I didn't vote in the poll, because of this.
Not exact matches
«We
voted on the first of October and now we have to defend our
vote and defend our republic
in the
polling stations and this time they aren't going to use violence against us,» says Eduard Morell, an activist for the ERC
in Terrassa.
Not So Fast: A new
poll found a marked increase
in the number of young Americans who say they will
vote in the upcoming midterms.
Clark, named the country's least popular premier last week, can't seem to connect with women (female voters are twice as likely to
vote NDP
in May, according to
polls).
While some of my closest friends are Catholics, I'm
not, so I wouldn't have had a
vote in this
poll to determine America's ten greatest Catholic intellectuals.
(CNN)- Bias against a Mormon presidential candidate hasn't budged
in 45 years, with 18 % of Americans saying they would
not vote for a well - qualified candidate who happened to be Mormon, according to a Gallup
Poll released Thursday.
In a political
poll, those who say they are going to
vote for candidate x are
not cross-examined to determine the authenticity of their stated intent.
Amazingly, some extraordinarily courageous individuals (initially Arnold himself, journalists David Quinn and Breda O'Brien, the Iona Institute; later on, John Waters, retired Regius Professor of Laws at Trinity College Dublin, William Binchy and the distinguished historian Prof. John A. Murphy; the gay campaigners for a «No»
vote, Paddy Manning and Keith Mills, deserve special mention) did succeed
in making a difference to the eventual numbers, although
not the outcome:
in the early Spring,
polls indicated that 17 percent of the electorate would
vote against the amendment, but by the time the actual referendum came around, 38 percent were indicating a «No»
vote, and that was the eventual outcome.
Most evangelical laypeople say they are
voting for Trump — though most
not for Trump — while most evangelical leaders have
not supported his candidacy
in past
polls.
He is at 8 %
in the
polls and going down, republicans are
not going to
vote for him... end of story!
The losers
in the 47 % do
not vote, most aren't bright enough to find their
polling place and of the ones that do they generally screw up the ballot anyway.
big gun I think the
poll is a bit misleading, you yourself have said give wenger till the end of season I want him gone but realise
in January it could hurt the club, so there's no where to
vote for some of us, start another
poll wenger out or wenger to stay then we will get a good idea as long as it's
not fixed
if you look some old videos of pele was amazing, his dribbling, ball control and shoot was much better than maradona, who forgot the match against uruguay 1970 world cup pele performed the best skill ever.yes maradona win the biggest
poll of fifa, but was
voted by young fans who do
nt see pele play,
in the other hand pele wins win the
poll by lengendery players who wins golden balls, if you do
nt believe watch here http://www.rsssf.com/miscellaneous/best-x-players-of-y.html.
Seton Hall was picked to finish second
in the preseason coaches
poll, receiving one first place
vote (presumably from Villanova coach Jay Wright who couldn't
vote for his own team).
I don't believe there would be a single United fan
not happy to have LVG replaced
in May with Pep — he led our recent
poll by a clear margin with 40 % of the
vote, whilst just 6 % of fans want Van Gaal to continue as far as 2017/18.
They're picked to finish third
in the Big Sky this season, but that's
not a knock: they picked up three first place
votes and four teams finished within seven points of the top of the
poll.
On the other side, those who are aware of their
vote not being «conventional» tend to hide it and do
not show
in polls.
Many assume a majority No
vote, but it is
not quite that simple.
In the 1975
poll, 67.2 per cent
voted to remain
in, while 32.8 per cent opted to withdraw.
All the favorable
polls in the world won't help if the other guy's supporters show up to
vote and yours don't.
On the contrary, if «your» candidate is losing
in the
polls you may consider your
vote more important to omit and can even flirt with
voting for someone despite
not supporting him / her completely (let's call it a protest
vote, see French presidential election
in 2002, with a lot of people
voting for small groups on the 1st round).
Electorally impotent but mass - membership parties of the far left are
not anything new
in Europe: the French Communist Party attracts 600,000 visitors to its annual «Fête de L'Humanité» yet
polls as few as 900,000
votes in national elections.
The party's appeal to the 48 % of people who
voted to remain
in the European Union last year did
not cut through as hoped on
polling day.
Our inability to coexist
in my views may
not be the only hurdle against 2019 general election as the age - long underage registration /
voting challenge mooted above raised its ugly head
in a recent but still trending video captured during a registration exercise and a local council
poll in some states.
With that
in mind, Democrats aren't skimping on the Get Out The
Vote operation: the Jones campaign and liberal groups are working desperately to encourage Alabama's overwhelmingly Democratic black voters to go to the
polls, regardless of past disappointment and present voter suppression.
I don't have
polls to back this up, but a simplified version of what I just said would be: A libertarian is likely to
vote FOR «pro-gay-marriage» specifically - e.g.
in a referendum - but
vote against politicians («D») who are for gay marriage for reasons that have nothing to do with gay marriage but with the politicians» other policies.
