement and state is for protection and education and health and infrastructure, etc., for all it is hard to be serious about religion — when the serious side of society is state it is hard to see religion being the serious side of enforcement — and the state enforcing the faith based side of society egad — doesn't god get lost in all that?

As with most on the extremist tilt, you only see the enemy on the other side while not seeing it on your own

I just don't see anyone explaining the other side of the story.

They do not see how their very success in re-ordering American law, policy, and society to provide maximal freedom and support for their own lives has led to devastating consequences to Americans living on the other side of the divide.

On the other side, the fundamentalists and conservative evangelicals have begun to see that Christian atonement and redemption are not merely for individual appropriation in isolation but also take into account the whole person with his / her involvement in society and culture.

Jung has seen that psychologically this means that an overemphasis on either side of a polarity such as conscious - unconscious, or sacred - profane, will lead not to a dialectical coincidentia oppositorum but to a reinforcement or enantiodromia of the (untransfigured) other pole, that is, to an inundation or regression.17 It will be helpful to keep these Jungian motifs in mind as we explore the somewhat surprising parallels between Jung's notion of «individuation» and Altizer's idea of an ongoing kenotic incarnation.

Yes Gary; Jesus is in you as your savour as He is the savour of the world: In Adam all die even so in Christ is All made alive: But I have seen in the past couple days your words and they are not my Lords at all: Christ is not divided or Bi-Polar: He does not cuss like a sailor one day and then minister to the masses the next: No; Christ is consistent, He is Grounded in His word; those that waver are not stable in anything, even as is written: I truly know now the you truly do have a mocking spirit in you, because again Christ is not Bi-polar: Go re-read you other post and see if they are the words of my Lord, then ask if anyone will be willing to follow you even as you are of Christ: The false Christ comes up along side of the truth Christ to pervert everything that is of God: That is how all these sects are again formed, many started of in the truth, but went out from the Word of our Lord even through Paul now to become their own god: You are now an example of what I speak: Thank - you Gary; In Jesus Name Alexandria:

Amen.The thing is too many people from both sides try to disprove the other, Scientist (well some) will say there is no God Ala Hawkings here and then some believers will say that evolution or anything pertaining to science that they don't understand is false.I don't believe that science and God are mutually exclusive.For me personally science helps to explain a lot of things regarding creation, almost like giving me a window into how creative God is.I believe that God uses science to show us how awesome he is.To me science does not disprove Gods existence it actually reaffirms it on a human logic level, for me.You may disagree, that's fine, but this is just how I see it.

See you on the other side... or not

Either way, Im not going to try to make myself feel better by slamming your beliefs, which is what I see going on by both sides, and yet both sides seem to trumpet themselves as being more enlightened then the other when in reality, they are just 2 sides of the same coin.

Even souls who've passed are in a temporary level of hell now, not as punishment, but to give them the opportunity to see the other side.

infact i would like to see an arguement with two sides that go like this, one is for hitler as for as his skill speaking and the other side argue for Cicero, both gave hour + long speeches that drove people to act on things they normally wouldn't have.

I expected that some people would not understand or would disagree with my argument, but I did not expect the warm and genuinely excited reactions from those whose own experience has led them to see Christ on the other side of the long border between contemporary Catholic and evangelical religious experiences.

On the other hand, I did think that Ozil played better today than the previous few times I've seen him — he made some comment mid-week to the effect that he's there to provide the artistic side of the game and not to do battle, so maybe that's all we can expect from him.

but its a bit sad to see that i as i know more about arsenal fans than other fans, to say from the bottom of my heart, that the fans on here are as worse as the worst if not the worst fans out there... arsenal being on a run, with özil scoring one of the best goals i have ever seen on tuesday, draws against the best defensive side in the league and no they arent stoke city or something they are SPURS equally title challenger as any of arsenal man city, man united, chelsea, liverpool, a team that sent man city home when they (city) looked unbeatable..

The logic behind fading to get the points makes a ton of sense as it adds up in the long run, but I don't see it if you're simply betting one side despite no line movement just because everyone is on the other side.

Lets be honest EUFA have always hated English football ever since the dark days of hooliganism and Brexit has only added to this, so to see the remaining two English sides in the Champions League drawn against each other plus Arsenal given a trip to Moscow under the present climate doesn't surprise me.

Now this is not what most Arsenal fans see: what I also want to see is Kolasanic tried in DM (Keene - Viera mold, but without the glaring facial expressions, and with a more than a touch of class, so much so that other sides will not figure out what is happening to their running lanes through middle).

i've seen us in our pomp, ie at our best — i'd like to witness another imposing and resplendent arsenal side... but i can't see another side comprised by arsene wenger not while there's other managers with their finger on the pulse as a far as top international quality players and tactics are concerned.

On the other side of the bracket, we could see some chaos: I'd tab Davidson as the No. 10 seed most likely to make the Sweet 16, and UCLA, despite not deserving its spot, could beat both SMU and Iowa State.

On the other side, we'll get a chance to see just how legit the Panthers are — not that they still need to prove that their 7 - 0 record is no fluke — but it will again be a great way for Cam Newton and Carolina to assert themselves as the leading contender for the number one seed in the conference.

Having successfully sold Shinji Kagawa back to Borussia Dortmund for a fee in the region of # 8m the Premier League side have seen a host of clubs register their interest in other players who are not deemed as part of Louis van Gaal's plans.

Yet he is not that player that can spark, drive and carve out opportunities for himself in the middle under pressure, hence why we always see him passing side ways or running into the box to capitalise on space that other players have created for him.

He concluded: «The ball was on the other side, I did not see what happened.

It remains to be seen whether the greater freedom given to Premier League sides to shop around the fringes of the strongest national teams would be countered by the fact that they won't be able to loan their purchases to other sides.

Their 1st goal was frustrating to see ox walking into the box while the guy he should have been tighter on got in for a free header, yes Theo could have done better on the other side to block the cross but at least Theo ran to try while the Ox just lazily walked into the box and not done anything to help defend the cross in.