Sentences with phrase «n't view the matter»

Despite the polarizing debate, Fariña said she didn't view the matter as something that merited serious dissent in New York.

Not exact matches

He went on: «While we may always have a different point of view about what happened at the end of our relationship, the founding of the company is a matter of record and not subject to «personal perspectives.»

Apparently it doesn't matter to Donald Trump that many businesses and citizens are outraged by his views about illegal immigrants.

«Look, if you think we can have zero interest rates forever, maybe it won't matter, but in my view one of two things is going to happen with all that debt.

When asked why Luckey was fired, Zuckerberg responded, «That is a specific personnel matter that it seems like it would be inappropriate to speak to here,» before adding, when pressed, that, «It was not because of a political view.»

«That creates a view that's not diverse, no matter if there's an assortment of genders and ethnicities.»

Banks will not be better behaved, capital markets will not be safer, and workers will not be paid more if the SEC comes around to Warren's views on these matters.

A few days later, while arguing that his personal feelings on the matter should not affect the ultimate decision to accept or reject the proposal, he stated, «from my [point of view] it seems that the community's feeling on this issue isalready [sic] clear.»

«That is a specific personnel matter than seems like it would be inappropriate...» Zuckerberg said before Cruz interrupted, pushing the CEO to exasperatedly respond, «Well then I can confirm that it was not because of a political view.»

Corporations are legally separate from their shareholders so it doesn't matter when an individual dies, it's not a taxable event from the point of view of the corporation and if there are undistributed profits those profits will remain untaxed.

This concentrated ownership may limit the ability of other stockholders to influence corporate matters, and, as a result, these stockholders may cause us to take actions that our other stockholders do not view as beneficial.

Whether it's three or four rate hikes this year probably doesn't matter all that much, in our view.

From the point of view of the banks, it does not matter how exactly they leverage their reserves.

from a bystander, but that you don't actually feel comfortable with your own views on the matter.

Mainline Protestants (Methodists, Presbyterians, Episcopalians, and the like) and evangelical / fundamentalist Protestants (an umbrella group of conservative churches including the Pentecostal, Baptist, Anabaptist, and Reformed traditions) not only belong to distinctly different kinds of churches, but they generally hold distinctly different views on such matters as theological orthodoxy and the inerrancy of the Bible, upon which conservative Christians are predictably conservative.

This is not, of course, the commonsense view of the matter today.

Catherine Roberts asks me, as a matter of my vocation as a teacher of religion, to view animals from a theocentric, not anthropocentric, perspective.

As to what «matters» that «count», wouldn't you agree that such a subjective question would only generate a subjective answer if I were to explain how these matters «count» according to my personal point of view?

I said it to hotair already, but I will expand it a bit for you: what is evidence for some is not accepted by everyone; just as in a court case, some jurors are convinced with very little evidence while some people can not be convinced of something no matter how much evidence there is... much of this comes from how you were raised and your own personal world view, for many people God does not fit into their world view so whatever evidence there is they close their eyes and say, «No, I don't believe that!»

I love comments like this that testify to the unfortunate fact that it doesn't matter how dumb or implausible or utterly brainless one's absurd view is.

Islam is however like most Abrahamic religions extremely violent in nature and to make matters worse unlike Judaism or Christianity has not been pushed aside from the major public view by science and technology.

It matters not so much HOW the universe was created (although the first version creation in Genesis is interestingly similar in some ways to the modern scientific view, going from light — the big bang — to simple then more increasingly complex life, but I digress) what matter is that it was created by a loving God.

For me I see evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truth.

Always was and is and will ever be no matter what matters of materialized shapes to tend to seemingly clutter up His spiritual abundancy It is truth that God has troubles within the fractal paradigms of inter-cellular cosmologies as protruding «activists» are sometimes revolting against the grains of our embodied sanctifications creating many undulations of travesties not uncommonly being viewed by us celestial beings as being viral and bacteriological in the way we understand things to be and become.

First I want to say that I'm not saying Atheist is a religion in a bad sence or to try and produce some sort of shame only that it falls under the definition of a religion and wondering how it would change your feelings \ view of Atheism even if everybody considered it a religous view, if it's something you believe to be true (that there is no god) what does it matter if someone labels it as your world view?

I'm not going to pick apart your other words here Mark because you have your views and no matter what is said, no amount of evidence will ever make you change your mind.

