Sentences with phrase «n free kind»

Hi everyone, my name is Meghna... i live in Mumbai... i m a fun loving caring n free kind of a person... i m looking for a person who is like me...

Not exact matches

Whether it's free videos, songs or apps, if it's not offered from a legitimate source such as the iTunes store or Google Play, people are taking a huge risk by saving this kind of content on their machines.

Don't assume you can swap cryptocurrency free of taxes: Traders have made tax - free «like - kind» exchanges of virtual currency in the past.

If you trade in a car in exchange for a lower lease price on a new car, the transaction won't be a tax - free like - kind swap, so any realized gain or loss will be recognized under the rules that apply to a sale.

The result is that Facebook can't use the rollout of access as a way to entrench its dominance in social networking and mobile messaging, its operator partners can't use free Facebook to gain an advantage over their rivals, and the same kind of behavior is off - limits to everyone else too.

For Toccarra Thomas, a small - business owner and graduate student in Knoxville, Tennessee, putting together that kind of generous emergency fund wasn't just about avoiding catastrophe, it was also about freeing herself up to seize a high - risk, high - reward opportunity.

These benefits would (i) largely go to developers and contractors for infrastructure projects like new pipelines that would happen even without new incentives and so be highly regressive; (ii) raise costs by failing to reach the tax - free pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and international investors who are the most plausible sources of incremental infrastructure finance; (iii) not encourage at all the highest return maintenance projects like fixing potholes that do not yield a pecuniary return for investors; and (iv) by offering credits at an unprecedented 82 percent rate, invite all kinds of tax shelter abuse.

These benefits would (i) largely go to developers and contractors for infrastructure projects like new pipelines that would happen even without new incentives and so be highly regressive; (ii) raise costs by failing to reach the tax - free pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and international investors that are the most plausible sources of incremental infrastructure finance; (iii) not encourage at all the highest return maintenance projects like fixing potholes that do not yield a pecuniary return for investors; and (iv) by offering credits at an unprecedented 82 per cent rate, invite all kinds of tax - shelter abuse.

This isn't the kind of «free market» that economists discussed this in the 19th and 20th centuries.

After all, «travel» and «free» aren't the kind of words you usually use...

Facebook doesn't like to decide what kind of rhetoric is appropriate or inappropriate for fear of encroaching on its users» free speech rights.

just because you are too unimaginative or too scared to think for a moment that a magic sky daddy isn't watching over you, please do not lump free thinkers in with your kind.

The USA is a place that is free from any kind of religious classification and official religious sponsorship, primarily because the founding fathers didn't want the church to have control on par with that of the church in England.

Free at last from the struggle to be something I'm not, from some restrictions (not that I would suddenly become a wild profligate — I'm not that kind of guy!)

Spin it how you will, religion constantly gets a free pass in this country and when its ever called out for its discriminatory practices and beliefs it claims religion has the right to discriminate based on those beliefs... but everybody else doesn't have the right to even make the accusation that religion is getting all kinds of special rights allowing them to justify their own discrimination.

I am also not sure that this kind of freedom is the freedom Christ has set us free into.

But a strong, Biblical understanding of God's grace, a grace that gives us everything for free, a grace that is not earned, not worked for, and can not be lost or destroyed, a grace that covers over all our sins, this kind of grace leads to one thing — eternal security.

Adam, created by God and in communion with God, is free; he is not subject to any kind of necessity.

It is not unusual therefore to find pastoral care «overlooking what was mildly wrong,» in order to take seriously what matters more urgently.7 Effective pastoral care must be free to exercise a kind of tolerance for vice, allowing a certain compulsion to continue while deliberately reducing another more dangerous one.8

Why is it that we would not give any special weight to the views of the local butcher, plumber or architect on national economic issues, but will give religious figures who know no more than the foregoing, some kind of free pass?

You can't pick out what you want... and it deffinetly condems gays, the bible says also, if you don't work you don't eat... and its a shame for someone not to take care of their familys... and yes we are to feed the poor... but the poor need to be taught how to take care of themselves... Your not poor if you have a big screen tv, car, extra jewlery, free cell phone, etc.... So there is no new kind of Christianity...!

They did not have the kinds of opportunities for free public education or upward social mobility that we have.

Mysticism doesn't float free of religion — with the exception of the past hundred years, when the dissatisfaction with organized religion has led some people to turn to mysticism as a kind of private religion.

i am sorry J.W but i don't believe there is a god of any kind... if there was a god, why would such a so called all powerful being allow for the treatment of its creation by its creation... the argument of free will is an old and tired one... if the existence was true and the laws put in place to honor such a creature were equally upheld by god then i would have been punished a long long time ago and so would have the majority of people... believer or not!

