Sentences with phrase «n't use that defense»

Wright has landed in a strange Eastern country, one which doesn't use defense lawyers.

Not exact matches

Speaking by phone from Detroit, Eight Mile Style publisher Joel Martin said he'd been infuriated during the trial by the defense's absurd contention that «Lose Yourself» wasn't original because it used the same chords as other songs.

(g) Further, you agree that if the online services, or your possession and use of the online services, infringes on a third party's intellectual property rights, you will not hold Apple responsible for the investigation, defense, settlement and discharge of any such intellectual property infringement claims.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was offered $ 60 million by Congress from Defense Department funds last year to fight Russian election interference efforts — but after Tillerson waited for seven months trying to decide whether he wanted to spend it or not, the offer was withdrawn, and none of the money was used, according to The New York Times.

At other times, however, donors may not realize that their funds are going to terror organizations: Extremists also conduct fundraising under fake charities that indicate donations will be used for humanitarian purposes, according to an October report by the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), an independent defense and security think - tank.

«It's not safe to run an internet facing Windows box right now,» said a hacker who used to work in the US Department of Defense.

Using the Plausible Deniability defense, they claimed that they weren't even in the loop when it came to paying AIG enough to turn around and pay Goldman Sachs and other arbitrageurs 100 cents on the dollar for securities worth about a fifth as much.

If you do not want to conclude the Agreement, do NOT click «Submit Member Info» and do NOT access, view, download or otherwise use any The Defense Alliance of Minnesota webpage, information or servicnot want to conclude the Agreement, do NOT click «Submit Member Info» and do NOT access, view, download or otherwise use any The Defense Alliance of Minnesota webpage, information or servicNOT click «Submit Member Info» and do NOT access, view, download or otherwise use any The Defense Alliance of Minnesota webpage, information or servicNOT access, view, download or otherwise use any The Defense Alliance of Minnesota webpage, information or services.

Any other use of The Defense Alliance of Minnesota (such as seeking to connect to someone a user does not know or to use The Defense Alliance of Minnesota as a means of generating revenue through the sale of contacts or information to others) is strictly prohibited and a violation of this Agreement.

That's the language a prosecutor, not a defense attorney, would use to explain illegal activity.

Aside from acceptable «basis» risk between the stocks we hold long and the indices we use to hedge, and perhaps 1 % of assets in option time - premium at any given time as a result of staggering our strikes to provide a stronger defense, we don't consider various speculative bubbles as threats to our own returns.

Paul states in an interview that he likes Switzerland's «very successful national defense,» and adds «there is no reason that we can't use that as a starting point.»

His conclusions didn't fit the anti-gun narrative that guns are used in crimes far more than in self - defense and therefore private ownership must be abolished.

Just like those anonymous sources, Netanyahu continues to use demagoguery about the defense system that has saved the lives of Israel's threatened citizens, who now include people who do not just live in the south.

Giving or taking access to items doesn't matter (so long as the item itself isn't evil) but a firearm is nothing but a tool... no different than a hammer or a saw... using it for self defense is openly condoned by the Bible.

-- To learn about EMDR Therapy: Among the hundreds of types of therapy, the treatment I found most effective and gave quickest relief and results for panic attacks, anxiety and depression, for me personally, is what the State Department of Defense uses to process vets from the battlefield (even though I'm not a solider): http://www.emdr.com/what-is-emdr/

And let's say in response they used your defense, that they can't include every single OT text.

So is the fierce defense of the backup position, that inequality doesn't matter - or maybe even that, to use Martha Stewart's signature phrase, it's a good thing.

Scripture does not condemn self defense, including the use of force for JUST purposes.

A man who flew C - 130 aircraft in the middle east, and who, perhaps more importantly, shoots coyotes in defense of his dog, would not be queasy in the use of American power.

As Jason Langley, an attorney with Denver - based Kennedy Childs, argued in one of the briefs he filed for the defense, the court «should not overturn the long - standing rule in Colorado that the term «person,» as is used in the Wrongful Death Act, encompasses only individuals born alive.

Jesus, while not explicitly condoning the use of violence in self - defense, implicitly suggests the need to be prepared for it when he tells his disciples to buy a sword if they do not have one, «now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.

''... BUT he was mentally ill so it was justified...» An insanity defense, if one is used, does not make anything justified.

In the list of spiritual armor, we read about the sword, but as we will see when we study that item, it was a short sword used primarily for defense, not offense.

