Sentences with phrase «n't sufficient fuel»

But sabbaticals aren't sufficient fuel for those who lack a deep curiosity and love for the practice of science, with all its frustrations and technical challenges.

Not exact matches

Job, and Paul, knew that life was a mystery to be walked and that in mystery there would be found intimacy with God, not answers to fuel a self sufficient existence.

Moody's says house price growth in Australia does not appear to be fuelled by excessive credit growth, capital buffers at the LMI companies are sufficient to meet a serious cyclical recession and mortgage loss ratios are not only benign, they are likely to improve.

«Given that the term «fuel poverty» does not seem to have been used once in yesterday's Budget statement, can the Secretary of State confirm that Warm Front will be sufficient to address Age Concern's assessment of the Budget that its failure to tackle fuel poverty will continue to leave more pensioners out in the cold?

If sufficient hydrogen is available, nearly all of the carbon in the coal or biomass feedstock to a Fischer - Tropsch plant would end up in the fuel products and not in the air, eliminating the need to capture and sequester carbon dioxide, the authors said.

Eating a high - fat diet — we're talking 70 percent dietary fat or higher — means you aren't getting sufficient glucose as fuel, and glycogen (your glucose backup tank in your liver) eventually becomes depleted.

Without a sufficient supply of food, which includes carbohydrates, the female body panics because it thinks it doesn't have enough fuel to be pregnant and breastfeed.

However, during longer distance races, blood glucose and liver / muscle glycogen is not sufficient to fuel your body during the entire race.

Athletes who don't fuel their bodies with sufficient amounts of protein will end up canceling out the benefits of a workout, making the athletes more susceptible to fatigue and anemia.

As a result cells do not have sufficient amount of key «fuel» to generate enough energy in mitochondria.

Other than the rough idle and hard starting there's no problem, the engine has plenty of power at high rpms and doesn't seem to be misfiring, both of which I think it would have problems with if the fuel pump wasn't providing sufficient pressure or volume.

Clearly that's not sufficient reason to abandon the old hydraulic pump and lines, especially since the 911 was already the lightest and most fuel efficient vehicle in its class.

The potential all - wheel - drive Soul is also a toss - up, as its fuel economy may suffer and there may not be sufficient demand for the enhanced — and likely more expensive — powertrain here.

But that's not all, OEM fuel injectors will not be sufficient, you will have to buy 630 cc injectors, aftermarket fuel rail, and a Walbro 255 lph fuel pump.

If a fully charged battery is powering a starter motor that is turning the engine over rapidly, at sufficient RPM, but the engine does not catch and run, that means that there is an ignition, fuel, air induction, or mechanical...

P0420 could be due to a variety of faults including even a fuel pump that is not supplying sufficient fuel, causing a lean condition, and hence «fooling» the O2 sensors (pre and post) as to the status (i.e., efficiency)...

Although a flat bonnet was originally intended with a fuel injection system underneath, this would probably not have produced sufficient power to achieve the promised 300 kph top speed.

The fuel injection technology of the time could not have provided sufficient power expected of the highest performance car of the range.

Subaru says such a powertrain will not only save weight but deliver more than sufficient acceleration while minimising fuel consumption and emissions.

It may not be in the upper part of the punchiness ladder, but the 300 Nm of torque are sufficient to move the 1.315 - kg body around, without having to ask for too much fuel.

It's a smooth engine, has sufficient torque lower in the rev range and gets a 36 mpg EPA fuel economy rating on the highway, which isn't bad considering the Accord's size.

The electric range is more than sufficient for the majority of trips, the charging is easy, and the gas generator (which is seamless and very quiet) is not only fuel efficient but gives it fantastic real - world driving range and none of the «range anxiety» than you'd get with a typical hybrid or gas - powered car.

With the GM 2.8 L diesel gaining only 2 MPG over the 2.5 L gasoline engine, while adding 440 pounds to its curb weight, the diesel fuel economy gains are not sufficient to offset the higher emission factor for diesel fuel, with the diesel option producing 4 % more CO2 - equivalent emissions over the truck's life - cycle.

