Romney can't talk about his faith; Romney must talk about his faith.
We don't talk about faith.
Piety was deeply personal and privatized; people did
not talk about their faith.
Not exact matches
We don't like to
talk about faith, but it is a key component in letting go of situations we can't control.
Willingness to Accept Risk — I'm
not talking about crazy risks, but entrepreneurs are people who are willing to start a business on a leap of
faith.
Now, if you want to
talk about religious theory, that's a different definition, as religious theory is based on belief and assumption and written statements that can
not be verified or proven without having
faith and belief.
The kind of reasonable, sound THINKING theology and religious /
faith ideas those of us as are here
talking about, simply doesn't lend itself to a pop culture.
Yes,
talk mostly
about family and love and life, but don't withhold elements of that persons
faith that they deserve in settling their existential angst.
Santorum seems to
not be bothered by that rule
about not bearing false witness, when he
talks about the president and his
faith.
I get a kick out of the Atheist
talking about how religious people try and ram their
faith down throats... and then you see clowns like hippypoet and the prayer is
not healthy kook... guess they are hypocrits just like everybody elese.
I know what I'm
talking about and
faith in God IS
NOT THE SAME THING as turning the last pages in one's mental family scrapbook.
If it is
not a person of faith then DO NOT talk about it
not a person of
faith then DO
NOT talk about it
NOT talk about it!!!
I didn't need to
talk about God, or
about religion... I had assurance in my
faith about those things, and I assumed the chaplin understood them and didn't need me to explain them.
Actually that verse is
talking about faith in God and
not faith that he will do what you ask.
Strange CNN
talks about Romney's religion but does
not talk about Obama's secret Muslim
faith.
Many religious people I have
talked to don't even know much
about their
faith, only what they are taught by rote.
I'm
not talking about ordinary
faith here.
So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out
about there
faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or
talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for
not being ashamed to speak
about there
faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there
faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of
faith have a right to free speech also.
Although I have to say I can't help but notice how many of these «people of
faith» types don't really
talk about or show much of their
faith until they've made a boat - load of money.
I'm
not talking about renouncing my
faith, though, just the connectivity and community aspects of church.
We used to ridicule those who
talked about justification by
faith because that
talk seemed to be an excuse for them
not to take Jesus» call to discipleship seriously.
In
talking about these books with some friends, I was reminded that books that challenge us at one stage of life or
faith may
not seem so challenging as we continue to mature.
Concerning preaching on aspects of the Catholic
Faith that don't always render comfort to the subjective dispositions of all the listeners I've found that the critiques frequently lie along the lines of, «Oh Father, you're always
talking about (fill in the blank)» or «It's just too complicated an issue.»
Matthew 21: 21 and Mark 11:23 Isn't
talking about prayer working absolutely, it's
talking about having
faith and whether or
not you have any doubt in your heart in which if there isn't any doubt you can move mountains.
Yet even while it ventures to
talk about this man in terms of the God - language of
faith, the New Testament does
not hesitate to describe this Jesus as a real man and one who points to Him who sent him.
Nick Page
talks to Sam
about the pros and cons of the Reformation, we look at why Bart Campolo (son of Tony) lost his
faith and hear form Christy Wimber on what happens when people don't get healed.
The three most obvious lessons appear to be: «Live more simply,» «Do as much as you are able for the poor and disadvantaged,» and «Don't let the way you live and
talk about the
faith make it seem something grim and unattractive.»
For Neville, therefore, to dismiss apparently out - of - hand the view that God is significantly to be described as individual, actual, and knowledgeable is for him to show that when he is
talking about «God» he is
not talking about the object of theistic
faith and worship.
Im
not talking about religion, or being religious, but believing in His word and applying it to your daily life, living it truly
not by man's principle, but by God's Word, putting
faith in Him just as a mother would to a babysitter who is going to look after her child, or just as you would trust someone with your money, or yet with your own life.
«Obama has repeatedly
talked about his Christian
faith, and his relationship with his controversial former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright...» — reading comprehension is
not a big thing with Republicans its seems
Brother John: When Jesus
talked about God's church, He was
not speaking of a physical place rather, the people of Christian
faith who made up the body and Christ was the head of His church.
The people constantly LYING
about the President's
faith are the same ones that DO
NOT want to
talk about Romney's REJECTION OF JESUS CHRIST AS THE SON OF GOD
Also, even if the author didn't believe in a god and just meant «goodness» this would still, I think, be
talking about a «
faith» that good would win out.
