Sentences with phrase «name authors rarely»

This is why no - name authors rarely get published, even if they have the greatest content in the world.

Not exact matches

Some really interesting books languish because their authors» names start with later alphabets, and I rarely get to the later part of my list before something catches my interest.

Rarely do consumer Google an author's name and decide to buy a book based on blog posts about the author as a person (unless they've done something so heinous that it makes news headlines, of course, which has happened).

While this might be a viable option for individual authors whose readers already know where to search, it can be incredibly difficult for publishers to lure readers, given that many consumers may be familiar with a name or title, but are rarely in tune with who launched a particular book.

Book signings for self published books may do little to create buzz in the media since signing events are rarely on the media's radar except for possibly a BIG name author.

Although I've been designing covers for a few years, and although I know it's standard, expected, and for that reason essentially mandatory for indie authors who want to look as mainstream as possible, I rarely add my name on my covers.

E.g by promoting both the publishers name and the editors name in ebook titles (and refuse to sell to stores where these are not equally as browsable attributes as author and title - unlike movies currently I only rarely know the editor / publisher of my favourite books) and redirect remaining marketing spend to fund fan / reader groups to gain «seed knowledge» to push recommendations as to who will like their new authors (ie feeding «if you liked the books of Charles Stross, why not try Richard Winslade's new opus» into amazon's recommendation engine, but with an eye to maximise the authors / editor / publishing houselong term brand appreciation rather than short term sales through erroneous linking only to top 10 authors).