Sentences with phrase «n't study a population»

«One of the important points of the study is that we didn't study a population of kids who had very high exposures.

Not exact matches

Perhaps most concerning is the study's findings that the smoking rate hasn't changed in poor populations; among the rich, it's fallen more than five percentage points.

One British study showed that the incidence of psychopathy among CEOs is four times that of the general population, so it's not as unlikely as you might think.

«While we are disappointed CheckMate - 026 did not meet its primary endpoint in this broad patient population, we remain committed to improving patient outcomes through our comprehensive development program, including the ongoing Phase III CheckMate - 227 study exploring the potential of the combination of Opdivo plus [our other cancer immunotherapy] Yervoy for PD - L1 positive patients, and Opdivo plus Yervoy, or Opdivo plus chemotherapy in PD - L1 negative patients,» he added.

In population - based studies, we don't see social skills making any difference, and indeed in our adult samples teaching social skills has a very modest effect.

In the chart above, courtesy of a March report from theOxford Institute for Energy Studies, you can see that the number of vehicles driving on Indian roads doubled between 2007 and 2014, thanks not only to an exploding population but also the rise of India's «spending class,» as Gianni calls it.

According to the study, 95 percent of the population didn't wash their hands long enough to kill infection - causing germs.

Lest common sense fail to convince readers that surgery is not a treatment for a mental disorder, a Swedish study published in 2011 found that over the long term, 324 people who had undergone sex - reassignment surgery demonstrated an alarmingly high suicide rate and experienced considerably higher numbers of severe psychiatric problems than were present in the general population.

Several Gallup poll studies of the general population have shown that those with higher IQ's tend not to believe in God.

With all due respect, if you'd read the actual study, you would see that this was not a whole genome sequence comparison; rather it was a comparison of mitochondrial 12S rDNA and 16S rDNA sequences for the purposes of confirming the species relationship between the Pod Mrcaru lizards (P. sicula), the source population from Pod Kopiste (also P. sicula), and the original indigenous population on Pod Mrcaru (P. mellisellensis).

Spiritual but not religious people are especially prevalent in the younger population in the United States, although a recent study has argued that it is not so much that people have stopped believing in God, but rather have drifted from formal institutions.

Of course, since they are studies of populations, they show tendencies and don't show the same difference exists in every individual.

Pew has released the findings of their 2014 U.S. Religious Landscape Study, which shows that among the overall population, the number of people who do not believe in God has increased 3 percentage points.

Such studies, however, have not yet been produced.19 There is also, within liberation theology, a lack of more profound theological analyses of the culture of Brazilian populations, both black and indigenous.

This is primarily the function of the study of geography — not mainly as a learning of place names, populations, and products and a drawing and reading of maps and charts, but as a responsible consideration of the earth as mankind's home.

But, the intention of the Mayo Clinic study isn't to shame 97.3 percent of the population.

Election returns and public - opinion studies indicate discontent with some serious imperfections in recent liberal political policies and programs; studies also show that the general population does not want to give up the values of such programs and still wants additional selected government services.

And the vast majority of people studying evolutionary processes are not trying to disprove god - they are too busy doing population genetics, DNA extractions and amplifications to debate something that silly.

Frankly, I'm not sure these studies are accurate, since up until the last one hundred years or so, the majority of the population of the world was unable to read or write.

The Harris Interactive Study of more than 2,000 people showed that six percent were vegetarian, four percent pescatarian, and two percent vegan First it is not a survey of the entire population, just the 2000 in the study... Then it lists pescatarians as meat free... So in reality 8 % of 2000 sureveyed do not eat meaStudy of more than 2,000 people showed that six percent were vegetarian, four percent pescatarian, and two percent vegan First it is not a survey of the entire population, just the 2000 in the study... Then it lists pescatarians as meat free... So in reality 8 % of 2000 sureveyed do not eat meastudy... Then it lists pescatarians as meat free... So in reality 8 % of 2000 sureveyed do not eat meat....

Studies have shown that most of the population do not consume the recommended amount of fruit and vegetables each day.

«This study's actual results do not show that drinking diet beverages causes cardiovascular events among any population.

However, with the exception of women who consumed a high intake of soy during adolescence, the majority of epidemiological studies (studies carried out in defined population groups) have not found that women with higher soy intakes are at lower risk of breast cancer.

The studies were not intended to address questions related to the efficacy of GR2E Golden Rice in helping to address vitamin A deficiency in affected population sub-groups, which can only be adequately addressed following regulatory authorization.

A recent study of the gluten - free diets of new and experienced coeliacs found that significant numbers of adult female participants did not achieve the recommended dietary intakes (RDI) or even the population averages of thiamin, folate, calcium, iron or fibre.

