Sentences with phrase «n't teach history»

Especially in high - poverty urban schools, where kids often struggle with reading, teachers spend hours every day on these skills and don't teach history or... [Read more...]

Especially in high - poverty urban schools, where kids often struggle with reading, teachers spend hours every day on these skills and don't teach history or science in any systematic way.

«And when I did teach, I really didn't teach history because my students couldn't read.

We don't teach history anymore.»

At an exclusive school somewhere outside of Arlington, Virginia, students aren't taught history, geography, or mathematics — at least not in the usual ways.

Not exact matches

But if our history of profligacy has taught us anything, it's that Canada can't afford to be complacent about the country's more than $ 500 - billion debt.

The practice of public relations is not what it used to be, but history can teach us some important lessons.

I once got into a very polite conversation — tour guides don't argue with guests — with a nice but unyielding tourist who said, «You have to go into teaching because that's the only thing to do with a history major.»

After finishing Antioch College at age 19, Shel had to come to terms with his own work history: career paths not only in writing and marketing / PR, but also in radio, teaching, arts, food service, office systems, community organizing, and environmental issues.

Of course, as history teaches us, in such situation regulators would probably blame «inherently unstable» banks — or capitalism — for not holding enough liquidity and not having a stable - enough deposit base in the first place.

The Intelligent Investor teaches you about the fundamentals of stock trading, goes into stock history, explains how the market behaves (or doesn't), gives you a formula for several different trading scenarios, demonstrates how to find an undervalued company, and explains how to manage your portfolio.

In fact, the Tanach is very clear to the Jews that the only covenant they have (and will ever have) is the one pounded out between G - d and the Jews on Mt. Sinai (which, if you read the fine print AND the NT is allowed to be understood / interpreted by designated leaders in the Jewish society; Jesus believed those people to be the Pharisees and told his JEWISH followers to adhere to Pharisee teachings... the Pharisees were the honorable, compassionate end of the theology spectrum in the first century instead of the bad rap they get from a mis - reading of the NT (done generally with no comprehension of Jewish culture or history).

Again, they don't teach much of this today, but you are the one who brought up «the history of both.»

I'd take a crack at History 201 as taught by the religious nut job frm my state (Bachmann) but I don't think I can compete with yours.

A career of teaching history has not yet acquainted Forrest G. Wood with that subtle lesson.

This may be old hat to you, but it was something that is not addressed in the history I was taught.

Religion has no place there, just like algebra shouldn't be taught in a history class, or French verb conjugation in a music class.

Buddhism (in its true form) provides a guide to the elimination of suffering, not deity worship; in fact never talks about God or gods in the sense the west does... FYI Buddha was born 630 years before Jesus, and it is proven that Buddhism traveled from eastern India all the way to Syria and the Middle East via the Silk Road... i am quite sure Jesus had heard some of his teachings... some of the things that Jesus says are a direct reflection of the eightfold path from buddhism... Jesus was the greatest salesman of all time... sold the most books in history... he really honestly does nt deserve worship but an Academy Award

The biblical teaching, after all, was not aimed at one or another of the various theories developed in the history of modern science but at the cosmological understandings of origins found among surrounding peoples.

Having faith of not should in no way effects ones ability to teach a history class.

♦ With a frequency that surprises us, although perhaps it shouldn't, we are asked to recommend a solid introduction to the teaching and history of Christianity.

We can not idealise the Church or the state there, but we can be thankful for the rich history of both — and for the many lessons they can teach us in the West and in the world of Islam.

And we look at church history and the churches and leaders we respect, not only in the US but globally, and what we see is that the overwhelming majority of Christians past and present continue to teach that these passages are very much applicable today.

Teachings about the Trinity, the Incarnation, and so forth that have not only been grounded in large portions of Scripture but have also been accepted by the vast majority of Christians in history — those we can pretty much give our lives to.

They schooled me according to a black folk tradition that taught that trouble doesn't last always, that the weak can gain victory over the strong (given the right planning), that God is at the helm of human history and that the best standard of excellence is a spiritual relation to life obtained in one's prayerful relation to God.

This position is not only taught in the AACS science textbooks but in texts for history, geography, social science and literature.

I couldn't agree more that we should teach history as true as it is known and we don't (mostly lies of omission).

