I do
not see a distinction there.
As for responding as a Christian or as a feminist, I personally don't see a distinction between the categories.
Scholars make distinctions where others do
not see any distinctions.
I don't see this distinction... I don't accept it as a personal philosophy that the state may do something totally against the ethics of the state.
It is not as though God did
not see the distinction between good and evil.
Didn't see that distinction in your write up above.
But I have
not seen this distinction made clearly or definitively.
We honestly don't see any distinction, though, between what we do in our studios and what we do at the gallery.
You just haven't seen the distinction yet.
Not exact matches
Boies draws a careful
distinction between daily fantasy sports and poker, though many people who play both don't
see such a big difference.
Importantly, Siddall and his management team also wrote a new mission statement that emphasized the agency was about satisfying housing «needs,»
not wants — a key
distinction for an organization that long
saw boosting homeownership as part of its mandate.
Second, let me say that, if we go with your second argument, then we could say that we agree that all
distinctions are
not the ideal, but just disagree on when we should
see, want to
see, or start to
see those
distinctions disappear.
I don't exactly disagree, though I think where we differ is that I
see a
distinction between receiving eternal life by faith and living as a follower of Jesus.
«We certainly can't build a Christology on that
distinction,» Dr. MacDonald admitted, «but it does help us to
see where Christology comes in.
The important discrimination, as he
saw it, was
not between material and immaterial — a
distinction with which he never dealt — but between moral and immoral.
But when I read about and
see young, emerging lives being destroyed by neglect, hunger, war and enraged parents, the
distinction refocuses, and I say, «Life, real life, is being
not only destroyed but twisted, deformed, «unholy» life is being created.»
This
distinction is important because there is a difference, according to the Bible, between what we
see and what God
sees: «For my thoughts are
not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, says the Lord» (Isa.
The way of
distinction, therefore, puts a positive valuation on the time - space continuum and, though it
sees divine redemption as the remaking of history into something new, it can
not conceive of divine - human interaction in other than historical terms which preserve the qualitative difference between God and man.
In any case, this
distinction between the given and The Given is anticipated in the correspondence, as
seen in Brightman's willingness to admit some degree of «faintness» in the given.40 The real difference may lie in Brightman's methodological desire to have the self (and what is given to and as the self, the shining present) clearly defined, while Hartshorne insists that
not only the self, but also the given «is more or less vague,» and must be so.
If you can
not see the difference then possibly you think they are all the same; there is a difference and the rest of us make the
distinction.
In his reply to «Die Bauleute» Buber makes a
distinction between revelation and the giving of the law which Rosenzweig has failed to make: «I do
not believe that revelation is ever lawgiving, and in the fact that lawgiving always comes out of it, I
see the fact of human opposition, the fact of man.»
Besides that, I can
not see how any so called loving God can include mass
distinction of life, his creations, over and over again in the history of our planet as we know it.
Let us never forget that precisely out of reverence for the Deity he was ignorant, that, so far as a pagan could be, he kept watch as a judge on the border between God / and man, watching out to
see that the deep gulf of qualitative
distinction be firmly fixed between them, between God / and man, that God / and man may
not in a way, philosophice, poetice, etc., coalesce into one.
Father Oakes does
not see the issue involved in the
distinction between micro «and macroevolution.
2 will use the term «causal objectification'to indicate that I do
not intend to deal with the type of objectification which Whitehead calls «presentational objectification» (
see PR 58 / 91 for this
distinction).
Finite spirit envisaged from the beginning and from its end, at least in the case of man, is «spirit in the world» or «cosmic spirit» and even with regard to the angels it will be appropriate for a Christian, and in the first place for a biblical, theology to
see their
distinction from mankind within this «cosmic spirituality» and
not outside it or in contrast to it.
Are
not our
distinctions between nature and history shortsighted anti of limited validity when
seen in this cosmic perspective?
In sum, in the argument that a PVS patient ought to be sustained as long as possible I
see the unhappy fruits of the three technological seductions I described above: death by «starvation» has now become our fault,
not nature's, if we omit treatment; the
distinction between omission and commission is erased in the insistence that the stopping of artificial feeding is the same as killing the patient and, as too often happens, a new technology gets legitimated and routinized by an invocation of the sanctity of life.
