Sentences with phrase «n't stand leggings»

Btw I am the most comfy person I know so far and I can't stand leggings... seriously not even for the gym.

Listen to what I'm about to say... the squat is NOT a standing leg press.

Not exact matches

For pet parents who can't stand being away from their four - legged friends, PetChatz offers a Skype - like solution.

With Jeff Bezos standing supreme, with one leg in Amazon's media - selling business and another in The Washington Post's news business, isn't a new D.C. bundle inevitable and logical?

So the only way you're going to be able to see it is that if you're if you're behind him then you've got to stand up and the next thing you know everyone in the entire auditorium or wherever they're watching this is now standing up and the only thing that's happening is that everyone's legs are getting weaker and they're more annoyed that they're having to stand up and they can't get high enough to see the show because everyone around them is taking advantage of this.

Morally and ethically Rachel Notley does not have a leg to stand on and she also knows that absolutely.

You don't have a leg to stand on and your kind are desperately seeking ways of stopping the exodus from religion all over the world.

After 350 million years, the fish still doesn't have a leg to stand on.

Well, since 92 % of senior pastors are male, I don't see that you have a leg to stand on.

If anything, I think this will backfire on Republicans if Romney is the nominee because he doesn't have a leg to stand on and many will just stay home.

If the RC had come out a couple of decades ago and asked the public for help in exposing the pedophile priests so that they could be excommunicated and imprisoned, they might have a leg to stand on, but they didn't do that.

If you are able to point out a single negative consequence that would stem from allowing gays to marry then you might have a leg to stand on; but you cant, so you don't.

Unless you can provide me with accruate and verifyable information about how many Christians there were afterwards, then you really don't have a leg to stand on.

If your god is not loving, then you don't have a leg to stand on either.

And «Unless you can provide me with accurate and verifiable information about how many Christians there were afterwards, then you really don't have a leg to stand on.»

When you have to rely on crazed copy and paste jobs to support a candidate that has changed his position on virtually EVERYTHING at LEAST once, you know you haven't got a leg to stand on.

Just because you don't credit The Watchmen, Nick Goggin, Darwin Fish and the rest of your zealot cronies from whom you copy / paste, doesn't mean that you have a leg to stand on with this complaint.

Anyone who tries to stop me will find that they don't have a leg to stand on, just like all those crippled liberal veterans and silly black people and foolish Jews!

Christians need a mob to make their opinions heard because their opinions are absurd, and with a mass collective of lowered intelligence reinforcing them, they need not concern themselves with not having a leg to stand on.

You don't have a leg to stand on and you know it!

They don't have a leg to stand on.

You don't have a leg to stand on and are simply talking out of your ass.

They don't have a leg to stand on and they know it.

But — and this is a BIG but — you do not have a leg to stand on.

She doesn't have a leg to stand on in court.

They know they don't have a leg to stand on, so they will often settle for trying giving their own absurd theory equal standing to the well - known scientific facts.

The problem is in your first sentence; we are not to go by the word of anyone but YHWH the Almighty Creator of all «Life» in Genesis chapters 1 - 7 of all His creation, for He is the only Savior, and Redeemer in Isaiah 49:26, and Isaiah 60:16, not jc, if the word is not from the King YHWH jc hasn't a leg to stand on.

chapter and verse as your fall - back position when you don't have a leg to stand on.

That monstrous interpretation has not one leg to stand on before Jesus.

Considering that you can not engage in honest discussion and debate, you have no leg to stand on.

He who stands on his tiptoes does not stand firm; he who stretches his legs does not walk (easily).

They don't have a constitutional leg to stand on to sue.

That being said, I think the only ones who have a leg to stand on in complaining against the wager are those who are convinced that God is not a possibility.

not a spec of proof any of you «hypo - christians» have a leg to stand on regarding existence of «GOD» or anyone else from that book of ghost stories you use to keep from having to think on your own.

So when in middle age I come at last to believe that a nation builds up a moral treasury of merit by the sacrifices of its people in war and I begin to worry, like the ancient moralists did, that we grow fat, lazy and contemptible amidst our plenty, I don't have a leg to stand on.

But now that the authorities of the Catholic Church have made it clear that if a Catholic school did disobey such a law, their bishops would not support them they do not have a leg to stand on.

Humanism denies men any religion, any suprahuman standard, any timeless point of reference; and without any of these things I do not believe humanists have a leg to stand on, and it is high time the absurdity of their position were realized.

prepare thy legs for much standing in the kitchen and prepare thy arms for much scrubbing of things that can't go in the dishwasher.

I do not think there is a need for CB, Holding, Beilik and Chambers are aging nicely, Kos has about 3 years left in him, Must still learning, GaBs still here, Mert have couple more games in the legs, Monnreal and Kolasonic can stand in, that is basically 9 CBs.

When you are playing football and you got a high ball to control the slightest touch will push you off it for sure eguaro pushed mustafi but mustafi should have stock his leg out to bring him down or elbowed him in the face well i would have done that Arsenal were not hungry enough for the cup if they were we would have seen some blood running down of some Manchester players Arsenal need to defend in packs of wolves The first half was not to bad we should have scored though but yes no back bone no hunger and no fight What is going to happen on Thursday how are we going to line up against them??? I need to see Arsenal fight like man stand up like man and use their skill and agility to turn Manchester to a loosing side Well if we do nt we need to separate the real man from the phony ones period

Keeping Ozil and Sanchez was down to the fact it would cost more to replace them and the chances are they would have been replaced by deadwood standard players and Wenger and Co truly wouldn't have a leg to stand on if this had occurred.

Its a sport where you are trying to use all your strength to cause brain damage; hopefully enough that the other man can't stand up on his own two legs.

Say what you will about Bonds — and we certainly do — but if legends like Aaron and possibly Mays are Team A-Rod, and MLB is happy to move on with all of his numbers intact, the Yankees probably don't have a leg to stand on in their upcoming dinger - centric legal battle.

Messi, come on you don't have a leg to stand on.

He is one of those people that even if he didn't have a leg to stand on he would still find a way to make his hand look strong.

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

They should stand by the French people and give them hope not run with their tails between their legs

So while Mientkiewicz doesn't have a legal leg to stand on — «The ball ain't his,» says Finkelman — neither do the Red Sox.

Story for the gods... they don't need Van Persie to beat us, just get some kids off the streets in a Man U, Chelski or hell, even Monaco kit, top it up by putting the moaning one [or just about any brash folk like Berbatov] in the picture and we are in deep s ** t, our players will quake in their boots and lose the plot; we only beat Man City «cos their manager is almost as studious and gentlemanly as our prof. kindly remind me of one feisty game we've won in recent times, ok maybe Stoke [it took a broken leg to Ramsey and constant harassment before our players thought it was necessary to stand up to Stoke].

BFG just can not stand on his legs and our GK just ran out like a child shown a lollipop.