Sentences with phrase «n't sell you at this point»

Not exact matches

Claire's Stores Inc., another chain that sells some toys, also is said to be nearing bankruptcy — though it's not at the point of being shut down.

He pointed out that Apple's 77.3 million iPhone sold in the quarter included 4.2 million that were only added to inventory at stores, not sold to customers, the highest number ever.

Jim Pishue, president of the Washington Bankers Association, points out that guidelines don't supersede federal law, which categorizes marijuana as a controlled substance that can not be legally sold anywhere in the U.S. And guidance, he noted, can change at any time.

«We're not at the point where the investment community is saturated in equities and there's nothing to do with stocks but sell.»

As Lal, Alvarez, and Greenberg point out in Retail Revolution, PetSmart faced a challenge when pet food suppliers began selling their products on various e-commerce sites, not to mention at Walmart, supermarkets, and other non-pet-specific places.

At some point, all the training, tweaking, and coaching won't get your worst reps to start selling.

I met Evan, he sold me the vision for Snap, if you like, and don't forget this is at a point when they just turned down pretty significant offers from Google and Facebook and all of my colleagues and friends and family were telling me I was an idiot to join the small startup in Venice.

At one point my stock was worth $ 5 million, but I couldn't sell it.

For example, you'll find you don't always get your points at merchants that do other things beyond selling food and drink.

Executives also complain that their salespeople can not sell the value of their products which means they sell at a less than desirable price point.

In a diversified portfolio you use your bonds to buy stocks (or for spending purposes if taking distributions from your portfolio) when the stock market falls so you aren't forced to sell your stocks at a low point in the cycle and lock in losses.

If you haven't sold the investment yet, it is just «down», you haven't actually lost anything until you sell at a lower price point.

That's — we didn't sell much in last year because we had way too much Session and were — we expect that to be well in EMEA, in particular, where we see — as Nick had mentioned in his remarks, we see more competition at the lower end of the price point range versus the upper end.

What we found during 2008 - 2009 is that most of our clients could distribute the income they required from their fixed income, which was a safe haven that was performing well, while not having to sell their stocks at a low point.

Prof. Patton pointed out that parking lot owners were not simply land speculators looking to sell out at a capital gain.

The principle is quite simple: sell stocks when they are doing well and squirrel away the profit in bonds from which you draw an income, don't sell stocks when they are not doing well and continue to draw your income from bonds until, potentially, they run out at which point you draw from stocks, replenish your bonds when stocks are doing well again.

A combination of a lost decade and having to sell equities at low prices in order to live can diminish your portfolio — to the point where it won't recover even when the salad days return.

«To sell at that point now, there's a risk that we can't deliver the product on time.

Interesting data points: Absentee buyers, typically investors who don't intend on living in the home as a primary residence, made up 22.3 percent of all homes sold in March, up from 20.9 percent at the same time last year.

But now, the company seems to have ramped up production, and at this point, the Nest thermostat is selling through a variety of places including Nest's online site, the Apple store, big box retailers like Best Buys and Lowe's and Amazon, among others.

«At the time our first record sold 50,000 records, when we didn't even know if we were going to sell one, it was an amazing point to realize there were people out there who knew who we [were],» Carter says.

And the sly salesman says pointing at the neighbors empty arms «Sure sure, but you are holding in your hands the same type of clothing as I am, though not the quality... Are you not trying to sell such phony finery?»

A little note: Some of my four preferred companies sell a number of products and whilst I'm sure they're all pure and delicious, I have not seen them all nor reviewed their ingredients so please note my support at this point is solely for the almond milks.

Last week a week's supply sold out in two days at a Whole Foods in North California, and as Grist.org points out: «Maybe you don't think you WANT a better fake meat, but you probably thought you didn't want a social network that let you transmit 140 - character bon mots, either.»

«Consumers are open to plant - based alternative proteins, and while they recognize health concerns as a distinct selling point for these, they will not waver when it comes to taste,» said William Roberts, senior food and drink analyst at Mintel.

I do not want to go into the details of exactly what we are doing or what we have done, but I have to say to you at this point that we have no evidence that Coles is selling below cost.

I quite agree sell all the deadwoods but which player in his right mind would want to come to arsenal at the moment, remember people man u was in the same situation under moyes but we're able to attract better player's even when not playing champions league, the selling point from arsenal point of view is to tell players which they are trying to get what the plan is of getting back to top flight football by going for the Europa league over the FA cup and finishing in the top six otherwise if they go for wishy - washy arsene wenger stupid attitude of we've got quality all the squad we are competing for everything then I'm afraid We will end up with nothing

- i don't mean he will nit never rule out he may sell at least one or two if those... this is Wenger... you all know him... thumb me down for pointing facts... if i lied that messi is signing for arsenal today, — 100 likes because you like rumours and hate facts.

I would like to disagree with the Author that everyone was glad that Ozil joined arsenal, when at that point i was really hoping for Benzema or Higuain, i know that Ozil will not be sold but what i would encourage the manager to do is to have the guts to sit him on the bench when he goes missing in games.

Walcott does not deserve his 140k and I never said he did, but Walcott is at a point where his stock plummeted so badly that if we were to sell him 1st we get jack all, 2nd we have to subsidies his wage.

At this point with our early injury concerns, Nastasic isn't looking to bad and even though I haven't seen Carvalho play besides the World Cup I would have swapped him for Arteta and or Flamini in a heartbeat, also since we barely play Podolski anyways we should have strengthen the LW as well by selling him and going all out for Di Maria (didn't take long for him to adapt did it?)