To begin with, we must
see that it is necessary to make
distinctions within the Bible, for
not everything in it has the same weight.
Pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer clearly
saw that «The
distinction between life that is worth living and life that is
not worth living must sooner or later destroy life itself.»
Not because the Bible is not the revealed word of God and not because the magisterium lacks the authority to teach the truth, but because the «truth» that the magisterium has the authority to teach is «truth for our salvation»; and although the above interpretation of the bara / asah distinction may conceivably be true, it is difficult to see how it can be a requirement for our salvati
Not because the Bible is
not the revealed word of God and not because the magisterium lacks the authority to teach the truth, but because the «truth» that the magisterium has the authority to teach is «truth for our salvation»; and although the above interpretation of the bara / asah distinction may conceivably be true, it is difficult to see how it can be a requirement for our salvati
not the revealed word of God and
not because the magisterium lacks the authority to teach the truth, but because the «truth» that the magisterium has the authority to teach is «truth for our salvation»; and although the above interpretation of the bara / asah distinction may conceivably be true, it is difficult to see how it can be a requirement for our salvati
not because the magisterium lacks the authority to teach the truth, but because the «truth» that the magisterium has the authority to teach is «truth for our salvation»; and although the above interpretation of the bara / asah
distinction may conceivably be true, it is difficult to
see how it can be a requirement for our salvation.
Indeed, they can be
seen as traditions of human action, in
distinction, although
not separation, from traditions of thought.
One
distinction that I make, and Martin does
not see the importance of, is between eternity and everlastingness, or immortality.
Sarah does
not say, but we can assume it lies in the
distinction any Christian must
see between Christian faith and modern ideologies.
Perhaps the most important
distinction of all is between those congregations that
see social service as part of their mission and those that do
not.
By making a
distinction between your faith which is constant and your beliefs that change, you can claim consistency while being inconsistent, and as we've
seen your faith is
not committed to any theology.
The
distinction between the presence of the Risen Christ and the Holy Spirit is
not always clear, either in John or Paul (
see 2 Cor.
There is a close parallel in the interaction of metaphorical language and literal language; there is no sharp line between the two, but only a
distinction which is relative, shifting, and contextdependent.31 «Man is a wolf» invites reflection
not only on wolf - life characteristics of man, but also on man - like characteristics of the wolf, which is
seen thereafter as more human.
NT does
not make this
distinction, and I
see here you say to cool to touch on the counter.
As if losing to Sunderland and
seeing John Terry banned for his final game at Stamford Bridge wasn't bad enough, Chelsea now have the «
distinction» of being the worst Premier League title defender ever.
This isn't too difficult a
distinction, thankfully, because it's very easy to weed out chowder imposters by simply taking a glance at their core ingredients and
seeing if flour is included or
not.
But NCB advocates do
not make the
distinction when they compare (
see «caring» s post above) a dramatically bad outcome like this one to «she might have had to have a c - section!!!!»
I'm glad to hear of shuls that aren't doling out the candy just to get through Teffilot but also
see a clear
distinction between breastfeeding and Bamba.
It does, however, make a
distinction between persons who have the «right of abode» (British citizens including a small minority of Commonwealth citizens) and those who do
not have this right (for more details
see Anderson and Blinder, 2014).
See also Alan's
distinction between the message a campaign uses and the actual language they use: supporters can still spread a message even when they don't parrot a candidate's talking points verbatim.
The
distinction is semantic, of course, and you may
not see much of a difference between this formulation and what I describe as the norm.
He wanted to make a
distinction between what he
saw as a politics of blame, grievance and fear — in a clear if
not explicit reference to UKIP — and what the Lib Dems offer.
People
see a clear
distinction between Albany, now, and Washington, which is
not working,» said Sen. Charles Fuschillo, a Long Island Republican and one of the co-chairs of SRCC.
Still, Chapman says, he would
not be surprised to
see water ice on asteroids, adding that the
distinction between comets, traditionally considered to be icy, and asteroids, which have been largely thought of as rocky, is becoming increasingly blurred.
«We
saw a clear
distinction: non-elective admissions drive the association between hospitalization and long - term changes in cognitive function in later life, while elective admissions do
not necessarily carry the same risk of negative cognitive outcomes,» James said.