Sentences with phrase «n't telescope»

The front seats are supportive, but the steering wheel doesn't telescope.
The steering wheel doesn't telescope.
Other complaints with the interior center around adjustability: the steering wheel doesn't telescope at all, and the tilt adjustment isn't fluid but clicks to set positions.
Inside, Mitsubishi's compact sedan simply isn't as comfortable as rivals: The steering wheel doesn't telescope, and extensive use of hard plastic makes it hard to find a good spot to rest an elbow on longer trips.
The seat is very upright and always feels too close to the underside of the steering wheel, which tilts but doesn't telescope.
Unfortunately, the steering wheel doesn't telescope, it only tilts, so it takes a little longer to find the proper seating position.
Sadly, the poorly designed infotainment system and a steering column that doesn't telescope far enough also show up in the 60 - series SUV.
Suffice it to say the Turbo has the same issues: B - pillars that barricade the view over your left shoulder, plus overstuffed seats with flimsy adjusters that left some editors awkwardly positioned against a steering wheel that didn't telescope.
Inside, the painted center console is made to look like a motorcycle's fuel tank, and the seats are surprisingly supportive, although the steering wheel doesn't telescope, so it's always too far away.
The standard steering wheel tilts but doesn't telescope — an unfortunate omission in a brand - new model.
The steering wheel tilts but doesn't telescope.
It also has a steering column that doesn't telescope and a four - speed automatic transmission, which were two of the key factors preventing Toyota from pursuing the alternative tagline, «It's a competitive car!»
A major disappointment in any new model, the steering wheel tilts but doesn't telescope.
Yes, the interior looks dated, the steering wheel doesn't telescope, and the rear suspension can occasionally be upset by rough roads.
The steering wheel does telescope, but it didn't telescope close enough for my needs.
The ForTwo is even more inept (its wheel doesn't telescope or tilt) but the Cooper and many subcompacts have a telescoping wheel.
The handle bars are ergonomically shaped and rotate into different positions for just the right angle for your comfort, but do not telescope upward for height.
The instrument he sought there was not a telescope, but rather a new kind of laser, more than 3,500 feet long and capable of emitting X-rays a billion times brighter than anything ever generated on Earth.
The steering wheel does not telescope, increasing the likelihood of uncomfortably hunching over to achieve an ideal arm bend while steering.
At its most basic in Tradesman form, the new Ram comes with a locking tailgate, automatic headlights, a tilt — but not telescoping — steering wheel, air conditioning, and a basic 6 - speaker radio with USB and auxiliary inputs.
cons: steering wheel does nt telescope, a bit noisy at 70mph (lacks 5th gear and tire choice), no tachometer.
The steering wheel does not telescope, leading to a very uncomfortable seating position.
But the sun visors are a joke, it can not telescope so it can not shield your eyes from the sun when you swing it to the side!!!
Unfortunately the steering wheel does not telescope, making it harder to find the perfect driving position.
It's worth noting that there are some notable shortcomings in the new Leaf's interior — presumably the byproduct of Nissan's push to keep the car's MSRP so low: As before, the steering wheel tilts, but does not telescope, and there's a sizable amount of hard plastics in use (most annoyingly on the door caps where some drivers like to rest their elbows).
The GPS features are built into the mount, not the telescope itself.

Not exact matches

Joel Achenbach at the Washington Post was the first to report the NRO had given the two «exquisite» flight - qualified telescopes — which it didn't need anymore — to NASA just over a week ago:
But any information about the NRO program that produced the once - secret telescopes was denied, with NASA staffers referring to the stock answer: «Due to classification or policy guidance, we can not discuss the program office or directorate that produced the hardware.»
Special equipment — telescopes, binoculars — is not necessary to view the Lyrid meteor shower, which is safe to view with the naked eye.
«Oumuamua (official designation 1I / 2017 U1 - the «I» is for «interstellar») was first spotted by the Pan-STARRS 1 telescope in Hawaii in late October, and it didn't take long for astrophysicists to figure out that both its trajectory and its velocity indicated that it was an extrasolar stranger, perhaps flung out by a neighboring star.
And, how can one look through a telescope to see the awesome beautiful wonders of the universe and not believe that there is not some higher power afoot?
You can not see it under a microscope or through a telescope.
Dreaming innocence is not, however, human life, and when Lewis contrasts Malacandra and «the silent planet» (earth), his low estimate of human life becomes evident: when Ransom acknowledges to one of the rational creatures that the speck through the telescope is his planet, «It was the bleakest moment in all his travels.»
Armed not with weapons but with telescopes and particle accelerators, and speaking by the signs and symbols of recondite mathematics, it has brought us to many strange shores and shown us alien and fantastic landscapes.
I feel humble every time I look out at the vastness of the universe through my telescope but, then again, the universe isn't plotting to make me suffer if I'm indifferent towards it either.
What I like the most it does not get in the way of the scientific method or the exploration being done by NASA, CERN, Hubble or Kepler telescopes.
Did you not torture Galileo until he saw it your way.All he asked was to look into the telescope.
If telescopes make it clear that heavenly bodies are not perfectly spherical and furthermore reveal moons rotating around a planet, then the old notion of the æther, a refined fifth element admitting only the potentiality for perfect circular motion on the part of perfectly spherical bodies, no longer has a role to play.
To observe them it is necessary to note that it was not simply a telescoping of two incompatible ideas; it was an assertion of two basic truths, both so indispensable that neither one could be surrendered then, or ought to be surrendered now.
But is it not possible that we have been looking through the wrong end of the telescope, or seeing things in the wrong light?
The observations of the COBE satellite and Hubble telescope prove the universe had a beginning and the laws of thermodynamics show the universe could not create itself out of a steady state of absolute nothing and can't be eternal.
It was through the use of telescopes that we managed to prove that the earth is not in the center of the universe, and by the use of microscopes that we started our journey to understand the smallest building materials of life.
We must realize that we can't understand life and death by looking through telescopes and microscopes!
It's not made up, its not postulated, it's verifiable evidence that we all see with telescopes.
And because you are not looking through a telescope you deny the facts that astronomers are reporting?
By following that logic I must therefore assume that gravity did not exist untill the apple hit Newton on the head and evidently the other planets did not exist till Galileo invented a telescope and turned it towards the sky and at that precise moment the rest of the planets spontenously appeared?
Indeed, the radio - telescope at Jodrell Bank can detect «radio» vibrations from exceedingly distant stars whose light - vibrations can not be received at all by any optical telescope in the world.
Is it possible that a man of Barr's education really wonders why some of us would not accept a natural explanation for the formation of stars and planets in light of discoveries made possible by the Hubble telescope?
Don't get me wrong, I know that a great deal is hidden from our limited senses, but that's why we invented telescopes and microscopes, for example.
It means that the earth on which we live is not the center of the physical universe, but a comparatively small planet revolving round a very average - sized star, which in turn is but one of a hundred thousand million others forming the galaxy we call the Milky Way, and that part of the universe that our existing telescopes have so far penetrated contains about a hundred million star systems or nebulae, similar to our galaxy.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z