Sentences with phrase «n't take you to court»

PDP didn't take him to court.

Their reply: «We're not taking you to court, we're just taking your money!»

I accuse the person and shame them in my social circle but don't take them to court.

By the way, there is a huge Arbitration clause that essentially says that you can't take them to court.

Even if a debt collector doesn't take you to court, they could still contact you to get you to pay your old debt.

If your debt is too old, the collector can't take you to court.

-- Even if your card debt has legally expired, that doesn't mean creditors can't take you to court seeking payment.

-- Even if your card debt has legally expired, that doesn't mean creditors can't take you to court seeking payment.

Not exact matches

Still, some have argued (in court) that the degree of risk isn't adequately communicated, and crowdfunding companies have taken steps to better communicate that uncertainty over time.

It doesn't appear to matter whether you go to a food court, or an office cafeteria, or a proper sit - down restaurant, or sit on a bench with a sandwich; what matters is that you take a break.

The former employer sued, but the court ruled that the information did not count as protected trade secrets because the company didn't take reasonable security measures to protect the information.

Such warnings are not legally binding but the government can take companies to court if the issues are ignored.

«I got Reno... He took care of it and s — ain't gonna happen, even if they did take it to court,» the text stated, a state forensics investigator testified.

And Shkreli seemed to be at pains to suggest he wasn't taking the trial seriously: dropping in on reporters during the trial (he called the prosecutors «junior varsity»), taking to social media during the evenings, declining to wear a tie in court, and ostentatiously reading a book during closing arguments.

If he doesn't give in, I must spend more money taking him to court.

Lucas took the designer to court for copyright infringement, but the court ruled the replicas were not covered by copyright law because they are not works of art.

Mars Canada, based in Bolton, Ont., took its complaint to Federal Court, but the two sides settled when Bemco agreed it would not import or sell the U.S. - made products in Canada.

After the game, it didn't take sports fans long to speculate that the malfunction was actually intentional to give the Spurs an even bigger home court advantage.

The U.S. Supreme Court is likely to be the ultimate decider, but the high court is not expected to take up the issue for several moCourt is likely to be the ultimate decider, but the high court is not expected to take up the issue for several mocourt is not expected to take up the issue for several months.

As it turned out, 18 minutes of sworn testimony from Redstone, presented in court Friday, was all it took to resolve the case — but not in Herzer's favor.

Katz says that in the event Unblock Us was ever taken to court, it might be able to argue «fair dealing» as a defence on the grounds that it is providing content Canadians would otherwise not get to see and for which there is no justifiable reason.

To do visual content marketing right, you have to not only find the right image, but you also have to secure permission so you can't be taken to court over unauthorized use of content later oTo do visual content marketing right, you have to not only find the right image, but you also have to secure permission so you can't be taken to court over unauthorized use of content later oto not only find the right image, but you also have to secure permission so you can't be taken to court over unauthorized use of content later oto secure permission so you can't be taken to court over unauthorized use of content later oto court over unauthorized use of content later on.

The results show that Canadian companies take full advantage of the tax opportunities afforded to them, and aren't afraid to battle it out in court over their interpretation of the rules.

In one challenge to a $ 30.6 million golf - course deduction taken in 2002 — but not resolved until 2009 — a tax court judge allowed 94 % of the write - off.

A federal appeals court signed off on the U.S. Interior Department's decision to take land into trust for a proposed Native American casino, rejecting arguments that the tribe's promises to mitigate environmental effects are «illusory» because as a sovereign Native American nation, it can not be sued to enforce them.

Following a controversial New York Times editorial by former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens Tuesday calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment, we asked readers to respond, offering not only the news of Stevens» stance, but also a Chicago Tribune editorial taking the other side of the issue.

Foy says if he doesn't, the Wilderness Committee is prepared to take the provincial government to court.

Last week, AARP and the State Attorneys General of California, Oregon and New York filed separate motions to intervene in the case and seek rehearings in front of the full court, anticipating the DOL would not take action to defend its rule.

According to law, unless the creditors file a case in the court, they are not allowed to take action against people who have gone bankrupt.

The difference with the tariffs that this government is bringing in — $ 330 million or more on tariffs and interestingly enough they're taking Sony to court for hesitating to pay tariffs that this government on the other side says doesn't actually exist, but if it doesn't exist how can they be taking them to court for not paying them?

James Smith, head of workplace strategy and business development at Morningstar, says many broker - dealers are taking a proactive approach to measuring the rule's impact on their 401 (k) advisory business, and not waiting for courts to determine the Labor Department rule's fate.

Following a controversial New York Times editorial by former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens Tuesday calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment, we asked readers to respond, offering not only the news of Stevens» stance, but also a Chicago Tribune editorial taking the other side of...

But Einhorn is not afraid to defend his business model: When someone else did the disclosure for him, he took that someone else to court.

A federal court on Thursday upheld the Labor Department's Fiduciary rule, in defiance of a Trump executive order signed on Feb. 3, which sought rescinding the rule enacted by his predecessor The executive order, though not taking effect immediately, sought the Labor Department to review options...

Most foreclosures in Colorado are non-judicial, which means the lender doesn't have to take you to court to foreclose on the home.

You will want to discuss all of your options with your attorney or tax advisor before taking action, especially if creditor protection is a concern for you, as the Supreme Court has ruled that Inherited IRAs are not protected under federal bankruptcy laws (although state law creditor protection of inherited IRAs still varies).

However, to date the courts have not taken this view, and those violating injunctions such as the one obtained by Kinder Morgan commonly find themselves in court facing contempt of court charges.

«The court need not reach far outside the complaint or be an expert in economics to take notice that it was the trading of toxic RMBS between financial institutions that nearly brought down the banking system in 2008,» Cogburn wrote in an order.

Non-judicial foreclosure doesn't require lenders to take you to court to foreclose, so it's cheaper for lenders and costs less.

«If you think for a moment that I'm going to stay my hand because your guy is taking the Fifth Amendment, and not issue a preliminary injunction to shut down what happened here, you're wrong,» U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup said, according to the transcript.

If you do not do all of these, you might be taken to court for covert surveillance.

This does not restrict your ability to take a complaint to a dispute resolution service of your choosing at your own expense, or to bring an action to court.

Why haven't you filed suit in Federal Court to have this taken off of our money, Tom?

Since they have taken theri case into courts, it was obvious they could not push their belief while still attached to the religious components.

If the courts are to be taken seriously on questions of religious liberty, they can not whitewash theological prejudice and the resulting discrimination.

Wouldn't doubt it if it's a ploy on their part to make Gays and Lesbians look bad during a time when the Supreme Court is taking up the Gay marriage issue!

Cook ends the letter saying that the company's opposition to the court order is not something they took lightly:

Same thing with lawyer who won't take cases, decides to live like a criminial and won't go to court.

«Same thing with lawyer who won't take cases, decides to live like a criminal and won't go to court.»

Listen Humble themselves (that is, don't control the situation, and don't assume they understand or perceive the situation perfectly) Identify how they contributed to the situation (whether consciously or unconsciously, directly or indirectly) Take responsibility Apologise Allow the other person to express what they want done (and do it, if it is within the pastor's ability, and truly helpful) Support the other person's decisions, even if the pastor disagree with them Empower the other person at every step Part friends if possible, and at peace, if at all possible (and never go to court — Jesus and Paul call this dangerous and ridiculous, respectively)