Sentences with phrase «n't value your children»

We're not valuing a child for the time in which she actually is a child.

This doesn't mean you don't value your children or care about your children and it definitely doesn't mean that your children aren't an important part of your life.

In other words, it is reasonably common for people to not value their children throughout their lives.

Not exact matches

«Whether this is a dedicate gamer who doesn't want to stop playing Mario or Zelda, or whether it's a child experiencing these franchises for the very first time, we believe the value proposition as well as the compelling content is what's fueling our momentum,» Reggie Fils - Aime, president of Nintendo of America, told Fortune.

If you have had the early conversations about the value of money, letting the child know about the existence of a trust fund — or whatever arrangements you have made — should not be such a problem.

«With my children, I try to go out of my way to teach good values, and I think they're not spoiled kids — I hope to God you know, and all I know is I am doing the best I can — but where did they really learn those values?

CBO's measure of before - tax comprehensive income includes all cash income (including non-taxable income not reported on tax returns, such as child support), taxes paid by businesses, [15] employees» contributions to 401 (k) retirement plans, and the estimated value of in - kind income received from various sources (such as food stamps, Medicare and Medicaid, and employer - paid health insurance premiums).

One caveat: If your child is the beneficiary of a 529 account that belongs to someone outside the immediate family, the value of the plan doesn't get factored into the federal financial aid formula, but withdrawals are treated as student income.

CFR, which is the poster child in all of this, is now trading under book value (0.98)-- something not even seen during the financial crisis of 2008.

If a child attends an out - of - state school, however, they won't receive the full value of the plan.

Just to be clear about the incident when I was 18: some of the members had been refusing to associate with non-members, or let their children play with them, on the assumption that «those people» didn't share our same values.

If you have the attitudes reflected in the article, please do not transmit such values to your children.

To hold that same - sex marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.

Such influences are natural and are not a violation of the child's freedom because, obviously, children - when they have reached the age of reason - will make their own decisions about those values.

Zechariah is told he is to be a father — a message that is unexpected but certainly not undesirable, for Zechariah and his wife Elizabeth are old and childless in a society that puts a high value on having children.

They say further that even if one does not equate a fetus with a child, as long as one attributes some value to the fetus» and they demonstrate how economists routinely make such outrageous calculations in insurance claims for loss of body parts» and put the value as low as one hundredth of a human being, the lowered crime rate would not come near justifying the number of abortions.

The value of counseling isn't that of getting a disturbed child or relationship «fixed»; the real value is in the new skills your family acquires to keep everyone in the family «going and growing.»

Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense of it all with a wave of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory of an angry God (they called her a «vessel of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape of a child is part of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted by my sin nature I can not trust it.

We don't pass on moral values directly, but we can open up the hearts of our children to encounter Christ, by our own example and by drawing them into this way of life.

To advocate self - help, to argue that affirmative action can not be a long - run solution to the problem of racial inequality, to suggest that some of what is transpiring in black communities reflects a spiritual malaise, to note that fundamental change will require that individual lives be transformed in ways that governments are ill - suited to do, to urge that we must look to how black men and women are relating to each other, how parents are bringing up their children, that we have to ask ourselves what values inform the behavior of our youth» to do these things is not to take a partisan position, or vent some neoconservative ideological screed.

But of course it is not detrimental to a child to tell them they have no value, no purpose outside of just an expansion of cells and a series of impulses.

The age old problem of SELF often is manifest in a false identity such as; «we are children of Abraham» (therefore I am righteous), «I go to... «church»» (somehow this «church» makes you something) or «all you say we will do» (the people of Israel saying they in themself can meet God's standard), «I give to the church» (not personally meeting others needs), «I do this program or that program» (though you do not desire to glorify God but rather there is some intrinsic value in doing a program).

«As chaplain to a group of disabled children travelling to Lourdes with HCPT he was as happy speaking with them as with any able bodied person, and thrived on the levelling which Lourdes offers: it doesn't matter how old you are or whether you can walk or speak, you still have value and worth.

Before Islam they worship idols After worshiping the one absolute God Before Islam they didn't know Jesus or Mary or any prophets After Islam who deny Jesus or Mary become blasphemer Before no payers no charity no family relation After Islam it become must Before Islam us - u-ry and slavery adultery was common After Islam got forbidden Before Islam women has no value and all her property to her husband After Islam become her own she can do what she like within Islamic laws Before Islam the girls - child were buried alive After Islam no girls - child were buried alive Before Islam no laws or guidance to people After Islam established the laws or guidance to people (sharia) Before Islam tribes killing each others After Islam they became brothers Before Islam there was no education After Islam became must and first word came to Muhammad from the angle was (read) Before Islam no scientific study After Islam seculars in chemistry and math the no. 1234 are Arabic and innovated the ZERO Before Islam they were tribes After Islam became empire from Spain to china And More.......

