Sentences with phrase «n walcott»

Sell giroud n walcott there so much better winger and strifers pay everton wat they want for lukaku proven in epl get reus.

Oh yh how abt this coincidence Wilshere n walcott injured for majority of the past 2 seasons n guess Wat Arsenal break their trophy drought!!

There is question marks over ozil n walcott after watford game with both of them going down the tunnel straight away after being subbed, no way can we gamble with ozil absolutely not and with our other injuries neither can we with walcott.

N walcott is becoming a lost course.

he seems unhappy at spurs.or bid for nabil fekir of Lyon.average but better than Campbell n walcott.

For me either ozil or carzola should b rested n play wilshere in central mid next to coq for 65 mins, rambo should b rested n walcott in, plus yes, gibbs has to play now... this is just my opinion!!!

forget box to box forget pace strictly talking about what ramsey n walcott have contributed over the past 2 months its not been good enough.

With the pace of sanchez n walcott, cazorl n ozil's precise pass, we can defo tear their defence apart on counter attacks.

Arsenal currently have 2 positions which are weak links on the pitch striker (Giroud n walcott) n right wing (rambo) all 3 are in the wenger «faves list» so regardless of how they play are more less undroppable.

not walcott who just should be sold... otherwise he just does nt have the speed of mind or feet to complement ozil and sanchez and does nt get back to defend sufficiently....

And chambers is quite fast too, not walcott fast but ivanovic type fast, not so fast where you could loose the ball or trip n fall, just fast enough to beat your man n keep the ball.

Isn't waLcott supposed 2 be the ready made sub 4 him?

if that fateful day at southampton wenger chose bale not walcott.

Ot Someone earlier was talking about the captaincy for the upcoming with bfg and kos out they said hopefully not walcott I agree.

The women's game had got better though the hatrick heroes goals I don't walcott would have scored the 2nd or 3rd one!

It is not that walcott is not performing its the fact that he struggles still with the simple stuff in football like controlling the ball when running with it, passing, dribbling, crossing and finishing (not always) and his defensive abilities are not good.

Firstly why didn't walcott hit it on the volley 2nd lyl I'm glad he didn't kolasinac showing our forwards how it's done.

We need a striker and a complete one not walcott or Podolski.

Not exact matches

No walcott because he's not quite fit yet.

WOULD LIKE RM TOO WALCOTT INJURY PRONE PLUS NOT A WORLDY RM REUS, i can't see why he would go real, due to bale and ronaldo on wings, so he will be bench player or wait for injury.

haha yeah i was a bit mad then lol i mean for example you also state the wages of our players and criticize it but that does nt annoy me cause i think you generally do nt like the high wages and money in the football nowadays and i agree with that, but the people who DO want signings and keep singling walcott out while we have SOOOO many underperforming players with the main matter being his wage is really contradictory, of course i know too that he is playing bad, but they should get it that nowadays wages for the english player are overexaggerated..

But not to worry, we have campbell and walcott....

I'm glad we withdrew the pursuit of Remy, I've never been a fun coz he's not better than what we currently have and tbh If we're not getting cavani, falcao or reus, I'd rather walcott or sanchez leading the line.

If we do that, Walcotts pace is pretty useless — and without his pace, he's not quite the astonishing player.

i do nt think that walcott is a bad player cause we all saw what he could do in season 12/13 in 13/14 het scored 5 goals in 5 games and then got the horrible injury and in 14/15 the whole crowd shouted THEO THEO THEO when walcott (and podolski i think) came in for a game we were leading then, after that game in his next start which özil also started after his injury, both of them scored immediately..

cnt tackle, cnt defend, cnt attack, has no chemistry with the remaining 3 forward (alexis, walcott, ozil) n even his passing was terrible and above all realising those two are affecting the game negatively not making subs till United scored.

Napoli said that walcott was not worth # 140k per week and such a payment would disrupt their wage structure.

Giroud plus injury prone walcott plus unproven Akpom is not enough, no matter which way you look at it.

I du n no what to say... All English players in our team are useless, walcott only cares about the money I couldn't even see Walcott both in attack and defence We could have gone 5 pts clear of City for God's sake... stoke match is now a must win...