We don't need to value our enemy for the «blessings» they bring us, like some kind of masochists, but when we free ourselves of pain we can free ourselves enough to love our enemies.

The revelation of the Word of God is a matter of the free decision of God, not a matter of bringing to the Bible the right kind of pre-understanding or the latest findings in form and redaction criticism.

The holy grail for those who want to preserve the idea of free will is a rigorous articulation of the proposition that mere prediction does not imply the lack of freedom (or, perhaps, a lack of the meaningful kind of freedom, since we all mean different things when we talk about «free will» anyway).

It is amazing to see people grow over the years: not by becoming more successful, more pain - free or more cheerful (in a denial kind of way); but more resilient, patient and wise.

Callahan writes: «What a free ride this is for the researchers, whose claims of potential benefits are treated with the kind of deference and credulity not seen since the days when the golden calf was worshipped.

Do you find that now that you've gotten to this level it's kind of freeing that you can say things or maybe do collaborations with different artists that you weren't able to before?

Paul's attitude means that sexuality did not have to be troublesome to Christians since they were free to choose the kind of relationship that best fit their personality.

Free, > Are you saying that these kinds of conversions don't really happen in real life?

They are free to express their discontent, and perhaps even serve as a kind of rein on out of control big government, but they themselves do not, and most likely will not, rule.

They were not inconsistent; but, knowing that no particular image can really represent God, they felt free to use almost every kind of verbal imagery.

«Engaging with God and entering the transformative life of the church does not mean we get a kind of «free pass,» an unconditional love that leaves us where we are,» writes Wesley.

Before marriage, she was now free to pursue an education of her choosing or not, to take a job or pursue a career, to engage in a kind of sample mating, and to marry or not when and as she saw fit.

S. A. Graves points out that while it is possible that a certain individual (J) freely chooses to perform a certain action (A), it is not possible for God to bring it about that J freely chooses to do A. Were God to bring it about that J chooses to do A, J's choice to do A would not count as free.2 Consider another kind of case proposed by Alvin Plantinga.

I do not know whether some sort of decentralized democratic socialism can supply a healthier economic base for the kind of change that seems necessary if we are to continue as a society of free men and women.

A kind of literal brainwashing will have taken place, and the free will that makes you real would have been, if not eliminated, then perhaps overpowered.

They are not ultimately autonomous... but they have a relative autonomy, an autonomy always threatened by demonic forces precisely because God wills to preserve here a sphere for the free decision of faith which is the only kind of victory he wills to have....

As time goes buy the kind defenders of free will over their rejection to «dead» here and colossians 2:13 tend to resort to a familiar defense, that of labeling it a Calvinist viewpoint and that its almost a cultist view point to hold.Very sad yet very much the defense of many christians.Dead may i suggest is dead, the inability to respond, does not mean that prior to being saved one could not read scripture but because of this spiritual deadness its not profitabel / meaningful - we just can not continue to revise the meaning of dead to fit a view point - because natural man has not been born again this deadness (spiritually) shows itself as «none seek after God», in this condition they are» slaves to sin» and the spiritual things of God (the bible) is «folly / foolishness» even the gospel is judged by natural man as «folly / foolishness «(1 cor.1: 18) Please stop with this weak / common defense called Calvinism - many believers are truly turned off by such a defense.We must not forget the man's «free will» is what took the whole human race down in the garden; i would hope we can rise above our love affair with the human will.

Hartshorne, however, seems to use these notions not only as context - free but also in a kind of epistemic sense.

You are free, as you say, to * choose * not to believe in God because you believe that there is insufficient evidence of the kind you would like for God's existence.

We have free and open elections, with campaigning not only allowed but encouraged on the part of all kinds of parties, candidates and viewpoints.

As long as they believe only their version of god is true, and only their version of god gave us free will... can you really not see what kind of convenient defense mechanism that affords them in an actual debate about their beliefs?

In other words, individual liberty is defined not merely by the kind of act or decision that one is free to engage, but by immunity from a certain kind of motive or purpose on the part of the legislator.

The word of GOD is not meant to be crunched like some kind of accounting ledger.Simply put, there are no answers only the search for them, no destination only the journey that our lives and our GOD given free will takes us on.

If HE made man (kind) puppets, then HE would be hated for not giving us free will!

Celibacy (self - mastery) has come to seem like an impossibility because some psychological camps says it's «unhealthy,» and I'm afraid we have accepted a kind of deterministic / instinctual view of the human person: we're not really free — we're programmed.

Just because there's people out there that like to believe in Jesus as being some kind of superhero here to save people and forget the fact that he was a man with specific teaching to follow, doesn't mean that you have free reign to criticize because some of us, many more than you might want to give credit to, don't act in a ridiculous manner as portrayed in articles here.