Belief in God is the defense mechanism that some brains use when they just can't comprehend something.

I would imagine both sides could claim defense of their way of life, both could say they only do what they do to defend themselves from the other and each will claim the other is the bad guy and the way the other fights is cowardly - they use bomber vests, we use unmanned drones - one willing to give their lives the other not.

Recovery of that which has been wrongly taken and punishment of evildoing are not explicitly named as justifications for the use of armed force by states in international law, but arguably they have been subsumed into the concept of self - defense: the former being recast as defense against an armed attack still in progress, as in the recovery of Kuwait from Iraq in 1991, the latter being recast as the right of retaliation.

These people believe not only should guns not be used for self - defense, but neither should our fists, or, perhaps even our feet, to run away.

Insofar as the need for defense provides just cause for public use of the sword, it comes from the responsibility of government to protect order, justice, and peace, not simply from the right to respond to an attacker in kind.

After reducing the just causes for resort to force to one, self - defense (§ 2308), the Catechism further limits this in § 2309 by four prudential conditions, all of which it says must be satisfied: «the damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or the community of nations must be lasting, grave, and certain; all other means of putting an end to it must have been shown to be impractical or ineffective [last resort]; there must be serious prospects of success; the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated.

But though Article 2 of the Charter sought to outlaw any use of armed force between or among states except in defense against aggression, it did not clearly define what counted as aggression — a matter that remains unsettled, as the recent debate over what counts as legitimate preemption testifies.

The «sword» being referenced was most likely a dagger used for traveling, not for the purpose of self - defense.

It is not primarily a defense of capitalism or banking, but a warning to the Jews not to be content with their tradition and past, but to develop and use it creatively.

So, to use the argument that being «intrinsically attracted» is NOT a defense for sin.

They used the sword only in the defense of Islam, not for its expansion, but then they defended it with all their strength and when necessary with their lives.

As scholars such as Christian Brugger have argued, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, most particularly in its revised form, seems to treat the death penalty, not primarily in terms of the special public authority of government, but in terms of the moral norms generally used in Catholic moral theology to govern the use of force in private self - defense.

M1 Garand in.308 (no, it's not my personal defense weapon, it's 30 - year old USGI surplus that I use at Regional CMP (civilian marksmanship program) events.

You can't use science as your defense if you deny the overwhelming amount of contradictory evidence it is throwing at you.

I really do hate war and wish that not a cent of my taxes were used to buy or make weapons or fund troops who mass murder family's in foreign countries, but I don't have much choice do I because it's part of our national defense that I do appreciate, so I pay my damn taxes like real American's should.

... Above all, do not attempt to use science... as a defense against Christianity.

In fact, the reader will perhaps be surprised to learn, David Novak's book is not only a most effective and learned defense of the use of natural law in Judaism, it is also one of the most brilliant expositions of natural law theory I know, fully worthy to join ranks with works on natural law by Yves Simon, Russell Hittinger, and John Finnis.

Ironic isn't it... that he uses bullying tactics in his defense against being labeled a bully and seems totally oblivious to it.

The author has a high view of scripture and goes through scriptural does and don'ts regarding the use of self - defense.

What I am against is the use of Scripture as a defense for the practice, especially when these passages are used to lay burdens of guilt on others if they don't give more, tithe more, and «joyfully» sacrifice more.

Well, neither do I, and with one aspect of what you say I agree: faith in God is used by many as a psychological defense mechanism, a lovely make - believe world to which sentimentally they retreat when they do not want to face life's stern realities.

They did not prioritize defense against armed attack, and certainly did not define just cause in terms of such self - defense, reflecting Augustine's conception of just war [as one in which] a Christian might justifiably use force to protect an innocent neighbor against harm.

Steve... thx for the contextual reminder, but it doesn't take away from my point of Paul's use of rhetoric in his defense of his gospel or his polemic.

We can protect the cherished right to bear arms in self - defense and still make sure unnecessary and violent weapons are not sold on our store shelves and online and are not accessible by those in our communities who would use them to commit acts of aggression and murder.

It was the basis of his argument for eloquent sermons as a counter-force to the malevolent uses of rhetoric: «While the faculty of eloquence, which is of great value in urging either evil or justice, is in itself indifferent, why should it not be obtained for the uses of the good in the service of truth if the evil usurp it for the winning of the perverse and vain causes in defense in iniquity and error?»

In your defense, I tried a recipe last summer using fresh mint, and it just wasn't minty enough.