The opposite of compulsion is not freedom but communion, says Buber, and this communion comes about through the child's first being free to venture on his own and then encountering the real values of the teacher.

Not only because it is Afro - Americans themselves, especially men, who now inflict these wounds upon themselves — through the ways they betray those who love them and bear their progeny, through the ways they bring up or abandon their children, through the ways they relate, or fail to relate, to each other, through the values and attitudes they cherish and the ones they choose to spurn, through their comforting ethnic myths about their neighborhoods, through their self - indulgences, denials and deceits — but because only they as individual men and women can find the antidote to heal themselves.

They can not, among other things, «awaken the child to cultural values» or «affect [children's] hearts and minds» in a way that will lead to a society where racial justice and reconciliation are the norm rather than the happy exception.

The author argues that the public schools ought not teach a value system and a world view contrary to the beliefs and values of the children's parents.

We shouldn't underestimate the value of giving children child - sized versions of important books.

They say that parents of young children should not resent the gains made by those over 60, but should simply insist that their own interests be equally valued.

Procreation is, then, the most promising positive route to immortality: we pass on to our children and then to their children not only our genes, but also our values and worldviews, and so we live on.

Yes, those future children had value, but the current ones did not.

Parents who were reared to believe that the values of «the family pew» are the only option for Christians are confused when they discover that their children do not conform to those ethical values.

When children do not share the values and attitudes of parents about sexuality, marriage, or family, parents feel they have failed.

belief in anything without supporting evidence is a childrens game... We teach our children not to lie, judge a book by its cover, or to take anything at face value or to just believe without questioning... you know, we say stuff like check the source and don't believe everything you see / hear... should we teach seeking knowledge or to have faith in without?

The lack of emphasis on a single religion does not stop Disney from taking up a catechizing role, Pinsky notes, «In the Western world in particular, the number of hours children spend receiving moral instruction in houses of worship is dwarfed by the amount of time spent sitting in front of screens large and small, learning values from Disney movies,» Disney's evangelistic entrepreneurship has been extraordinarily successful.

Today, my children (13 and 16 years of age do not believe in a higher being, but to beileve in what are «christian values.»

The conflict between the mothers who choose not to abort a Down syndrome child and these who do is salient at the Web site «The Ragged Edge,» where the mother of such a child expresses her disgust with «A Heartbreaking Choice»: «In other words, their fetuses had no value as imperfect living beings.

They are immoral and can not teach moral values to children.

Mary's surrender at the foot of the cross to a plan that could in no way have been part of her own for herself or for her child figures as the centerpiece of her proposal of a Catholic feminism, which locates the foremost value of women not in forms of service to others (marriage, motherhood) but in service to God, in the decision to surrender to his plan.

Anyone who can be ok with a high level of poverty and uninsured children does not display the values he preaches.

Jewish values won't accept sodomite couples raising children as parents, Jewish values will always keep what God has taught to be done; Jewish values go hand by hand with moral, with integrity, dignity, and solid principles, all of them given by God.

Having a court of law telling the masses that grew up with crosses in their class rooms and teach their children the same values that they were taught is not a short term change.

After all it is not difficult to understand the value of gift dimension for people who know the growing experience, for example of a child.

It said: «We value faith but do not wish it to be abused, be it for jumping ahead of others to gain entrance to a popular school, or blinkering children's educational experiences.

Our faith, morals, and values are not based upon us gathering at a chik - fil - a, it it based on how we treat God's other children.

You can raise your children as you see fit, so long as that does not prevent them from assimilating the core values of the society.

I hope «Christianity» is the right religion, if it is not then I have wasted a lot of time and money, or perhaps not, for if one lives up to the values, beliefs and principles of true Christianity that one would be one of the nicest people to live on Earth with and as a child of 6 I realized I did not like any of the people in my neighborhood very much, not much at all.

Will not the bookseller say: My dear child, your toy is not worth anything; it is true that when you still had the money you could have bought the book instead of the toy, but a toy is a peculiar kind of thing, for once it is bought it loses all value.

Second, and more crucially, that secular objection (as in the hippie saying I heard so often in my youth: «Don't lay your value trips on me, man») rests on the assumption that someone can authentically sexually donate himself to another without making a definitive commitment to the other person; that is, he can «hedge his bets,» so speak, without paying the consequences ¯ a foolish assumption given the rates of sexually transmitted diseases, the divorce rates, the numbers of children born out of wedlock, and so forth.