The artist, who dedicates himself to beauty, «teaches us that man can not be explained by history alone and that he also finds a reason for his existence in the order of nature.

The gospel was identified not with a teaching or a «religious» experience but with an action or history played out in the particular stories of individuals.

The new movement of the Gospel was not to be identified with a new teaching or a new experience but with an action and therefore a history.

Mark is not writing history or biography, not even giving an account of Jesus» teaching.

What must be done is to keep insisting on the right to teach the Bible as history and as literature in the public schools until this not only is permitted but becomes as widely practiced there as in the state universities.

Peace — Some disturbing remarks I've heard from tea - party folks compel me to remind Christians that even in the context of one of the most oppressive, cruel, and unjust governments in history (the Roman empire), Jesus taught peace, not violence.

actually you do nt have to prove the many deities or Gods that they really exist, because they really had existed in their times, They are part of the evolutionary process for us humans to transcend to higher consciousness.To simplify the analogy, when we were young and we are in the lower grade school, we were taught simple subjects not advance literatures but simple stories even mythicals, The same with religion, thousands of years ago when there was no science yet, primitive people had a religion, of course man made faiths to conform with their state of mind or intellect.But later atfter thousands of years we evolve into a more educated people and so new concept of God again was presented to them, another man made concept, and this go on and on, until a few thiousand years ago.monotheism, Judaism, christianity, islam, buddhism, etc also evolved, But with the accelerated evolution, these faith again is threatend with obsolesencs because of of scientific developments and education.In panthroteistic faith, the future religion needs to conform to evolutionary process, This proves that God is always there guiding the change.And it his will that made this a reality in history since the begining of the universe 13 billion years ago, and this will continue to exist until He will completely fulfill His will to infinity, Thats PANTHROTHEISM, the futue, man made religion under His guidance through scientifiic evoluition after the Bi Bang

«After thirty - five years of studying and teaching the theology and history of the Church,» writes Eamon Duffy, «I find myself living more and more out of resources acquired not in the lecture room or library, nor even at the post-conciliar liturgy, but in the narrow Catholicism of my 1950s childhood, warts and all.»

It doesn't change the message he left behind of love and forgiveness, there have been many great wise men throughout the world and history not all of them were perfect and Jesus lived as a man among us I am sure he made mistakes and learned what was important to teach his followers what really mattered.

The sometimes almost desperate conservatives must be taught to understand, not only theoretically but instinctively and in their spiritual life, that the Church does not exist outside time and history; that she is indeed founded on the grace of Christ, but is nevertheless a very human institution burdened by history.

History taught us differently... Bottom line is to leave religion where it belongs... in our hearts, not in politics...

Thomas, the Bible does not teach this staff, it was was developed by Greek anchient philosophers and when philosophy was introduced in theological schools, the rest is history.

His story, and that of other Chinese Indonesian Christians, has much to teach us as we consider whether or not to embrace Rod Dreher's Benedict Option (retreat in order to rebuild), or instead seek positive solutions to social problems in an America that judges us on the wrong side of history.

If your a christian than you don't know it's teachings very well or its history.

Such terms as solidarity, the common good, the guardian state, close regulatio n, and even equality are, as history has painfully taught us, equivocations.

Religion doesn't need to be taught in school, history — REAL history, reading, writing and math need to be taught in school.

If we believe that faith precedes regeneration, then we set our thinking and therefore ourselves in direct opposition not only to giants of Christian history but also to the teaching of Paul and of our Lord Himself (R. C. Sproul, «Regeneration Precedes Faith»).

Americans no longer love their own nation because the liberal activists didn't teach US history right.

The fact is that Abelard was trying to say, with his own passionate awareness of what love can mean in human experience, that in Jesus, God gave us not so much an example of what we should be like but — and this is the big point in his teaching — a vivid and compelling demonstration in a concrete event in history that God does love humanity and will go to any lengths to win from them their glad and committed response.

Philosophy, history, poetry, and drama were also taught not as specialized departments of knowledge, but as components of the classical literary tradition.

The reason that they don't teach «jesus» in history class: It's a myth.

Miller (whose father, Jim Nichols, taught church history at several Protestant seminaries) does not employ such theological categories.

The religion does not simply grow from developing the content of the founder's teaching; the life of the founder is held to be one of the crucial moments, perhaps the crucial moment, of history, in which some new relation to the transcendent has been established.