Sentences with phrase «n't trust human»

Large segments of millennials also simply don't trust human advisors.

Well, Christopher probably didn't realize that, and just didn't trust the humans to just let them take their spaceship and go home.

If you don't trust humans to serve as a content filter you'll probably never let your iPhone do it for you.

Jojo does not trust humans.

A feral cat will not trust humans and will most likely not allow a human to get within a certain distance.

They generally will not trust humans if they only see you for a short time.

You can hear in mama cats voice that she does not trust the human, but she learns that the human means no harm and eventually even lets the human handle her babies and even pet her.

This will do nothing but reinforce in their mind that they can not trust humans and they must amp up their protection even further.

Not exact matches

It's human nature to want to help people, but what a lot of us don't realize is that when we jump in with advice or a solution, we're shutting the other person down and destroying trust.

Slowly but surely, tech vendors are recognizing that they not only have to be on point regarding product functionality and support, they must also make genuine human connections with customers — developing relationships that inspire more than a transactional bond between parties but instead build bonds based on trust and real human experiences.

It's also difficult to isolate from other human resources administrative functions, so getting a handle on the trust cost isn't easy.

AI can replace a human in pure computing power or in data analysis, but it can't replace the magic that happens when you and your team learn to work together and really trust each other.

@In Santa we trust - «Are you saying that you don't believe that a god is monitoring every thought, word, and action of every human for the purpose of judgement when life ends?»

Religious beliefs aside, I don't see how anybody can trust another human being to the point of seeing them as divine.

We humans tend to instinctively hold on to what is familiar, and resist moving into the unknown, not trusting that it can be a place of greater freedom and happiness.

Human beings should not be trusted beyond certain limits.

sure... but they are only human, so i don't trust them 100 %... i've met plenty of christians i didn't like... however i still trust God...

If human reason is not to be trusted then your reasons for believing are not to be trusted.

President Trump deserves our prayers, but not our blind loyalty or trust, because one can never be too careful in protecting and preserving human life — and monitoring politicians who pledge to uphold it.

-LSB-...] The human community lives on the basis of assumptions it knows not how to produce -LSB-...]- whether we call it trust, fraternity, solidarity or friendship!

This is the characteristic mood of our times, in which not even the colossal destructiveness of two world wars and the possibility of the third have greatly disturbed our trust in human achievement.

Another way to say it would be to observe that my story testifies to the truth of the position the Christian church has held with almost total unanimity throughout the centuries — namely, that homosexuality was not God's original creative intention for humanity, that it is, on the contrary, a tragic sign of human nature and relationships being fractured by sin, and therefore that homosexual practice goes against God's express will for all human beings, especially those who trust in Christ.»

Why imply that Kurt isn't trying to live good... But human idea of «good» falls short... People need Jesus as a savior because we can not work our way there... Believing and trusting Jesus is all that is required.

Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense of it all with a wave of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory of an angry God (they called her a «vessel of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape of a child is part of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted by my sin nature I can not trust it.

I found trying to put my total trust in any human institution or person doesn't lead to real security.

It is prepared to trust itself to one of the most notoriously unreliable features of human existence — not only the pain and riskiness of human gestation and childbirth, but also the whole of human skittishness about male honor, and the potential for violence that goes with female dependency.

Trust me, I do NOT think human existence is bad.

Can these people be trusted not to demean, abuse or discount me in the fullness of my human identity?»

Now, Gudorf contends, present inroads on this tradition insist that: «1) bodily experience can reveal the divine, 2) affectivity is as essential as rationality to true Christian love, 3) Christian love exists not to bind autonomous selves, but as the proper form of connection between beings who become human persons in relation, and 4) the experience of bodily pleasure is important in creating the ability to trust and love others, including God.»

The tension that Israel knew throughout her life as a nation between faith in an electing, acting, covenanting God on the one hand, and on the other the rational improbability, if not absurdity, of the divine promises implicit in her faith; the conflict between the divine demand to trust and the human doubt; the incongruity between divine promise for the nation and the incredible historical odds against fulfillment — all of this Israel is mindful of in the shaping of the stories, and in the reading and cherishing of the stories.

Us pagans believe we are endowed with reason which allows us to judge whether or not someone can be trusted to deliver on their promises, if they are dangerous, or harmful — by watching their behavior - We judge — not some other being upstairs - Obama has shown his lack of human compassion and untruthfulness for 4 years, we have seen that his God is re-election money and that is at who's feet he worships.

Today, Christians of integrity are thrown back upon the never reducible testimony of Scripture, Tradition and the divine Spirit — a testimony that defies possession, but also manifests an exceptional trust in the insight, imagination, reasonableness and spiritual courage of ordinary human beings when they are modest enough to ask for what they do not and can not possess.

We can't afford to trust individual women with complete reproductive freedom if we are to implement a rational plan to move the human species forward into the future.