But as you have correctly pointed out though is that we only really spent the budget on 2 additional players really (even thought i believe that they would have been covered by c / l monies and other finances from building projects we make money and monies owed from debts owed to us from barca and others for players sold in years gone buy on thus not really touching the puma and emirates money at all # 70 million +).

They have a shelf life of 8/10 years at the very top if they are lucky so who can begrudge them the opportunity to make hay whilst the sun is shining... am not saying Sanchez is not money driven but the way the guy plays i can mortgage my life he actually enjoys the game, enjoys wining first and foremost then money comes 2nd... like the author of the article rightly pointed out, he was in Messi's shadow at Barca and could not express himself fully, now he is at a club where he is the main man and given a free role and license to express himself and i very much doubt if he will want to go to a club like Madrid (as been rumoured in the dailies today) to relieve the bad experience he suffered at Barca because let us face facts, he is never going to displace CR7 as the main man, so even if Madrid sells Benzema or Bale to make room for him he will be back to the same position he was at Barca, this time he will be playing 2nd fiddle to CR7 so my guess is all the Madrid talks is been fed the press by his agents to drive a hard bargain when contract extension talks resumes.....

I'm at the point now with a CDM that I don't care who it is just as long as flamini is sold and replaced even ki from Swansea would do as back up at least he can pass to his teammates and would be happy with a back up role to le coq!

I'm just not sold on Jackson at this point in time.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

At what point can we call that a pattern and not blow if off as just trying to get views / selling etc..

The other part of your post regarding Usmanov selling his shares could come true, if he feels there is no point in hanging around if he thinks there is no chance of him getting on the Board of Directors at Arsenal or take overall control, the only reason he will stick around is because he is a fan of the club, not just a very rich man trying to squeeze very penny from the club to prop up his other franchises.

Podolski, Cazorla (got nothing against them, all 30 + players can't retire with us, they have to move on at some point), are in the right age to be sold and replaced with better and younger players.

But from Arsenal's point of view, selling him there is a great business for me, at least we won't strengthen a rival...

There were many matches where it looked like he was the only one trying to make something happen and those around him went to sleep.He wants everyone to play with his strong mentality but little does he know that Arsenal is mentally weak team.Do you think Alexis can repeat this sulking in other top clubs?It's only Arsenal that opens themselves uo for such things in they way we behave and play.That being said I don't see the point in keeping a player who doesn't want to play for you but a rival.It's just sick.If I was Wenger I would've sold him but at am not.But mark my words we will be vindicated by his performances for another club just like the rest who left.

It will be s buyers market so kroenke will be after a bargain, usmanov does not need the money so will sit tight and see what happens in the future, perhsps kroenke will want to sell at some point and usmanov will buy.

I've had enough of this crap, look I honesty do think giroud is a good striker and he is a fairly consistant goal scorer, and every time he played for arsenal he gave 100 percent and I think we all appreciated the way he was, a true professional, but to say we as fans were too critical of him or that he didn't have enough of a chance at arsenal is just absolute bullshit, first of all he has scored more headed goals than any other player in the prem since he arrived in 2012 so we did play to his strengths and he was our main striker for four long years and every pundit on sky and motd has at one point said Giroud is not enough for arsenal to win the title ect, but, now we have sold him he is apparently the best thing since sliced bread and the best buy of the transfer window blah blah fuc * # * g blah.

Think Gabriel's problem might be language based but no I don't think we should sell him, he certainly does not lack the talent, he is just a bit fiery and rash, but so was the boss at one point in time.

The thing that really bothers me is the thing we've disagreed on in the past and that's imo Wengers apparent lack of Urgency and decisiveness when moving into the transfer window I know that Scheweinsteiger would be a great addition but He is somewhat over the hill in comparison to the others that are being toted about and while I know that we are not the cash Rich Man Poo or Man Sh!tty or Chelski I do know that we are at a point for the first time in ten years where we don't need to replace many players or are being frced to sell the quality ones we have, we are for the first time in a spot where we only need to add two or three players and we are there in terms of being able to compete, Id hate for the financial Exuberance to stop us taking that final stride forward into the competitive team we nearly are IMO spend the money now, get the striker, get the DM and we wont need to look at transfers in a big way again for several seasons and with that in mind Id rather have the likes of Benzema or Lacazetta or even Cavanni than a nearly over the hill Scheweinsteiger.

Massive mistake to sell him to any rival but the one you certainly don't strengthen is the reigning champions, what's the point if you're gonna make them stronger and you weaker at the same time.

Agree with many points in this article.Wenger is still one of the best managers in the World, no doubt about this but I think is enough is enough.His one of the managers who ressist a long time at the same club but I don't think he deserve to cache Ferguson.Is the oposite of Ferguson.Ferguson buy world class players and keep them, sell them after some succes years at the club, Wenger discover players, grow them and sell before we have a complet class team.

Northwestern at Michigan: Bettors still aren't sold on Michigan, as they're getting just 23 % of early spread bets as 8 - point favorites.

With that said... I say: If Vegas «pre-paid» a Kansas St. lay - off early in the line... (pre-paid layoffs don't have to go to the action - favourite, only a line shift needs to be anticipated with intention of middling the layoff and the action)... then they will have bought x amount of Kansas WTS units at +9.5 in anticipation of selling x amount of units at +7.5 in attempts to middle a 8 - 9 point spread where they'd win the action as well as the layoff.