Sentences with phrase «n walcot»

Ozil n sanchez n walcot.

And i would prefer lucaz perez to stay n walcot to go but i understand d need for homegrown players.

Do nt start wilshere... just giving him playing time wen we have secured the win n walcot should start on the right bse hes good against those teams via scoring

Comments like wenger relies on rosicky n walcot show how dim someone is.

Am glad he says «goals n assists» otherwise if we could combine him n walcot in to one playerthat would b deadly

guys thumb me down but i think although Mertesacker is slow as turtle he is very intelligent with him today we wouldnt concede the 2nd goal basically manu scored in all their opportunities and arsenal played with 10 man in the first hour as this guy walcot is piece of Siht hSit iSHt keep him as sub much better play Campbell or Giroud or whoever not walcot

Not exact matches

Gibbs hasn't got the confidence to pass the ball forward, he gets to pass back to often and is not good at defending Monreal is a class act so we need to add there Ramsey is not a wide player, why Wenger doesn't play his strongest first then make the 2subs in 65 min and Walcot should have started as Ramsey is better in Midfield.

The ox this year luks a different player.he is hungry and i do nt think it will be gud for us to bench him.it can affect his morale or even make his drive get lost walcot should be a better impact sub only reason he picks up late is his attitude.

I thought he was goin 2core 3mo until he (makeshift striker) was taken off n the first choice came on 2successfully complete his 8games with out a score by the way walcot had a good number of shorts on target as well MOTM.

Ospina Belerin • Mertesacker • Kolchielny • Gibbs (Im not a fan Monreal) Ramsey • Chambers Walcot • Ozil • Rosicky Giroud

Would have loved to see walcot come in for about 15 - 10 mins (but didn't happen).

Talented yes and with a tough team behind him ok, Walcot does nt like a tackle but just runs into defensive positions to hopefully block the route to our goal.

He is not what we need, we have started with Alexis and Walcot at the beginning of the season, they did very well both scoring goals but suddenly, we changed the lineup because OG scored goals when brought in as substitute.

Giroud is not the answer though Sanchez could be.But I do nt see AW playing Sanchez any time soon (even when Walcot returns.)

I believe Arsenal will not find it too difficult to win that game if Walcot and Alexis play on the flank, but if he keeps playing Ramsey on the right flank I am afriad it might be a very difficult game.

I find it disgusting when Wenger get praised even in the face of inadequacy, Wenger lost to barcelona, not those players with his 2substitutions, why he opt for Walcot when he had Joel and d beasty Welbeck is still a mystery to me.

Wilshere should have been brought in to create and add danger, speed to our game, Walcot some more and Giroud if needed... Ozil being supposed to sit apparently... So, it is no referee, but a team as reflecting manager... If owners and Wenger himself do not get a huge container of coffee, we will finish 12 and he will be doing the walk of shame, leave himself remembered as a loser... What they need to do NOW is bring Henry to assist him and do the job, boost, get players focused with winning spirit he has in him... Then wenger can sit all season long, bench himself as he does and watch henry do the running and screaming as other manager dio... Then we will be in top 3, meaning third; there's now way to ctach up the Manchesters and if we do nt wake up now, we will fight for fourth place; the spurs will distance us and fight for second or third.

Beside the issue of Walcot's contract, Wenger loves his midfielders and in fairness to him, when we play Ramsey on the right, we don't have a lot of movement behind the opposition's defence and we are not as fast as we are when playing wWalcot's contract, Wenger loves his midfielders and in fairness to him, when we play Ramsey on the right, we don't have a lot of movement behind the opposition's defence and we are not as fast as we are when playing walcotwalcot.

Walcot is really improving, don't stop playing him up front.

its not true, Walcot hasn't proved he can play there.if Walcots putting preconditionslike that b4 he signs then hes leaving.it just wont work, playing him upfront, but that wud explain why he keeps takin off Giroud an putting on Theo with 10 minutes to go.Wenger needs to man up an be honest with Theo, hes never going to be a centre forward

if u hv noticed his runs off the ball and the way he face the goal rather than showing his back and trying hold game he plays as outright striker... and walcot is injured so he cant play upfront for time being and abt alexis to be honest i hv not seen him play as a striker much... and as of now we hvnt sign a new striker..