We'd
talk about how our
faiths have potential to do so much good, and yet how unfortunately some people take it to the extreme so it doesn't portray the real love and service that are at the heart of what we believe.
There are four affirmations
about Jesus Christ that historically have been stressed in Christian
faith: (1) Jesus is truly human, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, living a human life under the same human conditions any one of us faces — thus Christology, statement of the significance of Jesus, must start «from below,» as many contemporary theologians are insisting; (2) Jesus is that one in whom God energizes in a supreme degree, with a decisive intensity; in traditional language he has been styled «the Incarnate Word of God»; (3) for our sake, to secure human wholeness of life as it moves onward toward fulfillment, Jesus
not only lived among us but also was crucified for us — this is the point of
talk about atonement wrought in and by him; (4) death was
not the end for him, so it is
not as if he never existed at all; in some way he triumphed over death, or was given victory over it, so that now and forever he is a reality in the life of God and effective among humankind.
Jesus in fact actually reveals the Father's love for him
not intalking
about it but in embracing us within it - he does
talk about it too, but you could listen to the
talk without receiving the revelation for that lies in responding in
faith to the offer of love.
What this means is that when Paul
talks about blindness and the veil in 2 Corinthians 2 — 3, he is
not talking primarily
about how a person receives eternal life by
faith in Jesus Christ, but
about all the other truths of the gospel which are contained in the rest of Scripture, and which are centered on the person and work of Jesus Christ.
«It can't be the only way of
talking about faith.»
«Unchurched folks are
not being overwhelmed by Christians
talking about their
faith,» said McConnell.
Though lots of people like to
talk about «degrees of
faith» this is
not a proper way of thinking
about biblical
faith.
Romney campaign spokeswoman man Andrea Saul said it was
not unusual for Romney to
talk publicly
about his
faith in public and in news media interviews.
Because there are numerous texts in the Bible which
talk about «saving» the soul from death, «saving» the life, being «saved» by works,
faith alone doesn't «save,» and so on throughout the Bible.
A second clue is something you wrote in a comment to me which I found odd (
not the comment where you called me a troll — an ugly character — that's totally understandable) I'm
talking about when you wrote: «I wouldn't say my «
faith» changes.
Though Scripture does
talk about «little
faith» and «great
faith» (e.g., Matt 8:10, 26), this is
not a reference to the degree of
faith someone has, but to the difficulty of the truth believed.
Because Republicans have been lying
about Obama's
faith and Romney simply won't
talk about his because it's too nutty.
But you're
not there to
talk about faith, are you?
As I have conversed with my Mormon co-workers
about their
faith, every time I bring up a question they don't seem to be able to answer, they revert to
talking about their experience (vision, dream, inner feeling, etc.) which proved to them the truth of what they believe, and then they tell me that if I really want to know the truth, I should pray for wisdom and ask God to give me a similar experience to reveal the truth to me.
The second he
talks about the «worldly» folk being more «authentic» — my word,
not his - and in the first quote he reveals his own anger at overhearing his father's prayers that sound both authentic and all
about the inner experience as he wrestled with his
faith.
«
Not just in one country but in numerous Muslim countries, I have been able to walk in, head held high, no covert cover story and not only identify passively as a Christian but identify openly, work openly and hold serious talks about faith between Muslims and Christians, and not just at the grassroots level of poverty — people who needed my help — but also with the powerful and influential people who could have, in that moment, had me arrested and had me taken out back.&raq
Not just in one country but in numerous Muslim countries, I have been able to walk in, head held high, no covert cover story and
not only identify passively as a Christian but identify openly, work openly and hold serious talks about faith between Muslims and Christians, and not just at the grassroots level of poverty — people who needed my help — but also with the powerful and influential people who could have, in that moment, had me arrested and had me taken out back.&raq
not only identify passively as a Christian but identify openly, work openly and hold serious
talks about faith between Muslims and Christians, and
not just at the grassroots level of poverty — people who needed my help — but also with the powerful and influential people who could have, in that moment, had me arrested and had me taken out back.&raq
not just at the grassroots level of poverty — people who needed my help — but also with the powerful and influential people who could have, in that moment, had me arrested and had me taken out back.»
To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you
about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of
faith... that was
not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is
not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example
not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was
talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do
not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....