Sentences with phrase «n't teach him discipline»

If they can't teach him discipline no one can.

Not exact matches

Its value is that it teaches not just music but also discipline, practice, cooperation, and culture.

«I didn't walk around beating people up because karate taught me discipline,» Uriah Hall told Breitbart Sports.

Pelagianism Augustine accused Pelagius of teaching salvation by works Western Christians are obsessed with not being saved by works Western Christians deemphasize ascetic disciplines and exercises Spirituality becomes a set of mental acts Salvation is rescue from hell, rather than transformation into glory Determinism enters some parts of western theology from Manichaeism through Augustine

The discipline of place teaches that it is more than enough to care skillfully and lovingly for oneâ $ ™ s own little circle, and this is the model for the good life, not the limitless jurisdiction of the ego, granted by a doctrine of choice, that is ever seeking its own fulfillment, pleasure, and satiation.

I'm not sure I agree with you on this one, David... Wouldn't teaching about tithing (or, if you prefer, giving) be like teaching about prayer, fasting, confession, Bible study, etc., under the umbrella of other spiritual disciplines?

Such a model of teaching is patently not perfect, but it does a better job than did the classical paradigm of bridging the gap between the discipline of New Testament studies as it actually exists and the students we actually face.

Jesus conquered with love teaching self - discipline and not bombing people, like the Muslims.

I am learning that I can not teach christian theology constructively unless I am aware that, historically, the church has done much to damage women, Jews, people of color and the whole inhabited earth; and unless, as a christian, I am learning how our doctrine, discipline and worship continue to reflect and contribute to this abuse of power.

TM's chief guru, the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, claims that the discipline of life renewal that he teaches is not really a religion at all but a psychological self - help program which pays all the dividends of religion without the embarrassing urgency and theology.

To discover what was distinctive about Jesus» teaching on church discipline, we have to ask what his hearers would have regarded as new — in other words, what was it that they didn't already know and accept?

But Luther was not the first to criticize certain theological teachings, church disciplines, or ecclesiastical practices.

For example, a teacher of physics necessarily teaches logic and rhetoric, while one who teaches logic or rhetoric as a special discipline does not necessarily teach physics.

The priest, however, must exercise other functions besides administering the sacraments and institutional means can not empower him to fulfill these duties; hence he needs to practice spiritual discipline, cultivating all the Christian virtues; he also needs to study, for «how can he teach unless he himself possess knowledge» and have gained a «full grasp of the Catholic teaching on faith and morals?»

When we view the domination of the university by academic disciplines based on modern metaphysics, and the domination of the world by policies that derive from the theories taught there, it is hard not to become deeply discouraged.

Those who teach Dante and Dostoevsky, for example, read their works religiously and not as consumers, and they invite students to enter a similar discipline.

And, therefore, the expectation must not be cherished that, save for modest and obvious instruction about voice, pace, organization, and such matters, preaching as a lively art of the church can be taught at all... Disciplines correlative to preaching can be taught, but preaching as an act of witness can not be taught.

We can only change them indirectly, by increasing our understanding, confessing when our behaviors don't match up, and practicing disciplines that teach our hearts God's ways.

By that is meant the decision not to discipline the many theologians and priests who, in a public and concerted campaign, rejected the teaching of the 1968 encyclical on human sexuality, Humanae Vitae (On Human Life).

Nevertheless, it is helpful to learn these skills, not for their information, but for the way they teach discipline and commitment.

I would not say that seminary taught me much that was helpful for life outside of seminary, but I would say that seminary taught me study habits and disciplined thinking patterns that have served me every day since graduation.

Religion, teaching and promoting hate, contempt or others, self - righteous anger and acting on it (OK by God) ignorance and that if you have religion you have rights but others who don't subscribe and submit to your religious authority, well then, it's ok to walk all over them, discipline them in the name of God, take away their rights and judge them.

«many times a trangender is interviewed and that person will say that they knew already when they were 4 years old that they were born in the wrong body» There is not one 4 year old out there that hasn't been inclined to do wrong either, just by their nature... and they need to be taught, disciplined and corrected in order to grow up normal.

Is a parent a monster for having a child when the parent knows that the child will not be perfect and will have to be taught and disciplined (perhaps with the violence of a spanking).

