Sentences with phrase «n't want that behavior»

We don't want behavior that is cruel or oppressive or exclusive.

You don't want the behavior to escalate.

Well I surely don't want THAT behavior!

Not exact matches

People want to change their environmental behavior but they don't.

Because the behaviors a candidate has demonstrated in previous similar positions are likely to be repeated, candidates are forced to share situations in which they may or may not have exhibited the behaviors you want to assess for your positions.

Despite the fact that he's milked #BloggerGate for all its worth, Dublin hotel and café owner Paul Stenson doesn't want the argument he's making about the entitled behavior of influencers to come at the expense of the woman who prompted it.

Otherwise, you will get behaviors you don't want.

You may want to change, think you should change, or even know you should change, but that doesn't necessarily result in a change of your behavior.

Whatever content users signal is most important by clicking on it other behavior may not be what they should — or want to — see, especially in the context of Twitter, an important source of information today.

It's Your Problem: Doug Curtis wanted to ensure that a behavior that plagues many CEOs wouldn't happen to him: employees running to their bosses with their every predicament.

I think that we are not a strategic fund for them in the sense that a lot of corporate VCs are, but what we are doing is really getting an early look at how consumer behavior is changing, what consumers want, what's going to make them really happy, and that I think is incredibly valuable.

In other words, there's some advantage that the behavior you want to change creates, or else it wouldn't be hard to change at all.

However, he suggested that behavior isn't one you want to see in someone who's running for public office.

We all know that good feedback is essential to cultivating the behaviors and outcomes we want while correcting those we don't, but what makes some people more effective at feedback than others?

Is there a clear line in your mind when behavior becomes just so unacceptable that you don't want to have anything to do with that company?

If you want more happiness and joy in your life than smiling is definitely a good start, since other things mentioned above require not just change in your behavior but also your mindset.

I'm not optimistic about any of those things (market, govt, country, future), but after my bummer of a post (about the Potemkin market, govt junkie - behavior, country's amazing devastation to institutions, employers and citizens, and the dismal future) I wanted to end on a laugh.

More often than not, there's a gulf between what your client will say they want, and what their behavior reveals about what they actually want.

Mr. Kalanick himself was caught on a video, which quickly went viral, in which he told one of Uber's drivers that «some people just don't want to take responsibility» for their own behavior, using an obscenity.

If Congress really wanted to shift behavior, it would enact permanent tax reductions of some kind related to investments — not short term gimmicks and ploys.

They wanted to increase sales but didn't know what behaviors would help.

EVEN if that means that some of those same people didn't want their right to engage in that behavior restricted..

Even now I will not put an atheist sticker on my car because I don't want to be killed or have my rights violated because of my risky behavior in a religiously oppressive society such as the one we have always had in this country.

I still say that an airplane should be a relaxing escape for all who fly, and should not be distracted by others who don't shower and smell, are loud obnoxious drunks, pass gas, smoke in the bathroom, pray outloud, and do other obnoxious human behavior that makes me just want to puke.

If you don't want your parents to look bad then always keep in mind the fact that your behavior reflects on them.

Instead, they want the church to change its position on some very controversial and contentious issues (a key example is the gay / lesbian push for acceptance of a sinful behavior), and that's not going to happen... most especially not in the Roman Catholic Church or Eastern Orthodox Church.

If you actually believed all that nonsense about God and spirit and Christians wanting to please God and perfect themselves you wouldn't try to justify your poor behavior as a Christian by comparing it to that of an atheist.

God isn't the one who has or needs taming is the people who are in need of taming by God... and the weather could very well be the reaction of the behavior of people's deeds... so yea God gets uncomfortable and can cause disaster if he want to show a sign or tame the people...

I can point to this as grounds for accusing the biblical deity of immoral behavior, e.g. I would not unnecessarily harm another person's other wise innocent children because I would not want anyone (mortal or deity) to unnecessarily harm my own children.

For example, a wife often wants a masculine, dominant man upon whom she can lean, but who will not interfere with her own domineering behavior.

