Sentences with phrase «n't see their point of view»

I don't understand why Christians (the ones who believe in creationism) can't see both points of view?

But I didn't see my point of view represented among the hundreds of comments.

Again, the entire point of the article is that the «divine» book has contradications on the subject that people like you ignore because you are so vane to not see any point of view but your own.

Some fans may read this as me not being a true fan as not supporting the side, personally I don't see this point of view.

Not exact matches

Everything had its own intricacy, but everything was from the point of view from the camera, which is great, because in person you don't see it as well, but once you put a camera in front of these, it just works perfectly.

But it's also worth seeing that refusal to opt for either extreme is not the same as shrugging your shoulders — it can be a principled point of view.

Try to see your problems from someone else's point of view if an answer is not apparent.

I didn't see it at the time, mostly because I lacked empathy and couldn't understand her point of view, but she was definitely giving me an opportunity to adjust my tactics and become a better leader.

«So as a consumer, I guess next year will not be a pleasant year from a purchasing point of view because you'll probably be seeing some inflation in all likelihood,» he said.

If you are in doubt as to whether you have a conflict, you must disclose and can not influence or take part in a decision, transaction, arrangement or otherwise in which you can be perceived to have an interest, direct or indirect; can not be seen to be impartial from an outsider point of view; or receive a benefit not shared by other shareholders.

«I don't see that from a market point of view... and certainly not from an iPhone point of view.»

I don't see that from a market point of view or?

It's because the two precious metals are not only money but, from the point of view of free individuals, the best sort of money, less susceptible to what governments see as the most desirable quality of money — the susceptibility to control by government and particularly its susceptibility to devaluation.

I don't see that from a market point of view or - and certainly not from an iPhone point of view,» he replied.

They do not it's only because people are not open minded but are to rigid to see another point of view.

If you really go down the list looking at every word and the heart behind it in light of scripture and in the light of the law of the Spirit of life you'll find major discrepancies and see how carnal, worldly and unbiblical those points of views really are... I'm concerned about the heart behind such views because it isn't one of a disciple (one who emulates their rabbi and is possessed by the «Holy» Spirit of God).

It adds: «With respect to the existence and the political choices of the State of Israel, they must be seen from a point of view that is not in itself religious but based on general considerations of international law.»

It is what has lead me to my veiw that Atheism as a religion, the passion most Atheist have for their point of view from the start you may not fall in this category but I'm sure you know someone that does.The same applies to Christians that freak out on someone and start forcing their view on others, I see that as wrong also if someone asks or brings the debate to you then by all means debate but why be rude how does it help?

I see the differing point of view every day when I turn on the TV, and it's not liberal or conservative.

It does nt mean he has abandoned God, it just means that he would like to see the world from anothers point of view.

While understanding the main point of the article, I wish to add that, in my view, wise men came to see baby Jesus about six months after His birth, at Passover time, not necessarily in Bethlehem, Jesus being in a house and not in a manger.

It doesn't seem that there is any point of view that Muslims should be accepting of Americans (or maybe I just never get to see that media because I don't live in a nation that has a large Muslim base).

Steve — I don't expect you to change or to see any other's point of view — but maybe it would be good to listen to others, have empathy with them rather then just perscribing your almost robotic response.

But from the point of view of a professor at a Catholic university (Patrick's), don't we have to be judgmental about the efforts of, say, Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Locke not only to «tame» but to destroy Christianity [see the symposium on Strauss referenced below]?

I consider myself a christian, with religious knowledge and general knowlege, however I do not hold to a set of views dictated by an organized religion, I believe the organized religions are where we have gone wrong, as someone pointed out earlier to most «religious people» to question ones faith or organization is wrong but that is exactly what the bible tells us to do... test ALL things to see what is true.

That's only useful when you need to rely upon talking people into seeing your point of view, and people with evidence on their side really shouldn't have to do that.