99 % of what people complain about in Doctrine, is really merely discipline - Doctrine taught incorrectly or in such a way that it can't be understood.

Basic in the Buddha's teaching and fundamental in Buddhism is the conviction that life is not worth living and is so inescapably linked with suffering that salvation consists in a self - discipline which ends in nirvana, the dissolution of the entity called I, and so in releasing the soul from the endless succession of births and rebirths which to the Buddha was axiomatic.

That's a good distinction for advising day - care workers on how to treat a two - year - old who is throwing food, but many forms of discipline carry some level of force, especially when someone won't willingly cooperate with the «teaching moment.»

Once people bother to learn and understand what the Chruch actually teaches (and, of that, what is Dogma and what is discipline) and not assume, the better off the conversations can be.

I agree discipline is needed to teach Children from whats wrong and right if not they most likely qill go astray but when the lesson is learned Jesus will dwell in our hearts and the Holy Spirit will confront are own spirit we are christians children of Fos

So then the child does not follow through and the parent smacks him with a belt or a cane lightly — for discipline purposes to teach the child a lesson.

Pastoral theology (like all seminary courses) can not be taught as a purely academic discipline.

Regarding Campbell, he didn't start him because of the complaints he made last year (he wanted to be guaranteed 1st team), Wenger was teaching him a lesson on being respectful and disciplined.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

In the same way that we do not expect a first grader to learn calculus, it is important to understand what age appropriate behaviour is and to shape your expectations of your child and your discipline (teaching) according to what a child can reasonably be expected to understand at any given age.

Alfie Kohn had an interesting article in the NYT this past week on how parents can use discipline as a method of control and not as a way to teach right from wrong.

We want the kids to see us as «same» and we think it teaches them not only respect and structure and security, but also the inherent belief that men and women are equally capable of love, discipline and hard work.

They're moving in the exact opposite direction that we as a country / workforce need to move: lets teach better management skills and the ability to recognize and acknowledge top level employees and have the strength and conviction to discipline the ones who aren't willing and able to do the work.

I am a fairly strict parent and this has been remarked upon several times by people who are decidedly not AP — but I teach through gentle discipline and I meet what I believe to be the needs of my children at their stages of development.

Disciplining your child doesn't mean punishing him; it means teaching him right from wrong.

Not the harsh and punitive kind, not the arbitrary and scary kind, but the kind of discipline that teaches you how to be respectful and gives the feeling of safety that comes with knowing that your parent is the adult and will keep you from getting out of contrNot the harsh and punitive kind, not the arbitrary and scary kind, but the kind of discipline that teaches you how to be respectful and gives the feeling of safety that comes with knowing that your parent is the adult and will keep you from getting out of contrnot the arbitrary and scary kind, but the kind of discipline that teaches you how to be respectful and gives the feeling of safety that comes with knowing that your parent is the adult and will keep you from getting out of control.

Remember, too, that disciplining your child doesn't mean controlling her — it means teaching her to control herself.

Rather than discipline and teach them by telling them what not to do, it's a lot easier to tell them exactly what we want them to do.

Use discipline that is aimed at teaching, not punishing.

Trying to force your child to do something won't teach self - discipline.

By encouraging those who still advocate corporal punishment to see the facts behind reasons parents today think corporal punishment works and breaking down those reasons to see why those reasons don't stand up to facts and examination, we can protect the most vulnerable members of society: children, who should be taught how to behave correctly on their own and develop the skills to regulate their own behavior so that they don't need to be constantly disciplined and who should not be physically hurt so that they obey at that particular moment, without learning how to regulate themselves in the future.

Many child behavior psychologists believe that needed life lessons are not being taught when discipline is angry and painful, and corporal punishment will often leave a child with increased anxiety and the inability to trust parental figures.

Schools with good discipline not only correct misbehavior but also teach appropriate behavior and coping skills.

But limits does not mean discipline, as in «something unpleasant to teach a lesson.»

You don't discipline a toddler: you teach, guide, nurture, and attune to them.»

And there was something about Baby College that not only gave them lots of useful information, just, you know, taught them important things about discipline, about reading to your kids that I think will really help them.