«It is my desire and my purpose to further the education of the people of Texas and elsewhere in wildlife conservation, in the knowledge of the breeding and living habits of our wild creatures and in the relationship of wildlife to domesticated livestock on our ranches and farms; to afford students and others interested in wildlife betterment and propagation and in the raising of wildlife along with domesticated animals a place for research and an opportunity for the study thereof; and to develop scientifically methods of increasing the wildlife population of the state and nation for the benefit of future generations... who may not have the opportunity to know and appreciate our wildlife, as I have, unless methods of increasing and conserving our wildlife are scientifically developed.

Experts are saying older men shouldn't worry about their higher risk of fathering a child with bipolar disorder (men 45 + are 25x more likely than a man in his 20s to father a child with bipolar disorder) because it's such a rare disease but recent studies show it's not rare at all and affects 4 - 5 % of the population.

But without multiple mutually corroborating & very rigorous population studies to determine strong associations among different variables, one can't speak confidently on what causes what — and this in a discipline, psychology, already fraught with poorly designed and low - statistical - rigor studies.

L. Eugene Arnold, a professor emeritus of psychiatry at Ohio State University, points out that the British study found that artificial food dyes and preservatives increase hyperactivity in the general population of children, not just kids with ADHD.

We know from the Birthplace study that the low risk populations were not at all equivalently low risk.

there were 3 groups in that 1967 study (btw 68 kids divided into 3 groups, by no means a big study), all kids were born in poverty, so these kids couldn't represent whole population.

In a study of Korean - American parenting, researchers found that over 75 % of the sample population didn't fit into any of the standard categories (Kim and Rohner 2002).

First, because black and Hispanic mothers were underrepresented in the study population, our results may not be applicable to the entire US population.

In many previous U.S. studies, it was not possible to disaggregate planned in - hospital births from planned out - of - hospital births that took place in the hospital after a woman's intrapartum transfer to the hospital.3, 9,10 The latter births represent 16.5 % of planned out - of - hospital births in our population, and misclassification of these births as in - hospital births caused rates of adverse outcomes among planned out - of - hospital births to be underestimated (in some cases, substantially).

But this doesn't make sense for everything we do in health care, and we know the information we get from randomized controlled trials doesn't always translate well to real life because 1) the restrictions we put on eligibility for studies rarely allows the results to be generalized to the population as a whole and 2) Adherence to the intervention tends to be higher in a randomized controlled trial than in real life which makes the effect seem «better» than it is.

However, this study only included kids at high - risk for celiac (based on genetic markers or a first - degree relative with the disease), so it might not apply to the general population.

* A study of parents of 86 children in clinics of pediatrics and child psychiatry (ages 2 - 13 years) on military bases (offspring of military personnel) revealed that cosleeping children received higher evaluations of their comportment from their teachers than did solitary sleeping children, and they were underrepresented in psychiatric populations compared with children who did not cosleep.

Our study illustrates that a randomized intervention trial with good socioeconomic information can help assess interventions designed to improve population health not only by examining the intervention effects on primary outcomes but also by evaluating the intervention's impact on socioeconomic inequalities.

With respect to potential sources of bias in the study sample, the initial cohort through which these women were identified is a self - selected population and may not be representative of all women who use fluoxetine during pregnancy.

The FDA has not approved these drugs for children under a year old because no studies have found them effective in that population.

Inclusion criteria were as follows: the study population was women who chose planned home birth at the onset of labor; the studies were from Western countries; the birth attendant was an authorized mid-wife or medical doctor; the studies were published in 1985 or later, with data not older than from 1980; and data on transfer from home to hospital were described.

Research studies do not predict anything at all about any particular baby or babies — they look at trends in a large population.

And in a, I don't remember this study group is maybe 40, 80 women something like that and they found a 5 % insufficient milk rate and that has, that's the basis of the number that continues to be recorded today but it was a very small population.

This suggests that women taking part in the study were not representative of the population being studied.

Baseline differences were noted between groups in two studies (Graffy 2004; Hoddinott 2012), in one study, the intervention was not delivered to all participants in the intervention group (Reeder 2014), and in one study, the study group differed significantly from the background population (Winterburn 2003).

And in the other study, the 29 % one, wasn't it a sampling of the general population?

Quiz Ref IDOur conclusions are limited by our study population, which was selected from a single cohort from the United States and sampled at a single time point; thus, our findings may not be entirely generalizable to populations elsewhere or to different points in infant development.

Although we could not find estimates of fan use in the US population, we examined the potential selection bias by evaluating characteristics associated with SIDS risks in study participants and nonparticipants in a previously published article.16 Using California birth certificate data, we compared the ORs for maternal age, maternal education, parity, birth weight, infant sex, and late initiation of prenatal care (> 5 months» gestation).

Although our study cohorts were closely matched on prognostic variables, we do not underestimate the degree of self - selection that takes place in a population of women choosing home birth.

Unlike previous studies, the Southampton research found the effect in children from the general population, not just those whose parents suspected they were sensitive to food dyes.