I also do not want to sound like an expert in human behavior but could you ask your partners aunt who or what influenced her the most at an early age?

The bible recognizes that people engaged in such behavior, but it does not follow that God wanted that behavior.

The rationalization of southern baptists is truly mind boggling — the idea that each church is «autonomous» as justification for outright racism is pitiful in this day and age — if the Southern Baptist convention had come out strongly and adamantly against this kind of behavior, I'd have at least a measure of respect for them — but to shrug off a blatant act of discrimination as the «work of the devil» and ignore the deacon's cowardice in wanting to avoid «controversy» is laughable — if it weren't for people having the courage to fan the flames of controversy, women and african american would not have the right to vote today — more evidence of the ignorance of most bible thumpers, and Mississippi in particular

Gothard's teachings involve rules upon rules all dealing with the outward, dress, hair, smiling, bright eyes, no birth control or dating, no higher education for girls who must stay in the home until the father decides what they should do, how God blesses and is happy with you if you do such and such, so many rules, those who really wanted to please God were under the weight of things they could never accomplish... plus the male regime and women having to be careful not to defraud men by their dress or looks made it so easy for sexual predatory behaviors to take hold and the woman at fault for the man's problems and such... ARGH!!!!!!!!!!!! No wonder some of the children of this regime became athiests.

But when I am listening to God... I know that He wants them (and me) to lead others to LOVE, not to encourage our friends in a behavior (such as hating) that grieves Him.

There are all sorts of reasons one might want to condemn such behavior, which represented at least one common pattern of male homosexual behavior Paul would have encountered in his culture — that it involved young boys, that it was not a matter of mutual pleasure, that it was a way of expressing one partner's superiority over the other, and soon — while perhaps not condemning some of the different forms homosexual activity takes in our culture.

While psychiatrists will, of course, be available to help people with a homosexual orientation if they want such help, the APA's decision is a clear disclaimer of responsibility for changing homosexual persons who are not troubled by their orientation and whose behavior is not socially irresponsible.

This is not what we would say or want to say, but it is what our behavior often reveals.

«Very rarely,» he continued, «did Jesus ever talk about morality or social issues... Often, people want to talk about behavior modification, and our church isn't about that... We're about soul transformation.»

They did not want the light to shine in their lives, because they knew that if it did, they would have to change their beliefs and their behaviors, and so they chose to remain in darkness.

It does not reflect prevailing patterns of human behavior... If you look around carefully, you will see that most people are not really maximizers, but instead what you might call «satisfiers»: they want to satisfy their needs, and that means being in equilibrium with oneself, with other people, with society and with nature.

You do not need a God above or a HeII below to illicit good behavior from humans, good behavior and treating others as you want to be treated is it's own reward.

Such hateful behaviors and actions have nothing to do with Jesus, look nothing like Jesus, and are not at all what Jesus taught or wanted His followers to do.

Also, when his disciples want to call down fire from heaven to incinerate the city that did not accept Jesus (this fit perfectly with God's behavior in the OT, does it not?)

If you want rational, decent behavior, don't hang out with the religious.

In response to this overall assessment of the FWT's methodological motives and behavior, I first want to address Griffin's contention that FWTs display the tendency to utilize a double standard when discussing evil — that they don't allow their «Own positions to be judged with the same rigor, and in terms of the same criteria, as the other positions.»

So, if some want to call out those who are divorced, that's fine, but that doesn't make h.o.m.o.s.e.x.u.a.l behavior moral.

We can not explain away this despicable behavior by saying that God can do what He wants, or that there is a mystery to God's actions which we will never know this side of heaven.

If you don't like the facts to bad, Like that the reason that gays came off the dsm was that physcs didn't want to determine deviant behavior anymore and said that if your ok then anything goes its only if you have a problem with it?

They griped and complained behind his back when he did not follow through on his responsibilities or when he came to a meeting drunk, but everyone covered up for him and did not want to hurt his feelings» by confronting his behavior or asking him to resign.