Sentences with phrase «n't use it for your child»

We have high quality supermarket raw milk here, but the vendor advices my to not use it for children.

You can't use it for your child's education.

A: If you end up with money in a Registered Education Savings Plan (RESP) that you can't use for a child's education, you can get back your original contributions tax - free.

Not exact matches

Facebook focuses on updates to programs while also providing an outlet to build their «humanity» branding strategy including posts on about how «invisible» and «voiceless» aren't appropriate words to use for children.

According to the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals, the benefits of using an IUD are «greater than any of the risks for women who haven't had children.»

My mother used to say she didn't have a child [for him] to spend [his] whole life in prison.»

If the food they didn't eat didn't go directly to the troops abroad, their leftovers could be used to feed their children: «That for every pang of hunger we feel we can have a double joy, that of knowing we are saving worse pangs in... little children, and that of knowing that for every pang we feel we lose a pound.»

loved the fact that this one carrier is suitable for use from the newborn days all the way until a child weighs 40 pounds as well as the fact that it «does not require inserts» to accommodate those youngest babies.

A mom blogger who runs the delightfully named site PregnantChicken.com loved the fact that this one carrier is suitable for use from the newborn days all the way until a child weighs 40 pounds as well as the fact that it «does not require inserts» to accommodate those youngest babies.

Try to find a baby carrier that you provide you years of use, but don't ever choose one not suitable for your child's current size.

While the medical - expense deduction isn't widely used, it can prove significant for families with special - needs children.

If one child decides not to go to school, goes to a cheaper school than expected, gets a full scholarship (more on that in a minute), or for some other reason doesn't use all of the money, you can simply change the beneficiary on the account and give those funds to another child... or even to yourself, if you'd like to go back to school.

The salient takeaway for readers in business settings is to stay mindful of the way Martin persuaded McCartney to leave his comfort zone, like a parent urging a child to try a new food: «Let us try it and if it doesn't work we won't use it and we'll go with your solo version.»

Maybe for that 15 - minute meal your child will not think about Instagram or Snapchat, but she will likely resent you for having to use the locker in the first place.

The most effective use of reverse psychology for parents hoping to push older kids towards wise choices isn't to actively manipulate them towards your desired aim — i.e. by fake nonchalantly asking if perhaps your child would like to give up a sport or AP class - but rather to hand control back to a kid who feels like they're already being pushed toward a particular future.

Don't be fooled when your children say they'll use a tablet or smart watch for academic purposes only.

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff called for social media to be regulated like the tobacco industry on Tuesday, while British Prime Minister Theresa May on Thursday called for tech companies to do more to protect users, saying they can not «stand by while their platforms are used to facilitate child abuse, modern slavery, or the spreading of terrorist and extremist content.»

Minors aren't allowed to own ETFs directly; the best way to give them shares is via aUGMA / UTMA account, which is like a box that says, «Assets in this box must be used for the benefit of the child and will be fully owned and controlled when they turn 18.»

That makes it an appealing way to hedge your bets: If you're child doesn't go to college, you can still use the funds for your retirement.

For example, we may plan to gift money to help fund our daughter's IRA and other retirement tools or to contribute to our grand children's 429 plans, but not for spending money that she can use in her working years — that she will have to eaFor example, we may plan to gift money to help fund our daughter's IRA and other retirement tools or to contribute to our grand children's 429 plans, but not for spending money that she can use in her working years — that she will have to eafor spending money that she can use in her working years — that she will have to earn.

The repeal of estate and gift taxes is especially problematic because it would provide a window for the very rich to use gift and trust structures to ensure that their wealth passes without tax not just to their children but to their grandchildren and great grandchildren, regardless of subsequent legislation.

When airlines and airports make even a passing effort to improve travel for families — give them their own spaces to wait for planes, give them seats where they can use bassinets, etc. etc. — the chance that the baby / child will be able to 1 / nap successfully 2 / get out their toddler energy 3 / not have to restrain themselves from something they don't understand — goes up astronomically.

You also can not allow your children or spouse to use your office for their own projects.