The rise in CO2 emissions due to the burning of fossil fuels from 1880 through the 1940's was not sufficient to have played a major role in the considerable global temperature rise that took place during that period — so if we want to presume that sea level rise is prompted by global temperature rise (along with concomitant melting of glaciers, etc.) then we can't really attribute very much of the rise in sea levels during that period to CO2.

Second, a recent report by «Bloomberg New Energy Finance» [BNEF] found that under free market conditions (i.e. RE deployed only where profitable) the best that the renewables will achieve by 2040 is sufficient deployment to take up all increase in energy demand, but they would not by that date reduce fossil fuels» overall usage.

But, as I explained to Gell - Mann then, I don't see better communication, on its own, being remotely sufficient to set the world on a course to shift swiftly from the fuels of convenience — coal and oil — even as human numbers and resource appetites crest.

A broad range of experts, within and outside the I.P.C.C., agree that sufficient energy to enable such progress (without overheating Earth) will come only with a mix of more efficient use of fossil fuels and fundamentally new energy technologies that do not influence the climate.

Besides I want to the CO2 level to be at least 500 PPM and believe subsidies should be used if necessary to ensure sufficient fossil fuel is burned Without more CO2 my muskmelons won't grow as big as I want.

In December alone, Germany installed nearly as much solar capacity as the United States has in total, fueled by the subsidies that solar companies admit sometimes made it possible not to worry whether there was sufficient demand in a given area for the power they would produce.

The Carbon Tax Center is often asked why a carbon tax is needed; wouldn't removing tax subsidies be sufficient to let efficiency and renewables compete on even terms with fossil fuels?

BBD writes - «Finite fossil hydrocarbon reserves (note I do not limit this definition to «fuel») plus robust physics of radiative transfer, plus paleoclimate evidence plus uncertainty are, together, more than sufficient grounds to justify the rapid reduction in fossil HC use.»

Financial incentives for installing such electrical generating capacity in mills have not been sufficient due to the historically low cost of fossil fuels and have often been passed over in favor of systems powered by historically inexpensive fossil fuels.

Finite fossil hydrocarbon reserves (note I do not limit this definition to «fuel») plus robust physics of radiative transfer, plus paleoclimate evidence plus uncertainty are, together, more than sufficient grounds to justify the rapid reduction in fossil HC use.

While it is true that it is quite impossible to grow sufficient wood to replace our present rate of fossil fuel consumption (there just is not enough land available), wood could be at least a part of the solution.

We certainly don't need any new coal mines or gas wells to have sufficient fossil fuel supply to keep existing power generators running while we transition to renewable electricity generation.

It seems that normal approaches like solid facts and sensible debate aren't sufficient when it comes to getting the message across in the teeth of vested fossil fuel interests.

Significant emission reductions can be achieved by energy ‐ efficiency improvements and fossil fuel switching, but they are not sufficient by themselves to provide the deep cuts needed.

There isn't sufficient «fossil» fuel to ever accomplish even the neutralization, let alone acidification.

How do you propose getting those developments to take place, given that the «free market» situation we have now had not produced results sufficient to provide energy cheap enough for much of the planet, and given that future acquisition of fossil fuels is likely to be more costly environmentally as well as economically?

But it's not realistic: Nationwide, there are only about 3500 service stations (out of 120,000) that offer natural gas — based automotive fuel, and it would cost billions of dollars and take years to develop sufficient infrastructure to make that fuel competitive with gasoline or diesel.

Technically not a difficult thing — and I suggest that with sufficient heat to generate hydrogen — a carbon / hydrogen synthesis is probably the future for liquid fuels.

Stopping new fossil fuel infrastructure development is essential, but not sufficient: we need more investment in better jobs, cleaner energy, and stronger communities.

Projections of U.S. transportation energy use indicate that better vehicle efficiency and low - carbon fuels will not be sufficient to reach sectoral emissions reduction goals if travel demand grows at pre-recession rates, so managing demand will be a key ingredient of climate policy for the sector.

I don't think an authority exists on the planet that is capable of calculating those risks with sufficient certainty to allow continued fossil fuel use without carbon sequestration.

Such a provision is not intelligible, to use the terminology of previous decisions of this Court, and therefore it fails to give sufficient indications that could fuel a legal debate.

Fuel centers will not really take off until there are sufficient electric vehicles on the road to create a sufficient market.