Nothing and what is he leaving behind coqoliin xhaka eleny monreal walcott!!!! So he has had 80 million in wages and thats what he cares about and that also goes for everyone running OUR club that do nt give a monkeys about the title or europe it will only change when totally fail and finish 10 - 12 for a few years and there pockets get hit and i can see it and that will make me hate wenger kronke gazidis and all those stuck up arrogant directors of our beloved club it will be like going back to Don howe managing the club and 17000 on the stands I hope i am wrong but can anyone see it any other way????? Time for change and change now Troy deemy is right no balls I wouldnt want to go into a battle with any of them backing me up White feathers all round

we are so far behind the last four of the CL that if wwenger is a serious manager he has to admit that at least two real quality signings are essential if we are to compete in epl and cl next year... walcott probably one of the most overrated players in the history of the epl... not really his fault to be honest... but its time to move on

flamini, sanogo (done nothing to suggest improving) podolski, rosicky (clearly not being considered), walcott (does not suit our hustling style) szez (do nt think he is trusted anymore) + host of reserves

im not to sure about sterling because im on the idea to take a striker first, like lacazette and play in the wing ox, welbeck, walcott, chuba or maybe campbell or wellington (probably i would sell the last one... al of u try him like a star when he is not younger than campbell and he did nt do anything, for me he is not on the standard)... BUT u cant said that walcott is the best winger in the league when he is fit.

Honestly i do nt really care if walcott leaves or not,, i really care if Mr. oldskool Grandpa will spend money on quality players e.g Quality Striker A must..

If you look at our most viable options for the liverpool game cech bellerin chambers gabriel monreal elneny xhaxa iwobi ramsey sanchez walcott This is just not right.

I can not recall this happening before without us fans knowing, ie rvp, walcott, sagna as well as concerns over ozil and sanchez.

OT: Fans short memory: couple of days ago all are not in favor of walcott, and now after his hattrick (against very weak WB) walcott is a wc player bla bla bla....

@kev I agree with you some arsenal fans have a tendecy of comparing our players with those of our opponents have signed siting they ai nt gud enough surely how can you say walcott is better than pedro I heard someone say monreal is better than azpili haha

(not far)-- Chambers out (suspension)-- walcott (unfit) but the important is about ours defense, mertesacker is too predictable and slow, plus who gonna play with him??? that is worrying....

nah disagree, Walcotts never been described as being on the top level, Begovic on the other hand has been getting rave reviews for years, so what you say isnt true.Because hes at Stoke he may not get the media attention, but i wanted to get him for years, of course Cech has been a great keeper, but David James does havea point about their ages and their relative prices.

I do nt want Walcott to go also but we can easily replace walcott not Kos.

Sell walcott, give ox one more go at establishing himself, not sure about gibbs, we need him for cover.

Wenger please ozil is not a winger and it is criminal that him and cazorla play together when there is so much pace in the team now (sanchez, ox, walcott, campbell, welbeck, gnabry)

sell walcott to city, i don't care!

walcott flamini welbeck should be sold n replaced wit quality enthusiastic players

my only hope is wenger to buy kanté of leicester.this guy is a beast at dm position with a good technical and physical quality.with him and coq in midfield against barca we can hope for anything special to happen.with finally olivier giroud slowly becoming WC striker, walcott most efficient and campbell who is a revelation this season, the return of alexis we can be dangerous against any defence.our only weak position is a dm position and wenger won't have any excuz this mercato bcoz there are players available that we can buy if we want.plz wenger go for at least one of this: kanté, wanyama, w.carvalho, l.bender, krychowiak, biglia, neves, l.gustavo, rabiot... if we try to sign s.roberto he will be a good addition with great quality.gunner for life!!!

walcott, sanchez, ox, cazorla, campball, podalski 2 quality players will not get to play as much as they like hope wenger rotates well and keeps the harmony

If we can not get Lemar and we sell walcott we will go for Mahrez; my sense is something's gonna give in the next few weeks and that can be as uneventful as refusing to sell wallcott because we may say that he is a flat track bully but he still scores goals

Last season walcott started well, got injured then when he came back seemed to be more concerned about not getting injured again, and his form suffered.

as for walcott he is not going to score as a cf, rw is his best position.