Once a prodigal, my membership has taught me to trust and believe in Jesus Christ; and believe that love of others is one of the greatest, if not the greatest of all human endeavors.

The strong, the real «doers» in Christendom have been those who relied solely on the work of God, and not those who trusted much in human activity.

As the author notes in the beginning, this volume is not intended as a homily, but rather as a companion; and like a trusted companion, it does not simply conduct a one - sided soliloquy over history and texts, but behaves dynamically: telling stories, empathizing with human frailty, and anticipating questions.

If it does not expect blind providence to save man through technical and material change, neither does it trust to a «free - ranging human intellect which contrives systems of absolute validity.»

Do not put your trust in princes, in human beings, who can not save.

One is that in choosing an indirect mode of self - revelation, God preserves human freedom by not coercing us into a trusting relationship.

The mark of the beast is spiritual, and identical to the pledged of allegiance to the flag, because worshipping doesn't come from a chip, or any technology device, although we are surrounded by human devices... The name of the beast is going to be written in the heart, or in the mind on those who worship the beast, because worshipping is of the heart, or of the mind... When the Germans used their right hand to pledge allegiance to the flag, or to Hitler, there was no physical mark in the right hand, or forehead of the German pledger, because the pledge of allegiance to the flag, or to Hitler, was written in the heart, or in the mind of the German pledger... When the US uses their right hand to pledge allegiance to the flag, there is no physical mark in the right hand, or on the forehead of the pledger, because the pledge of allegiance to the flag, is written in the heart, or in the mind of the pledger... The devil uses Romans 13 to deceive those who are pledging allegiance to the flag, because they do not believe what God said in Ex.20: 1 - 5, and De.4: 15 - 19... When a person pledges allegiance to a man, or to a flag, or to a nation, they are heading for destruction, because God said; «cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and make flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD Jer.17: 5 KJV... Whatever happened to the Germans who trusted in Hitler, or on their military power?

The reason of Jefferson and Paine and of what Henry May calls the Moderate Enlightenment that informed the Constitution did not rebel against the providential order, but at most rejected the received ways of understanding that order» tradition, authority, revelation, scripture» in favor of trusting in fresh human intellect.

He encouraged the pilgrims to «learn from her how to live with the clear conscience of those who do not bend to human compromises,» to be inspired by «her example of strength in the moments of greatest pain,» and to «imitate the solidity of faith of those who trust in God.»

There is no reason to think that all history is ending irrevocably for men because the human race quails before powers which it dare not trust itself to use, and before unanswered riddles it has come to despair of solving.

So the last two chapters of Part I affirm that «Christ's Church, trusting in the design of the Creator, acknowledges that human progress can serve man's true happiness, yet she can not help echoing the Apostle's warning: «Be not conformed to this world» (Rom 12:2)» (37).

I came to think of my surgeon, Mr. Barry Mc Guire, a man of half my years, not as some technician of the human mechanism but as a recently made friend with whom, in a short time, I developed a bond of trust that is at least as strong as any other forged in my lifetime.

7:7 - 11) But again the goodness of God is not under human control, no universally valid fact on which one can reckon; rather, only he who is willing to accept such goodness as a constituent factor in the reality of his own life and let it dominate his life can assert it, can trust it.

Faith, or unqualified trust in the goodness and loving / mercy of God is the human response to Grace, which is not a created power that enables us to fulfill the demands of the Law; but the Uncreated Presence of God.

Yet if all this meant that Luther had only a low view of human worth and character, one must also listen for his simul: at the same time, he cried — now in happy dread before the Holy — when God looks at the trusting one God sees not the «bad» or «useful» life but the new person.

Vertical trust is particularly helpful in periods of marital stress when horizontal trust is weakened; the same is true in other crises when fragile human trust is not enough to sustain hope and courage.

Jeremy good message and quite relevant for today God is still looking at our hearts and motives for serving him or are we serving our own agenda as Jonah was.He did nt feel compassionate towards his enemies and who could blame him they had cruelly killed many Jews it was a question of life or death to his own people.The Jewish nation was no more deserving of Gods grace than the other nations that is revealed by sending Jonah to preach a message of hope and life.Ultimately God calls all by faith in him and is willing to be merciful to all nations and peoples that do not not deserve it just like us it is by grace that we all are forgiven.I am pleased that God is sovereign and knows whats best he is merciful to us.Our human nature is that it is better to kill our enemies before they can kill us and that is essentially Jonahs message that is why he struggled to be obedient to Gods will.Gods message is to forgive those that trespass against us and show mercy.Its complicated and it is natural to protect ourselves and our families from those who would seek to destroy them but ultimately its about trusting God with everything easier said than done.If it comes to a choice we will have to trust God and ask for his strength because we cant do it in ours.As Christ laid down his life for us are we ready to lay our lives and the lives of our families as a sacrifice for him.To me that is where the story of Jonah is leading to we have the choice to fight our enemies or to love them as God loves them.brentnz