Sentences with phrase «n't writing court»

When Natasha isn't writing Court posts, she teaches workshops, reads the newspaper, and drinks overpriced coffee.

Not exact matches

Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the unanimous court, «once a use of force is deemed reasonable... it may not be found unreasonable by reference to some separate constitutional violation.»

«This court, as a trier of fact, is simply not firmly convinced of defendant's guilt,» Judge Wilson wrote in his ruling.

Maybe at the end of the day these emails will have the most significant impact on individual dealings with the people who wrote them, even in matters that have not yet registered with the broader public and even in matters will never be considered in court.

«The Court will not address the constitutional issues unless and until it needs to,» Jackson wrote.

«Typo's not so clever attempts to evade the court's preliminary injunction is quite certain,» Orrick wrote.

Jackson did not speak directly to the issue when summoned, though he elaborated in the court filing: «Just because I am photographed in or next to a certain vehicle, wearing an article of clothing, holding a product, sitting next to what appears to be large sums of money or modeling expensive pieces of jewelry does not mean that I own everything in those photos,» he wrote.

«Typo's not so clever attempts to evade the Court's preliminary injunction is quite certain,» wrote the judge, in what could be the closest thing to a legal opinion on Ryan Seacrest's intelligence as we're likely to get.

«A criminal defendant, we hold, need not request special interrogatories, nor need he acquiesce in the Government's request for discrete findings by the jury, in order to preserve in full a timely - raised objection to jury instructions,» Justice J. Ginsburg wrote in her explanation of the court's decision.

In a majority opinion written by Judge Christopher F. Droney, the appeals court said the Barry Diller - backed Internet company does not appear to violate copyright law because subscribers are assigned to their own tiny antennas at Aereo's Brooklyn data centre.

«There is no good cause for further judicial involvement where the court has now heard directly from Redstone that he has lost trust in Herzer, does not want her in his life and instead wants his daughter Shari to look after him as necessary,» the judge wrote in an opinion this morning.

In one challenge to a $ 30.6 million golf - course deduction taken in 2002 — but not resolved until 2009 — a tax court judge allowed 94 % of the write - off.

«The use of the medicines in lethal injections runs counter to the manufacturers» mission to save and enhance patients» lives, and carries with it not only a public - health risk, but also reputational, fiscal and legal risks,» wrote the companies in a friend of the court filing.

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters)- A lawsuit filed by drivers against ride service Uber should not proceed as a class action, the company argued in a court filing on Thursday, citing written statements of support from hundreds of other Uber drivers in a case that could decide whether they are independent contractors or employees.

On the other, Chen wrote, Uber argues that individual drivers are so unique that the court, «unlike, apparently, Uber itself,» can not make its own determination.

«Zachary Cruz is not Nikolas Cruz,» his attorney wrote in the court filing.

«Zachary Cruz should not be in a jail cell,» his attorney, Joseph Kimok, wrote in the 17 - page motion filed in Broward Circuit Court.

Since Rogers» ads had been in the marketplace since 2008 and Bell could not prove these claims caused «irreparable harm» to the company, Superior Court Justice Darla A. Wilson struck down Bell's injunction, writing that «there is no justification for the court to interfere in the advertising war between these two large corporations.&rCourt Justice Darla A. Wilson struck down Bell's injunction, writing that «there is no justification for the court to interfere in the advertising war between these two large corporations.&rcourt to interfere in the advertising war between these two large corporations.»

It should certainly be interesting, if the RECBC does decide to carry this thru to the nth degree with this example of government meddling, when some buyer, (that can't use his licensee Sister) decides it is a draconian measure for the Government of BC to dictate whom said buyer may choose to write his contract to purchase a property in The Province and brings the matter before the courts.

«The court need not reach far outside the complaint or be an expert in economics to take notice that it was the trading of toxic RMBS between financial institutions that nearly brought down the banking system in 2008,» Cogburn wrote in an order.