When everyone is able to know and be friends with all of the other people involved in the disagreements, there is more potential for each person to see the others» point of view and to genuinely care about their issues when they may not have seemed important otherwise.

i agre with Dave and then some - christians (and other folks who are serious in their beliefs too) are comical, believing and praying to someone who can't be seen, can't be proven... (this is from the point of view of an empiricist, who is able to measure things) Christians (well, me for sure) are hypocrits - believing in fantastic ideals and guaranteed to continualy fall short - that is a fairly comical notion, but nonetheless, one I enjoy to continue to strive for - setting high ideals and striving towards them.

«I prefer this over christological or christocentric since these are susceptible to a point of view I am not advocating here, namely, needing to «see Christ»; in every, or nearly every, Old Testament passage.

I do not see how it is possible, at least from a Christian or Western point of view, to avoid identifying Zen as a backward way tg nal or primordial Unity.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

Their epistemological privilege is based on the fact that, because their point of view is not distorted by power and riches, they can see differently.

The only one who can not is Lucifer because he do not want to, God heart is not made of iron, if there are evil people alive in this world it is only because God want them to repent to, there are most evil people who as a children or teenager was sweet but because of another being became evil, Only God know what it did make them change or their pain but only one things is sure as God he did have the first seat to see all their pain and live, and to my point of view as a Father it is by no means lesser than the pain he did feel for them or them victimes, like a electric chair.

We can look at what we see on TV, not from the point of view of who characters are, or even what they do, but what they mean.

I see things in a new view, points I haven't thought of.

We fail in our responsibility to history when we do not permit ourselves to see Civil War memorials from a Romantic point of view, and when we fail to recognize the phrase «lost cause» as a shorthand for a morally complex, tragic understanding of the South's defeat.

We can not expect the layman to see the gospel from the minister's point of view until the minister sees the world through the layman's eyes.

Now the point of this discussion is not to appeal to Whitehead as some sort of final authority; Hall clearly recognizes that his own view differs from that of Whitehead at some points (see, e.g., UP 200f.

Not one written in it's own language using only concepts and events which could have been seen as possible from the point of view of other fotune tellers in it's culture, and of it's own day.

I think, in a way, those attempts only prove what he is saying and we can't rest until he sees my point of view.

Our subconscious understanding of the laws of physics and the natural laws He has set forth to allow our existence to come about can not be observed, and to say that He is flawed because we see disease is viewing things from a very limited point of view, that being a living human being with an aversion to disease and loss of health.

In the pre-Enlightenment period, a notion like «Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch» did not function so much to invite inquiry into the mind, circumstances and psychology of Moses as it did to unite the literature under a single coordinating point of view, urging the reader to see a synthetic purpose within even the most heterogeneous and diverse collection of traditions.

I do not see Jeremy's point about something following v. 4 contradicting our view of 1Cor.

The third aspect of this development is that even the secular rationalist is coming to be seen as a person like another: not a god, not a superior impersonal intellect, monarch of all it surveys, but a man with a particular point of view.

Whitehead is not asserting an epistemological solipsism here, but is stating that the question of the community of nature to all, being metaphysical, is not one that has to be answered from the point of view of science.3 Moreover, it remains to be seen whether or not Whitehead's position, as it unfolds in the Enquiry, will remain uninvolved in the «difficult metaphysical question.»

The ONE THING Muslims most Muslims will never do, especially those who cry about how they are not being treated unfairly, is make any attemp to see any other point of view.

Also, he writes not from a Protestant but from a secularist point of view, and thus sees no inherent problem in the relation of religion to public education.

I find it disgusting that you do not have the capability to see things from any other point of view than your own..

In the same way that we must not prop up single passages out of context to support our views, we must also not see entire topics (such as tithing) as independent teaching points that can be disconnected from God's central message.

From a visitor point of view this is very valuable; it means they will see a much greater variety of potential suppliers and companies they just won't see at other shows.