A few of the many things that jump off of the pages for me are that it doesn't seem to support working families with kids (it REPEALS the up to $ 5,000 exclusion from gross income for dependent care assistance that many working parents use to subsidize the skyrocketing costs of child care while they work) or even those who (like my fantastic law students at UNLV) are pursuing and paying for higher education.

eBay, however, sells many sneakers which don't fall into this category, sneakers that are simply grey market retail sales or used goods, like any other category on eBay, including women's and children's shoes which you would never see for sale at Flight Club or any other channel listed in the previous paragraph.

However, I see nothing wrong with encouraging women to carry to term then put the child up for adoption, just like I don't think it is bad to encourage them to use condoms, as well as other forms of birth control.

While Judaism contains the oldest known humane limits on the use of animals (e.g., harming an animal is punishable, slaughter must be painless, they must be fed before one's children, they are to rest on the Sabbath, etc.), it does not eliminate animals for use as food, manufacture, or for ritual.

For me, If I can't use it freely with a child (or I wouldn't want my child to be using the words) then why ought I use it just to be able to apply it in one of the fashions listed in the article?

A single / divorced mother who uses her children for companionship is not usually healthy or right for both parties.

One further argument for such an approach and one we do not shy away from is the resources used in maintaining children in this setting.

I am a Catholic (by Catholic I mean, regularly attend church, send my children to Catholic school, and work in many ministries) I also use contraception, but I don't think that organizations the church runs should have to pay for anything they oppose — even it I don't oppose it.

For decades, states had used taxes to support public and private schools controlled by Protestants, with the goal not merely of Americanizing but of Protestantizing Catholic children.

actually there are approximately 36.3 million people — including 13 million children — that live in households that experience hunger or the risk of hunger... that is far too many people please do not use your blasphemy of the atheists / non-believers as an excuse for this especially given the number of innocent children involved

This website is not intended for use by children, especially those under age 13.

Brainwashing them with the bible, in turn using the threat of hell for not believing and to make them be good is child abuse.

We can not avoid crisis, but learning to handle each one as it comes, and using it as a growth experience, makes us better prepared for the surprises of the future, and assures our children a chance of growing up as the independent and creative persons we dream for them to be.

Surely, a God that is supposed be all things that are good would not refuse one of his children for using the most important gift from God and that is the ability to think.

The following will be provided by Woldingham School: Sheets and duvet Towel (but not for use at the swimming pool) Medication Please label any medication with your child's name and the dose.

I can't speak for others, but if I was ever on a jury judging a child that was forced to endure this nonsense who then decided to disembowel one of these clowns and use his entrails to make haggis, I could not in good faith ever vote to convict him of anything.

@Tom Tom - The poster who used the phrase «the child of their dreams» was not among those who were advocating for adoption.

I feel bad for those who choose to hate someone they know not of and you would rather have a SATAN statue than believe in our Lord Almighty sad is the only word I can use worse is that you tell your children that NO there is no GOD and you shall not be saved son or daughter.

Barbara Pitkin writes that «Calvin himself appears not to have advocated the use of physical force in response to sin in children; though he recognized the need for parental discipline, his explicit remedies were baptism and education (albeit strict and structural) into faith and morality.»

I mean, if a woman isn't even responsible enough to use birth control, what makes you think she's responsible enough to gestate a child for nine months without harming it?

Why wouldn't it also use wacko humans to kill children for stupid reasons like being infected with devils.

Some sociological studies of how the doctrine of karma is actually used in daily life suggest, however, that it does not inhibit a parent seeking a cure for a child who is ill.

Earlier this year the Commons culture, media and sport committee said there wasn't enough protection for children using the internet.

One who beleives this way could view God, using another way of describing it, as a grandparent who spoils his grandchildren rotten, minimizing the child's responibility, not properly diciplining them, or not diciplining them at all, and giving the child everything he asks for and thinks of.

So when Jesus quotes the law in Mark 7:10 about putting children to death for cursing their parents, He is not necessarily quoting it with approval, but is instead pointing out how the religious leaders were using the law to do the exact opposite of what the law said.

Quite to the contrary, the religious leaders were saying that it was okay for children to not honor their parents and provide for them if the money that would normally be used to do so was given to the temple.

oh right it does... it allows innocent children to die; it allows braindead pukes like you and just sayin to appease yourselves by thinking you are doing something when in fact you are being lazy goofs and wasting valuable oxygen that could be used for animals that are not as stupid as the two of you.