«The Majority suggests that the FBI failed to alert the court as to Mr. Steele's potential political motivations or the political motivations of those who hired him, but this is not accurate,» Schiff writes.

«They are not attempting to remove this case to federal court in order to increase their changes that the matter will be decided in private arbitration,» he wrote.

In a court where your opponent writes the rules and you can't appeal the outcome, is it really court at all?

The suspect «explained to me that I would not be dealing with him if this deal went further, but that I would be dealing with others who worked for Zambada,» the agent later wrote in documents filed in U.S. District Court in Seattle.

Justice Byron White wrote in dissent that the Court elevated the value of individual autonomy over the value of the «continued existence of... life or potential life,» while simultaneously pretending not to make such a choice and failing to demonstrate a constitutional warrant for preferring one value over the other.

Writing in Crisis, he observes that a crisis of conscience is created when the courts not only countenance the killing of the innocent but also decree, as in the Casey decision, that moral objection to such injustice is an offense against the constitutional order.

Christian missionaries in Mughal India were constantly trying to present the Christian faith not only by writing in Persian (the language of the Court) but also by telling the Christian story, for example, through the painting of miniatures, a notable art form at the time.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis famously wrote that the answer to objectionable speech «is more speech, not enforced silence.»

Many who hated Scalia's rulings could not help but be entertained by his razor - sharp writing, which he used especially in his dissenting opinions to carve up the majority's reasoning (my favorite is Planned Parenthood v. Casey, where among other things he referred to the majority's «Nietzschean vision of us unelected, life - tenured judges — leading a Volk who will be «tested by following»» the Court's rulings obediently).

And when that tradition was written courts weren't «promoting» people to AA.

Writing for the court in Abington v. Schempp (1963), Justice Tom Clark held that public schools can not establish a «religion of secularism,» preferring «those who believe in no religion over those who do believe.»

No doubt Jones» attorney asked the court for people to stop writing, blogging, etc. (after all the threats of the Emergent Crowd haven't worked too well to get all of us to bow and scrape to their every whim).

«Mr. Jeffs, although presumed innocent, has now been incarcerated for more than four years on charges that, given the [Utah] supreme court's opinion clarifying the law in Utah, will be difficult if not impossible for the state to sustain,» defense attorneys wrote in the motion filed in Utah's Third District Court earlier this mcourt's opinion clarifying the law in Utah, will be difficult if not impossible for the state to sustain,» defense attorneys wrote in the motion filed in Utah's Third District Court earlier this mCourt earlier this month.

Bishop Robert Vasa of Baker, Oregon, wrote a moving reflection on the Court's decision, which included this: «For the victims of Oregon's assisted - suicide law the world has become a place that they feel is not worth living in.

A major part of the problem is that though Immanuel Kant wrote about dignity in the 18th century and the word was in use even earlier, strong efforts to elucidate and work with it have not been made (as have been made for, say, the notion of human rights, the subject of innumerable books, essays and court cases).

The court placed Doe's intent — which was to get baptized but not to become a church member — over the «rules, customs, and tradition of the baptizing church,» Tucker wrote.

That means that doctrinal provisions of religious schools «may not be enough to fend off IRS challenges to tax - exempt status if the IRS or the courts conclude that the right of same - sex couples to marry is a fundamental and compelling public policy,» he wrote.

The Reverend Peter J. Gomes, a black minister of the American Baptist Church and longtime Harvard chaplain, wrote in the Boston Globe: «When lawyers, the courts, and the media all seem complicit in the cycle of vengeance and blood and no closure short of decapitation seems acceptable, then we have reason to worry about the climate for justice, mercy, and charity; and Salem in 1692 seems not so far removed in moral climate from Boston in 2002.»