Quite a lot of Americans wouldn't
vote for an atheist on general principles;
in 2012, a
poll estimated it was around 43 % for a presidential election, assuming the candidate was of their party and well - qualified.
And organising a referendum is precisely risking such an outcome,
not as a mere possibility or
in an opinion
poll but
in an officially sanctioned
vote.
He believes the opinion
polls are probably over-emphasising the Remain
vote and agrees that Labour supporters have
not been motivated to
vote to stay
in the EU.
These were only two individuals but it still seems significant that people who haven't been to the
polls since they
voted for Reagan
in 1980 or 1984 are saying they'll be
voting for Trump.
If you stir
in legislation such as the European Referendum Act 2015 which set the question to appear on the ballot paper but failed to address the legal consequences of a
vote to leave, and the anomalies thrown up by the Fixed Term Parliaments Act 2011,
not least the ability to avoid a fixed - term, then the unsatisfactory basis upon which the country has gone to the
polls three times
in the last three years is underscored.
According to him, though the NPP won convincingly
in the 2016
polls, they would have done better had it
not been for the intimidations by the NDC which prevented some of its supporters from
voting.
The process seemed to be abnormally long (up to 3 days and 3 nights)
in the areas where opposition enjoys strong support, and was marked with constant conflicts, strange power cuts
in the
polls and international observers or observers from opposition parties
not being let into the
polls at all: all symptomatic of possible attempts to alternate the results and change the
voting papers.
Don't forget, either, that EU citizens living
in the UK can also
vote for the last time
in this
poll.
For example,
in Spain you can go to the
polling station and
vote in person the election day, that would automatically invalidate your mail
vote (these are introduced only after the station is
polled, and they are introduced only if the sender is
not registered as having
voted).
Liberals often claim that while there may be other forms of voter fraud
in the United States, like voter registration fraud, the only kind of voter fraud that a voter ID law can possibly prevent is
in - person voter fraud (where someone shows up at a
polling station and
votes when they're
not legally permitted), and that there have been almost no documented cases of someone committing intentional
in - person voter fraud
in the United States.
On a more positive note, it is also possible that there could be something of a «reverse Bradley effect», whereby normally Republican voters don't admit
in polls that they will
vote for a Black Democrat... but then do because they can't stand McCain.
However, the
poll of 13,000 people finds the increased lead is due
not to a surge
in Labour popularity but to a tripling of the UKIP
vote in the marginals.»
Our online
polling is also being adjusted
in a comparable manner to our telephone
polling, where supporters of the Green Party or UKIP have their secondary
voting intention reallocated to other parties where no Green or UKIP candidate is on their ballot paper or undecided refused or would
not vote.
As Anthony Wells points out, it is somewhat inevitable that Labour should be doing worse where they started stronger because there are some places where they didn't have 15 points to lose, but it might also be partly because Ashcroft only
polled in Labour seats where the Yes
vote was relatively strong
in the independence referendum.
The pre-election
polling averages (
not the FiveThirtyEight forecasts, which also account for other factors)
in the 10 most competitive Senate races had a 6 - percentage point Democratic bias as compared to the
votes counted
in each state so far.
Not enough people
vote in this country, and the notion that Kathleen Rice is asking people to drive to the
polls for her when she didn't support candidates who asked the same for 18 years demonstrates her hypocrisy.
In the meanwhile, don't forget to
vote —
polls open throughout New York at 6 am tomorrow and close at 9 pm.
These
polls typically do
not show much sign of switching between general and constituency specific
vote intention, except
in Liberal Democrat seats where it is unclear whether the switching is tactical or due to the personal popularity of the sitting MP.
They don't «
vote» for him
in their
poll response because they don't know his name,
not because they disagree with his views or his purity.
Clegg has indicated that he would
not forge a coalition with Labour should it come third
in the popular
vote — as it is currently placed
in opinion
polls.
The net effects of this trend are reflected
in the
vote intention
polls, but geographical implications for this year's local elections are
not part of my model.
In itself the results of the poll (the first poll of voting intentions in Scotland that ICM has conducted for many years) are not particularly remarkabl
In itself the results of the
poll (the first
poll of
voting intentions
in Scotland that ICM has conducted for many years) are not particularly remarkabl
in Scotland that ICM has conducted for many years) are
not particularly remarkable.
But despite their lead
in the
polls, Labour can
not rest on its laurels and take the women's
vote for granted.
The
poll's figures for general election
voting intentions are
not as bad but still
not good: although the headline figures are Con 31 %, Lab 36 %, LD 9 %, UKIP 15 %, of those who
voted Labour
in 2010, 9 % are said to be intending to
vote UKIP.
Those
polls suggested that almost two - thirds of members
voting in the leadership contest had joined the Labour Party before,
not after, the 2015 general election.