Walcot's contract talks always constitute a source of nervousness and instability within arsenal and we don't need that.

Am I the only one that thinks a fit diaby and walcot through out the season will determine whether we successful or not?

Vela is far better than walcot n the ox only that he was never given the time like these 2 in his prefered position (striker) otherwise those few moments he got t in carling cup the boy delivered

Walcot is not better than Sanchez and once Ox is able to add goals to his game, both him and Sanchez will be benching Theo for years to come.

Don't expect Giroud, Ozil, Ramsey, Walcot, Elneny and Iwobi could get the ball back, they all are not strong enough and a little bit of soft.

I believe that most of this fans do not understand the importance of Walcot in the team.

we shud hv usd walcot in our previous match its lyk we keep our playrs fit for their international careers they get injuries n their sickbed is ARSENAL!

Arsene will continue to lie to us fans, he only said that to divert our attention, and on the last day, you will hear,» we were close but it was too late «we already sold Coq, Ox and Walcot that almost 75m and we can only get Miki without no penny, ARSENAL FC IS A BUSINESS ORGANIZATION NOT A FOOTBALL CLUB.

is it our transfer tactics and poor scouting or just poor management of this players, I just checked squawka's and the goal scoring CHART, the young man has 50 goals in all competition for club and country at just twenty, not to talk of harry kane's chart which is outrageously way high, but the same cant be said of our players like walcot and chamberlain who has been in the club for donkey years without significant improvement, walcot just got 100goals just the other day, something he should have reached a long time ago....

i rate him highly, he is a box to box player but can play as a cover for Ozil and can give a better balance to the team than walcot when he plays in the left wing which is not either his preferred place nor his natural one.

Yes don't just play Walcot and OX together for this game.

And if Wenger will unfortunately not get us the WC striker we badly need, he should go back to playing Giroud as our top striker and Sanchez and Walcot on the wings.

og is gwd @aerial attacks, cnt & wnt score easily one on one wt the keeper, we all knw walcot is athreat wen one on one wt the keeper, that makes mi agree that its tym wenger should use both of them upfront, they could capitalriz each others weaknes.ts s ma opinion iam nt an expert thats y am jo nd nt wenger critics kip off

Lets face it, Walcot is not a CF and he is never going to be that 20 - 30 goals a season striker we are yearning for.

Well, personally I did not view Walcot as a striker.

Ok we haven't signed a WC ST as many of us anticipated, and Welbeck is injured which i rates him more than the «Martial» signed to United, Now Wenger has no choice than Walcot and Giroud at the moment.

its not negativity is simple logic, we couldnt beat chelsea with this same line up, and when ramsey was injured, wilshere got up from bench, so Walcot is out for sure

With this squad, with Giroud / walcot injury, I don't see epl trophy, it may happen, but very unlikely.

See we need a good Winger cos walcot faded off in the second half a good CF and a good CB, this thing hurts so much, something you love so dearly isn't giving you any smile at all, United, Liv, city will look at there club and smile, but we!

Its hard for Ozil also as he has formed good partner ship with Alexis and Walcot and now both are not playing.

Walcot can score goals but not Welbeck.

Walcot is not a striker, he is a winger and a lazy one for that matter, wants others to do his job for him while he gets paid... Put him on the wing where he belongs, and if he refuses to track back as always, bench him... if he wants to leave let him do so.

Walcot is the only player who makes it difficult to renew his contract and he is not even our best player.

to be or not to be, lol... I remember that from that squeaky bird in RIO 2, it just goes to show that arsenal players bar sanchez and kos are all cocky lots, making a hell out of temporary form, lem me let u into this big secret, if an arsenal player wants to lose form listen to his media interviews e.g iwobi, giorud, ozil, ramsey, walcot and co..

We really need to sell Walcot n get a hungry winger who can ship in goals.

Where as Mahrez would probably replace Walcot (who didn't get on pitch after formation change I think)

OG can scores goals but not good enough to our playing style especially when we want our super players like Sanchez and Ozil to control the pitch, Walcot always grantees that to the team, he may score less but contributes a lot to the team.

I prefer to give players like Campel and Gnabry more chance than Pod and don't forget that we will have Walcot back and I really don't think Pod can offer us much right now... so yes let him go in Jan

i can't believe walcot is the highest earner In arsenal.