Overturning a lower court's decision that ruled that the laws unconstitutionally limited access to abortion in the state, New Orleans - based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals judges wrote, «on its face does not impose an undue burden on the life and health of a woman.&rcourt's decision that ruled that the laws unconstitutionally limited access to abortion in the state, New Orleans - based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals judges wrote, «on its face does not impose an undue burden on the life and health of a woman.&rCourt of Appeals judges wrote, «on its face does not impose an undue burden on the life and health of a woman.»

Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes emphasized the danger of invoking divine morality when he wrote, in a 1917 opinion, «The law is not a brooding omnipresence in the sky.»

If it were an accident, the first time it caused rashes and or nose bleeds and diarrhea, they would have written what caused it in my Medical Records to stop others from causing the adverse reactions, but no, they have to try to prevent a Law Suit and write that I am delusional about the adverse reactions so every Doctor after that forced the adverse reactions on me and or refused to give me the Medical Treatment actually need, while they make money off charging the government for the Toxic Harmful Drugs that a Judge ordered them not to give me, tut they just falsely called me delusional about the Court Orders, to made money poisoning me with Toxic Drugs and Rash Creams, but normally they do that to their suspecting Victims to make money off doing Kidney transplants like they did to my Uncle, but they will not replace mine, because that is what they planned to do to kill me, just ask their associate assassin Dr Kanter of the Minneapolis VA, of course he will say I am delusional after he assaulted me saying the other Hospital Labs were wrong about that Blood Test that show the harm they caused.

On Tuesday, Wheaton College and Belmont Abbey College won a legal round against the HHS contraceptive mandate not only for themselves, but for all fellow plaintiffs as a D.C. appeals court prompted the Obama administration to promise not to enforce the mandate (as currently written) and — on top of that — regularly report on its progress toward new rules that better protect religious freedom.

When the matter reached the Supreme Court of the United States, Chief Justice Roger Brooke Taney, writing for a seven — man majority against two dissenters, accepted Sandford's major contentions, not only sending Scott back into slavery, but holding, in effect, that he had never been free.

We took this one to the Supreme Court, and the decision, written by Chief Justice White, held that the First Amendment does not protect private censorship by the broadcaster and that, between the right of the broadcaster and the right of the listeners and viewers, «it is the right of the viewers and listeners that is paramount.»

According to CSW, the Administrative Court recently decided to dismiss the case, but the judge had not delivered his written decision, which prevented the churches» lawyers from appealing the decision.

Noonan wrote a dissent from the appellate court's opinion that the firm could not require its employees to attend company prayer services, even though the owners allowed them to sleep, read, or otherwise ignore the service so long as they were present.

You may ask us at any point not to share your information with third parties for this purpose, by contacting the Head of Marketing & Events at [email protected] or writing to Anaerobic Digestion and Bioresources Association (ADBA) Canterbury Court, Kennington Park Business Centre, 1 - 3 Brixton Road, London, SW9 6DE.

As written by the Express, the west London side insist that Costa is still their player and must return to the English capital in order to full - fill his contractual obligations, which the player claims went out the window after boss Conte told him that he was not part of the Italians plans for this season, with the two's battle set to be continued in High Court if peace can not be agreed between the two.

Sitting on the sofa, I show him a few items: newspaper and magazine pieces about the Liston fights; Ali's conversion to Islam; the arrest for refusing military induction; the epic first battle with Frazier; the Supreme Court overturning the draft conviction; Foreman being voodooed by Ali; the Thrilla in Manila; the boxing lesson he gave Spinks in their second contest; a recent article about Ali buying buses for Chicago - area public schools (immediately after seeing a TV news story about how Dade County had no money for new buses, Ali sat down, wrote a check and mailed it, not using the gift as a tax deduction); and one about helping a young man wearing a hooded dark sweatshirt and jeans who crawled out on a high window ledge of a Wilshire Boulevard skyscraper in Los Angeles to kill himself.

In his ruling, N.Y. Supreme Court justice Manuel Mendez wrote, «New York State penal law does not refer to «wagering» or «betting,» rather it states that a person, «risks something of value.