Religon does nt matter because I do nt believe therefore their view points are automatically wrong.

John McCain could be sharp and concise in many matters of foreign affairs, but when it came to articulating his views on economic issues, he could not cover his weaknesses.

The Nazi program could be made to seem justifiable, even humane, if presented as the elimination of lives not on the basis that they were of no use to anyone else (though that was clearly the Nazi view of the matter) but on the basis that they were of no use to themselves.

Of course, it doesn't matter because people who want to believe a skewed partisan idea will do so, no matter how many balanced views they are presented.

Other students of liberalism have held that its view of happiness is not only private but also preferential, i.e., that the nature of one's self - interest is solely a matter of preference, so that one's happiness is defined in whatever way one pleases.

What I've gathered from past and present exchanges is that no matter what the evidence may indicate, you have made up your mind and will not consider anything that contradicts your world - view.

Those who did not acquiesce to the accepted in this matter view were simply shunned and / or driven out.

thugology (n) a world view grounded in the personality of a bully, especially one that pretends to be concerned with matters of theology

And when I ask for any justification of their view, I get such comments as Brigitte's above — «Christine said she can't see what people see in the Bible, so I am not quite sure why it matters.»

This teaching simply can not be maintained in an unequivocal sense on a fundamentally monist view of matter and spirit.

And it doesn't matter what your religion, political views, s3xual orientation etc..

This is when the Spirit goes to work in us that the mountain of pride building up in our hearts over the years soon comes into view, no matter how much we don't want to look.

Steven thanks for your testimony I agree with your view that homosexuality is not an orientation we are not born that way but its a choice.We can choose to live by what our flesh dictates or we can live by what God reveals through his word and by his holy spirit.If we are serious about following God we chose to follow him so it does nt matter whether gay or straight our choice is to follow God with all our heart.I have never been gay but have battled and was overcome by my fleshly desires not until i turned from them and asked the holy spirit to help me have i been changed for that i will always be grateful to the Lord.So in that sense we are no different our testimonys are important and are powerful.Thank you for your witness and may the Lord continue to use you as his vessel to touch lives and hearts for him.brentnz

If you changed your views on the use of nuclear power and had insider information that had caused that change of views or supported it, then you would be ethically correct to speak out on the matter whether still an employee or not.

The basic view of Tim Nichols was that «The questions doesn't matter because we always talk about the death and resurrection of Jesus anyway.»

= > perspective is not a matter of choice it is a matter of World View.

In other words, they were allowed to teach the Catholic view on these matters, but only as one option among many, and not as if it were actually true.

The rationale for academic freedom need not be a view of human nature; it may be put theologically as a matter of faithfulness to God.

If does not matter that their view on same s $ x is at odds with you or even that you feel their views are fanatical, they still have the right to stand up for their beliefs.

society, where sin is viewed as little more than psychological maladjustment, or behavior arising out of corrupt economic structures, or as a failure of the educational system, baptism reminds us that, in spite of Gestalt and I'm OK, You're OK, what we do naturally is not the best we could do, that our inborn selfishness and pride are life - and - death matters, that Christians are made, not born.

In view of the central importance of this doctrine it matters less whether it is readily accepted by our contemporaries, provided that its message is not interpreted in a narrow, selfishly individualistic sense, but that the gracious divine act which opens man to God is from the beginning understood also as creating authentic community among men.

When I talk to my good friend who is a very conservative Catholic who views taking communion as sacred and every crumb is representative of Christ's body and not one crumb will drop... then compare it to how we do it at church... everyone ripping bread from the same loaf, crumbs everywhere, kids spilling the «wine»... does it really matter... is one more right than the other... one upholds church law on how communion will be performed versus our laid back version.

In this dualistic view, how they are related, or whether they are related at all does not matter.

When God commanded Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac, it was not just to see if Abraham was faithful enough to follow his commandment, it was also symbolic of the sacrifice God himself would make in sacrifice his beloved and begotten son, but unlike Abraham who was spared at the last moment from carrying through with the sacrifice of his son, God the father actually carried through with the sacrifice and although it wasn't permanent it still did not mean that there was no anguish, it doesn't matter how brief it was, if it was enough for divine and eternal beings to have to go through such heartache, all of which for our lowly sakes, in my view that is quite significant and I believe that such suffering is actually beyond mine or anyone else's comprehension.